Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions
Nitrous oxide emissions increase because of denitrification in the first few days after cattle (Bos taurus) slurry (CS) is applied to grassland soils fertilized with NO3 Denitrifying conditions are created when the readily decomposable C in the CS is oxidized by the soil microbial biomass when NO3 i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil Science Society of America journal 2002-03, Vol.66 (2), p.647-652 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 652 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 647 |
container_title | Soil Science Society of America journal |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Stevens, R. James Laughlin, Ronald J. |
description | Nitrous oxide emissions increase because of denitrification in the first few days after cattle (Bos taurus) slurry (CS) is applied to grassland soils fertilized with NO3 Denitrifying conditions are created when the readily decomposable C in the CS is oxidized by the soil microbial biomass when NO3 is present and O2 is deficient. Half of the readily decomposable C in CS can be volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that take up to 4 d to degrade. The timing of CS application relative to fertilizer‐NO3 application could therefore affect the losses of N2O and N2 We used the 15N gas‐flux method to measure N2O and N2 fluxes from grassland when CS containing 60 kg NH4‐N ha−1 was applied 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 d before the application of 60 kg N ha−1 of K15NO3 For a field experiment repeated in April, May, August, and October 1998, CS applied 3 or 4 d before KNO3 had no significant effect in any month on the flux of N2O in the 124 h after KNO3 application. On average over all months, the extra emission of N2O‐N over the control was equivalent to 0.8, 1.1, and 2.9% of KNO3‐N for prior applications of CS at 2, 1, and 0 d, respectively. When CS was applied 4 d prior to KNO3 there was no significant effect on the flux of N2 in any month. The maximum loss of N2O + N2 was 8.3% of the KNO3 applied (5 kg N ha−1) when CS and KNO3 were applied at the same time in April. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2136/sssaj2002.6470 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35128701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>111663886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-7c1747c91d24499199e03ff784a7981fe7b688b1790acd0a85ec07625425816d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vE0EMhlcIJELplfMICW4b7Nn5PHAIaQtFET2kHNFqOutFE013w8xGJfx6Jk0FUi-92LL1-LWtt6reIMw5NupDztltOACfK6HhWTVD0cgalMLn1QwahbW0Vr6sXuW8AUBpAWbVj6WbpkhsHXcp7dliu42BOvaJ-jERu6A0hRj-UGLfwpTcRGw13lHK9-W4y-zqd-iIuaFjZ2E49H7SwM5vQ85hHPLr6kXvYqbTh3xSfb84v15-qVdXny-Xi1XtBQLU2qMW2lvsuBDWorUETd9rI5y2BnvSN8qYG9QWnO_AGUketOJScGlQdc1J9f6ou03jrx3lqS0XeIrRDVSubBuJ3GjAJ0GOaBqudAHfPgI34y4N5YnCKFAghCnQ_Aj5NOacqG-3Kdy6tG8R2oMn7T9P2oMnZeDdg6rL3sU-ucGH_H-qkRyFlYX7eOTuQqT9E6rtevGVr9eHWFr3e_4CNP6eBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216060448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stevens, R. James ; Laughlin, Ronald J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, R. James ; Laughlin, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrous oxide emissions increase because of denitrification in the first few days after cattle (Bos taurus) slurry (CS) is applied to grassland soils fertilized with NO3 Denitrifying conditions are created when the readily decomposable C in the CS is oxidized by the soil microbial biomass when NO3 is present and O2 is deficient. Half of the readily decomposable C in CS can be volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that take up to 4 d to degrade. The timing of CS application relative to fertilizer‐NO3 application could therefore affect the losses of N2O and N2 We used the 15N gas‐flux method to measure N2O and N2 fluxes from grassland when CS containing 60 kg NH4‐N ha−1 was applied 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 d before the application of 60 kg N ha−1 of K15NO3 For a field experiment repeated in April, May, August, and October 1998, CS applied 3 or 4 d before KNO3 had no significant effect in any month on the flux of N2O in the 124 h after KNO3 application. On average over all months, the extra emission of N2O‐N over the control was equivalent to 0.8, 1.1, and 2.9% of KNO3‐N for prior applications of CS at 2, 1, and 0 d, respectively. When CS was applied 4 d prior to KNO3 there was no significant effect on the flux of N2 in any month. The maximum loss of N2O + N2 was 8.3% of the KNO3 applied (5 kg N ha−1) when CS and KNO3 were applied at the same time in April.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2002.6470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle manure ; Emissions ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasslands ; Nitrates ; Nitrous oxide ; Sludge ; Slurries</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2002-03, Vol.66 (2), p.647-652</ispartof><rights>Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.66:647–652.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-7c1747c91d24499199e03ff784a7981fe7b688b1790acd0a85ec07625425816d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-7c1747c91d24499199e03ff784a7981fe7b688b1790acd0a85ec07625425816d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2002.6470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2002.6470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13521495$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, R. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laughlin, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Nitrous oxide emissions increase because of denitrification in the first few days after cattle (Bos taurus) slurry (CS) is applied to grassland soils fertilized with NO3 Denitrifying conditions are created when the readily decomposable C in the CS is oxidized by the soil microbial biomass when NO3 is present and O2 is deficient. Half of the readily decomposable C in CS can be volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that take up to 4 d to degrade. The timing of CS application relative to fertilizer‐NO3 application could therefore affect the losses of N2O and N2 We used the 15N gas‐flux method to measure N2O and N2 fluxes from grassland when CS containing 60 kg NH4‐N ha−1 was applied 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 d before the application of 60 kg N ha−1 of K15NO3 For a field experiment repeated in April, May, August, and October 1998, CS applied 3 or 4 d before KNO3 had no significant effect in any month on the flux of N2O in the 124 h after KNO3 application. On average over all months, the extra emission of N2O‐N over the control was equivalent to 0.8, 1.1, and 2.9% of KNO3‐N for prior applications of CS at 2, 1, and 0 d, respectively. When CS was applied 4 d prior to KNO3 there was no significant effect on the flux of N2 in any month. The maximum loss of N2O + N2 was 8.3% of the KNO3 applied (5 kg N ha−1) when CS and KNO3 were applied at the same time in April.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vE0EMhlcIJELplfMICW4b7Nn5PHAIaQtFET2kHNFqOutFE013w8xGJfx6Jk0FUi-92LL1-LWtt6reIMw5NupDztltOACfK6HhWTVD0cgalMLn1QwahbW0Vr6sXuW8AUBpAWbVj6WbpkhsHXcp7dliu42BOvaJ-jERu6A0hRj-UGLfwpTcRGw13lHK9-W4y-zqd-iIuaFjZ2E49H7SwM5vQ85hHPLr6kXvYqbTh3xSfb84v15-qVdXny-Xi1XtBQLU2qMW2lvsuBDWorUETd9rI5y2BnvSN8qYG9QWnO_AGUketOJScGlQdc1J9f6ou03jrx3lqS0XeIrRDVSubBuJ3GjAJ0GOaBqudAHfPgI34y4N5YnCKFAghCnQ_Aj5NOacqG-3Kdy6tG8R2oMn7T9P2oMnZeDdg6rL3sU-ucGH_H-qkRyFlYX7eOTuQqT9E6rtevGVr9eHWFr3e_4CNP6eBg</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Stevens, R. James</creator><creator>Laughlin, Ronald J.</creator><general>Soil Science Society</general><general>Soil Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions</title><author>Stevens, R. James ; Laughlin, Ronald J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-7c1747c91d24499199e03ff784a7981fe7b688b1790acd0a85ec07625425816d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, R. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laughlin, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, R. James</au><au>Laughlin, Ronald J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>647</spage><epage>652</epage><pages>647-652</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Nitrous oxide emissions increase because of denitrification in the first few days after cattle (Bos taurus) slurry (CS) is applied to grassland soils fertilized with NO3 Denitrifying conditions are created when the readily decomposable C in the CS is oxidized by the soil microbial biomass when NO3 is present and O2 is deficient. Half of the readily decomposable C in CS can be volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that take up to 4 d to degrade. The timing of CS application relative to fertilizer‐NO3 application could therefore affect the losses of N2O and N2 We used the 15N gas‐flux method to measure N2O and N2 fluxes from grassland when CS containing 60 kg NH4‐N ha−1 was applied 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 d before the application of 60 kg N ha−1 of K15NO3 For a field experiment repeated in April, May, August, and October 1998, CS applied 3 or 4 d before KNO3 had no significant effect in any month on the flux of N2O in the 124 h after KNO3 application. On average over all months, the extra emission of N2O‐N over the control was equivalent to 0.8, 1.1, and 2.9% of KNO3‐N for prior applications of CS at 2, 1, and 0 d, respectively. When CS was applied 4 d prior to KNO3 there was no significant effect on the flux of N2 in any month. The maximum loss of N2O + N2 was 8.3% of the KNO3 applied (5 kg N ha−1) when CS and KNO3 were applied at the same time in April.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Soil Science Society</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2002.6470</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-5995 |
ispartof | Soil Science Society of America journal, 2002-03, Vol.66 (2), p.647-652 |
issn | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35128701 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle manure Emissions Fertilizers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasslands Nitrates Nitrous oxide Sludge Slurries |
title | Cattle Slurry Applied Before Fertilizer Nitrate Lowers Nitrous Oxide and Dinitrogen Emissions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cattle%20Slurry%20Applied%20Before%20Fertilizer%20Nitrate%20Lowers%20Nitrous%20Oxide%20and%20Dinitrogen%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Stevens,%20R.%20James&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=647&rft.epage=652&rft.pages=647-652&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2002.6470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E111663886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216060448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |