A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers
The growing time-based competition (TBC) literature coincides with an increased emphasis on time in manufacturing organizations. In a 1993 survey, 93 per cent of US and European managers identified reliable delivery times as having above average importance, while overall delivery speed was cited by...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of operations & production management 1996-06, Vol.16 (6), p.56-67 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 67 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 56 |
| container_title | International journal of operations & production management |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Bozarth, Cecil Chapman, Steve |
| description | The growing time-based competition (TBC) literature coincides with an increased emphasis on time in manufacturing organizations. In a 1993 survey, 93 per cent of US and European managers identified reliable delivery times as having above average importance, while overall delivery speed was cited by 88 per cent and 89 per cent, respectively. At the same time, 82 per cent of Japanese managers rated rapid new product introduction as having above average importance. Highlights potentially different sources of time-based advantages. The factors described above are linked by a common emphasis on time, but the driving strategies and tactics used to achieve them can differ or possibly conflict. Presents a framework of time-based competition for manufacturers. Demonstrates how differences between engineer-to-order, make-to-order, assembly-to-order and make-to-stock manufacturers result in the need to use different approaches to implement TBC. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/01443579610119090 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35111753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18581578</galeid><sourcerecordid>A18581578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7a1db96c3360f6a7b9a58ff294eeddef7b55eecf6b306b485513d1b89d1a22583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQQEVJoNskPyA300NPcaKxLNu6FJYlXxDopTkLWRoFLba0leyW_PvIuKdmoWEOgpn3hhkNIZdArwFod0OhrhlvRQMUQFBBP5ENtLwrGy7YCdks9TID7WfyJaU9pbRiwDfk-7bQwU_Ov6DXr8Vvh3-KYIvJjVj2KqHJ5fGAk5tc8IUNsRiVn63S0xwxpnNyatWQ8OLve0ae725_7h7Kpx_3j7vtU6nrjk9lq8D0otGMNdQ2qu2F4p21lagRjUHb9pwjatv0jDZ9VjgwA30nDKiq4h07I9_WvocYfs2YJjm6pHEYlMcwJ8k4QF6X_ResBHDKBGTw6z_gPszR5yVkxSpWVy1dul2t0IsaUDpvwxSVzl-FUQ3Bo3U5vYWOd8DbZcryCJ7D4Oj0MR5WXseQUkQrD9GNKr5KoHI5q3x31uzQ1cFxGcJ8SLk6rrxD5cFY9gb3Ba7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232342703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Bozarth, Cecil ; Chapman, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Bozarth, Cecil ; Chapman, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>The growing time-based competition (TBC) literature coincides with an increased emphasis on time in manufacturing organizations. In a 1993 survey, 93 per cent of US and European managers identified reliable delivery times as having above average importance, while overall delivery speed was cited by 88 per cent and 89 per cent, respectively. At the same time, 82 per cent of Japanese managers rated rapid new product introduction as having above average importance. Highlights potentially different sources of time-based advantages. The factors described above are linked by a common emphasis on time, but the driving strategies and tactics used to achieve them can differ or possibly conflict. Presents a framework of time-based competition for manufacturers. Demonstrates how differences between engineer-to-order, make-to-order, assembly-to-order and make-to-stock manufacturers result in the need to use different approaches to implement TBC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01443579610119090</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOPMDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Competitive advantage ; Costs ; Design ; Efficiency ; Flexibility ; Management ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Market positioning ; Methods ; Order entry ; Product development ; Product lines ; Production engineering ; Production management ; Production planning ; Time management</subject><ispartof>International journal of operations & production management, 1996-06, Vol.16 (6), p.56-67</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.</rights><rights>MCB UP Limited 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7a1db96c3360f6a7b9a58ff294eeddef7b55eecf6b306b485513d1b89d1a22583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7a1db96c3360f6a7b9a58ff294eeddef7b55eecf6b306b485513d1b89d1a22583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01443579610119090/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01443579610119090/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,964,11622,27911,27912,52673,52676</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bozarth, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers</title><title>International journal of operations & production management</title><description>The growing time-based competition (TBC) literature coincides with an increased emphasis on time in manufacturing organizations. In a 1993 survey, 93 per cent of US and European managers identified reliable delivery times as having above average importance, while overall delivery speed was cited by 88 per cent and 89 per cent, respectively. At the same time, 82 per cent of Japanese managers rated rapid new product introduction as having above average importance. Highlights potentially different sources of time-based advantages. The factors described above are linked by a common emphasis on time, but the driving strategies and tactics used to achieve them can differ or possibly conflict. Presents a framework of time-based competition for manufacturers. Demonstrates how differences between engineer-to-order, make-to-order, assembly-to-order and make-to-stock manufacturers result in the need to use different approaches to implement TBC.</description><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Order entry</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Production engineering</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Time management</subject><issn>0144-3577</issn><issn>1758-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQQEVJoNskPyA300NPcaKxLNu6FJYlXxDopTkLWRoFLba0leyW_PvIuKdmoWEOgpn3hhkNIZdArwFod0OhrhlvRQMUQFBBP5ENtLwrGy7YCdks9TID7WfyJaU9pbRiwDfk-7bQwU_Ov6DXr8Vvh3-KYIvJjVj2KqHJ5fGAk5tc8IUNsRiVn63S0xwxpnNyatWQ8OLve0ae725_7h7Kpx_3j7vtU6nrjk9lq8D0otGMNdQ2qu2F4p21lagRjUHb9pwjatv0jDZ9VjgwA30nDKiq4h07I9_WvocYfs2YJjm6pHEYlMcwJ8k4QF6X_ResBHDKBGTw6z_gPszR5yVkxSpWVy1dul2t0IsaUDpvwxSVzl-FUQ3Bo3U5vYWOd8DbZcryCJ7D4Oj0MR5WXseQUkQrD9GNKr5KoHI5q3x31uzQ1cFxGcJ8SLk6rrxD5cFY9gb3Ba7k</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Bozarth, Cecil</creator><creator>Chapman, Steve</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers</title><author>Bozarth, Cecil ; Chapman, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7a1db96c3360f6a7b9a58ff294eeddef7b55eecf6b306b485513d1b89d1a22583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Order entry</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Production engineering</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Time management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bozarth, Cecil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of operations & production management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bozarth, Cecil</au><au>Chapman, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of operations & production management</jtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>56-67</pages><issn>0144-3577</issn><eissn>1758-6593</eissn><coden>IOPMDU</coden><abstract>The growing time-based competition (TBC) literature coincides with an increased emphasis on time in manufacturing organizations. In a 1993 survey, 93 per cent of US and European managers identified reliable delivery times as having above average importance, while overall delivery speed was cited by 88 per cent and 89 per cent, respectively. At the same time, 82 per cent of Japanese managers rated rapid new product introduction as having above average importance. Highlights potentially different sources of time-based advantages. The factors described above are linked by a common emphasis on time, but the driving strategies and tactics used to achieve them can differ or possibly conflict. Presents a framework of time-based competition for manufacturers. Demonstrates how differences between engineer-to-order, make-to-order, assembly-to-order and make-to-stock manufacturers result in the need to use different approaches to implement TBC.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/01443579610119090</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-3577 |
| ispartof | International journal of operations & production management, 1996-06, Vol.16 (6), p.56-67 |
| issn | 0144-3577 1758-6593 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35111753 |
| source | Emerald Journals |
| subjects | Competitive advantage Costs Design Efficiency Flexibility Management Manufacturers Manufacturing Market positioning Methods Order entry Product development Product lines Production engineering Production management Production planning Time management |
| title | A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T10%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20contingency%20view%20of%20time-based%20competition%20for%20manufacturers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20operations%20&%20production%20management&rft.au=Bozarth,%20Cecil&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=56-67&rft.issn=0144-3577&rft.eissn=1758-6593&rft.coden=IOPMDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01443579610119090&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18581578%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232342703&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18581578&rfr_iscdi=true |