The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?

Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine and petroleum geology 2009-11, Vol.26 (9), p.1766-1784
Hauptverfasser: Sawolo, Nurrochmat, Sutriono, Edi, Istadi, Bambang P., Darmoyo, Agung B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1784
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1766
container_title Marine and petroleum geology
container_volume 26
creator Sawolo, Nurrochmat
Sutriono, Edi
Istadi, Bambang P.
Darmoyo, Agung B.
description Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a unique opportunity to study the genesis and development of a mud volcano. For the first time, this paper presents all raw and interpreted drilling data, so any interested party can perform their own assessment. Our study suggests that LUSI mud volcano was a naturally occurring mud volcano in an area prone for its mud volcanism. Pressure analysis done on the Banjarpanji well shows that the pressure exerted at the well is lower than the fracture pressure at the last casing shoe, and suggests that the well was intact and did not suffer an underground blowout. This is further supported by evidence and observation made during drilling (such as circulation was done on an open BOP) and subsequent relief wells (Sonan and temperature log runs). This study offers a different alternative to earlier hypothesis that events at the Banjarpanji well were the trigger for the LUSI mud volcano. More work is needed by the scientific community to study the sequence of events in order to explain and clarify the real trigger of LUSI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.04.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35059465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264817209000750</els_id><sourcerecordid>35059465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-f95980788e9191820de0168c20f08d88d4c251ee3343adda575214dbaa099d8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOAjEURRujiYh-g125m_G102FaN4YQRRMSF0JcNqV9YMkwxXaGhL93CMYtq7c5977cQ8g9g5wBGz1u8q2JO2zXGHIOoHIQOQC_IAMmqyITUBWXZAB8JDLJKn5NblLaAEClgA3IdP6NdLb4fKfbztF9qK1pAm2jX68x-mZNbWjaGPYY0-GJfplEfUut6RI6ujxQF31d99jzLblamTrh3d8dksXry3zyls0-pu-T8SwzAqDNVqpUEiopUTHFJAeH_QZpOaxAOimdsLxkiEUhCuOcKauSM-GWxoBSTtpiSB5OvbsYfjpMrd76ZLGuTYOhS7oooVRiVJ4FOeOs_ww9WJ1AG0NKEVd6F32v9KAZ6KNhvdH_hvXRsAahe8N9cnxKYj947zHqZD02Fp2PaFvtgj_b8Qs464fH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21211680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sawolo, Nurrochmat ; Sutriono, Edi ; Istadi, Bambang P. ; Darmoyo, Agung B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawolo, Nurrochmat ; Sutriono, Edi ; Istadi, Bambang P. ; Darmoyo, Agung B.</creatorcontrib><description>Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a unique opportunity to study the genesis and development of a mud volcano. For the first time, this paper presents all raw and interpreted drilling data, so any interested party can perform their own assessment. Our study suggests that LUSI mud volcano was a naturally occurring mud volcano in an area prone for its mud volcanism. Pressure analysis done on the Banjarpanji well shows that the pressure exerted at the well is lower than the fracture pressure at the last casing shoe, and suggests that the well was intact and did not suffer an underground blowout. This is further supported by evidence and observation made during drilling (such as circulation was done on an open BOP) and subsequent relief wells (Sonan and temperature log runs). This study offers a different alternative to earlier hypothesis that events at the Banjarpanji well were the trigger for the LUSI mud volcano. More work is needed by the scientific community to study the sequence of events in order to explain and clarify the real trigger of LUSI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.04.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Communities ; Crude oil ; Drilling ; Earthquake ; East Java ; Exploration ; Fracture mechanics ; Geology ; LUSI ; Marine ; Mud ; Mud volcano ; Underground blowout ; Watukosek</subject><ispartof>Marine and petroleum geology, 2009-11, Vol.26 (9), p.1766-1784</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-f95980788e9191820de0168c20f08d88d4c251ee3343adda575214dbaa099d8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-f95980788e9191820de0168c20f08d88d4c251ee3343adda575214dbaa099d8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817209000750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawolo, Nurrochmat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutriono, Edi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istadi, Bambang P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmoyo, Agung B.</creatorcontrib><title>The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?</title><title>Marine and petroleum geology</title><description>Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a unique opportunity to study the genesis and development of a mud volcano. For the first time, this paper presents all raw and interpreted drilling data, so any interested party can perform their own assessment. Our study suggests that LUSI mud volcano was a naturally occurring mud volcano in an area prone for its mud volcanism. Pressure analysis done on the Banjarpanji well shows that the pressure exerted at the well is lower than the fracture pressure at the last casing shoe, and suggests that the well was intact and did not suffer an underground blowout. This is further supported by evidence and observation made during drilling (such as circulation was done on an open BOP) and subsequent relief wells (Sonan and temperature log runs). This study offers a different alternative to earlier hypothesis that events at the Banjarpanji well were the trigger for the LUSI mud volcano. More work is needed by the scientific community to study the sequence of events in order to explain and clarify the real trigger of LUSI.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Earthquake</subject><subject>East Java</subject><subject>Exploration</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>LUSI</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>Mud volcano</subject><subject>Underground blowout</subject><subject>Watukosek</subject><issn>0264-8172</issn><issn>1873-4073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFOAjEURRujiYh-g125m_G102FaN4YQRRMSF0JcNqV9YMkwxXaGhL93CMYtq7c5977cQ8g9g5wBGz1u8q2JO2zXGHIOoHIQOQC_IAMmqyITUBWXZAB8JDLJKn5NblLaAEClgA3IdP6NdLb4fKfbztF9qK1pAm2jX68x-mZNbWjaGPYY0-GJfplEfUut6RI6ujxQF31d99jzLblamTrh3d8dksXry3zyls0-pu-T8SwzAqDNVqpUEiopUTHFJAeH_QZpOaxAOimdsLxkiEUhCuOcKauSM-GWxoBSTtpiSB5OvbsYfjpMrd76ZLGuTYOhS7oooVRiVJ4FOeOs_ww9WJ1AG0NKEVd6F32v9KAZ6KNhvdH_hvXRsAahe8N9cnxKYj947zHqZD02Fp2PaFvtgj_b8Qs464fH</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Sawolo, Nurrochmat</creator><creator>Sutriono, Edi</creator><creator>Istadi, Bambang P.</creator><creator>Darmoyo, Agung B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?</title><author>Sawolo, Nurrochmat ; Sutriono, Edi ; Istadi, Bambang P. ; Darmoyo, Agung B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-f95980788e9191820de0168c20f08d88d4c251ee3343adda575214dbaa099d8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Earthquake</topic><topic>East Java</topic><topic>Exploration</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>LUSI</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>Mud volcano</topic><topic>Underground blowout</topic><topic>Watukosek</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawolo, Nurrochmat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutriono, Edi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istadi, Bambang P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmoyo, Agung B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawolo, Nurrochmat</au><au>Sutriono, Edi</au><au>Istadi, Bambang P.</au><au>Darmoyo, Agung B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?</atitle><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1766</spage><epage>1784</epage><pages>1766-1784</pages><issn>0264-8172</issn><eissn>1873-4073</eissn><abstract>Following the Yogyakarta earthquake on May 27th, 2006, the subsequent eruption of a mud volcano has been closely observed and analyzed by the geological community. The mud volcano, known as LUSI, began erupting near the Banjarpanji-1 exploration well in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. LUSI offers a unique opportunity to study the genesis and development of a mud volcano. For the first time, this paper presents all raw and interpreted drilling data, so any interested party can perform their own assessment. Our study suggests that LUSI mud volcano was a naturally occurring mud volcano in an area prone for its mud volcanism. Pressure analysis done on the Banjarpanji well shows that the pressure exerted at the well is lower than the fracture pressure at the last casing shoe, and suggests that the well was intact and did not suffer an underground blowout. This is further supported by evidence and observation made during drilling (such as circulation was done on an open BOP) and subsequent relief wells (Sonan and temperature log runs). This study offers a different alternative to earlier hypothesis that events at the Banjarpanji well were the trigger for the LUSI mud volcano. More work is needed by the scientific community to study the sequence of events in order to explain and clarify the real trigger of LUSI.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.04.002</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8172
ispartof Marine and petroleum geology, 2009-11, Vol.26 (9), p.1766-1784
issn 0264-8172
1873-4073
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35059465
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Assessments
Communities
Crude oil
Drilling
Earthquake
East Java
Exploration
Fracture mechanics
Geology
LUSI
Marine
Mud
Mud volcano
Underground blowout
Watukosek
title The LUSI mud volcano triggering controversy: Was it caused by drilling?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A12%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20LUSI%20mud%20volcano%20triggering%20controversy:%20Was%20it%20caused%20by%20drilling?&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20petroleum%20geology&rft.au=Sawolo,%20Nurrochmat&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1766&rft.epage=1784&rft.pages=1766-1784&rft.issn=0264-8172&rft.eissn=1873-4073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35059465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21211680&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264817209000750&rfr_iscdi=true