Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources

Global human population transitioned from a rural to urban majority in 2008. The struggle to accommodate urban growth while simultaneously conserving natural resources will be felt around the globe. The capacity to project urban growth scenarios that reflect various public policies so that their rel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2009-12, Vol.93 (3), p.172-183
Hauptverfasser: Beardsley, Karen, Thorne, James H., Roth, Nathaniel E., Gao, Shengyi, McCoy, Michael C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 3
container_start_page 172
container_title Landscape and urban planning
container_volume 93
creator Beardsley, Karen
Thorne, James H.
Roth, Nathaniel E.
Gao, Shengyi
McCoy, Michael C.
description Global human population transitioned from a rural to urban majority in 2008. The struggle to accommodate urban growth while simultaneously conserving natural resources will be felt around the globe. The capacity to project urban growth scenarios that reflect various public policies so that their relative impacts can be evaluated on natural resources is broadly needed. We developed a framework for such analyses by using a spatially explicit urban growth model to project seven different growth scenarios that represent a range of public policies. The outputs were analyzed in terms of their impacts on 14 types of conservation priority lands. The scenarios covered policies that ranged from “Business as Usual,” to “Farmland Soils Protection,” to “Compact Growth.” At state-government convened meetings, regional scientists identified and assembled the 14 key conservation priority data layers reflecting high value open space and conservation opportunities. We assessed the impact of each projected urban growth output with each conservation priority layer. The scenario with the least overall ecological impact was the Compact Growth Scenario; the Great Cities Scenario was also relatively low. Because of its efficiency and ease of use, the general availability of needed data, and its suitability for use by local governments, the method presented here could be incorporated for other regions of the world where working landscapes are negatively affected by urban growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35050806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204609001406</els_id><sourcerecordid>35050806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-90dfbf272d2f007d6c6a3cb0cd29692140ed6f27966b26679a9dcba692c5b5d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO4zAQhi3ESlu6-w7mALeEsdM49RFVwK5UiQuc9mA59qS4CnHwJCDefo2KEDc4jTTzzf9LH2OnAkoBQl3sy94Ofk7tmGcpAXQJTQlQHbGFWDeyUKDkMVtkVhcSVuonOyHaA4ColViwf5dESBSGHZ8ekIeh62ccHPLY8WTH4HnOtgPfpfgyPfDcxRPuQhxsz8fYBxeQeBx4G2Ifd8HldUKKc3JIv9iPzvaEv9_nkt1fX91t_hTb25u_m8tt4VaimgoNvms72UgvO4DGK6ds5VpwXmqlpVgBepXvWqlWKtVoq71rbT65uq19VS3Z-SF3TPFpRprMYyCHfTaCcSZT1VDDGtSXoBSgq7VqMqgPoEuRKGFnxhQebXo1Asybd7M3n7ybN-8GGpO959-z9xJLWUeX7OACfQRIKepKa5G5zYHDrOY5YDKUZWb1PiR0k_ExfKPtP-TQoDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21093867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Beardsley, Karen ; Thorne, James H. ; Roth, Nathaniel E. ; Gao, Shengyi ; McCoy, Michael C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beardsley, Karen ; Thorne, James H. ; Roth, Nathaniel E. ; Gao, Shengyi ; McCoy, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><description>Global human population transitioned from a rural to urban majority in 2008. The struggle to accommodate urban growth while simultaneously conserving natural resources will be felt around the globe. The capacity to project urban growth scenarios that reflect various public policies so that their relative impacts can be evaluated on natural resources is broadly needed. We developed a framework for such analyses by using a spatially explicit urban growth model to project seven different growth scenarios that represent a range of public policies. The outputs were analyzed in terms of their impacts on 14 types of conservation priority lands. The scenarios covered policies that ranged from “Business as Usual,” to “Farmland Soils Protection,” to “Compact Growth.” At state-government convened meetings, regional scientists identified and assembled the 14 key conservation priority data layers reflecting high value open space and conservation opportunities. We assessed the impact of each projected urban growth output with each conservation priority layer. The scenario with the least overall ecological impact was the Compact Growth Scenario; the Great Cities Scenario was also relatively low. Because of its efficiency and ease of use, the general availability of needed data, and its suitability for use by local governments, the method presented here could be incorporated for other regions of the world where working landscapes are negatively affected by urban growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; GIS ; Modeling ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2009-12, Vol.93 (3), p.172-183</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-90dfbf272d2f007d6c6a3cb0cd29692140ed6f27966b26679a9dcba692c5b5d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-90dfbf272d2f007d6c6a3cb0cd29692140ed6f27966b26679a9dcba692c5b5d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22153991$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beardsley, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Nathaniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shengyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>Global human population transitioned from a rural to urban majority in 2008. The struggle to accommodate urban growth while simultaneously conserving natural resources will be felt around the globe. The capacity to project urban growth scenarios that reflect various public policies so that their relative impacts can be evaluated on natural resources is broadly needed. We developed a framework for such analyses by using a spatially explicit urban growth model to project seven different growth scenarios that represent a range of public policies. The outputs were analyzed in terms of their impacts on 14 types of conservation priority lands. The scenarios covered policies that ranged from “Business as Usual,” to “Farmland Soils Protection,” to “Compact Growth.” At state-government convened meetings, regional scientists identified and assembled the 14 key conservation priority data layers reflecting high value open space and conservation opportunities. We assessed the impact of each projected urban growth output with each conservation priority layer. The scenario with the least overall ecological impact was the Compact Growth Scenario; the Great Cities Scenario was also relatively low. Because of its efficiency and ease of use, the general availability of needed data, and its suitability for use by local governments, the method presented here could be incorporated for other regions of the world where working landscapes are negatively affected by urban growth.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFO4zAQhi3ESlu6-w7mALeEsdM49RFVwK5UiQuc9mA59qS4CnHwJCDefo2KEDc4jTTzzf9LH2OnAkoBQl3sy94Ofk7tmGcpAXQJTQlQHbGFWDeyUKDkMVtkVhcSVuonOyHaA4ColViwf5dESBSGHZ8ekIeh62ccHPLY8WTH4HnOtgPfpfgyPfDcxRPuQhxsz8fYBxeQeBx4G2Ifd8HldUKKc3JIv9iPzvaEv9_nkt1fX91t_hTb25u_m8tt4VaimgoNvms72UgvO4DGK6ds5VpwXmqlpVgBepXvWqlWKtVoq71rbT65uq19VS3Z-SF3TPFpRprMYyCHfTaCcSZT1VDDGtSXoBSgq7VqMqgPoEuRKGFnxhQebXo1Asybd7M3n7ybN-8GGpO959-z9xJLWUeX7OACfQRIKepKa5G5zYHDrOY5YDKUZWb1PiR0k_ExfKPtP-TQoDs</recordid><startdate>20091215</startdate><enddate>20091215</enddate><creator>Beardsley, Karen</creator><creator>Thorne, James H.</creator><creator>Roth, Nathaniel E.</creator><creator>Gao, Shengyi</creator><creator>McCoy, Michael C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091215</creationdate><title>Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources</title><author>Beardsley, Karen ; Thorne, James H. ; Roth, Nathaniel E. ; Gao, Shengyi ; McCoy, Michael C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-90dfbf272d2f007d6c6a3cb0cd29692140ed6f27966b26679a9dcba692c5b5d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beardsley, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Nathaniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shengyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beardsley, Karen</au><au>Thorne, James H.</au><au>Roth, Nathaniel E.</au><au>Gao, Shengyi</au><au>McCoy, Michael C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2009-12-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>172-183</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>Global human population transitioned from a rural to urban majority in 2008. The struggle to accommodate urban growth while simultaneously conserving natural resources will be felt around the globe. The capacity to project urban growth scenarios that reflect various public policies so that their relative impacts can be evaluated on natural resources is broadly needed. We developed a framework for such analyses by using a spatially explicit urban growth model to project seven different growth scenarios that represent a range of public policies. The outputs were analyzed in terms of their impacts on 14 types of conservation priority lands. The scenarios covered policies that ranged from “Business as Usual,” to “Farmland Soils Protection,” to “Compact Growth.” At state-government convened meetings, regional scientists identified and assembled the 14 key conservation priority data layers reflecting high value open space and conservation opportunities. We assessed the impact of each projected urban growth output with each conservation priority layer. The scenario with the least overall ecological impact was the Compact Growth Scenario; the Great Cities Scenario was also relatively low. Because of its efficiency and ease of use, the general availability of needed data, and its suitability for use by local governments, the method presented here could be incorporated for other regions of the world where working landscapes are negatively affected by urban growth.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2046
ispartof Landscape and urban planning, 2009-12, Vol.93 (3), p.172-183
issn 0169-2046
1872-6062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35050806
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
GIS
Modeling
Urbanization
title Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20influence%20of%20rapid%20urban%20growth%20and%20regional%20policies%20on%20biological%20resources&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Beardsley,%20Karen&rft.date=2009-12-15&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=172-183&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35050806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21093867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204609001406&rfr_iscdi=true