Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques
Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews labor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 378 |
creator | Allaire, Suzanne E. Roulier, Stéphanie Cessna, Allan J. |
description | Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35027786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169409004776</els_id><sourcerecordid>35027786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNpoVvtTyjmRu9mevIxk4w3IqK1IEhpvQ6ZzIlmGSdrMqvsvzfLLL01NyHwnPO-PCHkB4OaAWt_ruv1025Icaw5QFeDroGJT2TFtOoqrkB9JisAzivWdvIr-ZbzGsoRQq7I7Z-tnebgd2F6pJuEHhOWtx2pH-MbDRPNMYz5nF7ShK8B32j0dAh-4eiM7mkKL1vMx-SLt2PG74f7iDzcXP-7uq3u7n_9vrq8q6yUeq4GUI2VvCutQCvwDLAXErXq-7b3vEepkGvXW647ofpGKMF5B26QUvTadeKInC17Nynuc2fzHLLDcbQTxm02ogGulG4_BDkrFVjLCtgsoEsx56LAbFJ4tmlnGJi9YLM2B8FmL9iANkVwmTs9BNjs7OiTnVzI_4d5CRBayMKdLJy30djHVJiHv7xsgP1_MN4U4mIhsIgrkpPJLuDkcAgJ3WyGGD7o8g4yRZxp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21070161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Dye tracing ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finger flow ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Image analysis ; literature reviews ; Lysimeters ; Macropore flow ; measurement ; Pollution, environment geology ; preferential flow ; Soil heterogeneity ; soil science ; soil water movement</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22103834$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</description><subject>Dye tracing</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finger flow</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>Lysimeters</subject><subject>Macropore flow</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>preferential flow</subject><subject>Soil heterogeneity</subject><subject>soil science</subject><subject>soil water movement</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNpoVvtTyjmRu9mevIxk4w3IqK1IEhpvQ6ZzIlmGSdrMqvsvzfLLL01NyHwnPO-PCHkB4OaAWt_ruv1025Icaw5QFeDroGJT2TFtOoqrkB9JisAzivWdvIr-ZbzGsoRQq7I7Z-tnebgd2F6pJuEHhOWtx2pH-MbDRPNMYz5nF7ShK8B32j0dAh-4eiM7mkKL1vMx-SLt2PG74f7iDzcXP-7uq3u7n_9vrq8q6yUeq4GUI2VvCutQCvwDLAXErXq-7b3vEepkGvXW647ofpGKMF5B26QUvTadeKInC17Nynuc2fzHLLDcbQTxm02ogGulG4_BDkrFVjLCtgsoEsx56LAbFJ4tmlnGJi9YLM2B8FmL9iANkVwmTs9BNjs7OiTnVzI_4d5CRBayMKdLJy30djHVJiHv7xsgP1_MN4U4mIhsIgrkpPJLuDkcAgJ3WyGGD7o8g4yRZxp</recordid><startdate>20091115</startdate><enddate>20091115</enddate><creator>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creator><creator>Roulier, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Cessna, Allan J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091115</creationdate><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><author>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Dye tracing</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finger flow</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>Lysimeters</topic><topic>Macropore flow</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>preferential flow</topic><topic>Soil heterogeneity</topic><topic>soil science</topic><topic>soil water movement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allaire, Suzanne E.</au><au>Roulier, Stéphanie</au><au>Cessna, Allan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2009-11-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>378</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>179-204</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35027786 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Dye tracing Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Finger flow Hydrogeology Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Image analysis literature reviews Lysimeters Macropore flow measurement Pollution, environment geology preferential flow Soil heterogeneity soil science soil water movement |
title | Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20preferential%20flow%20in%20soils:%20A%20review%20of%20different%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Allaire,%20Suzanne%20E.&rft.date=2009-11-15&rft.volume=378&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=179-204&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35027786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21070161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169409004776&rfr_iscdi=true |