Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques

Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews labor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204
Hauptverfasser: Allaire, Suzanne E., Roulier, Stéphanie, Cessna, Allan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 204
container_issue 1
container_start_page 179
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 378
creator Allaire, Suzanne E.
Roulier, Stéphanie
Cessna, Allan J.
description Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35027786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169409004776</els_id><sourcerecordid>35027786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNpoVvtTyjmRu9mevIxk4w3IqK1IEhpvQ6ZzIlmGSdrMqvsvzfLLL01NyHwnPO-PCHkB4OaAWt_ruv1025Icaw5QFeDroGJT2TFtOoqrkB9JisAzivWdvIr-ZbzGsoRQq7I7Z-tnebgd2F6pJuEHhOWtx2pH-MbDRPNMYz5nF7ShK8B32j0dAh-4eiM7mkKL1vMx-SLt2PG74f7iDzcXP-7uq3u7n_9vrq8q6yUeq4GUI2VvCutQCvwDLAXErXq-7b3vEepkGvXW647ofpGKMF5B26QUvTadeKInC17Nynuc2fzHLLDcbQTxm02ogGulG4_BDkrFVjLCtgsoEsx56LAbFJ4tmlnGJi9YLM2B8FmL9iANkVwmTs9BNjs7OiTnVzI_4d5CRBayMKdLJy30djHVJiHv7xsgP1_MN4U4mIhsIgrkpPJLuDkcAgJ3WyGGD7o8g4yRZxp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21070161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Dye tracing ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finger flow ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Image analysis ; literature reviews ; Lysimeters ; Macropore flow ; measurement ; Pollution, environment geology ; preferential flow ; Soil heterogeneity ; soil science ; soil water movement</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22103834$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</description><subject>Dye tracing</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finger flow</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>Lysimeters</subject><subject>Macropore flow</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>preferential flow</subject><subject>Soil heterogeneity</subject><subject>soil science</subject><subject>soil water movement</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNpoVvtTyjmRu9mevIxk4w3IqK1IEhpvQ6ZzIlmGSdrMqvsvzfLLL01NyHwnPO-PCHkB4OaAWt_ruv1025Icaw5QFeDroGJT2TFtOoqrkB9JisAzivWdvIr-ZbzGsoRQq7I7Z-tnebgd2F6pJuEHhOWtx2pH-MbDRPNMYz5nF7ShK8B32j0dAh-4eiM7mkKL1vMx-SLt2PG74f7iDzcXP-7uq3u7n_9vrq8q6yUeq4GUI2VvCutQCvwDLAXErXq-7b3vEepkGvXW647ofpGKMF5B26QUvTadeKInC17Nynuc2fzHLLDcbQTxm02ogGulG4_BDkrFVjLCtgsoEsx56LAbFJ4tmlnGJi9YLM2B8FmL9iANkVwmTs9BNjs7OiTnVzI_4d5CRBayMKdLJy30djHVJiHv7xsgP1_MN4U4mIhsIgrkpPJLuDkcAgJ3WyGGD7o8g4yRZxp</recordid><startdate>20091115</startdate><enddate>20091115</enddate><creator>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creator><creator>Roulier, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Cessna, Allan J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091115</creationdate><title>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</title><author>Allaire, Suzanne E. ; Roulier, Stéphanie ; Cessna, Allan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-d075a4297070870f10eb34e87bb6bf2be47e28cba28937b53732290cd443b8c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Dye tracing</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finger flow</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>Lysimeters</topic><topic>Macropore flow</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>preferential flow</topic><topic>Soil heterogeneity</topic><topic>soil science</topic><topic>soil water movement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allaire, Suzanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roulier, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cessna, Allan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allaire, Suzanne E.</au><au>Roulier, Stéphanie</au><au>Cessna, Allan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2009-11-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>378</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>179-204</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Preferential flow (PF) in soil has both environmental and human health implications since it favours contaminant transport to groundwater without interaction with the chemically and biologically reactive upper layer of soil. PF is, however, difficult to measure and quantify. This paper reviews laboratory and field techniques, such as breakthrough curves, dye tracing, and scanning techniques, for evaluating PF in soil at different scales. Advanced technologies, such as scanning techniques, have increased our capability to quantify transport processes within the soil with minimal soil disturbance. Important issues with respect to quantifying PF concern large-scale studies, frozen soil conditions, tracing techniques for particles and gases, a lack of simple mathematical tools for interpreting field data, and the lack of a systematic approach for comparing PF data resulting from different measurement techniques. Also, more research is required to quantify the relative importance of the various PF processes that occur in soil rather than the integrated result of all PF processes in soils.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009-11, Vol.378 (1), p.179-204
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35027786
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Dye tracing
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Finger flow
Hydrogeology
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Image analysis
literature reviews
Lysimeters
Macropore flow
measurement
Pollution, environment geology
preferential flow
Soil heterogeneity
soil science
soil water movement
title Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20preferential%20flow%20in%20soils:%20A%20review%20of%20different%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Allaire,%20Suzanne%20E.&rft.date=2009-11-15&rft.volume=378&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=179-204&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35027786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21070161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169409004776&rfr_iscdi=true