Electric field optimization of the power cable joint by using evolutionary calculation method

This paper examines electric field optimizations at the joint of power cables by using evolution strategy [(1+1)‐ES, (µ+λ)‐ES] and genetic algorithm which are so‐ called evolutionary calculation methods. The object of the paper is to minimize the electric field strength on the inner curved electrode...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electrical engineering in Japan 2005-03, Vol.150 (4), p.44-53
Hauptverfasser: Yonetsu, Daigo, Hara, Takehisa, Shimada, Shigeki, Kaji, Mikio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper examines electric field optimizations at the joint of power cables by using evolution strategy [(1+1)‐ES, (µ+λ)‐ES] and genetic algorithm which are so‐ called evolutionary calculation methods. The object of the paper is to minimize the electric field strength on the inner curved electrode under the constraint that the electric field strength along the interface between the two different insulators should be below the permissible value. The surface charge method that provides accurate solutions on the boundaries for the multilayer substances with a relatively small number of elements is employed for the calculation of the electric field distribution. Three evolutionary calculation methods are employed for the optimization method. Because these methods employ mutation and rearrangement (cross‐over) processes, the shape design can be performed widely and locally. As a result, each method can reduce the electric field strength on the inner curved electrode while the electric field strength along the interface was kept below the permissible value. The search results of each optimization method were compared and (µ+λ)‐ES was found to have the best performance of the three methods. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Electr Eng Jpn, 150(4): 44–53, 2005; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/eej.10287
ISSN:0424-7760
1520-6416
DOI:10.1002/eej.10287