Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches

This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Transport reviews 2009-09, Vol.29 (5), p.557-567
Hauptverfasser:	Timmermans, Harry J.P., Molin, Eric J.E.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Conjoint analysis Preferences Research methodology Transportation research Workshops
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	567
container_issue	5
container_start_page	557
container_title	Transport reviews
container_volume	29
creator	Timmermans, Harry J.P. Molin, Eric J.E.
description	This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses some examples of such increased complexity and some potential solutions to reduce respondent burden. Because some of these developments and solutions are discussed in more detail in other workshop papers, the level of detail in this paper depends on the specific topic. Those topics that are not discussed in the workshops receive slightly more attention.
doi_str_mv	10.1080/01441640902827532
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34856656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912812291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-7e8147da5cf346435a185b3e082074205f1387823d1d71bc8b471578251b028d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPGzEURi1EJQLtD-jO6oLdFD_HpmKTppQiIbFp15bjuQNOHXtqOyT59zVKV0WIheXXOb6-H0IfKflMiSYXhApBe0EuCdNMSc6O0IyKXnRtqY7R7Pm-a4A6QaelrAghghMyQ6tvYIOPD3jr6yO-jS6DLTDgRVpPAXa-7rGPbRdXyceKr3cTZL-GWMsX_NW63w85beKAbRv3T5CfPGxxGvE8VMjRVsDzacrJukco79G70YYCH_7NZ-jX9-ufix_d3f3N7WJ-1zmh-9op0FSowUo38tYAl5ZqueRANCNKMCJHyrXSjA90UHTp9FIoKtuBpMvW_MDP0Pnh3Vb4zwZKNWtfHIRgI6RNMVxo2feyb-Cn_8BV2rRfh2IY7dkl44o1iB4gl1MpGUYztQBs3htKzHP05kX0zVEHx8cx5bXdphwGU-0-pDxmG50vLy1Td7WZV2-a_PXCfwGnnJpz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216292372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Timmermans, Harry J.P. ; Molin, Eric J.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Harry J.P. ; Molin, Eric J.E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses some examples of such increased complexity and some potential solutions to reduce respondent burden. Because some of these developments and solutions are discussed in more detail in other workshop papers, the level of detail in this paper depends on the specific topic. Those topics that are not discussed in the workshops receive slightly more attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-1647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01441640902827532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Conjoint analysis ; Preferences ; Research methodology ; Transportation research ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Transport reviews, 2009-09, Vol.29 (5), p.557-567</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-7e8147da5cf346435a185b3e082074205f1387823d1d71bc8b471578251b028d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-7e8147da5cf346435a185b3e082074205f1387823d1d71bc8b471578251b028d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Harry J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molin, Eric J.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches</title><title>Transport reviews</title><description>This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses some examples of such increased complexity and some potential solutions to reduce respondent burden. Because some of these developments and solutions are discussed in more detail in other workshop papers, the level of detail in this paper depends on the specific topic. Those topics that are not discussed in the workshops receive slightly more attention.</description><subject>Conjoint analysis</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Transportation research</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0144-1647</issn><issn>1464-5327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPGzEURi1EJQLtD-jO6oLdFD_HpmKTppQiIbFp15bjuQNOHXtqOyT59zVKV0WIheXXOb6-H0IfKflMiSYXhApBe0EuCdNMSc6O0IyKXnRtqY7R7Pm-a4A6QaelrAghghMyQ6tvYIOPD3jr6yO-jS6DLTDgRVpPAXa-7rGPbRdXyceKr3cTZL-GWMsX_NW63w85beKAbRv3T5CfPGxxGvE8VMjRVsDzacrJukco79G70YYCH_7NZ-jX9-ufix_d3f3N7WJ-1zmh-9op0FSowUo38tYAl5ZqueRANCNKMCJHyrXSjA90UHTp9FIoKtuBpMvW_MDP0Pnh3Vb4zwZKNWtfHIRgI6RNMVxo2feyb-Cn_8BV2rRfh2IY7dkl44o1iB4gl1MpGUYztQBs3htKzHP05kX0zVEHx8cx5bXdphwGU-0-pDxmG50vLy1Td7WZV2-a_PXCfwGnnJpz</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Timmermans, Harry J.P.</creator><creator>Molin, Eric J.E.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches</title><author>Timmermans, Harry J.P. ; Molin, Eric J.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-7e8147da5cf346435a185b3e082074205f1387823d1d71bc8b471578251b028d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Conjoint analysis</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Transportation research</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Harry J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molin, Eric J.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transport reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timmermans, Harry J.P.</au><au>Molin, Eric J.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches</atitle><jtitle>Transport reviews</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>557-567</pages><issn>0144-1647</issn><eissn>1464-5327</eissn><abstract>This paper serves as background information for the TRB workshop on stated preference modelling. The main argument of the paper is that the development of stated preference and choice models has witnessed increased complexity, which in turn has led to higher respondent burden. The paper discusses some examples of such increased complexity and some potential solutions to reduce respondent burden. Because some of these developments and solutions are discussed in more detail in other workshop papers, the level of detail in this paper depends on the specific topic. Those topics that are not discussed in the workshops receive slightly more attention.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01441640902827532</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0144-1647
ispartof	Transport reviews, 2009-09, Vol.29 (5), p.557-567
issn	0144-1647 1464-5327
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34856656
source	Business Source Complete
subjects	Conjoint analysis Preferences Research methodology Transportation research Workshops
title	Dealing with Increased Complexity in Conjoint Experiments: Background and Overview of Alternate Approaches
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dealing%20with%20Increased%20Complexity%20in%20Conjoint%20Experiments:%20Background%20and%20Overview%20of%20Alternate%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=Transport%20reviews&rft.au=Timmermans,%20Harry%20J.P.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=557-567&rft.issn=0144-1647&rft.eissn=1464-5327&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01441640902827532&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1912812291%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216292372&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true