Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population
There is an extraordinary assortment of technical approaches to conserving carnivore populations, but the effectiveness of conservation activities is rarely evaluated. Accordingly, we initiated a study to assess the impact of several conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological conservation 2009-11, Vol.142 (11), p.2681-2690 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2690 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2681 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Balme, Guy A. Slotow, Rob Hunter, Luke T.B. |
description | There is an extraordinary assortment of technical approaches to conserving carnivore populations, but the effectiveness of conservation activities is rarely evaluated. Accordingly, we initiated a study to assess the impact of several conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a leopard (
Panthera pardus) population in Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. These included revisions of the statutory systems that regulate problem animal control and trophy hunting, and we instituted a program intended to reduce human–leopard conflict in the region. We compared demographic rates of radiocollared leopards from two sampling periods: a pre-treatment period prior to intervention, and a treatment period after intervention. The average annual mortality rate of the population decreased from 0.401
±
0.070 to 0.134
±
0.016, with fewer leopards killed by humans and in intraspecific clashes after intervention. The overall reproductive output of the population increased in the treatment period, although annual cub production was higher in the pre-treatment period. This was mainly due to larger litter sizes prior to intervention, which may have been a strategy used by female leopards to offset high levels of infanticide. Results from camera-trap surveys and a Leslie-matrix model indicated an increase in annual population growth rate (
λ) of 14–16% after the implementation of conservation measures. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing both the numerical and functional components of population dynamics when managing large carnivores exposed to hunting or persecution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34771206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320709002730</els_id><sourcerecordid>20800089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-58328f0bae6a21bc9363f1de7da4e735758d2cfdbc9a3fb8ef8cbdadd753f9eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV-L1TAQxYsoeF39BoJ5UdyH1vxpm_RFkEXXhQUF3ecwTSaaS29Sk3Zh_fSm28VHfUpm5ndOwpyqeslowyjr3x2b0UcTQ8MpHRraN5TTR9WBKSlqPjD5uDpQSvtacCqfVs9yPpZSir47VL-vTjOYhURHikHGdAuLj4H4sJQ7hq3IpDSWn0jsXYCTN5lAsGTGlH1eMBjc1HDfQLMuaMmEcYZkyVvyFUJRpjIt9ZrPyRzndbp_43n1xMGU8cXDeVbdfPr4_eJzff3l8uriw3VtWqWWulOCK0dHwB44G80geuGYRWmhRSk62SnLjbNlAsKNCp0yowVrZSfcgKM4q97svnOKv1bMiz75bHCaIGBcsxatlIzT_r8gp6rsTQ0FbHfQpJhzQqfn5E-Q7jSjektEH_WeiN4S0bTXJZEie_3gD9nA5BIE4_NfLeei7VupCvdq5xxEDT9SYW6-ccpEcVaKSVGI9zuBZW-3HpPOxm9JWJ_QLNpG_--v_AF8oLAW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20800089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Balme, Guy A. ; Slotow, Rob ; Hunter, Luke T.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balme, Guy A. ; Slotow, Rob ; Hunter, Luke T.B.</creatorcontrib><description>There is an extraordinary assortment of technical approaches to conserving carnivore populations, but the effectiveness of conservation activities is rarely evaluated. Accordingly, we initiated a study to assess the impact of several conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a leopard (
Panthera pardus) population in Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. These included revisions of the statutory systems that regulate problem animal control and trophy hunting, and we instituted a program intended to reduce human–leopard conflict in the region. We compared demographic rates of radiocollared leopards from two sampling periods: a pre-treatment period prior to intervention, and a treatment period after intervention. The average annual mortality rate of the population decreased from 0.401
±
0.070 to 0.134
±
0.016, with fewer leopards killed by humans and in intraspecific clashes after intervention. The overall reproductive output of the population increased in the treatment period, although annual cub production was higher in the pre-treatment period. This was mainly due to larger litter sizes prior to intervention, which may have been a strategy used by female leopards to offset high levels of infanticide. Results from camera-trap surveys and a Leslie-matrix model indicated an increase in annual population growth rate (
λ) of 14–16% after the implementation of conservation measures. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing both the numerical and functional components of population dynamics when managing large carnivores exposed to hunting or persecution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; carnivores ; conservation areas ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Evidence-based conservation ; Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) ; females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; human-wildlife relations ; Human–carnivore conflict ; landowners ; litter size ; mortality ; Panthera pardus ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Phinda–Mkhuze ; population dynamics ; population growth ; Problem animal control ; sport hunting ; Trophy hunting ; wildlife management ; young animals</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2009-11, Vol.142 (11), p.2681-2690</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-58328f0bae6a21bc9363f1de7da4e735758d2cfdbc9a3fb8ef8cbdadd753f9eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-58328f0bae6a21bc9363f1de7da4e735758d2cfdbc9a3fb8ef8cbdadd753f9eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320709002730$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22346478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balme, Guy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotow, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Luke T.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>There is an extraordinary assortment of technical approaches to conserving carnivore populations, but the effectiveness of conservation activities is rarely evaluated. Accordingly, we initiated a study to assess the impact of several conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a leopard (
Panthera pardus) population in Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. These included revisions of the statutory systems that regulate problem animal control and trophy hunting, and we instituted a program intended to reduce human–leopard conflict in the region. We compared demographic rates of radiocollared leopards from two sampling periods: a pre-treatment period prior to intervention, and a treatment period after intervention. The average annual mortality rate of the population decreased from 0.401
±
0.070 to 0.134
±
0.016, with fewer leopards killed by humans and in intraspecific clashes after intervention. The overall reproductive output of the population increased in the treatment period, although annual cub production was higher in the pre-treatment period. This was mainly due to larger litter sizes prior to intervention, which may have been a strategy used by female leopards to offset high levels of infanticide. Results from camera-trap surveys and a Leslie-matrix model indicated an increase in annual population growth rate (
λ) of 14–16% after the implementation of conservation measures. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing both the numerical and functional components of population dynamics when managing large carnivores exposed to hunting or persecution.</description><subject>animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carnivores</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Evidence-based conservation</subject><subject>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>human-wildlife relations</subject><subject>Human–carnivore conflict</subject><subject>landowners</subject><subject>litter size</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Panthera pardus</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Phinda–Mkhuze</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>Problem animal control</subject><subject>sport hunting</subject><subject>Trophy hunting</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>young animals</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV-L1TAQxYsoeF39BoJ5UdyH1vxpm_RFkEXXhQUF3ecwTSaaS29Sk3Zh_fSm28VHfUpm5ndOwpyqeslowyjr3x2b0UcTQ8MpHRraN5TTR9WBKSlqPjD5uDpQSvtacCqfVs9yPpZSir47VL-vTjOYhURHikHGdAuLj4H4sJQ7hq3IpDSWn0jsXYCTN5lAsGTGlH1eMBjc1HDfQLMuaMmEcYZkyVvyFUJRpjIt9ZrPyRzndbp_43n1xMGU8cXDeVbdfPr4_eJzff3l8uriw3VtWqWWulOCK0dHwB44G80geuGYRWmhRSk62SnLjbNlAsKNCp0yowVrZSfcgKM4q97svnOKv1bMiz75bHCaIGBcsxatlIzT_r8gp6rsTQ0FbHfQpJhzQqfn5E-Q7jSjektEH_WeiN4S0bTXJZEie_3gD9nA5BIE4_NfLeei7VupCvdq5xxEDT9SYW6-ccpEcVaKSVGI9zuBZW-3HpPOxm9JWJ_QLNpG_--v_AF8oLAW</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Balme, Guy A.</creator><creator>Slotow, Rob</creator><creator>Hunter, Luke T.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population</title><author>Balme, Guy A. ; Slotow, Rob ; Hunter, Luke T.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-58328f0bae6a21bc9363f1de7da4e735758d2cfdbc9a3fb8ef8cbdadd753f9eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carnivores</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Evidence-based conservation</topic><topic>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>human-wildlife relations</topic><topic>Human–carnivore conflict</topic><topic>landowners</topic><topic>litter size</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Panthera pardus</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Phinda–Mkhuze</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>Problem animal control</topic><topic>sport hunting</topic><topic>Trophy hunting</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>young animals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balme, Guy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotow, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Luke T.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balme, Guy A.</au><au>Slotow, Rob</au><au>Hunter, Luke T.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2681</spage><epage>2690</epage><pages>2681-2690</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>There is an extraordinary assortment of technical approaches to conserving carnivore populations, but the effectiveness of conservation activities is rarely evaluated. Accordingly, we initiated a study to assess the impact of several conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a leopard (
Panthera pardus) population in Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. These included revisions of the statutory systems that regulate problem animal control and trophy hunting, and we instituted a program intended to reduce human–leopard conflict in the region. We compared demographic rates of radiocollared leopards from two sampling periods: a pre-treatment period prior to intervention, and a treatment period after intervention. The average annual mortality rate of the population decreased from 0.401
±
0.070 to 0.134
±
0.016, with fewer leopards killed by humans and in intraspecific clashes after intervention. The overall reproductive output of the population increased in the treatment period, although annual cub production was higher in the pre-treatment period. This was mainly due to larger litter sizes prior to intervention, which may have been a strategy used by female leopards to offset high levels of infanticide. Results from camera-trap surveys and a Leslie-matrix model indicated an increase in annual population growth rate (
λ) of 14–16% after the implementation of conservation measures. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing both the numerical and functional components of population dynamics when managing large carnivores exposed to hunting or persecution.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.020</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2009-11, Vol.142 (11), p.2681-2690 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34771206 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | animal reproduction Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences carnivores conservation areas Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Evidence-based conservation Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology human-wildlife relations Human–carnivore conflict landowners litter size mortality Panthera pardus Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Phinda–Mkhuze population dynamics population growth Problem animal control sport hunting Trophy hunting wildlife management young animals |
title | Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard ( Panthera pardus) population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20conservation%20interventions%20on%20the%20dynamics%20and%20persistence%20of%20a%20persecuted%20leopard%20(%20Panthera%20pardus)%20population&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Balme,%20Guy%20A.&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2681&rft.epage=2690&rft.pages=2681-2690&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20800089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20800089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320709002730&rfr_iscdi=true |