Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software
Rigorous quality demonstration is important when developing safety-critical software such as a reactor protection system (RPS) for a nuclear power plant. Although using formal methods such as formal modeling and verification is strongly recommended, domain experts often reject formal methods for fou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE software 2009-05, Vol.26 (3), p.42-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | IEEE software |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Yoo, Junbeom Jee, Eunkyoung Cha, Sungdeok (Steve) |
description | Rigorous quality demonstration is important when developing safety-critical software such as a reactor protection system (RPS) for a nuclear power plant. Although using formal methods such as formal modeling and verification is strongly recommended, domain experts often reject formal methods for four reasons: there are too many candidate techniques, the notations appear complex, the tools often work only in isolation, and output is often too difficult for domain experts to understand. A formal-methods-based process that supports development, verification and validation, and safety analysis can help domain experts overcome these obstacles. Nuclear engineers can also use CASE tools to apply formal methods without having to know details of the underlying formalism. The authors spent more than seven years working with nuclear engineers in developing RPS software and applying formal methods. The engineers and regulatory personnel found the process effective and easy to apply with the integrated tool support. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MS.2009.67 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34751348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4814957</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>34751348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d3306619349528c4dfe6a45cc8a66c883533ce34633fa57574bccaf2261f3e283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxauXxYOCsDXZydeCFylWhRYPq15DzCaSst1oskX6702pePDgaWB4eJl3EDoleEIIrq8XzaTCuJ5wsYdGpAZRUlLTfTTCguJSUFYfoqOUlhhjRgCP0M0sxJXuikVobef790L3bfFqo3fe6MGHvgiuaLSzw6acRj_kbVc0wQ1fOtpjdOB0l-zJzxyjl9nd8_ShnD_dP05v56UBSoayBcCc52tozSppaOss15QZIzXnRkpgAMYC5QBOM8EEfTNGu6rixIGtJIzR5S73I4bPtU2DWvlkbNfp3oZ1UlIwDBhTluXFvxKoyL3pNvL8D1yGdexzC1URJkEC8IyudsjEkFK0Tn1Ev9JxowhW23-rRaO2_1ZcZHy2w95a-wupJLm1gG-PUni3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215838336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Yoo, Junbeom ; Jee, Eunkyoung ; Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Junbeom ; Jee, Eunkyoung ; Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</creatorcontrib><description>Rigorous quality demonstration is important when developing safety-critical software such as a reactor protection system (RPS) for a nuclear power plant. Although using formal methods such as formal modeling and verification is strongly recommended, domain experts often reject formal methods for four reasons: there are too many candidate techniques, the notations appear complex, the tools often work only in isolation, and output is often too difficult for domain experts to understand. A formal-methods-based process that supports development, verification and validation, and safety analysis can help domain experts overcome these obstacles. Nuclear engineers can also use CASE tools to apply formal methods without having to know details of the underlying formalism. The authors spent more than seven years working with nuclear engineers in developing RPS software and applying formal methods. The engineers and regulatory personnel found the process effective and easy to apply with the integrated tool support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-7459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MS.2009.67</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IESOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Alamitos: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automation ; Computer aided software engineering ; Computer programs ; Control systems ; Embedded software ; Failure analysis ; Formal method ; formal methods ; Formalism ; function block diagram (FBD) ; Language ; Logic testing ; modeling ; Nuclear engineering ; Nuclear power generation ; Nuclear power plants ; Nuclear reactors ; Product development ; Program verification (computers) ; Programmable control ; Protection systems ; Requirements analysis ; Safety management ; safety-critical software ; Semantics ; Software ; Software development ; Software engineering ; Software safety ; Software testing ; Software tools ; Subject specialists ; US Department of Transportation ; verification</subject><ispartof>IEEE software, 2009-05, Vol.26 (3), p.42-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright IEEE Computer Society May/Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d3306619349528c4dfe6a45cc8a66c883533ce34633fa57574bccaf2261f3e283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d3306619349528c4dfe6a45cc8a66c883533ce34633fa57574bccaf2261f3e283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4814957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4814957$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Junbeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jee, Eunkyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</creatorcontrib><title>Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software</title><title>IEEE software</title><addtitle>S-M</addtitle><description>Rigorous quality demonstration is important when developing safety-critical software such as a reactor protection system (RPS) for a nuclear power plant. Although using formal methods such as formal modeling and verification is strongly recommended, domain experts often reject formal methods for four reasons: there are too many candidate techniques, the notations appear complex, the tools often work only in isolation, and output is often too difficult for domain experts to understand. A formal-methods-based process that supports development, verification and validation, and safety analysis can help domain experts overcome these obstacles. Nuclear engineers can also use CASE tools to apply formal methods without having to know details of the underlying formalism. The authors spent more than seven years working with nuclear engineers in developing RPS software and applying formal methods. The engineers and regulatory personnel found the process effective and easy to apply with the integrated tool support.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Computer aided software engineering</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Embedded software</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Formal method</subject><subject>formal methods</subject><subject>Formalism</subject><subject>function block diagram (FBD)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Logic testing</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Nuclear engineering</subject><subject>Nuclear power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Program verification (computers)</subject><subject>Programmable control</subject><subject>Protection systems</subject><subject>Requirements analysis</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>safety-critical software</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software development</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software safety</subject><subject>Software testing</subject><subject>Software tools</subject><subject>Subject specialists</subject><subject>US Department of Transportation</subject><subject>verification</subject><issn>0740-7459</issn><issn>1937-4194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqxauXxYOCsDXZydeCFylWhRYPq15DzCaSst1oskX6702pePDgaWB4eJl3EDoleEIIrq8XzaTCuJ5wsYdGpAZRUlLTfTTCguJSUFYfoqOUlhhjRgCP0M0sxJXuikVobef790L3bfFqo3fe6MGHvgiuaLSzw6acRj_kbVc0wQ1fOtpjdOB0l-zJzxyjl9nd8_ShnD_dP05v56UBSoayBcCc52tozSppaOss15QZIzXnRkpgAMYC5QBOM8EEfTNGu6rixIGtJIzR5S73I4bPtU2DWvlkbNfp3oZ1UlIwDBhTluXFvxKoyL3pNvL8D1yGdexzC1URJkEC8IyudsjEkFK0Tn1Ev9JxowhW23-rRaO2_1ZcZHy2w95a-wupJLm1gG-PUni3</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Yoo, Junbeom</creator><creator>Jee, Eunkyoung</creator><creator>Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software</title><author>Yoo, Junbeom ; Jee, Eunkyoung ; Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d3306619349528c4dfe6a45cc8a66c883533ce34633fa57574bccaf2261f3e283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Computer aided software engineering</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Embedded software</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Formal method</topic><topic>formal methods</topic><topic>Formalism</topic><topic>function block diagram (FBD)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Logic testing</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Nuclear engineering</topic><topic>Nuclear power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Program verification (computers)</topic><topic>Programmable control</topic><topic>Protection systems</topic><topic>Requirements analysis</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>safety-critical software</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software development</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software safety</topic><topic>Software testing</topic><topic>Software tools</topic><topic>Subject specialists</topic><topic>US Department of Transportation</topic><topic>verification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Junbeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jee, Eunkyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE software</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoo, Junbeom</au><au>Jee, Eunkyoung</au><au>Cha, Sungdeok (Steve)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software</atitle><jtitle>IEEE software</jtitle><stitle>S-M</stitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>42-49</pages><issn>0740-7459</issn><eissn>1937-4194</eissn><coden>IESOEG</coden><abstract>Rigorous quality demonstration is important when developing safety-critical software such as a reactor protection system (RPS) for a nuclear power plant. Although using formal methods such as formal modeling and verification is strongly recommended, domain experts often reject formal methods for four reasons: there are too many candidate techniques, the notations appear complex, the tools often work only in isolation, and output is often too difficult for domain experts to understand. A formal-methods-based process that supports development, verification and validation, and safety analysis can help domain experts overcome these obstacles. Nuclear engineers can also use CASE tools to apply formal methods without having to know details of the underlying formalism. The authors spent more than seven years working with nuclear engineers in developing RPS software and applying formal methods. The engineers and regulatory personnel found the process effective and easy to apply with the integrated tool support.</abstract><cop>Los Alamitos</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MS.2009.67</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-7459 |
ispartof | IEEE software, 2009-05, Vol.26 (3), p.42-49 |
issn | 0740-7459 1937-4194 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34751348 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Automation Computer aided software engineering Computer programs Control systems Embedded software Failure analysis Formal method formal methods Formalism function block diagram (FBD) Language Logic testing modeling Nuclear engineering Nuclear power generation Nuclear power plants Nuclear reactors Product development Program verification (computers) Programmable control Protection systems Requirements analysis Safety management safety-critical software Semantics Software Software development Software engineering Software safety Software testing Software tools Subject specialists US Department of Transportation verification |
title | Formal Modeling and Verification of Safety-Critical Software |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formal%20Modeling%20and%20Verification%20of%20Safety-Critical%20Software&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20software&rft.au=Yoo,%20Junbeom&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=42-49&rft.issn=0740-7459&rft.eissn=1937-4194&rft.coden=IESOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MS.2009.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E34751348%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215838336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4814957&rfr_iscdi=true |