Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation
Recent developments in flood modeling have led to the concept of coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models. In this paper two coupled models are examined; a one-dimensional (1D) sewer model coupled with a 1D surface network model (1D/1D) and a 1D sewer model coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) surfac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2009-06, Vol.135 (6), p.495-504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 504 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 495 |
container_title | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Leandro, Jorge Chen, Albert S Djordjević, Slobodan Savić, Dragan A |
description | Recent developments in flood modeling have led to the concept of coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models. In this paper two coupled models are examined; a one-dimensional (1D) sewer model coupled with a 1D surface network model (1D/1D) and a 1D sewer model coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) surface flow model (1D/2D). Flow over the terrain is better modeled by 2D models, whereas in confined channels 1D models provide a good approximation with less computational effort. This paper presents a comparison of the simulation results of 1D/1D model and a 1D/2D model. The methodology adopted for setting up the models is outlined and explained in detail as well as the 1D/1D modeling techniques used for reproducing the 1D/2D model results. The surface flow comparison clarifies the limitations of the 1D/1D model and indicates that the definition of the surface pathways, the linking elements sewer/surface, and inclusion of virtual manholes are key factors for setting up a more accurate 1D/1D model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34731601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34731601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8bac3d1534796cee1f2758673ba2911b16298faa1adfc3fd5b10ef11705c51563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRsFbfYfEg7SHtTjbZNN5K2lqh4iH20NMySXYhJcnG3Qbp25tQ6c25zDDM98N8hDwDmwETMJ8s02Q93R5mEAfci2LGZmwoHt2Q0XV3S0Ys4tyLAz--Jw_OHRmDQMSLEcHE1C3a0pmGGk1hNYcVxaYYJn9FE9O1lSroJFU_ys7TzmrM1ZRuz4XFripz-mEKVTmqjaV7m2FDN5UxBU3LuqvwVJrmkdxprJx6-utjst-sv5Ktt_t8e0-WOw8D4Z-8RYY5LyDkQRSLXCnQfhQuRMQz9GOADIQfLzQiYKFzroswA6Y0QMTCPIRQ8DF5ueS21nx3yp1kXbpcVRU2ynRO9sEcBIP-8PVymFvjnFVatras0Z4lMDlYlXKwKrcHORiUg0H5Z7WHxQXGPlseTWeb_qkr-T_4C4hGegY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34731601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Leandro, Jorge ; Chen, Albert S ; Djordjević, Slobodan ; Savić, Dragan A</creator><creatorcontrib>Leandro, Jorge ; Chen, Albert S ; Djordjević, Slobodan ; Savić, Dragan A</creatorcontrib><description>Recent developments in flood modeling have led to the concept of coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models. In this paper two coupled models are examined; a one-dimensional (1D) sewer model coupled with a 1D surface network model (1D/1D) and a 1D sewer model coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) surface flow model (1D/2D). Flow over the terrain is better modeled by 2D models, whereas in confined channels 1D models provide a good approximation with less computational effort. This paper presents a comparison of the simulation results of 1D/1D model and a 1D/2D model. The methodology adopted for setting up the models is outlined and explained in detail as well as the 1D/1D modeling techniques used for reproducing the 1D/2D model results. The surface flow comparison clarifies the limitations of the 1D/1D model and indicates that the definition of the surface pathways, the linking elements sewer/surface, and inclusion of virtual manholes are key factors for setting up a more accurate 1D/1D model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9429</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-7900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7900</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2009-06, Vol.135 (6), p.495-504</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8bac3d1534796cee1f2758673ba2911b16298faa1adfc3fd5b10ef11705c51563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8bac3d1534796cee1f2758673ba2911b16298faa1adfc3fd5b10ef11705c51563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,76162,76170</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leandro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Albert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjević, Slobodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savić, Dragan A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation</title><title>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Recent developments in flood modeling have led to the concept of coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models. In this paper two coupled models are examined; a one-dimensional (1D) sewer model coupled with a 1D surface network model (1D/1D) and a 1D sewer model coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) surface flow model (1D/2D). Flow over the terrain is better modeled by 2D models, whereas in confined channels 1D models provide a good approximation with less computational effort. This paper presents a comparison of the simulation results of 1D/1D model and a 1D/2D model. The methodology adopted for setting up the models is outlined and explained in detail as well as the 1D/1D modeling techniques used for reproducing the 1D/2D model results. The surface flow comparison clarifies the limitations of the 1D/1D model and indicates that the definition of the surface pathways, the linking elements sewer/surface, and inclusion of virtual manholes are key factors for setting up a more accurate 1D/1D model.</description><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9429</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhhdRsFbfYfEg7SHtTjbZNN5K2lqh4iH20NMySXYhJcnG3Qbp25tQ6c25zDDM98N8hDwDmwETMJ8s02Q93R5mEAfci2LGZmwoHt2Q0XV3S0Ys4tyLAz--Jw_OHRmDQMSLEcHE1C3a0pmGGk1hNYcVxaYYJn9FE9O1lSroJFU_ys7TzmrM1ZRuz4XFripz-mEKVTmqjaV7m2FDN5UxBU3LuqvwVJrmkdxprJx6-utjst-sv5Ktt_t8e0-WOw8D4Z-8RYY5LyDkQRSLXCnQfhQuRMQz9GOADIQfLzQiYKFzroswA6Y0QMTCPIRQ8DF5ueS21nx3yp1kXbpcVRU2ynRO9sEcBIP-8PVymFvjnFVatras0Z4lMDlYlXKwKrcHORiUg0H5Z7WHxQXGPlseTWeb_qkr-T_4C4hGegY</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Leandro, Jorge</creator><creator>Chen, Albert S</creator><creator>Djordjević, Slobodan</creator><creator>Savić, Dragan A</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation</title><author>Leandro, Jorge ; Chen, Albert S ; Djordjević, Slobodan ; Savić, Dragan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8bac3d1534796cee1f2758673ba2911b16298faa1adfc3fd5b10ef11705c51563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leandro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Albert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjević, Slobodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savić, Dragan A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leandro, Jorge</au><au>Chen, Albert S</au><au>Djordjević, Slobodan</au><au>Savić, Dragan A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>495-504</pages><issn>0733-9429</issn><issn>1943-7900</issn><eissn>1943-7900</eissn><abstract>Recent developments in flood modeling have led to the concept of coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models. In this paper two coupled models are examined; a one-dimensional (1D) sewer model coupled with a 1D surface network model (1D/1D) and a 1D sewer model coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) surface flow model (1D/2D). Flow over the terrain is better modeled by 2D models, whereas in confined channels 1D models provide a good approximation with less computational effort. This paper presents a comparison of the simulation results of 1D/1D model and a 1D/2D model. The methodology adopted for setting up the models is outlined and explained in detail as well as the 1D/1D modeling techniques used for reproducing the 1D/2D model results. The surface flow comparison clarifies the limitations of the 1D/1D model and indicates that the definition of the surface pathways, the linking elements sewer/surface, and inclusion of virtual manholes are key factors for setting up a more accurate 1D/1D model.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9429 |
ispartof | Journal of hydraulic engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2009-06, Vol.135 (6), p.495-504 |
issn | 0733-9429 1943-7900 1943-7900 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34731601 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D Coupled (Sewer/Surface) Hydraulic Models for Urban Flood Simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A28%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%201D/1D%20and%201D/2D%20Coupled%20(Sewer/Surface)%20Hydraulic%20Models%20for%20Urban%20Flood%20Simulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydraulic%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Leandro,%20Jorge&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=495-504&rft.issn=0733-9429&rft.eissn=1943-7900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34731601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34731601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |