Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing
A major focus of conservation is on protecting areas to ensure the persistence of biological diversity. Because such areas may be large, not easily accessible, subject to change, and sensitive to the surrounding landscape, remote sensing can be a valuable tool in establishing and managing protected...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing of environment 2009-07, Vol.113 (7), p.1370-1381 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1381 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1370 |
container_title | Remote sensing of environment |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Wiens, John Sutter, Robert Anderson, Mark Blanchard, Jon Barnett, Analie Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa Avery, Chadwick Laine, Stephen |
description | A major focus of conservation is on protecting areas to ensure the persistence of biological diversity. Because such areas may be large, not easily accessible, subject to change, and sensitive to the surrounding landscape, remote sensing can be a valuable tool in establishing and managing protected areas. We describe three case studies to illustrate how remote sensing can contribute to setting priorities for conservation actions, monitoring the status of conservation targets, and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation strategies. In the Connecticut River watershed, remote sensing has been used to assess flood regimes and identify key areas of floodplain forests and their context for conservation planning. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, remote sensing has provided information to assess the effectiveness of management strategies to restore fire to the longleaf pine sandhills ecosystem, control invasive species, and prioritize annual prescribed burns. In eastern US forests, remote sensing is being used to evaluate the ecological condition and changes at properties where direct access would be difficult.
As the resolution and capacities of remote-sensing technology continue to develop, however, several issues are becoming increasingly important. It is essential that the spatial and temporal resolution of remote-sensing data be matched to the relevant scales of biodiversity, major threats, and management actions. Data layers must be compatible, both in scale and in measurement properties, and key patterns must be distinguished from irrelevant detail, especially at the finer scales of application in local management. Combining remote sensing with ground surveys can expand the array of information used in management and contribute to the ecological interpretation of remote-sensing data. Because conservation funds are always limited, remote sensing also must be cost effective. This requires balancing the wealth of detail afforded by ever-finer resolution of remote-sensing data with what is actually needed to implement sound conservation and management. Remote sensing is a valuable tool, but it is not a panacea for all of the challenges of conservation monitoring and management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34473495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425709000479</els_id><sourcerecordid>20603138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-98e0c18155ba1ee8e32eb442e7cb91c0f25a27c376c7b89c7ba8d7723888d59f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7jlxK3F-WiTwglNDBCTODDOUZu6kKlrRtJN2r8n0zjDxZal97Hsh5BrBjkDVt6u8hAx5wA6hzIHDidkwrSqMlAgT8kEQMhM8kKdk4sYVwCs0IpNyOs79mhHN3zSemip9UPEsDuMfZoj7XygjfOt22GIbtzf0eUX0uB7pL6jAdd-RBpxiAm5JGdd3Ue8-u1T8jF_XM6es8Xb08vsYZFZWeoxqzSCZZoVRVMzRI2CYyMlR2WbilnoeFFzZYUqrWp0lUqtW6W40Fq3RdWJKbk57t0E_73FOJq1ixb7dDH6bTRCSiVkVfwb5FCCYEKnIDsGbfAxBuzMJrh1HfaGgTn4NSuT_JqDXwOlSX4Tc39kML26cxhMtA4Hi60LyahpvfuD_gGM84Mv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20603138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wiens, John ; Sutter, Robert ; Anderson, Mark ; Blanchard, Jon ; Barnett, Analie ; Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa ; Avery, Chadwick ; Laine, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiens, John ; Sutter, Robert ; Anderson, Mark ; Blanchard, Jon ; Barnett, Analie ; Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa ; Avery, Chadwick ; Laine, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>A major focus of conservation is on protecting areas to ensure the persistence of biological diversity. Because such areas may be large, not easily accessible, subject to change, and sensitive to the surrounding landscape, remote sensing can be a valuable tool in establishing and managing protected areas. We describe three case studies to illustrate how remote sensing can contribute to setting priorities for conservation actions, monitoring the status of conservation targets, and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation strategies. In the Connecticut River watershed, remote sensing has been used to assess flood regimes and identify key areas of floodplain forests and their context for conservation planning. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, remote sensing has provided information to assess the effectiveness of management strategies to restore fire to the longleaf pine sandhills ecosystem, control invasive species, and prioritize annual prescribed burns. In eastern US forests, remote sensing is being used to evaluate the ecological condition and changes at properties where direct access would be difficult.
As the resolution and capacities of remote-sensing technology continue to develop, however, several issues are becoming increasingly important. It is essential that the spatial and temporal resolution of remote-sensing data be matched to the relevant scales of biodiversity, major threats, and management actions. Data layers must be compatible, both in scale and in measurement properties, and key patterns must be distinguished from irrelevant detail, especially at the finer scales of application in local management. Combining remote sensing with ground surveys can expand the array of information used in management and contribute to the ecological interpretation of remote-sensing data. Because conservation funds are always limited, remote sensing also must be cost effective. This requires balancing the wealth of detail afforded by ever-finer resolution of remote-sensing data with what is actually needed to implement sound conservation and management. Remote sensing is a valuable tool, but it is not a panacea for all of the challenges of conservation monitoring and management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Biodiversity ; Connecticut River ; Conservation ; Ecological monitoring ; Eglin Air Force Base ; Forest management ; Forests ; Management ; Monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2009-07, Vol.113 (7), p.1370-1381</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-98e0c18155ba1ee8e32eb442e7cb91c0f25a27c376c7b89c7ba8d7723888d59f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-98e0c18155ba1ee8e32eb442e7cb91c0f25a27c376c7b89c7ba8d7723888d59f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiens, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutter, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Analie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, Chadwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laine, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>A major focus of conservation is on protecting areas to ensure the persistence of biological diversity. Because such areas may be large, not easily accessible, subject to change, and sensitive to the surrounding landscape, remote sensing can be a valuable tool in establishing and managing protected areas. We describe three case studies to illustrate how remote sensing can contribute to setting priorities for conservation actions, monitoring the status of conservation targets, and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation strategies. In the Connecticut River watershed, remote sensing has been used to assess flood regimes and identify key areas of floodplain forests and their context for conservation planning. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, remote sensing has provided information to assess the effectiveness of management strategies to restore fire to the longleaf pine sandhills ecosystem, control invasive species, and prioritize annual prescribed burns. In eastern US forests, remote sensing is being used to evaluate the ecological condition and changes at properties where direct access would be difficult.
As the resolution and capacities of remote-sensing technology continue to develop, however, several issues are becoming increasingly important. It is essential that the spatial and temporal resolution of remote-sensing data be matched to the relevant scales of biodiversity, major threats, and management actions. Data layers must be compatible, both in scale and in measurement properties, and key patterns must be distinguished from irrelevant detail, especially at the finer scales of application in local management. Combining remote sensing with ground surveys can expand the array of information used in management and contribute to the ecological interpretation of remote-sensing data. Because conservation funds are always limited, remote sensing also must be cost effective. This requires balancing the wealth of detail afforded by ever-finer resolution of remote-sensing data with what is actually needed to implement sound conservation and management. Remote sensing is a valuable tool, but it is not a panacea for all of the challenges of conservation monitoring and management.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Connecticut River</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Eglin Air Force Base</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7jlxK3F-WiTwglNDBCTODDOUZu6kKlrRtJN2r8n0zjDxZal97Hsh5BrBjkDVt6u8hAx5wA6hzIHDidkwrSqMlAgT8kEQMhM8kKdk4sYVwCs0IpNyOs79mhHN3zSemip9UPEsDuMfZoj7XygjfOt22GIbtzf0eUX0uB7pL6jAdd-RBpxiAm5JGdd3Ue8-u1T8jF_XM6es8Xb08vsYZFZWeoxqzSCZZoVRVMzRI2CYyMlR2WbilnoeFFzZYUqrWp0lUqtW6W40Fq3RdWJKbk57t0E_73FOJq1ixb7dDH6bTRCSiVkVfwb5FCCYEKnIDsGbfAxBuzMJrh1HfaGgTn4NSuT_JqDXwOlSX4Tc39kML26cxhMtA4Hi60LyahpvfuD_gGM84Mv</recordid><startdate>20090715</startdate><enddate>20090715</enddate><creator>Wiens, John</creator><creator>Sutter, Robert</creator><creator>Anderson, Mark</creator><creator>Blanchard, Jon</creator><creator>Barnett, Analie</creator><creator>Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa</creator><creator>Avery, Chadwick</creator><creator>Laine, Stephen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090715</creationdate><title>Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing</title><author>Wiens, John ; Sutter, Robert ; Anderson, Mark ; Blanchard, Jon ; Barnett, Analie ; Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa ; Avery, Chadwick ; Laine, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-98e0c18155ba1ee8e32eb442e7cb91c0f25a27c376c7b89c7ba8d7723888d59f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Connecticut River</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Eglin Air Force Base</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiens, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutter, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Analie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, Chadwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laine, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiens, John</au><au>Sutter, Robert</au><au>Anderson, Mark</au><au>Blanchard, Jon</au><au>Barnett, Analie</au><au>Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Naikoa</au><au>Avery, Chadwick</au><au>Laine, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2009-07-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1370</spage><epage>1381</epage><pages>1370-1381</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>A major focus of conservation is on protecting areas to ensure the persistence of biological diversity. Because such areas may be large, not easily accessible, subject to change, and sensitive to the surrounding landscape, remote sensing can be a valuable tool in establishing and managing protected areas. We describe three case studies to illustrate how remote sensing can contribute to setting priorities for conservation actions, monitoring the status of conservation targets, and evaluating the effectiveness of conservation strategies. In the Connecticut River watershed, remote sensing has been used to assess flood regimes and identify key areas of floodplain forests and their context for conservation planning. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, remote sensing has provided information to assess the effectiveness of management strategies to restore fire to the longleaf pine sandhills ecosystem, control invasive species, and prioritize annual prescribed burns. In eastern US forests, remote sensing is being used to evaluate the ecological condition and changes at properties where direct access would be difficult.
As the resolution and capacities of remote-sensing technology continue to develop, however, several issues are becoming increasingly important. It is essential that the spatial and temporal resolution of remote-sensing data be matched to the relevant scales of biodiversity, major threats, and management actions. Data layers must be compatible, both in scale and in measurement properties, and key patterns must be distinguished from irrelevant detail, especially at the finer scales of application in local management. Combining remote sensing with ground surveys can expand the array of information used in management and contribute to the ecological interpretation of remote-sensing data. Because conservation funds are always limited, remote sensing also must be cost effective. This requires balancing the wealth of detail afforded by ever-finer resolution of remote-sensing data with what is actually needed to implement sound conservation and management. Remote sensing is a valuable tool, but it is not a panacea for all of the challenges of conservation monitoring and management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.020</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-4257 |
ispartof | Remote sensing of environment, 2009-07, Vol.113 (7), p.1370-1381 |
issn | 0034-4257 1879-0704 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34473495 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Arrays Biodiversity Connecticut River Conservation Ecological monitoring Eglin Air Force Base Forest management Forests Management Monitoring Remote sensing Strategy |
title | Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: The role of remote sensing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A44%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20and%20conserving%20lands%20for%20biodiversity:%20The%20role%20of%20remote%20sensing&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Wiens,%20John&rft.date=2009-07-15&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1370&rft.epage=1381&rft.pages=1370-1381&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20603138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20603138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425709000479&rfr_iscdi=true |