Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation
Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials chemistry and physics 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 519 |
container_title | Materials chemistry and physics |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | An, Quanzhang Li, Liuhe Hu, Tao Xin, Yunchang Fu, Ricky K.Y. Kwok, D.T.K. Cai, Xun Chu, Paul K. |
description | Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2
×
10
17
ions
cm
−2 and 5
×
10
16
ions
cm
−2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260
°C for 1
h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34471626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0254058409002296</els_id><sourcerecordid>34471626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v2zAMxYWiA5pm_Q7upTd71B_L9rEI1m5AgF22syDJNKIgslxJGZJvP6XZYdhlOxGP-D2C5CPkkUJDgcpP-8brbHfol905NQxgaEA0wPgNWdG-G2rOKbslK2CtqKHtxR25T2kPQDtK-YqcNsEvOroU5ipMVTi5UWdXRMTkUtazxUvfhmXBWOWIOuNYmXNlUPv64GasLrTzy0HP-WrV81gVmbwufY8xvRN_UR_Jh0kfEj78rmvy4-Xz982Xevvt9evmeVtb3vNcjwwsTmiMFNMwTIDIhcHWdG1vjLZG9pyxSYC0XW-t5ZpbajrAybZS9p3ka_J0nbvE8HbElJV3yeKhLILhmBQXoqOS_RtkIAXvaF_A4QraGFKKOKklOq_jWVFQl1DUXv0RirqEokCoEkrxbq5eLCf_dBhVsg7Lk0cX0WY1BvcfU34BdtOf6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20643718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</creator><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><description>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2
×
10
17
ions
cm
−2 and 5
×
10
16
ions
cm
−2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260
°C for 1
h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Beam-line ion implantation ; Copper ; Oxidation resistance ; Plasma immersion ion implantation</subject><ispartof>Materials chemistry and physics, 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liuhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Yunchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, D.T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><title>Materials chemistry and physics</title><description>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2
×
10
17
ions
cm
−2 and 5
×
10
16
ions
cm
−2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260
°C for 1
h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</description><subject>Beam-line ion implantation</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Oxidation resistance</subject><subject>Plasma immersion ion implantation</subject><issn>0254-0584</issn><issn>1879-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v2zAMxYWiA5pm_Q7upTd71B_L9rEI1m5AgF22syDJNKIgslxJGZJvP6XZYdhlOxGP-D2C5CPkkUJDgcpP-8brbHfol905NQxgaEA0wPgNWdG-G2rOKbslK2CtqKHtxR25T2kPQDtK-YqcNsEvOroU5ipMVTi5UWdXRMTkUtazxUvfhmXBWOWIOuNYmXNlUPv64GasLrTzy0HP-WrV81gVmbwufY8xvRN_UR_Jh0kfEj78rmvy4-Xz982Xevvt9evmeVtb3vNcjwwsTmiMFNMwTIDIhcHWdG1vjLZG9pyxSYC0XW-t5ZpbajrAybZS9p3ka_J0nbvE8HbElJV3yeKhLILhmBQXoqOS_RtkIAXvaF_A4QraGFKKOKklOq_jWVFQl1DUXv0RirqEokCoEkrxbq5eLCf_dBhVsg7Lk0cX0WY1BvcfU34BdtOf6A</recordid><startdate>20090815</startdate><enddate>20090815</enddate><creator>An, Quanzhang</creator><creator>Li, Liuhe</creator><creator>Hu, Tao</creator><creator>Xin, Yunchang</creator><creator>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creator><creator>Kwok, D.T.K.</creator><creator>Cai, Xun</creator><creator>Chu, Paul K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090815</creationdate><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><author>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Beam-line ion implantation</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Oxidation resistance</topic><topic>Plasma immersion ion implantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liuhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Yunchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, D.T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Materials chemistry and physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>An, Quanzhang</au><au>Li, Liuhe</au><au>Hu, Tao</au><au>Xin, Yunchang</au><au>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</au><au>Kwok, D.T.K.</au><au>Cai, Xun</au><au>Chu, Paul K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</atitle><jtitle>Materials chemistry and physics</jtitle><date>2009-08-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>519-522</pages><issn>0254-0584</issn><eissn>1879-3312</eissn><abstract>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2
×
10
17
ions
cm
−2 and 5
×
10
16
ions
cm
−2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260
°C for 1
h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0254-0584 |
ispartof | Materials chemistry and physics, 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522 |
issn | 0254-0584 1879-3312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34471626 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Beam-line ion implantation Copper Oxidation resistance Plasma immersion ion implantation |
title | Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20oxidation%20resistance%20of%20copper%20treated%20by%20beam-line%20ion%20implantation%20and%20plasma%20immersion%20ion%20implantation&rft.jtitle=Materials%20chemistry%20and%20physics&rft.au=An,%20Quanzhang&rft.date=2009-08-15&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=519-522&rft.issn=0254-0584&rft.eissn=1879-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34471626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20643718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0254058409002296&rfr_iscdi=true |