Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation

Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials chemistry and physics 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522
Hauptverfasser: An, Quanzhang, Li, Liuhe, Hu, Tao, Xin, Yunchang, Fu, Ricky K.Y., Kwok, D.T.K., Cai, Xun, Chu, Paul K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 2
container_start_page 519
container_title Materials chemistry and physics
container_volume 116
creator An, Quanzhang
Li, Liuhe
Hu, Tao
Xin, Yunchang
Fu, Ricky K.Y.
Kwok, D.T.K.
Cai, Xun
Chu, Paul K.
description Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2 × 10 17 ions cm −2 and 5 × 10 16 ions cm −2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260 °C for 1 h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34471626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0254058409002296</els_id><sourcerecordid>34471626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v2zAMxYWiA5pm_Q7upTd71B_L9rEI1m5AgF22syDJNKIgslxJGZJvP6XZYdhlOxGP-D2C5CPkkUJDgcpP-8brbHfol905NQxgaEA0wPgNWdG-G2rOKbslK2CtqKHtxR25T2kPQDtK-YqcNsEvOroU5ipMVTi5UWdXRMTkUtazxUvfhmXBWOWIOuNYmXNlUPv64GasLrTzy0HP-WrV81gVmbwufY8xvRN_UR_Jh0kfEj78rmvy4-Xz982Xevvt9evmeVtb3vNcjwwsTmiMFNMwTIDIhcHWdG1vjLZG9pyxSYC0XW-t5ZpbajrAybZS9p3ka_J0nbvE8HbElJV3yeKhLILhmBQXoqOS_RtkIAXvaF_A4QraGFKKOKklOq_jWVFQl1DUXv0RirqEokCoEkrxbq5eLCf_dBhVsg7Lk0cX0WY1BvcfU34BdtOf6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20643718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</creator><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><description>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2 × 10 17 ions cm −2 and 5 × 10 16 ions cm −2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260 °C for 1 h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Beam-line ion implantation ; Copper ; Oxidation resistance ; Plasma immersion ion implantation</subject><ispartof>Materials chemistry and physics, 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liuhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Yunchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, D.T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><title>Materials chemistry and physics</title><description>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2 × 10 17 ions cm −2 and 5 × 10 16 ions cm −2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260 °C for 1 h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</description><subject>Beam-line ion implantation</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Oxidation resistance</subject><subject>Plasma immersion ion implantation</subject><issn>0254-0584</issn><issn>1879-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v2zAMxYWiA5pm_Q7upTd71B_L9rEI1m5AgF22syDJNKIgslxJGZJvP6XZYdhlOxGP-D2C5CPkkUJDgcpP-8brbHfol905NQxgaEA0wPgNWdG-G2rOKbslK2CtqKHtxR25T2kPQDtK-YqcNsEvOroU5ipMVTi5UWdXRMTkUtazxUvfhmXBWOWIOuNYmXNlUPv64GasLrTzy0HP-WrV81gVmbwufY8xvRN_UR_Jh0kfEj78rmvy4-Xz982Xevvt9evmeVtb3vNcjwwsTmiMFNMwTIDIhcHWdG1vjLZG9pyxSYC0XW-t5ZpbajrAybZS9p3ka_J0nbvE8HbElJV3yeKhLILhmBQXoqOS_RtkIAXvaF_A4QraGFKKOKklOq_jWVFQl1DUXv0RirqEokCoEkrxbq5eLCf_dBhVsg7Lk0cX0WY1BvcfU34BdtOf6A</recordid><startdate>20090815</startdate><enddate>20090815</enddate><creator>An, Quanzhang</creator><creator>Li, Liuhe</creator><creator>Hu, Tao</creator><creator>Xin, Yunchang</creator><creator>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creator><creator>Kwok, D.T.K.</creator><creator>Cai, Xun</creator><creator>Chu, Paul K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090815</creationdate><title>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</title><author>An, Quanzhang ; Li, Liuhe ; Hu, Tao ; Xin, Yunchang ; Fu, Ricky K.Y. ; Kwok, D.T.K. ; Cai, Xun ; Chu, Paul K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-d20cefebb64f99f0ee34be5b758bbacb68322f406c78ccc3a3c1b70efc5668763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Beam-line ion implantation</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Oxidation resistance</topic><topic>Plasma immersion ion implantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>An, Quanzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liuhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Yunchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, D.T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Materials chemistry and physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>An, Quanzhang</au><au>Li, Liuhe</au><au>Hu, Tao</au><au>Xin, Yunchang</au><au>Fu, Ricky K.Y.</au><au>Kwok, D.T.K.</au><au>Cai, Xun</au><au>Chu, Paul K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation</atitle><jtitle>Materials chemistry and physics</jtitle><date>2009-08-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>519-522</pages><issn>0254-0584</issn><eissn>1879-3312</eissn><abstract>Copper which has many favorable properties such as low cost, high thermal and electrical conductivity, as well as easy fabrication and joining is one of the main materials in lead frames, interconnects, and foils in flexible circuits. Furthermore, copper is one of the best antibacterial materials. However, unlike aluminum oxide or chromium oxide, the surface copper oxide layer does not render sufficient protection against oxidation. In this work, in order to improve the surface oxidation resistance of Cu, Al and N were introduced into copper by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and beam-line ion implantation (BII). The implantation fluences of Al and N were 2 × 10 17 ions cm −2 and 5 × 10 16 ions cm −2, respectively. The implanted and untreated copper samples were oxidized in air at 260 °C for 1 h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicate that both implantation methods can enhance the oxidation resistance of copper but to different extent. PIII is superior to BII in enhancing the oxidation resistance of copper. The effects and possible mechanisms are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-0584
ispartof Materials chemistry and physics, 2009-08, Vol.116 (2), p.519-522
issn 0254-0584
1879-3312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34471626
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Beam-line ion implantation
Copper
Oxidation resistance
Plasma immersion ion implantation
title Comparison of oxidation resistance of copper treated by beam-line ion implantation and plasma immersion ion implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20oxidation%20resistance%20of%20copper%20treated%20by%20beam-line%20ion%20implantation%20and%20plasma%20immersion%20ion%20implantation&rft.jtitle=Materials%20chemistry%20and%20physics&rft.au=An,%20Quanzhang&rft.date=2009-08-15&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=519-522&rft.issn=0254-0584&rft.eissn=1879-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.04.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34471626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20643718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0254058409002296&rfr_iscdi=true