Defect states in HfO2 on deposited on Ge(1 1 1) and Ge(1 0 0) substrates
There is considerable interest in the direct bonding between Si and Ge substrates and high-K nano-crystalline transition metal elemental and complex oxides. Implicit in this is the elimination of lower-K interfacial transition regions (ITRs) in gate stacks which limit device down-scaling of advanced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied surface science 2009-04, Vol.255 (13-14), p.6443-6450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There is considerable interest in the direct bonding between Si and Ge substrates and high-K nano-crystalline transition metal elemental and complex oxides. Implicit in this is the elimination of lower-K interfacial transition regions (ITRs) in gate stacks which limit device down-scaling of advanced devices to meet roadmap targets. A novel approach is presented in this article for (i) deposition of HfO2 onto N-passivated Ge(1 1 1) and Ge(1 0 0) substrates, a process that also prevents subcutaneous oxidation of the Ge substrate during the deposition of nano-crystalline HfO2 and non-crystalline Hf Si oxynitride dielectrics as well, and (ii) the effective removal of Ge-N, during an 800 deg C rapid thermal annealing. Removal of Ge-N bonding has been confirmed by X-ray absorption N K1 spectra (XAS). However, even though X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies has indicated no detectable Ge-O bonding at the Ge-dielectric interfaces as-deposited, a significant amount of Ge-O bonding throughout the entire HfO2 film is detected by XPS and XAS after the 800 deg C anneal. Current-voltage measurements indicate significantly higher leakage for HfO2 films on Ge(1 1 1) compared with Ge(1 0 0). These correlate with differences in band edge defect state densities obtained from spectroscopic measurements, and are consistent with a more columnar, bonding morphology for direct bonding of HfO2 on Ge(1 1 1) than for Ge(1 0 0). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0169-4332 1873-5584 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.09.070 |