Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties

Carolina bays are shallow depression wetlands found in the southeastern United States that have been severely altered by human activity. The need to restore these complex and diverse systems is well established, but our limited understanding of wetland hydrologic processes in these systems hinders o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Restoration ecology 2008-12, Vol.16 (4), p.668-677
Hauptverfasser: Barton, Christopher D, Andrews, Danielle M, Kolka, Randall K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 677
container_issue 4
container_start_page 668
container_title Restoration ecology
container_volume 16
creator Barton, Christopher D
Andrews, Danielle M
Kolka, Randall K
description Carolina bays are shallow depression wetlands found in the southeastern United States that have been severely altered by human activity. The need to restore these complex and diverse systems is well established, but our limited understanding of wetland hydrologic processes in these systems hinders our ability to assess the effectiveness of bay restoration efforts. Carolina bays exhibit a wide range of moisture regimes from seasonally saturated to semipermanently inundated. Differing physicochemical properties of soils within bay interiors may control bay hydrology. However, previous efforts to establish relationships between soil characteristics and bay hydrology have been inconclusive. An assessment of soil and hydroperiod was initiated in 16 bays designated to be restored and 6 bays that were not restored (reference). Soil morphology was described, and permanent monitoring wells were installed at each site. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationships between the soil physicochemical characteristics and the bay hydroperiod for restored and reference bays in both pre- and postrestoration periods. A significant relationship (r²= 0.75, p= 0.02) between prerestoration hydroperiod and clay content in the argillic horizon (Bt) of the reference bays was observed. This relationship was then used to evaluate hydroperiod change in the restored bays from the postrestoration period. The relationship accurately identified sites that exhibited high prerestoration hydroperiods and did not need hydrologic restoration (n= 4) and effectively showed sites that exhibited substantial increases in hydroperiod due to the restoration activities (n= 7).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00480.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33598749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20271452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-e6d5550341a130fd494b348ab37905332a581f84f01ccfb454db4f3f7cffc1043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFv0zAUxiMEEmPjbyDiwC3hObYTR-ICVWknpjE2qnF7ch27c0njYqes-e9xFrQDl-GLP8vf771nf0mSEshJXO-3OeFFmRGAH3kBIHIAJiA_PktOHi-eRw0lyYq6Ii-TVyFsAQgXgp4km_lv2R5kb7tNuhwa7_baW9ek1zrsXRd0artR987rJp1J71rbyfSTHNJb3beya0K6CiN842ybXt0NwSqn7vTOKhnPD_V6q8NZ8sLINujXf_fTZPV5_n22zC6-Ls5nHy8yRbmATJcN5xwoI5JQMA2r2ZoyIde0qoFTWkguiBHMAFHKrBlnzZoZaipljCLA6Gnybqq79-7XIQ6OOxuUbuOo2h0CUsprUbH6SWMBRUUYL6Lx7T_GrTv4Lj4CC0IFA-BjWzGZlHcheG1w7-1O-gEJ4JgTbnGMA8c4cMwJH3LCY0Q_TOi9bfXw3xxez2dRRDybcBt6fXzEpf-JZUUrjreXC1x8I5Quqy-4jP43k99Ih3LjbcDVTQHxtwkvGYiK_gGJxbEr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213840054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Barton, Christopher D ; Andrews, Danielle M ; Kolka, Randall K</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Christopher D ; Andrews, Danielle M ; Kolka, Randall K</creatorcontrib><description>Carolina bays are shallow depression wetlands found in the southeastern United States that have been severely altered by human activity. The need to restore these complex and diverse systems is well established, but our limited understanding of wetland hydrologic processes in these systems hinders our ability to assess the effectiveness of bay restoration efforts. Carolina bays exhibit a wide range of moisture regimes from seasonally saturated to semipermanently inundated. Differing physicochemical properties of soils within bay interiors may control bay hydrology. However, previous efforts to establish relationships between soil characteristics and bay hydrology have been inconclusive. An assessment of soil and hydroperiod was initiated in 16 bays designated to be restored and 6 bays that were not restored (reference). Soil morphology was described, and permanent monitoring wells were installed at each site. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationships between the soil physicochemical characteristics and the bay hydroperiod for restored and reference bays in both pre- and postrestoration periods. A significant relationship (r²= 0.75, p= 0.02) between prerestoration hydroperiod and clay content in the argillic horizon (Bt) of the reference bays was observed. This relationship was then used to evaluate hydroperiod change in the restored bays from the postrestoration period. The relationship accurately identified sites that exhibited high prerestoration hydroperiods and did not need hydrologic restoration (n= 4) and effectively showed sites that exhibited substantial increases in hydroperiod due to the restoration activities (n= 7).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00480.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>argillic soil horizon ; Carolina bay ; Environmental restoration ; Geochemistry ; Hydrology ; restoration ; Soil testing ; wetland hydroperiod ; wetland soils ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2008-12, Vol.16 (4), p.668-677</ispartof><rights>2008 Society for Ecological Restoration International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-e6d5550341a130fd494b348ab37905332a581f84f01ccfb454db4f3f7cffc1043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-e6d5550341a130fd494b348ab37905332a581f84f01ccfb454db4f3f7cffc1043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2008.00480.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2008.00480.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Danielle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolka, Randall K</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Carolina bays are shallow depression wetlands found in the southeastern United States that have been severely altered by human activity. The need to restore these complex and diverse systems is well established, but our limited understanding of wetland hydrologic processes in these systems hinders our ability to assess the effectiveness of bay restoration efforts. Carolina bays exhibit a wide range of moisture regimes from seasonally saturated to semipermanently inundated. Differing physicochemical properties of soils within bay interiors may control bay hydrology. However, previous efforts to establish relationships between soil characteristics and bay hydrology have been inconclusive. An assessment of soil and hydroperiod was initiated in 16 bays designated to be restored and 6 bays that were not restored (reference). Soil morphology was described, and permanent monitoring wells were installed at each site. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationships between the soil physicochemical characteristics and the bay hydroperiod for restored and reference bays in both pre- and postrestoration periods. A significant relationship (r²= 0.75, p= 0.02) between prerestoration hydroperiod and clay content in the argillic horizon (Bt) of the reference bays was observed. This relationship was then used to evaluate hydroperiod change in the restored bays from the postrestoration period. The relationship accurately identified sites that exhibited high prerestoration hydroperiods and did not need hydrologic restoration (n= 4) and effectively showed sites that exhibited substantial increases in hydroperiod due to the restoration activities (n= 7).</description><subject>argillic soil horizon</subject><subject>Carolina bay</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>Soil testing</subject><subject>wetland hydroperiod</subject><subject>wetland soils</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFv0zAUxiMEEmPjbyDiwC3hObYTR-ICVWknpjE2qnF7ch27c0njYqes-e9xFrQDl-GLP8vf771nf0mSEshJXO-3OeFFmRGAH3kBIHIAJiA_PktOHi-eRw0lyYq6Ii-TVyFsAQgXgp4km_lv2R5kb7tNuhwa7_baW9ek1zrsXRd0artR987rJp1J71rbyfSTHNJb3beya0K6CiN842ybXt0NwSqn7vTOKhnPD_V6q8NZ8sLINujXf_fTZPV5_n22zC6-Ls5nHy8yRbmATJcN5xwoI5JQMA2r2ZoyIde0qoFTWkguiBHMAFHKrBlnzZoZaipljCLA6Gnybqq79-7XIQ6OOxuUbuOo2h0CUsprUbH6SWMBRUUYL6Lx7T_GrTv4Lj4CC0IFA-BjWzGZlHcheG1w7-1O-gEJ4JgTbnGMA8c4cMwJH3LCY0Q_TOi9bfXw3xxez2dRRDybcBt6fXzEpf-JZUUrjreXC1x8I5Quqy-4jP43k99Ih3LjbcDVTQHxtwkvGYiK_gGJxbEr</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Barton, Christopher D</creator><creator>Andrews, Danielle M</creator><creator>Kolka, Randall K</creator><general>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties</title><author>Barton, Christopher D ; Andrews, Danielle M ; Kolka, Randall K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-e6d5550341a130fd494b348ab37905332a581f84f01ccfb454db4f3f7cffc1043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>argillic soil horizon</topic><topic>Carolina bay</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>Soil testing</topic><topic>wetland hydroperiod</topic><topic>wetland soils</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Danielle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolka, Randall K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Christopher D</au><au>Andrews, Danielle M</au><au>Kolka, Randall K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>668</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>668-677</pages><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Carolina bays are shallow depression wetlands found in the southeastern United States that have been severely altered by human activity. The need to restore these complex and diverse systems is well established, but our limited understanding of wetland hydrologic processes in these systems hinders our ability to assess the effectiveness of bay restoration efforts. Carolina bays exhibit a wide range of moisture regimes from seasonally saturated to semipermanently inundated. Differing physicochemical properties of soils within bay interiors may control bay hydrology. However, previous efforts to establish relationships between soil characteristics and bay hydrology have been inconclusive. An assessment of soil and hydroperiod was initiated in 16 bays designated to be restored and 6 bays that were not restored (reference). Soil morphology was described, and permanent monitoring wells were installed at each site. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationships between the soil physicochemical characteristics and the bay hydroperiod for restored and reference bays in both pre- and postrestoration periods. A significant relationship (r²= 0.75, p= 0.02) between prerestoration hydroperiod and clay content in the argillic horizon (Bt) of the reference bays was observed. This relationship was then used to evaluate hydroperiod change in the restored bays from the postrestoration period. The relationship accurately identified sites that exhibited high prerestoration hydroperiods and did not need hydrologic restoration (n= 4) and effectively showed sites that exhibited substantial increases in hydroperiod due to the restoration activities (n= 7).</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00480.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-2971
ispartof Restoration ecology, 2008-12, Vol.16 (4), p.668-677
issn 1061-2971
1526-100X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33598749
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects argillic soil horizon
Carolina bay
Environmental restoration
Geochemistry
Hydrology
restoration
Soil testing
wetland hydroperiod
wetland soils
Wetlands
title Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Hydroperiod%20Response%20in%20Restored%20Carolina%20Bay%20Wetlands%20Using%20Soil%20Physicochemical%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Barton,%20Christopher%20D&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=668&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=668-677&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00480.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20271452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213840054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true