Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems

The paper describes the model software REPRO (REPROduction of soil fertility) designed for analyzing interlinked carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes in the system soil–plant–animal–environment. The model couples the balancing of C, N and energy fluxes with the target to estimate the climate-relevant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable agriculture and food systems 2008-03, Vol.23 (1), p.38-52
Hauptverfasser: Küstermann, Björn, Kainz, Maximilian, Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Renewable agriculture and food systems
container_volume 23
creator Küstermann, Björn
Kainz, Maximilian
Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen
description The paper describes the model software REPRO (REPROduction of soil fertility) designed for analyzing interlinked carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes in the system soil–plant–animal–environment. The model couples the balancing of C, N and energy fluxes with the target to estimate the climate-relevant CO2, CH4 and N2O sources and sinks of farming systems. For the determination of the net greenhouse effect, calculations of C sequestration in the soil, CO2 emissions from the use of fossil energy, CH4 emissions from livestock keeping and N2O emissions from the soil have been made. The results were converted into CO2 equivalents using its specific global warming potential (GWP). The model has been applied in the experimental farm Scheyern in southern Germany, which had been divided into an organic (org) and a conventional (con) farming system in 1992. Rather detailed series of long-term measuring data are available for the farm in Scheyern, which have been used for validating the software for its efficiency and applicability under very different management yet nearly equal site conditions. The organic farm is multi-structured with a legume-based crop rotation (N2 fixation: 83 kg ha−1 yr−1). The livestock density (LSU=Livestock Unit according to FAO) is 1.4 LSU ha−1. The farm is oriented on closed mass cycles; from the energetic point of view it represents a low-input system (energy input 4.5 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The conventional farm is a simple-structured cash crop system, based on mineral N (N input 145 kg ha−1 yr−1). Regarding the energy consumption, the system is run on high inputs (energy input 14.0 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The organic crop rotation reaches about 57% (8.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1) of the DM yield, about 66% (163 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the N removal and roughly 56% (3741 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the C fixation of the conventional crop rotation. In the organic rotation, 18 GJ per GJ of fossil energy input are bound in the harvested biomass vis-à-vis 11.1 GJ in the conventional rotation. The strongest influence on the greenhouse effect is exerted by C sequestration and N2O emissions. In Scheyern, C sequestration has set in under organic management (+0.37 Mg ha−1 yr−1), while humus depletion has been recorded in the conventional system (−0.25 Mg ha−1 yr−1). Greenhouse gas emissions (GGEs) due to fuel consumption and the use of machines are nearly on the same level in both crop rotations. However, the conventional system emits an additional 637 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1, which had been consume
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1742170507002062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33283234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1742170507002062</cupid><jstor_id>44473563</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44473563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-185e9df3450a4a712da62b368aa872e2ea2d10f63b25c693d0a4b92a54db27da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSNEJfr6ASwqWSzYpfjtZIkqaCtKK0S7tib2JM0liVs7F3H_PQ63ukhFFStbM985OjNTFG8ZPWWUmQ_fmZGcGaqooZRTzV8V-0upZIaJ17s_VW-Kg5RWmalqI_aL8DV4HPqpIw5iEybiNm7ARGDyBNPcjzD3uRpa0kXE6T6sE5IOEsGxTym3EmljGEmIHUy9-6NzYfqJ06KDgbQQx8U-bdKMYzoq9loYEh4_vYfF3edPt2cX5dXN-eXZx6vSyUrPJasU1r4VUlGQYBj3oHkjdAVQGY4cgXtGWy0arpyuhc9YU3NQ0jfceBCHxfut70MMj-s8ic15HQ4DTJhnsELwSnAh_wtyqqSkkmbw3TNwFdYxj5jNuKy1zIvOENtCLoaUIrb2IeYdxo1l1C6Hsv8cKmtOtppVmkPcCaSURii9eJbbfp83-GvXh_jDaiOMsvr8m1XiuhK3F9R-ybx4ygBjE3vf4d-kL6f4DRVLrkc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>324964713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Küstermann, Björn ; Kainz, Maximilian ; Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Küstermann, Björn ; Kainz, Maximilian ; Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>The paper describes the model software REPRO (REPROduction of soil fertility) designed for analyzing interlinked carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes in the system soil–plant–animal–environment. The model couples the balancing of C, N and energy fluxes with the target to estimate the climate-relevant CO2, CH4 and N2O sources and sinks of farming systems. For the determination of the net greenhouse effect, calculations of C sequestration in the soil, CO2 emissions from the use of fossil energy, CH4 emissions from livestock keeping and N2O emissions from the soil have been made. The results were converted into CO2 equivalents using its specific global warming potential (GWP). The model has been applied in the experimental farm Scheyern in southern Germany, which had been divided into an organic (org) and a conventional (con) farming system in 1992. Rather detailed series of long-term measuring data are available for the farm in Scheyern, which have been used for validating the software for its efficiency and applicability under very different management yet nearly equal site conditions. The organic farm is multi-structured with a legume-based crop rotation (N2 fixation: 83 kg ha−1 yr−1). The livestock density (LSU=Livestock Unit according to FAO) is 1.4 LSU ha−1. The farm is oriented on closed mass cycles; from the energetic point of view it represents a low-input system (energy input 4.5 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The conventional farm is a simple-structured cash crop system, based on mineral N (N input 145 kg ha−1 yr−1). Regarding the energy consumption, the system is run on high inputs (energy input 14.0 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The organic crop rotation reaches about 57% (8.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1) of the DM yield, about 66% (163 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the N removal and roughly 56% (3741 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the C fixation of the conventional crop rotation. In the organic rotation, 18 GJ per GJ of fossil energy input are bound in the harvested biomass vis-à-vis 11.1 GJ in the conventional rotation. The strongest influence on the greenhouse effect is exerted by C sequestration and N2O emissions. In Scheyern, C sequestration has set in under organic management (+0.37 Mg ha−1 yr−1), while humus depletion has been recorded in the conventional system (−0.25 Mg ha−1 yr−1). Greenhouse gas emissions (GGEs) due to fuel consumption and the use of machines are nearly on the same level in both crop rotations. However, the conventional system emits an additional 637 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1, which had been consumed in the manufacture of mineral N and pesticides in the upstream industry. Besides the analyses in the experimental farm Scheyern, the model has been applied in 28 commercial farms (18 org and 10 con) with comparable soil and climate conditions in the surroundings of Scheyern (mean distance 60 km). The program calculations are aimed at benchmarking the results obtained in the farming systems Scheyern; they are expected to disclose management-specific variations in the emission of climate-relevant gases and to rate the suitability of the model for describing such management-specific effects. In order to make the situation in the farms comparable, only the emissions from cropping systems were analyzed. Livestock keeping remained unconsidered. Due to lower N and energy inputs, clearly lower N2O and CO2 emissions were obtained for the organic farms than for the conventional systems. The analyses have shown possibilities for the optimization of management and the mitigation of GGE. Our findings underline that organic farming includes a high potential for C sequestration and the reduction of GGEs. Currently, the model REPRO is tested by 90 farms in the Federal Republic of Germany with the aim to apply it in the future not only in the field of research but also in the management of commercial farms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742170507002062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAAEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agricultural practices ; Agroecosystems ; C sequestration ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Cash crops ; Climate change ; Climatic conditions ; Commercial farms ; Comparative studies ; Computer based modeling ; Conventional farming ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Decomposing organic matter ; Energy consumption ; Experimental farms ; Farm buildings ; Farming ; farming system ; Farming systems ; Global warming ; global warming potential ; Greenhouse effect ; greenhouse gas emissions ; Greenhouse gases ; Humus ; Livestock ; Methane ; modeling ; Nitrogen fixation ; Nitrous oxide ; Organic farming ; Organic farms ; Pesticides ; Pollutant emissions ; REPRO ; Selected Research Papers from the First ISOFAR Conference, 2005 ; Soil fertility ; Soils ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2008-03, Vol.23 (1), p.38-52</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008</rights><rights>2008 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-185e9df3450a4a712da62b368aa872e2ea2d10f63b25c693d0a4b92a54db27da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-185e9df3450a4a712da62b368aa872e2ea2d10f63b25c693d0a4b92a54db27da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1742170507002062/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Küstermann, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainz, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><description>The paper describes the model software REPRO (REPROduction of soil fertility) designed for analyzing interlinked carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes in the system soil–plant–animal–environment. The model couples the balancing of C, N and energy fluxes with the target to estimate the climate-relevant CO2, CH4 and N2O sources and sinks of farming systems. For the determination of the net greenhouse effect, calculations of C sequestration in the soil, CO2 emissions from the use of fossil energy, CH4 emissions from livestock keeping and N2O emissions from the soil have been made. The results were converted into CO2 equivalents using its specific global warming potential (GWP). The model has been applied in the experimental farm Scheyern in southern Germany, which had been divided into an organic (org) and a conventional (con) farming system in 1992. Rather detailed series of long-term measuring data are available for the farm in Scheyern, which have been used for validating the software for its efficiency and applicability under very different management yet nearly equal site conditions. The organic farm is multi-structured with a legume-based crop rotation (N2 fixation: 83 kg ha−1 yr−1). The livestock density (LSU=Livestock Unit according to FAO) is 1.4 LSU ha−1. The farm is oriented on closed mass cycles; from the energetic point of view it represents a low-input system (energy input 4.5 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The conventional farm is a simple-structured cash crop system, based on mineral N (N input 145 kg ha−1 yr−1). Regarding the energy consumption, the system is run on high inputs (energy input 14.0 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The organic crop rotation reaches about 57% (8.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1) of the DM yield, about 66% (163 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the N removal and roughly 56% (3741 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the C fixation of the conventional crop rotation. In the organic rotation, 18 GJ per GJ of fossil energy input are bound in the harvested biomass vis-à-vis 11.1 GJ in the conventional rotation. The strongest influence on the greenhouse effect is exerted by C sequestration and N2O emissions. In Scheyern, C sequestration has set in under organic management (+0.37 Mg ha−1 yr−1), while humus depletion has been recorded in the conventional system (−0.25 Mg ha−1 yr−1). Greenhouse gas emissions (GGEs) due to fuel consumption and the use of machines are nearly on the same level in both crop rotations. However, the conventional system emits an additional 637 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1, which had been consumed in the manufacture of mineral N and pesticides in the upstream industry. Besides the analyses in the experimental farm Scheyern, the model has been applied in 28 commercial farms (18 org and 10 con) with comparable soil and climate conditions in the surroundings of Scheyern (mean distance 60 km). The program calculations are aimed at benchmarking the results obtained in the farming systems Scheyern; they are expected to disclose management-specific variations in the emission of climate-relevant gases and to rate the suitability of the model for describing such management-specific effects. In order to make the situation in the farms comparable, only the emissions from cropping systems were analyzed. Livestock keeping remained unconsidered. Due to lower N and energy inputs, clearly lower N2O and CO2 emissions were obtained for the organic farms than for the conventional systems. The analyses have shown possibilities for the optimization of management and the mitigation of GGE. Our findings underline that organic farming includes a high potential for C sequestration and the reduction of GGEs. Currently, the model REPRO is tested by 90 farms in the Federal Republic of Germany with the aim to apply it in the future not only in the field of research but also in the management of commercial farms.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agroecosystems</subject><subject>C sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cash crops</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Commercial farms</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer based modeling</subject><subject>Conventional farming</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Decomposing organic matter</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Experimental farms</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>farming system</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>global warming potential</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humus</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic farms</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pollutant emissions</subject><subject>REPRO</subject><subject>Selected Research Papers from the First ISOFAR Conference, 2005</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSNEJfr6ASwqWSzYpfjtZIkqaCtKK0S7tib2JM0liVs7F3H_PQ63ukhFFStbM985OjNTFG8ZPWWUmQ_fmZGcGaqooZRTzV8V-0upZIaJ17s_VW-Kg5RWmalqI_aL8DV4HPqpIw5iEybiNm7ARGDyBNPcjzD3uRpa0kXE6T6sE5IOEsGxTym3EmljGEmIHUy9-6NzYfqJ06KDgbQQx8U-bdKMYzoq9loYEh4_vYfF3edPt2cX5dXN-eXZx6vSyUrPJasU1r4VUlGQYBj3oHkjdAVQGY4cgXtGWy0arpyuhc9YU3NQ0jfceBCHxfut70MMj-s8ic15HQ4DTJhnsELwSnAh_wtyqqSkkmbw3TNwFdYxj5jNuKy1zIvOENtCLoaUIrb2IeYdxo1l1C6Hsv8cKmtOtppVmkPcCaSURii9eJbbfp83-GvXh_jDaiOMsvr8m1XiuhK3F9R-ybx4ygBjE3vf4d-kL6f4DRVLrkc</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Küstermann, Björn</creator><creator>Kainz, Maximilian</creator><creator>Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems</title><author>Küstermann, Björn ; Kainz, Maximilian ; Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-185e9df3450a4a712da62b368aa872e2ea2d10f63b25c693d0a4b92a54db27da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agroecosystems</topic><topic>C sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cash crops</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Commercial farms</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer based modeling</topic><topic>Conventional farming</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Decomposing organic matter</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Experimental farms</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>farming system</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>global warming potential</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humus</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic farms</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pollutant emissions</topic><topic>REPRO</topic><topic>Selected Research Papers from the First ISOFAR Conference, 2005</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Küstermann, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainz, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Küstermann, Björn</au><au>Kainz, Maximilian</au><au>Hülsbergen, Kurt-Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>38-52</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><coden>AJAAEZ</coden><abstract>The paper describes the model software REPRO (REPROduction of soil fertility) designed for analyzing interlinked carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fluxes in the system soil–plant–animal–environment. The model couples the balancing of C, N and energy fluxes with the target to estimate the climate-relevant CO2, CH4 and N2O sources and sinks of farming systems. For the determination of the net greenhouse effect, calculations of C sequestration in the soil, CO2 emissions from the use of fossil energy, CH4 emissions from livestock keeping and N2O emissions from the soil have been made. The results were converted into CO2 equivalents using its specific global warming potential (GWP). The model has been applied in the experimental farm Scheyern in southern Germany, which had been divided into an organic (org) and a conventional (con) farming system in 1992. Rather detailed series of long-term measuring data are available for the farm in Scheyern, which have been used for validating the software for its efficiency and applicability under very different management yet nearly equal site conditions. The organic farm is multi-structured with a legume-based crop rotation (N2 fixation: 83 kg ha−1 yr−1). The livestock density (LSU=Livestock Unit according to FAO) is 1.4 LSU ha−1. The farm is oriented on closed mass cycles; from the energetic point of view it represents a low-input system (energy input 4.5 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The conventional farm is a simple-structured cash crop system, based on mineral N (N input 145 kg ha−1 yr−1). Regarding the energy consumption, the system is run on high inputs (energy input 14.0 GJ ha−1 yr−1). The organic crop rotation reaches about 57% (8.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1) of the DM yield, about 66% (163 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the N removal and roughly 56% (3741 kg ha−1 yr−1) of the C fixation of the conventional crop rotation. In the organic rotation, 18 GJ per GJ of fossil energy input are bound in the harvested biomass vis-à-vis 11.1 GJ in the conventional rotation. The strongest influence on the greenhouse effect is exerted by C sequestration and N2O emissions. In Scheyern, C sequestration has set in under organic management (+0.37 Mg ha−1 yr−1), while humus depletion has been recorded in the conventional system (−0.25 Mg ha−1 yr−1). Greenhouse gas emissions (GGEs) due to fuel consumption and the use of machines are nearly on the same level in both crop rotations. However, the conventional system emits an additional 637 kg CO2 eq ha−1 yr−1, which had been consumed in the manufacture of mineral N and pesticides in the upstream industry. Besides the analyses in the experimental farm Scheyern, the model has been applied in 28 commercial farms (18 org and 10 con) with comparable soil and climate conditions in the surroundings of Scheyern (mean distance 60 km). The program calculations are aimed at benchmarking the results obtained in the farming systems Scheyern; they are expected to disclose management-specific variations in the emission of climate-relevant gases and to rate the suitability of the model for describing such management-specific effects. In order to make the situation in the farms comparable, only the emissions from cropping systems were analyzed. Livestock keeping remained unconsidered. Due to lower N and energy inputs, clearly lower N2O and CO2 emissions were obtained for the organic farms than for the conventional systems. The analyses have shown possibilities for the optimization of management and the mitigation of GGE. Our findings underline that organic farming includes a high potential for C sequestration and the reduction of GGEs. Currently, the model REPRO is tested by 90 farms in the Federal Republic of Germany with the aim to apply it in the future not only in the field of research but also in the management of commercial farms.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742170507002062</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-1705
ispartof Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2008-03, Vol.23 (1), p.38-52
issn 1742-1705
1742-1713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33283234
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural management
Agricultural practices
Agroecosystems
C sequestration
Carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon sequestration
Cash crops
Climate change
Climatic conditions
Commercial farms
Comparative studies
Computer based modeling
Conventional farming
Crop rotation
Cropping systems
Decomposing organic matter
Energy consumption
Experimental farms
Farm buildings
Farming
farming system
Farming systems
Global warming
global warming potential
Greenhouse effect
greenhouse gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Humus
Livestock
Methane
modeling
Nitrogen fixation
Nitrous oxide
Organic farming
Organic farms
Pesticides
Pollutant emissions
REPRO
Selected Research Papers from the First ISOFAR Conference, 2005
Soil fertility
Soils
Sustainable agriculture
title Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A12%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20carbon%20cycles%20and%20estimation%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20organic%20and%20conventional%20farming%20systems&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=K%C3%BCstermann,%20Bj%C3%B6rn&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=38-52&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft.coden=AJAAEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742170507002062&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44473563%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=324964713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1742170507002062&rft_jstor_id=44473563&rfr_iscdi=true