Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss
According to the Federal Highway Administration’s Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) Manual and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Reference Manual, the exit loss associated with a culvert discharging into a downstream channel is equal to the change in culver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2008-04, Vol.134 (2), p.263-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Tullis, B. P Robinson, S. C |
description | According to the Federal Highway Administration’s Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) Manual and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Reference Manual, the exit loss associated with a culvert discharging into a downstream channel is equal to the change in culvert and channel velocity heads or a loss coefficient multiplied by the culvert velocity head. For a short culvert, the calculated exit loss often represents the largest single system energy loss component. To investigate the apparent dominance of exit loss in outlet control culvert hydraulics, a laboratory culvert exit loss study was conducted using prototype-scale culverts, with projecting end treatments, discharging into a downstream channel where all of the channel discharge was supplied by the culvert. The experimentally determined exit losses were compared with predicted exit loss values using traditional exit loss equations and the Borda–Carnot minor loss expression, which is traditionally used to quantify energy loss at sudden expansions in pressurized pipe flow. The Borda–Carnot expression proved to be significantly more accurate, relative to traditional methods, for the conditions tested. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33117435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21017654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-4d3dd41ffdc6d8b70b09c65e37dee3e792faf35d3f3aa0fd0bddd7782d9e7b7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QdyLuj1Ubz7atHsQRpkfMBCZew5pk4yOrp1JK-7fm9KxR326EA4n9x6E7jE8YIjw43i2TOcT4JQGCaN8TADiCaZsSsYkopMTNMD-PWCcs1M0OHLn6MK5DQBmHGCArj9aWTWF2RfVepS25be2zWj-UzSjRe3cJTozsnT66jCHaPU8_0xfg8X7y1s6WwTSG5uAKaoUw8aoPFJxxiGDJI9CTbnSmmqeECMNDRU1VEowCjKlFOcxUYnmGdd0iO56787WX612jdgWLtdlKStdt05QijFnNPwXJBgwj0LmwacezK2_w2ojdrbYSrsXGETXT4iun-i6iK6L6PoJ308Q4ft5we3hJ-lyWRorq7xwRwsBwpIwSTx303NG1kKurWdWSwKYel0c8bgjpj3hRVps6tZWvuVxj7_X-AXE54sV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21017654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Tullis, B. P ; Robinson, S. C</creator><creatorcontrib>Tullis, B. P ; Robinson, S. C</creatorcontrib><description>According to the Federal Highway Administration’s Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) Manual and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Reference Manual, the exit loss associated with a culvert discharging into a downstream channel is equal to the change in culvert and channel velocity heads or a loss coefficient multiplied by the culvert velocity head. For a short culvert, the calculated exit loss often represents the largest single system energy loss component. To investigate the apparent dominance of exit loss in outlet control culvert hydraulics, a laboratory culvert exit loss study was conducted using prototype-scale culverts, with projecting end treatments, discharging into a downstream channel where all of the channel discharge was supplied by the culvert. The experimentally determined exit losses were compared with predicted exit loss values using traditional exit loss equations and the Borda–Carnot minor loss expression, which is traditionally used to quantify energy loss at sudden expansions in pressurized pipe flow. The Borda–Carnot expression proved to be significantly more accurate, relative to traditional methods, for the conditions tested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDEDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; drainage channels ; equations ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; hydraulic structures ; Irrigation. Drainage ; pipes ; quantitative analysis ; TECHNICAL NOTES ; water flow</subject><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-04, Vol.134 (2), p.263-266</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-4d3dd41ffdc6d8b70b09c65e37dee3e792faf35d3f3aa0fd0bddd7782d9e7b7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-4d3dd41ffdc6d8b70b09c65e37dee3e792faf35d3f3aa0fd0bddd7782d9e7b7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20249599$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tullis, B. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S. C</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>According to the Federal Highway Administration’s Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) Manual and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Reference Manual, the exit loss associated with a culvert discharging into a downstream channel is equal to the change in culvert and channel velocity heads or a loss coefficient multiplied by the culvert velocity head. For a short culvert, the calculated exit loss often represents the largest single system energy loss component. To investigate the apparent dominance of exit loss in outlet control culvert hydraulics, a laboratory culvert exit loss study was conducted using prototype-scale culverts, with projecting end treatments, discharging into a downstream channel where all of the channel discharge was supplied by the culvert. The experimentally determined exit losses were compared with predicted exit loss values using traditional exit loss equations and the Borda–Carnot minor loss expression, which is traditionally used to quantify energy loss at sudden expansions in pressurized pipe flow. The Borda–Carnot expression proved to be significantly more accurate, relative to traditional methods, for the conditions tested.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>drainage channels</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>hydraulic structures</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>pipes</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>TECHNICAL NOTES</subject><subject>water flow</subject><issn>0733-9437</issn><issn>1943-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QdyLuj1Ubz7atHsQRpkfMBCZew5pk4yOrp1JK-7fm9KxR326EA4n9x6E7jE8YIjw43i2TOcT4JQGCaN8TADiCaZsSsYkopMTNMD-PWCcs1M0OHLn6MK5DQBmHGCArj9aWTWF2RfVepS25be2zWj-UzSjRe3cJTozsnT66jCHaPU8_0xfg8X7y1s6WwTSG5uAKaoUw8aoPFJxxiGDJI9CTbnSmmqeECMNDRU1VEowCjKlFOcxUYnmGdd0iO56787WX612jdgWLtdlKStdt05QijFnNPwXJBgwj0LmwacezK2_w2ojdrbYSrsXGETXT4iun-i6iK6L6PoJ308Q4ft5we3hJ-lyWRorq7xwRwsBwpIwSTx303NG1kKurWdWSwKYel0c8bgjpj3hRVps6tZWvuVxj7_X-AXE54sV</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Tullis, B. P</creator><creator>Robinson, S. C</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss</title><author>Tullis, B. P ; Robinson, S. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-4d3dd41ffdc6d8b70b09c65e37dee3e792faf35d3f3aa0fd0bddd7782d9e7b7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>drainage channels</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>hydraulic structures</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>pipes</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>TECHNICAL NOTES</topic><topic>water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tullis, B. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S. C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tullis, B. P</au><au>Robinson, S. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>263-266</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><eissn>1943-4774</eissn><coden>JIDEDH</coden><abstract>According to the Federal Highway Administration’s Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) Manual and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Reference Manual, the exit loss associated with a culvert discharging into a downstream channel is equal to the change in culvert and channel velocity heads or a loss coefficient multiplied by the culvert velocity head. For a short culvert, the calculated exit loss often represents the largest single system energy loss component. To investigate the apparent dominance of exit loss in outlet control culvert hydraulics, a laboratory culvert exit loss study was conducted using prototype-scale culverts, with projecting end treatments, discharging into a downstream channel where all of the channel discharge was supplied by the culvert. The experimentally determined exit losses were compared with predicted exit loss values using traditional exit loss equations and the Borda–Carnot minor loss expression, which is traditionally used to quantify energy loss at sudden expansions in pressurized pipe flow. The Borda–Carnot expression proved to be significantly more accurate, relative to traditional methods, for the conditions tested.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263)</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9437 |
ispartof | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-04, Vol.134 (2), p.263-266 |
issn | 0733-9437 1943-4774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33117435 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences drainage channels equations Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production hydraulic structures Irrigation. Drainage pipes quantitative analysis TECHNICAL NOTES water flow |
title | Quantifying Culvert Exit Loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A42%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Culvert%20Exit%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Tullis,%20B.%20P&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=263-266&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft.eissn=1943-4774&rft.coden=JIDEDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(263)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21017654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21017654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |