Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control
The hydraulic characteristics of multi- and single-barrel circular culverts were compared in this study. One-, two-, and three-barrel culverts configurations, operating under inlet control, were tested in the laboratory with various approach conditions and barrel spacing (horizontal and vertical). T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2008-08, Vol.134 (4), p.507-514 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 514 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Haderlie, Gary M Tullis, Blake P |
description | The hydraulic characteristics of multi- and single-barrel circular culverts were compared in this study. One-, two-, and three-barrel culverts configurations, operating under inlet control, were tested in the laboratory with various approach conditions and barrel spacing (horizontal and vertical). The single-barrel head-discharge relationship was consistent with the average head-discharge relationship of the individual barrels in a multibarrel culvert configuration with a uniform upstream approach flow and uniform invert elevations. For the nonuniform approach flow condition, the single-barrel model overpredicted the average-barrel flow by up to 10%. With the middle barrel installed at a lower elevation than the outside barrels, in submerged flow the single-barrel head discharge relationship was consistent with the outside barrels, but the middle barrel was up to 7% more efficient than the single-barrel discharge. The flow rate variations are attributed, in part, to a reduction in approach flow contraction entering the center culvert in the three-culvert configuration and a nonuniform distribution of intermittently forming surface vortices at the culvert inlets. The results of a state (United States) Department of Transportation survey regarding multiple culvert use are also presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32946607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19663690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-3d98c227eb4f961f99f20bf83d9ab0d5a5e90fe762a8a76ab80378e6154d66203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAYhoMoOKf_Qy_qdqh--dGk2UEYZbrBxIN6DmmbQEfWzqQV9t_burGjnj54eXhfvgehewwPGDh-nMzfs8UUBKWxZFRMCEA6xZTN2CQBMT1DI9znMROCnaPRibtEVyFsADATACPEl_vS685VRYgaG712rq1y7b1xUda5b-PbEHV1aXy0qp1po6ypW9-4a3RhtQvm5njH6PN58ZEt4_Xbyyqbr2PNMG1jWsq0IESYnFnJsZXSEsht2uc6hzLRiZFgjeBEp1pwnadARWo4TljJOQE6RneH3p1vvjoTWrWtQmGc07VpuqAokYzz_rn_QCw5p1wOjU8HsPBNCN5YtfPVVvu9wqAGsUoNYtUgTA3C1CBW9WIVU8nv0u1xSYdCO-t1XVTh1EIgoYRw2XOzA9djRm2azte9qdPK3yM_K3GJwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19663690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Haderlie, Gary M ; Tullis, Blake P</creator><creatorcontrib>Haderlie, Gary M ; Tullis, Blake P</creatorcontrib><description>The hydraulic characteristics of multi- and single-barrel circular culverts were compared in this study. One-, two-, and three-barrel culverts configurations, operating under inlet control, were tested in the laboratory with various approach conditions and barrel spacing (horizontal and vertical). The single-barrel head-discharge relationship was consistent with the average head-discharge relationship of the individual barrels in a multibarrel culvert configuration with a uniform upstream approach flow and uniform invert elevations. For the nonuniform approach flow condition, the single-barrel model overpredicted the average-barrel flow by up to 10%. With the middle barrel installed at a lower elevation than the outside barrels, in submerged flow the single-barrel head discharge relationship was consistent with the outside barrels, but the middle barrel was up to 7% more efficient than the single-barrel discharge. The flow rate variations are attributed, in part, to a reduction in approach flow contraction entering the center culvert in the three-culvert configuration and a nonuniform distribution of intermittently forming surface vortices at the culvert inlets. The results of a state (United States) Department of Transportation survey regarding multiple culvert use are also presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDEDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Irrigation. Drainage ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-08, Vol.134 (4), p.507-514</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-3d98c227eb4f961f99f20bf83d9ab0d5a5e90fe762a8a76ab80378e6154d66203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-3d98c227eb4f961f99f20bf83d9ab0d5a5e90fe762a8a76ab80378e6154d66203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20532269$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haderlie, Gary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Blake P</creatorcontrib><title>Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>The hydraulic characteristics of multi- and single-barrel circular culverts were compared in this study. One-, two-, and three-barrel culverts configurations, operating under inlet control, were tested in the laboratory with various approach conditions and barrel spacing (horizontal and vertical). The single-barrel head-discharge relationship was consistent with the average head-discharge relationship of the individual barrels in a multibarrel culvert configuration with a uniform upstream approach flow and uniform invert elevations. For the nonuniform approach flow condition, the single-barrel model overpredicted the average-barrel flow by up to 10%. With the middle barrel installed at a lower elevation than the outside barrels, in submerged flow the single-barrel head discharge relationship was consistent with the outside barrels, but the middle barrel was up to 7% more efficient than the single-barrel discharge. The flow rate variations are attributed, in part, to a reduction in approach flow contraction entering the center culvert in the three-culvert configuration and a nonuniform distribution of intermittently forming surface vortices at the culvert inlets. The results of a state (United States) Department of Transportation survey regarding multiple culvert use are also presented.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9437</issn><issn>1943-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAYhoMoOKf_Qy_qdqh--dGk2UEYZbrBxIN6DmmbQEfWzqQV9t_burGjnj54eXhfvgehewwPGDh-nMzfs8UUBKWxZFRMCEA6xZTN2CQBMT1DI9znMROCnaPRibtEVyFsADATACPEl_vS685VRYgaG712rq1y7b1xUda5b-PbEHV1aXy0qp1po6ypW9-4a3RhtQvm5njH6PN58ZEt4_Xbyyqbr2PNMG1jWsq0IESYnFnJsZXSEsht2uc6hzLRiZFgjeBEp1pwnadARWo4TljJOQE6RneH3p1vvjoTWrWtQmGc07VpuqAokYzz_rn_QCw5p1wOjU8HsPBNCN5YtfPVVvu9wqAGsUoNYtUgTA3C1CBW9WIVU8nv0u1xSYdCO-t1XVTh1EIgoYRw2XOzA9djRm2azte9qdPK3yM_K3GJwA</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Haderlie, Gary M</creator><creator>Tullis, Blake P</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control</title><author>Haderlie, Gary M ; Tullis, Blake P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-3d98c227eb4f961f99f20bf83d9ab0d5a5e90fe762a8a76ab80378e6154d66203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haderlie, Gary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Blake P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haderlie, Gary M</au><au>Tullis, Blake P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>507-514</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><eissn>1943-4774</eissn><coden>JIDEDH</coden><abstract>The hydraulic characteristics of multi- and single-barrel circular culverts were compared in this study. One-, two-, and three-barrel culverts configurations, operating under inlet control, were tested in the laboratory with various approach conditions and barrel spacing (horizontal and vertical). The single-barrel head-discharge relationship was consistent with the average head-discharge relationship of the individual barrels in a multibarrel culvert configuration with a uniform upstream approach flow and uniform invert elevations. For the nonuniform approach flow condition, the single-barrel model overpredicted the average-barrel flow by up to 10%. With the middle barrel installed at a lower elevation than the outside barrels, in submerged flow the single-barrel head discharge relationship was consistent with the outside barrels, but the middle barrel was up to 7% more efficient than the single-barrel discharge. The flow rate variations are attributed, in part, to a reduction in approach flow contraction entering the center culvert in the three-culvert configuration and a nonuniform distribution of intermittently forming surface vortices at the culvert inlets. The results of a state (United States) Department of Transportation survey regarding multiple culvert use are also presented.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9437 |
ispartof | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-08, Vol.134 (4), p.507-514 |
issn | 0733-9437 1943-4774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32946607 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Irrigation. Drainage TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Hydraulics of Multibarrel Culverts under Inlet Control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A36%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydraulics%20of%20Multibarrel%20Culverts%20under%20Inlet%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Haderlie,%20Gary%20M&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=507-514&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft.eissn=1943-4774&rft.coden=JIDEDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(507)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19663690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19663690&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |