Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro

Zirconia, a biomaterial widely used in dentistry, has recently attracted much attention for its mechanical strength and toughness. Previously, its lack of mutagenic and carcinogenic power was reported. We describe here other essential aspects to be taken into account to define in vitro the biocompat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 2008-09, Vol.86A (4), p.959-968
Hauptverfasser: Raffaelli, Luca, Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi, Piccioni, Elisabetta, Toesca, Amelia, Serini, Simona, Resci, Federica, Missori, Mauro, De Spirito, Marco, Manicone, Paolo F., Calviello, Gabriella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 968
container_issue 4
container_start_page 959
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
container_volume 86A
creator Raffaelli, Luca
Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi
Piccioni, Elisabetta
Toesca, Amelia
Serini, Simona
Resci, Federica
Missori, Mauro
De Spirito, Marco
Manicone, Paolo F.
Calviello, Gabriella
description Zirconia, a biomaterial widely used in dentistry, has recently attracted much attention for its mechanical strength and toughness. Previously, its lack of mutagenic and carcinogenic power was reported. We describe here other essential aspects to be taken into account to define in vitro the biocompatibility of a material: the growth rate, viability, and adhesion capacity of normal stabilized cells growing on it. To this aim, immortalized RAT‐1 fibroblasts, growing either on zirconia and on feldspatic (FE) ceramics were compared. In particular, the level of expression and the intra‐ and extra‐cellular organization of fibronectin, a glycoprotein involved in cellular adhesion and migration during tissue repair, was analyzed. Fibroblasts cultured on zirconia showed a higher growth rate, and underwent necrosis at lower levels than cells on FE ceramic, whereas either materials did not stimulate apoptosis. Adhesion capacity of fibroblasts was evaluated measuring adherent cell nucleic acids with the fluorimetric CyQuant® assay, and it was found significantly higher in cells cultured on zirconia than on FE ceramic. This finding may be explained by the higher and more precocious expression of the adhesion protein fibronectin observed by indirect immunofluorescence in fibroblasts on zirconia. Overall, the results suggest that zirconia, exerting low cytotoxicity and strongly inducing adhesion capacity, increases cellular growth rate of fibroblasts. All these features suggest that zirconia could represent a more suitable biomaterial than FE ceramic for prosthesis in dentistry. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.a.31693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32906979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32906979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-58aab07dd9045e8fa17025b0b520a70e2716ce25c00e57f8f25b9541f2e3fd853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtv1TAchS0Eoi8mduSJheZiO7GdjLSCy6NQhiKkLpbj_Ky6JHGwnba3e_9vfB-FjcmP850zfAi9pGRBCWFvr9thoRclFU35BO1TzllRNYI_Xd-rpihZI_bQQYzXGRaEs-doj9ZESMrrffSwDP42XR3jG6db17u0Osa6u4Lo_Ignn2BMTvf5b-ywdW3wI5jkRgx3U4C4ofJrk7S9jiliM_dpDtDhHN27YPzoNPYBW-i7OOnkDDYQ9OBMXFdvXAr-CD2zuo_wYnceoh8f3l-cfizOzpefTt-dFaYSVVnwWuuWyK5rSMWhtppKwnhLWs6IlgSYpMIA44YQ4NLWNocNr6hlUNqu5uUher3dnYL_PUNManDRQN_rEfwcVXZFRCObDL7Zgib4GANYNQU36LBSlKi1dZWtK6021jP9ajc7twN0_9id5gzQLXDrelj9b0t9Pvn6OFpsOy4muPvb0eGXErKUXP38tlRZAL-8_P5FXZR_ADXfnwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32906979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Raffaelli, Luca ; Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi ; Piccioni, Elisabetta ; Toesca, Amelia ; Serini, Simona ; Resci, Federica ; Missori, Mauro ; De Spirito, Marco ; Manicone, Paolo F. ; Calviello, Gabriella</creator><creatorcontrib>Raffaelli, Luca ; Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi ; Piccioni, Elisabetta ; Toesca, Amelia ; Serini, Simona ; Resci, Federica ; Missori, Mauro ; De Spirito, Marco ; Manicone, Paolo F. ; Calviello, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><description>Zirconia, a biomaterial widely used in dentistry, has recently attracted much attention for its mechanical strength and toughness. Previously, its lack of mutagenic and carcinogenic power was reported. We describe here other essential aspects to be taken into account to define in vitro the biocompatibility of a material: the growth rate, viability, and adhesion capacity of normal stabilized cells growing on it. To this aim, immortalized RAT‐1 fibroblasts, growing either on zirconia and on feldspatic (FE) ceramics were compared. In particular, the level of expression and the intra‐ and extra‐cellular organization of fibronectin, a glycoprotein involved in cellular adhesion and migration during tissue repair, was analyzed. Fibroblasts cultured on zirconia showed a higher growth rate, and underwent necrosis at lower levels than cells on FE ceramic, whereas either materials did not stimulate apoptosis. Adhesion capacity of fibroblasts was evaluated measuring adherent cell nucleic acids with the fluorimetric CyQuant® assay, and it was found significantly higher in cells cultured on zirconia than on FE ceramic. This finding may be explained by the higher and more precocious expression of the adhesion protein fibronectin observed by indirect immunofluorescence in fibroblasts on zirconia. Overall, the results suggest that zirconia, exerting low cytotoxicity and strongly inducing adhesion capacity, increases cellular growth rate of fibroblasts. All these features suggest that zirconia could represent a more suitable biomaterial than FE ceramic for prosthesis in dentistry. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18067158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aluminum Silicates - pharmacology ; Animals ; Apoptosis - drug effects ; Cell Adhesion - drug effects ; Cell Line ; Cell Proliferation - drug effects ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; Cells, Cultured ; cellular adhesion ; cellular growth rate ; Ceramics - pharmacology ; Fibroblasts - cytology ; Fibroblasts - drug effects ; Fibroblasts - ultrastructure ; fibronectin ; Fibronectins - metabolism ; fixed partial dentures ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Polystyrenes - pharmacology ; Potassium Compounds - pharmacology ; Rats ; zirconia ; Zirconium - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2008-09, Vol.86A (4), p.959-968</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-58aab07dd9045e8fa17025b0b520a70e2716ce25c00e57f8f25b9541f2e3fd853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-58aab07dd9045e8fa17025b0b520a70e2716ce25c00e57f8f25b9541f2e3fd853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.31693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.31693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18067158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raffaelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccioni, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toesca, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serini, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resci, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Missori, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Spirito, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manicone, Paolo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calviello, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Zirconia, a biomaterial widely used in dentistry, has recently attracted much attention for its mechanical strength and toughness. Previously, its lack of mutagenic and carcinogenic power was reported. We describe here other essential aspects to be taken into account to define in vitro the biocompatibility of a material: the growth rate, viability, and adhesion capacity of normal stabilized cells growing on it. To this aim, immortalized RAT‐1 fibroblasts, growing either on zirconia and on feldspatic (FE) ceramics were compared. In particular, the level of expression and the intra‐ and extra‐cellular organization of fibronectin, a glycoprotein involved in cellular adhesion and migration during tissue repair, was analyzed. Fibroblasts cultured on zirconia showed a higher growth rate, and underwent necrosis at lower levels than cells on FE ceramic, whereas either materials did not stimulate apoptosis. Adhesion capacity of fibroblasts was evaluated measuring adherent cell nucleic acids with the fluorimetric CyQuant® assay, and it was found significantly higher in cells cultured on zirconia than on FE ceramic. This finding may be explained by the higher and more precocious expression of the adhesion protein fibronectin observed by indirect immunofluorescence in fibroblasts on zirconia. Overall, the results suggest that zirconia, exerting low cytotoxicity and strongly inducing adhesion capacity, increases cellular growth rate of fibroblasts. All these features suggest that zirconia could represent a more suitable biomaterial than FE ceramic for prosthesis in dentistry. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008</description><subject>Aluminum Silicates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>cellular adhesion</subject><subject>cellular growth rate</subject><subject>Ceramics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - cytology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - ultrastructure</subject><subject>fibronectin</subject><subject>Fibronectins - metabolism</subject><subject>fixed partial dentures</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Polystyrenes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Potassium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium - pharmacology</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtv1TAchS0Eoi8mduSJheZiO7GdjLSCy6NQhiKkLpbj_Ky6JHGwnba3e_9vfB-FjcmP850zfAi9pGRBCWFvr9thoRclFU35BO1TzllRNYI_Xd-rpihZI_bQQYzXGRaEs-doj9ZESMrrffSwDP42XR3jG6db17u0Osa6u4Lo_Ignn2BMTvf5b-ywdW3wI5jkRgx3U4C4ofJrk7S9jiliM_dpDtDhHN27YPzoNPYBW-i7OOnkDDYQ9OBMXFdvXAr-CD2zuo_wYnceoh8f3l-cfizOzpefTt-dFaYSVVnwWuuWyK5rSMWhtppKwnhLWs6IlgSYpMIA44YQ4NLWNocNr6hlUNqu5uUher3dnYL_PUNManDRQN_rEfwcVXZFRCObDL7Zgib4GANYNQU36LBSlKi1dZWtK6021jP9ajc7twN0_9id5gzQLXDrelj9b0t9Pvn6OFpsOy4muPvb0eGXErKUXP38tlRZAL-8_P5FXZR_ADXfnwg</recordid><startdate>20080915</startdate><enddate>20080915</enddate><creator>Raffaelli, Luca</creator><creator>Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi</creator><creator>Piccioni, Elisabetta</creator><creator>Toesca, Amelia</creator><creator>Serini, Simona</creator><creator>Resci, Federica</creator><creator>Missori, Mauro</creator><creator>De Spirito, Marco</creator><creator>Manicone, Paolo F.</creator><creator>Calviello, Gabriella</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080915</creationdate><title>Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro</title><author>Raffaelli, Luca ; Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi ; Piccioni, Elisabetta ; Toesca, Amelia ; Serini, Simona ; Resci, Federica ; Missori, Mauro ; De Spirito, Marco ; Manicone, Paolo F. ; Calviello, Gabriella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-58aab07dd9045e8fa17025b0b520a70e2716ce25c00e57f8f25b9541f2e3fd853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aluminum Silicates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>cellular adhesion</topic><topic>cellular growth rate</topic><topic>Ceramics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - cytology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - ultrastructure</topic><topic>fibronectin</topic><topic>Fibronectins - metabolism</topic><topic>fixed partial dentures</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Polystyrenes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Potassium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raffaelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccioni, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toesca, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serini, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resci, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Missori, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Spirito, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manicone, Paolo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calviello, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raffaelli, Luca</au><au>Iommetti, Pierfrancesco Rossi</au><au>Piccioni, Elisabetta</au><au>Toesca, Amelia</au><au>Serini, Simona</au><au>Resci, Federica</au><au>Missori, Mauro</au><au>De Spirito, Marco</au><au>Manicone, Paolo F.</au><au>Calviello, Gabriella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2008-09-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>86A</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>959-968</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><abstract>Zirconia, a biomaterial widely used in dentistry, has recently attracted much attention for its mechanical strength and toughness. Previously, its lack of mutagenic and carcinogenic power was reported. We describe here other essential aspects to be taken into account to define in vitro the biocompatibility of a material: the growth rate, viability, and adhesion capacity of normal stabilized cells growing on it. To this aim, immortalized RAT‐1 fibroblasts, growing either on zirconia and on feldspatic (FE) ceramics were compared. In particular, the level of expression and the intra‐ and extra‐cellular organization of fibronectin, a glycoprotein involved in cellular adhesion and migration during tissue repair, was analyzed. Fibroblasts cultured on zirconia showed a higher growth rate, and underwent necrosis at lower levels than cells on FE ceramic, whereas either materials did not stimulate apoptosis. Adhesion capacity of fibroblasts was evaluated measuring adherent cell nucleic acids with the fluorimetric CyQuant® assay, and it was found significantly higher in cells cultured on zirconia than on FE ceramic. This finding may be explained by the higher and more precocious expression of the adhesion protein fibronectin observed by indirect immunofluorescence in fibroblasts on zirconia. Overall, the results suggest that zirconia, exerting low cytotoxicity and strongly inducing adhesion capacity, increases cellular growth rate of fibroblasts. All these features suggest that zirconia could represent a more suitable biomaterial than FE ceramic for prosthesis in dentistry. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18067158</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.31693</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-3296
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2008-09, Vol.86A (4), p.959-968
issn 1549-3296
1552-4965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32906979
source Access via Wiley Online Library; MEDLINE
subjects Aluminum Silicates - pharmacology
Animals
Apoptosis - drug effects
Cell Adhesion - drug effects
Cell Line
Cell Proliferation - drug effects
Cell Survival - drug effects
Cells, Cultured
cellular adhesion
cellular growth rate
Ceramics - pharmacology
Fibroblasts - cytology
Fibroblasts - drug effects
Fibroblasts - ultrastructure
fibronectin
Fibronectins - metabolism
fixed partial dentures
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Polystyrenes - pharmacology
Potassium Compounds - pharmacology
Rats
zirconia
Zirconium - pharmacology
title Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20viability,%20adhesion%20potential,%20and%20fibronectin%20expression%20in%20fibroblasts%20cultured%20on%20zirconia%20or%20feldspatic%20ceramics%20in%20vitro&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Raffaelli,%20Luca&rft.date=2008-09-15&rft.volume=86A&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=959-968&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.31693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32906979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32906979&rft_id=info:pmid/18067158&rfr_iscdi=true