Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer
IrO 2 –RuO 2 , IrO 2 –Pt and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 electrocatalysts were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution in a Solid Polymer Electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. These mixtures were characterized by XRD and SEM. The anode catalyst powders were sprayed onto Nafion 117 membrane (catalyst co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied electrochemistry 2009-02, Vol.39 (2), p.191-196 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 196 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Journal of applied electrochemistry |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Di Blasi, A. D’Urso, C. Baglio, V. Antonucci, V. Arico’, A. S. Ornelas, R. Matteucci, F. Orozco, G. Beltran, D. Meas, Y. Arriaga, L. G. |
description | IrO
2
–RuO
2
, IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–Ta
2
O
5
electrocatalysts were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution in a Solid Polymer Electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. These mixtures were characterized by XRD and SEM. The anode catalyst powders were sprayed onto Nafion 117 membrane (catalyst coated membrane, CCM), using Pt catalyst at the cathode. The CCM procedure was extended to different in-house prepared catalyst formulations to evaluate if such a method could be applied to electrolyzers containing durable titanium backings. The catalyst loading at the anode was about 6 mg cm
−2
, whereas 1 mg cm
−2
Pt was used at the cathode. The electrochemical activity for water electrolysis was investigated in a single cell SPE electrolyzer at 80 °C. It was found that the terminal voltage obtained with Ir–Ta oxide was slightly lower than that obtained with IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
at low current density (lower than 0.15 A cm
−2
). At higher current density, the IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
catalysts performed better than Ir–Ta oxide. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32853082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32853082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-33b4d02dc16b968126f49afad12dc7727eb2404f17a37935c61dfaac7189ca8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcPOJE4G1nYdzRBWPSpVSQZG4WVvHKa3SuNgJIpw4cucP-RLSpmcuuzurmVntEHLO4IoBJNeegQQIAGSQxhEL2gMyYFHCAymFPCQDAM4CmbKXY3Li_QoAUh6HA_I9dWaDDuulrShWOTXvWDY9tAV9bDL--_Uzdhm_pNvagWm9I-7RDHkWUY01lq2vPS2so_WrofajXZiqs7Nls3NzBvVuWG4P0afpLTWl0bWzZftp3Ck5KrD05mzfh-T57nY2eggm2f14dDMJtIh4HQgxD3PguWbxPI0l43ERplhgzrpdkvDEzHkIYcESFEkqIh2zvEDUCZOpRqnFkFz0vhtn3xrja7Veem3KEitjG68El5EAyTsi64naWe-dKdTGLdfoWsVAbTNXfeaqy1xtM1dtp-G9xnfcamGcWtnGVd0__4j-ABHHiHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32853082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Di Blasi, A. ; D’Urso, C. ; Baglio, V. ; Antonucci, V. ; Arico’, A. S. ; Ornelas, R. ; Matteucci, F. ; Orozco, G. ; Beltran, D. ; Meas, Y. ; Arriaga, L. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Blasi, A. ; D’Urso, C. ; Baglio, V. ; Antonucci, V. ; Arico’, A. S. ; Ornelas, R. ; Matteucci, F. ; Orozco, G. ; Beltran, D. ; Meas, Y. ; Arriaga, L. G.</creatorcontrib><description>IrO
2
–RuO
2
, IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–Ta
2
O
5
electrocatalysts were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution in a Solid Polymer Electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. These mixtures were characterized by XRD and SEM. The anode catalyst powders were sprayed onto Nafion 117 membrane (catalyst coated membrane, CCM), using Pt catalyst at the cathode. The CCM procedure was extended to different in-house prepared catalyst formulations to evaluate if such a method could be applied to electrolyzers containing durable titanium backings. The catalyst loading at the anode was about 6 mg cm
−2
, whereas 1 mg cm
−2
Pt was used at the cathode. The electrochemical activity for water electrolysis was investigated in a single cell SPE electrolyzer at 80 °C. It was found that the terminal voltage obtained with Ir–Ta oxide was slightly lower than that obtained with IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
at low current density (lower than 0.15 A cm
−2
). At higher current density, the IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
catalysts performed better than Ir–Ta oxide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Electrochemistry ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Original Paper ; Physical Chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied electrochemistry, 2009-02, Vol.39 (2), p.191-196</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-33b4d02dc16b968126f49afad12dc7727eb2404f17a37935c61dfaac7189ca8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-33b4d02dc16b968126f49afad12dc7727eb2404f17a37935c61dfaac7189ca8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Blasi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Urso, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglio, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arico’, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ornelas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteucci, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltran, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meas, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriaga, L. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer</title><title>Journal of applied electrochemistry</title><addtitle>J Appl Electrochem</addtitle><description>IrO
2
–RuO
2
, IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–Ta
2
O
5
electrocatalysts were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution in a Solid Polymer Electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. These mixtures were characterized by XRD and SEM. The anode catalyst powders were sprayed onto Nafion 117 membrane (catalyst coated membrane, CCM), using Pt catalyst at the cathode. The CCM procedure was extended to different in-house prepared catalyst formulations to evaluate if such a method could be applied to electrolyzers containing durable titanium backings. The catalyst loading at the anode was about 6 mg cm
−2
, whereas 1 mg cm
−2
Pt was used at the cathode. The electrochemical activity for water electrolysis was investigated in a single cell SPE electrolyzer at 80 °C. It was found that the terminal voltage obtained with Ir–Ta oxide was slightly lower than that obtained with IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
at low current density (lower than 0.15 A cm
−2
). At higher current density, the IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
catalysts performed better than Ir–Ta oxide.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><issn>0021-891X</issn><issn>1572-8838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcPOJE4G1nYdzRBWPSpVSQZG4WVvHKa3SuNgJIpw4cucP-RLSpmcuuzurmVntEHLO4IoBJNeegQQIAGSQxhEL2gMyYFHCAymFPCQDAM4CmbKXY3Li_QoAUh6HA_I9dWaDDuulrShWOTXvWDY9tAV9bDL--_Uzdhm_pNvagWm9I-7RDHkWUY01lq2vPS2so_WrofajXZiqs7Nls3NzBvVuWG4P0afpLTWl0bWzZftp3Ck5KrD05mzfh-T57nY2eggm2f14dDMJtIh4HQgxD3PguWbxPI0l43ERplhgzrpdkvDEzHkIYcESFEkqIh2zvEDUCZOpRqnFkFz0vhtn3xrja7Veem3KEitjG68El5EAyTsi64naWe-dKdTGLdfoWsVAbTNXfeaqy1xtM1dtp-G9xnfcamGcWtnGVd0__4j-ABHHiHw</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Di Blasi, A.</creator><creator>D’Urso, C.</creator><creator>Baglio, V.</creator><creator>Antonucci, V.</creator><creator>Arico’, A. S.</creator><creator>Ornelas, R.</creator><creator>Matteucci, F.</creator><creator>Orozco, G.</creator><creator>Beltran, D.</creator><creator>Meas, Y.</creator><creator>Arriaga, L. G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer</title><author>Di Blasi, A. ; D’Urso, C. ; Baglio, V. ; Antonucci, V. ; Arico’, A. S. ; Ornelas, R. ; Matteucci, F. ; Orozco, G. ; Beltran, D. ; Meas, Y. ; Arriaga, L. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-33b4d02dc16b968126f49afad12dc7727eb2404f17a37935c61dfaac7189ca8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Blasi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Urso, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglio, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonucci, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arico’, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ornelas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteucci, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orozco, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltran, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meas, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arriaga, L. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied electrochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Blasi, A.</au><au>D’Urso, C.</au><au>Baglio, V.</au><au>Antonucci, V.</au><au>Arico’, A. S.</au><au>Ornelas, R.</au><au>Matteucci, F.</au><au>Orozco, G.</au><au>Beltran, D.</au><au>Meas, Y.</au><au>Arriaga, L. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied electrochemistry</jtitle><stitle>J Appl Electrochem</stitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>191-196</pages><issn>0021-891X</issn><eissn>1572-8838</eissn><abstract>IrO
2
–RuO
2
, IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–Ta
2
O
5
electrocatalysts were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution in a Solid Polymer Electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. These mixtures were characterized by XRD and SEM. The anode catalyst powders were sprayed onto Nafion 117 membrane (catalyst coated membrane, CCM), using Pt catalyst at the cathode. The CCM procedure was extended to different in-house prepared catalyst formulations to evaluate if such a method could be applied to electrolyzers containing durable titanium backings. The catalyst loading at the anode was about 6 mg cm
−2
, whereas 1 mg cm
−2
Pt was used at the cathode. The electrochemical activity for water electrolysis was investigated in a single cell SPE electrolyzer at 80 °C. It was found that the terminal voltage obtained with Ir–Ta oxide was slightly lower than that obtained with IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
at low current density (lower than 0.15 A cm
−2
). At higher current density, the IrO
2
–Pt and IrO
2
–RuO
2
catalysts performed better than Ir–Ta oxide.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-891X |
ispartof | Journal of applied electrochemistry, 2009-02, Vol.39 (2), p.191-196 |
issn | 0021-891X 1572-8838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32853082 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Electrochemistry Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering Original Paper Physical Chemistry |
title | Preparation and evaluation of RuO2–IrO2, IrO2–Pt and IrO2–Ta2O5 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A57%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparation%20and%20evaluation%20of%20RuO2%E2%80%93IrO2,%20IrO2%E2%80%93Pt%20and%20IrO2%E2%80%93Ta2O5%20catalysts%20for%20the%20oxygen%20evolution%20reaction%20in%20an%20SPE%20electrolyzer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20electrochemistry&rft.au=Di%20Blasi,%20A.&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=191-196&rft.issn=0021-891X&rft.eissn=1572-8838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10800-008-9651-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32853082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32853082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |