Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis

The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta psychologica 1985-12, Vol.60 (2), p.173-191
Hauptverfasser: Keele, Steven W., Pokorny, Robert A., Corcos, Daniel M., Ivry, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 191
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 60
creator Keele, Steven W.
Pokorny, Robert A.
Corcos, Daniel M.
Ivry, Richard
description The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were ‘good timers’ with one effector tended to be ‘good timers’ with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32318222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000169188590054X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1301240467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3ea9e6b23f84094236bffd5c02deabf21550b3322de39f7978cf1be3d763959a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8FQfRQzUe_4kFY1k9Y8KKw4CGk6dTN0jQ1aYX996a74sGDp-GdeeZl5kXolOArgkl2jTEmccZJcVGklxzjNImXe2hCipzFGeX5Ppr8IofoyPt1kAnhZILe72zUgVPQ9dq2kWyryNjeuqhzthrUtulX0kGkrDFB9Nro9iMyoFay1d74m2gWZs5BI0daNsFENhuv_TE6qGXj4eSnTtHbw_3r_ClevDw-z2eLWCWU9zEDySErKauLBPOEsqys6ypVmFYgy5qSNMUlYzRIxuuc54WqSQmsyjPGUy7ZFJ3vfMPNnwP4XhjtFTSNbMEOXjDKSEEpDeDZH3BtBxeu9YIwTGiCkywPVLKjlLPeO6hF57SRbiMIFmPeYgxTjGGKIhXbvMUyrN3u1iC8-qXBCa80tAoq7UD1orL6f4NvpIWHyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301240467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Keele, Steven W. ; Pokorny, Robert A. ; Corcos, Daniel M. ; Ivry, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Keele, Steven W. ; Pokorny, Robert A. ; Corcos, Daniel M. ; Ivry, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were ‘good timers’ with one effector tended to be ‘good timers’ with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Hague: Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 1985-12, Vol.60 (2), p.173-191</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3ea9e6b23f84094236bffd5c02deabf21550b3322de39f7978cf1be3d763959a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3ea9e6b23f84094236bffd5c02deabf21550b3322de39f7978cf1be3d763959a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keele, Steven W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokorny, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corcos, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivry, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><description>The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were ‘good timers’ with one effector tended to be ‘good timers’ with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.</description><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8FQfRQzUe_4kFY1k9Y8KKw4CGk6dTN0jQ1aYX996a74sGDp-GdeeZl5kXolOArgkl2jTEmccZJcVGklxzjNImXe2hCipzFGeX5Ppr8IofoyPt1kAnhZILe72zUgVPQ9dq2kWyryNjeuqhzthrUtulX0kGkrDFB9Nro9iMyoFay1d74m2gWZs5BI0daNsFENhuv_TE6qGXj4eSnTtHbw_3r_ClevDw-z2eLWCWU9zEDySErKauLBPOEsqys6ypVmFYgy5qSNMUlYzRIxuuc54WqSQmsyjPGUy7ZFJ3vfMPNnwP4XhjtFTSNbMEOXjDKSEEpDeDZH3BtBxeu9YIwTGiCkywPVLKjlLPeO6hF57SRbiMIFmPeYgxTjGGKIhXbvMUyrN3u1iC8-qXBCa80tAoq7UD1orL6f4NvpIWHyQ</recordid><startdate>19851201</startdate><enddate>19851201</enddate><creator>Keele, Steven W.</creator><creator>Pokorny, Robert A.</creator><creator>Corcos, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Ivry, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Martinus Nijhoff</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19851201</creationdate><title>Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis</title><author>Keele, Steven W. ; Pokorny, Robert A. ; Corcos, Daniel M. ; Ivry, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3ea9e6b23f84094236bffd5c02deabf21550b3322de39f7978cf1be3d763959a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keele, Steven W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokorny, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corcos, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivry, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keele, Steven W.</au><au>Pokorny, Robert A.</au><au>Corcos, Daniel M.</au><au>Ivry, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><date>1985-12-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>173-191</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were ‘good timers’ with one effector tended to be ‘good timers’ with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.</abstract><cop>The Hague</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 1985-12, Vol.60 (2), p.173-191
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32318222
source Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T00%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20perception%20and%20motor%20production%20share%20common%20timing%20mechanisms:%20A%20correlational%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Keele,%20Steven%20W.&rft.date=1985-12-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=173-191&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1301240467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301240467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=000169188590054X&rfr_iscdi=true