Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system

Methods for the quantitative XPS analysis of solids with concentration depth profiles in near-surface regions have been validated with reference samples consisting of self-assembled monolayers of n-octadecanethiol (“C 18-SAM”) adsorbed on gold substrates of different surface roughness. In addition,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surface science 2008-02, Vol.602 (3), p.755-767
Hauptverfasser: Merzlikin, Sergiy V., Tolkachev, Nikolay N., Strunskus, Thomas, Witte, Gregor, Glogowski, Thomas, Wöll, Christof, Grünert, Wolfgang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 767
container_issue 3
container_start_page 755
container_title Surface science
container_volume 602
creator Merzlikin, Sergiy V.
Tolkachev, Nikolay N.
Strunskus, Thomas
Witte, Gregor
Glogowski, Thomas
Wöll, Christof
Grünert, Wolfgang
description Methods for the quantitative XPS analysis of solids with concentration depth profiles in near-surface regions have been validated with reference samples consisting of self-assembled monolayers of n-octadecanethiol (“C 18-SAM”) adsorbed on gold substrates of different surface roughness. In addition, they have been compared with respect to the effect of surface roughness on the results obtained. The roughness of the substrate surfaces has been studied by STM, AFM, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Depth sensitivity was achieved by variation of the photoemission angle (ARXPS) and of the excitation energy (“ERXPS”). For the latter, a new data treatment algorithm has been developed in which intensity information acquired for different excitation energies is modelled with hypothetical depth distribution functions of the species studied, taking into account possible depth variations of the inelastic photoelectron mean free path. After identification of a suitable function type for the concentration depth profiles, the optimum profile parameters are determined. For a C 18-SAM adsorbed on an atomically flat Au substrate this method allows to correctly identify the nature of the depth profile and to precisely determine the overlayer thickness and the (zero) gold concentration in it. While ARXPS yielded realistic results for the atomically flat Au substrate as well, it proved to be more affected by surface roughness than ERXPS. ARXPS may even completely fail to detect surface enrichment in carbon whereas ERXPS identified the organic surface layer though with exaggerated thickness. In ERXPS, the depth coordinate is extended by surface roughness, but the back-extrapolation to the external surface to describe the properties of the latter is not affected even for extremely rough surfaces. ERXPS offers, therefore, an attractive potential for the analysis of the outmost surface layer of real materials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32145420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039602807012009</els_id><sourcerecordid>32145420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f811c30e579b05be9893b495e96344344f0e751e7b31e5f9e21a57e5d02d309d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxyPESpSFF-DkC9wS_BE3icQFVXxJK4F2QeJmOc6kdeXYweNW5MY77APxLjwJbrviiGXJY89v_iPPvyheMFoxytav9xUe0FSc0qZivKJUPipWrG26kjeyfVysKBVduaa8fVI8RdzTvOpOrorft4DBHa3fkrQDMsCcdsSEEAfrdQJiPZl3IQVwYFIMnuB8DtCEeSF_ft2TTZhmHS3mXBgJ_DQ26WTzDTzE7UKOOXl5OGJFtN8enI5lPLeFgXz_ckfGEM_dtdduQYsnIU0Q3FhqRJh6l8Ep-OD0AjFHAziCCyaYnhVXo3YIzx_O6-Lb-3dfNx_Lm88fPm3e3pRG1DyVY8uYERRk0_VU9tC1nejzAKBbi7rOe6TQSAZNLxjIsQPOtGxADpQPgnaDuC5eXXTnGH4cAJOaLBpwTnsIB1SCs1rWnGaQX0CTh4QRRjVHO-m4KEbVySu1Vyev1MkrxbjKXuWilw_qGo12Y9TeWPxXmdGWNU2duTcXDvJXjxaiQmPBGxhszLaoIdj_tfkL3smwXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32145420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Merzlikin, Sergiy V. ; Tolkachev, Nikolay N. ; Strunskus, Thomas ; Witte, Gregor ; Glogowski, Thomas ; Wöll, Christof ; Grünert, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Merzlikin, Sergiy V. ; Tolkachev, Nikolay N. ; Strunskus, Thomas ; Witte, Gregor ; Glogowski, Thomas ; Wöll, Christof ; Grünert, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Methods for the quantitative XPS analysis of solids with concentration depth profiles in near-surface regions have been validated with reference samples consisting of self-assembled monolayers of n-octadecanethiol (“C 18-SAM”) adsorbed on gold substrates of different surface roughness. In addition, they have been compared with respect to the effect of surface roughness on the results obtained. The roughness of the substrate surfaces has been studied by STM, AFM, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Depth sensitivity was achieved by variation of the photoemission angle (ARXPS) and of the excitation energy (“ERXPS”). For the latter, a new data treatment algorithm has been developed in which intensity information acquired for different excitation energies is modelled with hypothetical depth distribution functions of the species studied, taking into account possible depth variations of the inelastic photoelectron mean free path. After identification of a suitable function type for the concentration depth profiles, the optimum profile parameters are determined. For a C 18-SAM adsorbed on an atomically flat Au substrate this method allows to correctly identify the nature of the depth profile and to precisely determine the overlayer thickness and the (zero) gold concentration in it. While ARXPS yielded realistic results for the atomically flat Au substrate as well, it proved to be more affected by surface roughness than ERXPS. ARXPS may even completely fail to detect surface enrichment in carbon whereas ERXPS identified the organic surface layer though with exaggerated thickness. In ERXPS, the depth coordinate is extended by surface roughness, but the back-extrapolation to the external surface to describe the properties of the latter is not affected even for extremely rough surfaces. ERXPS offers, therefore, an attractive potential for the analysis of the outmost surface layer of real materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ARXPS ; Depth resolution ; Excitation energy ; Self-assembled monolayers ; Synchrotron XPS ; XPS</subject><ispartof>Surface science, 2008-02, Vol.602 (3), p.755-767</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f811c30e579b05be9893b495e96344344f0e751e7b31e5f9e21a57e5d02d309d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f811c30e579b05be9893b495e96344344f0e751e7b31e5f9e21a57e5d02d309d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20081774$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merzlikin, Sergiy V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkachev, Nikolay N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strunskus, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glogowski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöll, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grünert, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system</title><title>Surface science</title><description>Methods for the quantitative XPS analysis of solids with concentration depth profiles in near-surface regions have been validated with reference samples consisting of self-assembled monolayers of n-octadecanethiol (“C 18-SAM”) adsorbed on gold substrates of different surface roughness. In addition, they have been compared with respect to the effect of surface roughness on the results obtained. The roughness of the substrate surfaces has been studied by STM, AFM, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Depth sensitivity was achieved by variation of the photoemission angle (ARXPS) and of the excitation energy (“ERXPS”). For the latter, a new data treatment algorithm has been developed in which intensity information acquired for different excitation energies is modelled with hypothetical depth distribution functions of the species studied, taking into account possible depth variations of the inelastic photoelectron mean free path. After identification of a suitable function type for the concentration depth profiles, the optimum profile parameters are determined. For a C 18-SAM adsorbed on an atomically flat Au substrate this method allows to correctly identify the nature of the depth profile and to precisely determine the overlayer thickness and the (zero) gold concentration in it. While ARXPS yielded realistic results for the atomically flat Au substrate as well, it proved to be more affected by surface roughness than ERXPS. ARXPS may even completely fail to detect surface enrichment in carbon whereas ERXPS identified the organic surface layer though with exaggerated thickness. In ERXPS, the depth coordinate is extended by surface roughness, but the back-extrapolation to the external surface to describe the properties of the latter is not affected even for extremely rough surfaces. ERXPS offers, therefore, an attractive potential for the analysis of the outmost surface layer of real materials.</description><subject>ARXPS</subject><subject>Depth resolution</subject><subject>Excitation energy</subject><subject>Self-assembled monolayers</subject><subject>Synchrotron XPS</subject><subject>XPS</subject><issn>0039-6028</issn><issn>1879-2758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxyPESpSFF-DkC9wS_BE3icQFVXxJK4F2QeJmOc6kdeXYweNW5MY77APxLjwJbrviiGXJY89v_iPPvyheMFoxytav9xUe0FSc0qZivKJUPipWrG26kjeyfVysKBVduaa8fVI8RdzTvOpOrorft4DBHa3fkrQDMsCcdsSEEAfrdQJiPZl3IQVwYFIMnuB8DtCEeSF_ft2TTZhmHS3mXBgJ_DQ26WTzDTzE7UKOOXl5OGJFtN8enI5lPLeFgXz_ckfGEM_dtdduQYsnIU0Q3FhqRJh6l8Ep-OD0AjFHAziCCyaYnhVXo3YIzx_O6-Lb-3dfNx_Lm88fPm3e3pRG1DyVY8uYERRk0_VU9tC1nejzAKBbi7rOe6TQSAZNLxjIsQPOtGxADpQPgnaDuC5eXXTnGH4cAJOaLBpwTnsIB1SCs1rWnGaQX0CTh4QRRjVHO-m4KEbVySu1Vyev1MkrxbjKXuWilw_qGo12Y9TeWPxXmdGWNU2duTcXDvJXjxaiQmPBGxhszLaoIdj_tfkL3smwXg</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Merzlikin, Sergiy V.</creator><creator>Tolkachev, Nikolay N.</creator><creator>Strunskus, Thomas</creator><creator>Witte, Gregor</creator><creator>Glogowski, Thomas</creator><creator>Wöll, Christof</creator><creator>Grünert, Wolfgang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system</title><author>Merzlikin, Sergiy V. ; Tolkachev, Nikolay N. ; Strunskus, Thomas ; Witte, Gregor ; Glogowski, Thomas ; Wöll, Christof ; Grünert, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f811c30e579b05be9893b495e96344344f0e751e7b31e5f9e21a57e5d02d309d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ARXPS</topic><topic>Depth resolution</topic><topic>Excitation energy</topic><topic>Self-assembled monolayers</topic><topic>Synchrotron XPS</topic><topic>XPS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merzlikin, Sergiy V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkachev, Nikolay N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strunskus, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glogowski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöll, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grünert, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Surface science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merzlikin, Sergiy V.</au><au>Tolkachev, Nikolay N.</au><au>Strunskus, Thomas</au><au>Witte, Gregor</au><au>Glogowski, Thomas</au><au>Wöll, Christof</au><au>Grünert, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system</atitle><jtitle>Surface science</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>602</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>755</spage><epage>767</epage><pages>755-767</pages><issn>0039-6028</issn><eissn>1879-2758</eissn><coden>SUSCAS</coden><abstract>Methods for the quantitative XPS analysis of solids with concentration depth profiles in near-surface regions have been validated with reference samples consisting of self-assembled monolayers of n-octadecanethiol (“C 18-SAM”) adsorbed on gold substrates of different surface roughness. In addition, they have been compared with respect to the effect of surface roughness on the results obtained. The roughness of the substrate surfaces has been studied by STM, AFM, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Depth sensitivity was achieved by variation of the photoemission angle (ARXPS) and of the excitation energy (“ERXPS”). For the latter, a new data treatment algorithm has been developed in which intensity information acquired for different excitation energies is modelled with hypothetical depth distribution functions of the species studied, taking into account possible depth variations of the inelastic photoelectron mean free path. After identification of a suitable function type for the concentration depth profiles, the optimum profile parameters are determined. For a C 18-SAM adsorbed on an atomically flat Au substrate this method allows to correctly identify the nature of the depth profile and to precisely determine the overlayer thickness and the (zero) gold concentration in it. While ARXPS yielded realistic results for the atomically flat Au substrate as well, it proved to be more affected by surface roughness than ERXPS. ARXPS may even completely fail to detect surface enrichment in carbon whereas ERXPS identified the organic surface layer though with exaggerated thickness. In ERXPS, the depth coordinate is extended by surface roughness, but the back-extrapolation to the external surface to describe the properties of the latter is not affected even for extremely rough surfaces. ERXPS offers, therefore, an attractive potential for the analysis of the outmost surface layer of real materials.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.005</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6028
ispartof Surface science, 2008-02, Vol.602 (3), p.755-767
issn 0039-6028
1879-2758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_32145420
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects ARXPS
Depth resolution
Excitation energy
Self-assembled monolayers
Synchrotron XPS
XPS
title Resolving the depth coordinate in photoelectron spectroscopy – Comparison of excitation energy variation vs. angular-resolved XPS for the analysis of a self-assembled monolayer model system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A12%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolving%20the%20depth%20coordinate%20in%20photoelectron%20spectroscopy%20%E2%80%93%20Comparison%20of%20excitation%20energy%20variation%20vs.%20angular-resolved%20XPS%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20a%20self-assembled%20monolayer%20model%20system&rft.jtitle=Surface%20science&rft.au=Merzlikin,%20Sergiy%20V.&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=602&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=755&rft.epage=767&rft.pages=755-767&rft.issn=0039-6028&rft.eissn=1879-2758&rft.coden=SUSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32145420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32145420&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0039602807012009&rfr_iscdi=true