Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs

Before the implementation of a parking information system, it is necessary to evaluate the parking difficulty, technology choice, and system costs. In this study, the parking problem was quantified by asking parkers to express their parking difficulties in five scaled levels from the least to the mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced transportation 2008-01, Vol.42 (2), p.151-178
Hauptverfasser: Teng, Hualiang (Harry), Qi, Yi (Grace), Martinelli, David R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Journal of advanced transportation
container_volume 42
creator Teng, Hualiang (Harry)
Qi, Yi (Grace)
Martinelli, David R.
description Before the implementation of a parking information system, it is necessary to evaluate the parking difficulty, technology choice, and system costs. In this study, the parking problem was quantified by asking parkers to express their parking difficulties in five scaled levels from the least to the most difficult. An ordered Probit model was developed to identify the factors that influence a parker to feel the parking difficulty. The results indicate that the amount of parking information parkers had before their trips was directly related to their parking search time, which in turn, influenced their perceptions of parking difficulty. Parkers' preferences to parking information technologies were identified based on developing binary and multinomial probit models. The results indicate that personal business trips and older persons would like to use the kiosk, while the more educated and males would not. Trips with shopping and social/recreation purposes and the drivers who had visited the destination areas frequently would like to choose roadside display. Drivers who had planned their parking and had Internet access would use in‐vehicle device. The system cost was estimated based on the cost for each component of the system. The results show that providing en‐route parking search information through roadside displays is more expensive than providing pre‐trip information through a web site.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/atr.5670420204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31842348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A172555825</galeid><sourcerecordid>A172555825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5704-a34ed8c5bad61a09e4f2337810a929fd2ea3d5e979f7e1fd7ac34ab778c13e4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxSMEEmXhyjkXOJHijziOj9UCu4gFVqjA0Zo646whH11PIuh_j0srFqRKyNJYGv3e84xflj3lbMkZEy9hiktVaVYKJlh5L1ukKgrJjbqfLRg3uqi0MA-zR0TfGJNGmXKRXV5D_B6GNm-C98HN3bTLYWjy7bEdBj_GHqYwDjntaMI-n9DdDGM3tgHpN-tGmuhx9sBDR_jkeJ9ln9-8Xp9fFlcfL96er64Kp9JoBcgSm9qpDTQVB2aw9EJKXXMGRhjfCATZKDTaeI3cNxqcLGGjde24xHIjz7LnB99tHG9npMn2gRx2HQw4zmQlr0shyzqBxQFsoUO732OK4FocMEI3DuhDaq-4FkqpWqjEL0_w6TTYB3dS8OIvwWamMCClQqG9maiFmeikv4sjUURvtzH0EHeWM7sP0KYA7V2ASfDsuCmQg85HGFygO5UxldDV3tgcuB9pwN1_XO1q_emfN46fFFK0P_9oU_i20lIr-_XDhX33pXr1fn3NrZa_AAX4u0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31842348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Teng, Hualiang (Harry) ; Qi, Yi (Grace) ; Martinelli, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Teng, Hualiang (Harry) ; Qi, Yi (Grace) ; Martinelli, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Before the implementation of a parking information system, it is necessary to evaluate the parking difficulty, technology choice, and system costs. In this study, the parking problem was quantified by asking parkers to express their parking difficulties in five scaled levels from the least to the most difficult. An ordered Probit model was developed to identify the factors that influence a parker to feel the parking difficulty. The results indicate that the amount of parking information parkers had before their trips was directly related to their parking search time, which in turn, influenced their perceptions of parking difficulty. Parkers' preferences to parking information technologies were identified based on developing binary and multinomial probit models. The results indicate that personal business trips and older persons would like to use the kiosk, while the more educated and males would not. Trips with shopping and social/recreation purposes and the drivers who had visited the destination areas frequently would like to choose roadside display. Drivers who had planned their parking and had Internet access would use in‐vehicle device. The system cost was estimated based on the cost for each component of the system. The results show that providing en‐route parking search information through roadside displays is more expensive than providing pre‐trip information through a web site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-6729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/atr.5670420204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATRDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Automobile parking ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Management ; Road transportation and traffic ; Technology application ; Traffic engineering</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced transportation, 2008-01, Vol.42 (2), p.151-178</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5704-a34ed8c5bad61a09e4f2337810a929fd2ea3d5e979f7e1fd7ac34ab778c13e4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5704-a34ed8c5bad61a09e4f2337810a929fd2ea3d5e979f7e1fd7ac34ab778c13e4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19962765$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teng, Hualiang (Harry)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi (Grace)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs</title><title>Journal of advanced transportation</title><addtitle>J. Adv. Transp</addtitle><description>Before the implementation of a parking information system, it is necessary to evaluate the parking difficulty, technology choice, and system costs. In this study, the parking problem was quantified by asking parkers to express their parking difficulties in five scaled levels from the least to the most difficult. An ordered Probit model was developed to identify the factors that influence a parker to feel the parking difficulty. The results indicate that the amount of parking information parkers had before their trips was directly related to their parking search time, which in turn, influenced their perceptions of parking difficulty. Parkers' preferences to parking information technologies were identified based on developing binary and multinomial probit models. The results indicate that personal business trips and older persons would like to use the kiosk, while the more educated and males would not. Trips with shopping and social/recreation purposes and the drivers who had visited the destination areas frequently would like to choose roadside display. Drivers who had planned their parking and had Internet access would use in‐vehicle device. The system cost was estimated based on the cost for each component of the system. The results show that providing en‐route parking search information through roadside displays is more expensive than providing pre‐trip information through a web site.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobile parking</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Road transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Traffic engineering</subject><issn>0197-6729</issn><issn>2042-3195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxSMEEmXhyjkXOJHijziOj9UCu4gFVqjA0Zo646whH11PIuh_j0srFqRKyNJYGv3e84xflj3lbMkZEy9hiktVaVYKJlh5L1ukKgrJjbqfLRg3uqi0MA-zR0TfGJNGmXKRXV5D_B6GNm-C98HN3bTLYWjy7bEdBj_GHqYwDjntaMI-n9DdDGM3tgHpN-tGmuhx9sBDR_jkeJ9ln9-8Xp9fFlcfL96er64Kp9JoBcgSm9qpDTQVB2aw9EJKXXMGRhjfCATZKDTaeI3cNxqcLGGjde24xHIjz7LnB99tHG9npMn2gRx2HQw4zmQlr0shyzqBxQFsoUO732OK4FocMEI3DuhDaq-4FkqpWqjEL0_w6TTYB3dS8OIvwWamMCClQqG9maiFmeikv4sjUURvtzH0EHeWM7sP0KYA7V2ASfDsuCmQg85HGFygO5UxldDV3tgcuB9pwN1_XO1q_emfN46fFFK0P_9oU_i20lIr-_XDhX33pXr1fn3NrZa_AAX4u0c</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Teng, Hualiang (Harry)</creator><creator>Qi, Yi (Grace)</creator><creator>Martinelli, David R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Institute for Transportation</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs</title><author>Teng, Hualiang (Harry) ; Qi, Yi (Grace) ; Martinelli, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5704-a34ed8c5bad61a09e4f2337810a929fd2ea3d5e979f7e1fd7ac34ab778c13e4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobile parking</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Road transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Traffic engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teng, Hualiang (Harry)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yi (Grace)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teng, Hualiang (Harry)</au><au>Qi, Yi (Grace)</au><au>Martinelli, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle><addtitle>J. Adv. Transp</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>151-178</pages><issn>0197-6729</issn><eissn>2042-3195</eissn><coden>JATRDC</coden><abstract>Before the implementation of a parking information system, it is necessary to evaluate the parking difficulty, technology choice, and system costs. In this study, the parking problem was quantified by asking parkers to express their parking difficulties in five scaled levels from the least to the most difficult. An ordered Probit model was developed to identify the factors that influence a parker to feel the parking difficulty. The results indicate that the amount of parking information parkers had before their trips was directly related to their parking search time, which in turn, influenced their perceptions of parking difficulty. Parkers' preferences to parking information technologies were identified based on developing binary and multinomial probit models. The results indicate that personal business trips and older persons would like to use the kiosk, while the more educated and males would not. Trips with shopping and social/recreation purposes and the drivers who had visited the destination areas frequently would like to choose roadside display. Drivers who had planned their parking and had Internet access would use in‐vehicle device. The system cost was estimated based on the cost for each component of the system. The results show that providing en‐route parking search information through roadside displays is more expensive than providing pre‐trip information through a web site.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/atr.5670420204</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-6729
ispartof Journal of advanced transportation, 2008-01, Vol.42 (2), p.151-178
issn 0197-6729
2042-3195
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31842348
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Applied sciences
Automobile parking
Exact sciences and technology
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Management
Road transportation and traffic
Technology application
Traffic engineering
title Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parking%20difficulty%20and%20parking%20information%20system%20technologies%20and%20costs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20transportation&rft.au=Teng,%20Hualiang%20(Harry)&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=151-178&rft.issn=0197-6729&rft.eissn=2042-3195&rft.coden=JATRDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/atr.5670420204&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA172555825%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31842348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A172555825&rfr_iscdi=true