Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis

Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis

Workflows form the essential part of the process execution both in a single machine and in distributed environments. Although providing conditional structures is not mandatory for a workflow management system, support for conditional workflows is very important in terms of error handling, flexibilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific programming 2007-01, Vol.15 (4), p.283-297
Hauptverfasser: Bahsi, Emir M., Ceyhan, Emrah, Kosar, Tevfik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 4
container_start_page 283
container_title Scientific programming
container_volume 15
creator Bahsi, Emir M.
Ceyhan, Emrah
Kosar, Tevfik
description Workflows form the essential part of the process execution both in a single machine and in distributed environments. Although providing conditional structures is not mandatory for a workflow management system, support for conditional workflows is very important in terms of error handling, flexibility and robustness. Several of the existing workflow management systems already support conditional structures via use of different constructs. In this paper, we study the most widely used workflow management systems and their support for conditional structures such as if, switch, and while. We compare implementation of common conditional structures using each of these workflow management systems via case studies, and discuss capabilities of each system.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2007/680291
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31738191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31738191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-1412730c2b83af86db52bd95dfdffb58645b1580890544993376fabe0c67060e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1OhDAURhujiePoyhdg5cbg3Etpad0R4l8yxoUa3TUFWoMCHVvQ8PYywdX3LU7O4hByjnCFyNgmAcg2XEAi8YCsUGQslijfD-cPTMQySdNjchLCJwAKBFgRXri-bobG9bqN3pz_sq37jR51rz9MZ_rhOsqj59H_mCnSfR3lMzaFJpySI6vbYM7-d01eb29eivt4-3T3UOTbuKKAQ4wpJhmFKikF1VbwumRJWUtW29rakgmeshKZACGBpamUlGbc6tJAxTPgYOiaXCzenXffowmD6ppQmbbVvXFjUBQzKlDiDF4uYOVdCN5YtfNNp_2kENS-jdq3UUsb-gce71Si</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31738191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bahsi, Emir M. ; Ceyhan, Emrah ; Kosar, Tevfik</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahsi, Emir M. ; Ceyhan, Emrah ; Kosar, Tevfik</creatorcontrib><description>Workflows form the essential part of the process execution both in a single machine and in distributed environments. Although providing conditional structures is not mandatory for a workflow management system, support for conditional workflows is very important in terms of error handling, flexibility and robustness. Several of the existing workflow management systems already support conditional structures via use of different constructs. In this paper, we study the most widely used workflow management systems and their support for conditional structures such as if, switch, and while. We compare implementation of common conditional structures using each of these workflow management systems via case studies, and discuss capabilities of each system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-9244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-919X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2007/680291</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Scientific programming, 2007-01, Vol.15 (4), p.283-297</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-1412730c2b83af86db52bd95dfdffb58645b1580890544993376fabe0c67060e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahsi, Emir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceyhan, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosar, Tevfik</creatorcontrib><title>Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis</title><title>Scientific programming</title><description>Workflows form the essential part of the process execution both in a single machine and in distributed environments. Although providing conditional structures is not mandatory for a workflow management system, support for conditional workflows is very important in terms of error handling, flexibility and robustness. Several of the existing workflow management systems already support conditional structures via use of different constructs. In this paper, we study the most widely used workflow management systems and their support for conditional structures such as if, switch, and while. We compare implementation of common conditional structures using each of these workflow management systems via case studies, and discuss capabilities of each system.</description><issn>1058-9244</issn><issn>1875-919X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1OhDAURhujiePoyhdg5cbg3Etpad0R4l8yxoUa3TUFWoMCHVvQ8PYywdX3LU7O4hByjnCFyNgmAcg2XEAi8YCsUGQslijfD-cPTMQySdNjchLCJwAKBFgRXri-bobG9bqN3pz_sq37jR51rz9MZ_rhOsqj59H_mCnSfR3lMzaFJpySI6vbYM7-d01eb29eivt4-3T3UOTbuKKAQ4wpJhmFKikF1VbwumRJWUtW29rakgmeshKZACGBpamUlGbc6tJAxTPgYOiaXCzenXffowmD6ppQmbbVvXFjUBQzKlDiDF4uYOVdCN5YtfNNp_2kENS-jdq3UUsb-gce71Si</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Bahsi, Emir M.</creator><creator>Ceyhan, Emrah</creator><creator>Kosar, Tevfik</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis</title><author>Bahsi, Emir M. ; Ceyhan, Emrah ; Kosar, Tevfik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-1412730c2b83af86db52bd95dfdffb58645b1580890544993376fabe0c67060e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahsi, Emir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceyhan, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosar, Tevfik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Scientific programming</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahsi, Emir M.</au><au>Ceyhan, Emrah</au><au>Kosar, Tevfik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Scientific programming</jtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>283-297</pages><issn>1058-9244</issn><eissn>1875-919X</eissn><abstract>Workflows form the essential part of the process execution both in a single machine and in distributed environments. Although providing conditional structures is not mandatory for a workflow management system, support for conditional workflows is very important in terms of error handling, flexibility and robustness. Several of the existing workflow management systems already support conditional structures via use of different constructs. In this paper, we study the most widely used workflow management systems and their support for conditional structures such as if, switch, and while. We compare implementation of common conditional structures using each of these workflow management systems via case studies, and discuss capabilities of each system.</abstract><doi>10.1155/2007/680291</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-9244
ispartof Scientific programming, 2007-01, Vol.15 (4), p.283-297
issn 1058-9244
1875-919X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31738191
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Conditional Workflow Management: A Survey and Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditional%20Workflow%20Management:%20A%20Survey%20and%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20programming&rft.au=Bahsi,%20Emir%20M.&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=283-297&rft.issn=1058-9244&rft.eissn=1875-919X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2007/680291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31738191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31738191&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true