The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation

These studies investigated whether the positivity effect in older adults results in positively valenced interpretations of ambiguous scenarios and whether personally relevant health content and induced positive and negative moods attenuate or moderate the effect. In two studies conducted in 2022 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emotion (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2025-02
Hauptverfasser: Matovic, Diana, Abraham, Rebecca, Basford, Eva, Viju, Abhirami, Wuthrich, Viviana M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume
creator Matovic, Diana
Abraham, Rebecca
Basford, Eva
Viju, Abhirami
Wuthrich, Viviana M
description These studies investigated whether the positivity effect in older adults results in positively valenced interpretations of ambiguous scenarios and whether personally relevant health content and induced positive and negative moods attenuate or moderate the effect. In two studies conducted in 2022 and 2023, older ( = 31, = 72.16, = 7.81, = 51, = 71.64, = 6.39) and younger ( = 25, = 19.16, = 1.49, = 51, = 20.20, = 1.88) adults underwent audiovisual mood inductions (positive, neutral, negative; within subjects) with baseline and postinduction affect measured and completed an ambiguous scenario interpretation task (health, social content; within subjects) and measures of depression and anxiety symptomology. Studies found that older versus younger adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios, and this positivity effect was not significantly attenuated by health-related content. There was no significant evidence for age-based differences in mood-induced processing. Instead, negative mood congruence was found across age groups in Study 2 using improved methodology. In sum, older adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios than younger adults, consistent with top-down emotion regulation processes used to increase well-being. The positivity effect was robust to health and social content, and both age groups demonstrated negative mood-induced processing, consistent with past findings. Most participants were born in Australia and had high levels of education and socioeconomic resources, and thus replication in more culturally and socioeconomically diverse participants is needed. Understanding the positivity effect has implications for how interventions may target mental health-related mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
doi_str_mv 10.1037/emo0001501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3164394754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3164394754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1551-fbbf063f6decdef35faf9d42f7bf763d5fc9306d546d5f537efa07b3002375473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F1LwzAUBuAgipvTG3-ABLwRoZr0NO16KcMvGHgzr0vanriMNplJKuzfm7Kp4EVICA-H97yEXHJ2xxkU99hbxhgXjB-RKS-BJ1zw_Di-RTpPQGTphJx5v4kmgzI7JRMoSw7ZvJwSuVoj3Vqvg_7SYUdRKWwC1Z46Ww8-0GDpGmUX1lSalnrbaNnRxpqAJjJDZV_rj8EOnvoGjXTaxt-AbuswyKCtOScnSnYeLw73jLw_Pa4WL8ny7fl18bBMGi4ET1RdK5aDyltsWlQglFRlm6WqqFWRQytUUwLLW5HFowQUqCQramAshUJkBczIzX7u1tnPAX2oeh0jdZ00GONVwPNx-2gjvf5HN3ZwJqYbFcxLzmEceLtXjbPeO1TV1uleul3FWTUWX_0VH_HVYeRQ99j-0p-m4RuuKH8D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3163891137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Matovic, Diana ; Abraham, Rebecca ; Basford, Eva ; Viju, Abhirami ; Wuthrich, Viviana M</creator><creatorcontrib>Matovic, Diana ; Abraham, Rebecca ; Basford, Eva ; Viju, Abhirami ; Wuthrich, Viviana M</creatorcontrib><description>These studies investigated whether the positivity effect in older adults results in positively valenced interpretations of ambiguous scenarios and whether personally relevant health content and induced positive and negative moods attenuate or moderate the effect. In two studies conducted in 2022 and 2023, older ( = 31, = 72.16, = 7.81, = 51, = 71.64, = 6.39) and younger ( = 25, = 19.16, = 1.49, = 51, = 20.20, = 1.88) adults underwent audiovisual mood inductions (positive, neutral, negative; within subjects) with baseline and postinduction affect measured and completed an ambiguous scenario interpretation task (health, social content; within subjects) and measures of depression and anxiety symptomology. Studies found that older versus younger adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios, and this positivity effect was not significantly attenuated by health-related content. There was no significant evidence for age-based differences in mood-induced processing. Instead, negative mood congruence was found across age groups in Study 2 using improved methodology. In sum, older adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios than younger adults, consistent with top-down emotion regulation processes used to increase well-being. The positivity effect was robust to health and social content, and both age groups demonstrated negative mood-induced processing, consistent with past findings. Most participants were born in Australia and had high levels of education and socioeconomic resources, and thus replication in more culturally and socioeconomically diverse participants is needed. Understanding the positivity effect has implications for how interventions may target mental health-related mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3542</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1931-1516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-1516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/emo0001501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39913489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Emotional Regulation ; Emotional States ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Negative Emotions ; Older Adulthood ; Positivism ; Stimulus Ambiguity</subject><ispartof>Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2025-02</ispartof><rights>2025, The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-4992-8793 ; 0009-0000-8477-449X ; 0000-0001-7227-229X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39913489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matovic, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basford, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viju, Abhirami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuthrich, Viviana M</creatorcontrib><title>The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation</title><title>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><description>These studies investigated whether the positivity effect in older adults results in positively valenced interpretations of ambiguous scenarios and whether personally relevant health content and induced positive and negative moods attenuate or moderate the effect. In two studies conducted in 2022 and 2023, older ( = 31, = 72.16, = 7.81, = 51, = 71.64, = 6.39) and younger ( = 25, = 19.16, = 1.49, = 51, = 20.20, = 1.88) adults underwent audiovisual mood inductions (positive, neutral, negative; within subjects) with baseline and postinduction affect measured and completed an ambiguous scenario interpretation task (health, social content; within subjects) and measures of depression and anxiety symptomology. Studies found that older versus younger adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios, and this positivity effect was not significantly attenuated by health-related content. There was no significant evidence for age-based differences in mood-induced processing. Instead, negative mood congruence was found across age groups in Study 2 using improved methodology. In sum, older adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios than younger adults, consistent with top-down emotion regulation processes used to increase well-being. The positivity effect was robust to health and social content, and both age groups demonstrated negative mood-induced processing, consistent with past findings. Most participants were born in Australia and had high levels of education and socioeconomic resources, and thus replication in more culturally and socioeconomically diverse participants is needed. Understanding the positivity effect has implications for how interventions may target mental health-related mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation</subject><subject>Emotional States</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Negative Emotions</subject><subject>Older Adulthood</subject><subject>Positivism</subject><subject>Stimulus Ambiguity</subject><issn>1528-3542</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0F1LwzAUBuAgipvTG3-ABLwRoZr0NO16KcMvGHgzr0vanriMNplJKuzfm7Kp4EVICA-H97yEXHJ2xxkU99hbxhgXjB-RKS-BJ1zw_Di-RTpPQGTphJx5v4kmgzI7JRMoSw7ZvJwSuVoj3Vqvg_7SYUdRKWwC1Z46Ww8-0GDpGmUX1lSalnrbaNnRxpqAJjJDZV_rj8EOnvoGjXTaxt-AbuswyKCtOScnSnYeLw73jLw_Pa4WL8ny7fl18bBMGi4ET1RdK5aDyltsWlQglFRlm6WqqFWRQytUUwLLW5HFowQUqCQramAshUJkBczIzX7u1tnPAX2oeh0jdZ00GONVwPNx-2gjvf5HN3ZwJqYbFcxLzmEceLtXjbPeO1TV1uleul3FWTUWX_0VH_HVYeRQ99j-0p-m4RuuKH8D</recordid><startdate>20250206</startdate><enddate>20250206</enddate><creator>Matovic, Diana</creator><creator>Abraham, Rebecca</creator><creator>Basford, Eva</creator><creator>Viju, Abhirami</creator><creator>Wuthrich, Viviana M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8477-449X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-229X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250206</creationdate><title>The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation</title><author>Matovic, Diana ; Abraham, Rebecca ; Basford, Eva ; Viju, Abhirami ; Wuthrich, Viviana M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1551-fbbf063f6decdef35faf9d42f7bf763d5fc9306d546d5f537efa07b3002375473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation</topic><topic>Emotional States</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Negative Emotions</topic><topic>Older Adulthood</topic><topic>Positivism</topic><topic>Stimulus Ambiguity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matovic, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basford, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viju, Abhirami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuthrich, Viviana M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matovic, Diana</au><au>Abraham, Rebecca</au><au>Basford, Eva</au><au>Viju, Abhirami</au><au>Wuthrich, Viviana M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation</atitle><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><date>2025-02-06</date><risdate>2025</risdate><issn>1528-3542</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><eissn>1931-1516</eissn><abstract>These studies investigated whether the positivity effect in older adults results in positively valenced interpretations of ambiguous scenarios and whether personally relevant health content and induced positive and negative moods attenuate or moderate the effect. In two studies conducted in 2022 and 2023, older ( = 31, = 72.16, = 7.81, = 51, = 71.64, = 6.39) and younger ( = 25, = 19.16, = 1.49, = 51, = 20.20, = 1.88) adults underwent audiovisual mood inductions (positive, neutral, negative; within subjects) with baseline and postinduction affect measured and completed an ambiguous scenario interpretation task (health, social content; within subjects) and measures of depression and anxiety symptomology. Studies found that older versus younger adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios, and this positivity effect was not significantly attenuated by health-related content. There was no significant evidence for age-based differences in mood-induced processing. Instead, negative mood congruence was found across age groups in Study 2 using improved methodology. In sum, older adults provided significantly more positive interpretations of ambiguous scenarios than younger adults, consistent with top-down emotion regulation processes used to increase well-being. The positivity effect was robust to health and social content, and both age groups demonstrated negative mood-induced processing, consistent with past findings. Most participants were born in Australia and had high levels of education and socioeconomic resources, and thus replication in more culturally and socioeconomically diverse participants is needed. Understanding the positivity effect has implications for how interventions may target mental health-related mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>39913489</pmid><doi>10.1037/emo0001501</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8477-449X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-229X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-3542
ispartof Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2025-02
issn 1528-3542
1931-1516
1931-1516
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3164394754
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Age Differences
Emotional Regulation
Emotional States
Female
Human
Male
Negative Emotions
Older Adulthood
Positivism
Stimulus Ambiguity
title The positivity effect is robust to health and social content in ambiguous scenario interpretation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20positivity%20effect%20is%20robust%20to%20health%20and%20social%20content%20in%20ambiguous%20scenario%20interpretation&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Matovic,%20Diana&rft.date=2025-02-06&rft.issn=1528-3542&rft.eissn=1931-1516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/emo0001501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3164394754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3163891137&rft_id=info:pmid/39913489&rfr_iscdi=true