Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure
Surgical intervention is a cornerstone of adult spinal deformity (ASD) management. However, there remain burdens from complications including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Posterior anatomical preservation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) has emerged as an accessi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2025-01, p.123741, Article 123741 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 123741 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | |
creator | Patel, Ruchit V. Chalif, Joshua I. Yearley, Alexander G. Jha, Rohan Chalif, Eric J. Zaidi, Hasan A. |
description | Surgical intervention is a cornerstone of adult spinal deformity (ASD) management. However, there remain burdens from complications including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Posterior anatomical preservation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) has emerged as an accessible approach to potentially reduce PJK/PJF risk.
We assembled an institutional cohort of ASD patients evaluated between 2017-2022 who had spinal fusion performed with a modified subperiosteal dissection at and immediately below the UIV. Through a meta-analysis with a random-effects model, we compared our incidence of PJK/PJF against other prophylactic interventions.
Ninety patients were identified, (median age: 64 years, average follow-up: 19 months). A majority had scoliosis and/or spinal stenosis with a median of 8 levels fused (40% revision cases). 6.7% and 3.3% of patients developed PJK and PJF respectively, with the most common clinical correlate being a minor neurologic deficit such as numbness (37.8%). PJK/PJF and non-PJK/PJF patients had similar post-operative complication profiles. Radiographic parameters varied: the PJK/PJF cohort had greater pre-operative pelvic incidence/pelvic tilt and post-operative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch as well as smaller operative correction of the thoracolumbar Cobb angle. In the literature, prophylactic interventions broadly reduced the incidence of PJK/PJF, with a pooled estimate of 19% compared to 36% in patients who did not receive any additional intervention.
Preservation of posterior anatomical structures likely has a role in reducing the rate of PJK/PJF. Linking radiographic parameters to PJK/PJF while studying techniques that keep posterior structures intact may be steps toward improving ASD correction outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123741 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3162572426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S187887502500097X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3162572426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1093-87e05d08211ff602920a59d7877055231d682875f3c349c8e6438032f892e0403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1LAzEQDaJYqf0DHmSPXrrmYz8S8FKK1WrFHvQcYnYWs-yXyabaf2-WVoeBecw8hjfzELoiOCaYZLdV_N2CjymmaUwoyxNygi4Iz_mc55k4_ccpnqCZcxUOwUjCc3aOJkxwLkTGLpBcN73SQ9SV0aKolIZ2iF68075WNlq0augao1UdbS04sDs1mK6NQm5t92OaMHjyrR6bAT7v-8_OGReptohWytTewiU6K1XtYHasU_S-un9bPs43rw_r5WIzB4IFCzoBpwXmlJCyzDAVFKtUFDnPc5ymlJEi4zQcUzLNEqE5ZAnjmNGSCwo4wWyKbg57e9t9eXCDbIzTUNeqhc47yUhG05wmNAvU6yPVfzRQyN6GQ-xe_j0lEO4OBAiCdwasdNpAq6EwFvQgi85IguVog6zkaIMcbZAHG9gv0wN4kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3162572426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Patel, Ruchit V. ; Chalif, Joshua I. ; Yearley, Alexander G. ; Jha, Rohan ; Chalif, Eric J. ; Zaidi, Hasan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ruchit V. ; Chalif, Joshua I. ; Yearley, Alexander G. ; Jha, Rohan ; Chalif, Eric J. ; Zaidi, Hasan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical intervention is a cornerstone of adult spinal deformity (ASD) management. However, there remain burdens from complications including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Posterior anatomical preservation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) has emerged as an accessible approach to potentially reduce PJK/PJF risk.
We assembled an institutional cohort of ASD patients evaluated between 2017-2022 who had spinal fusion performed with a modified subperiosteal dissection at and immediately below the UIV. Through a meta-analysis with a random-effects model, we compared our incidence of PJK/PJF against other prophylactic interventions.
Ninety patients were identified, (median age: 64 years, average follow-up: 19 months). A majority had scoliosis and/or spinal stenosis with a median of 8 levels fused (40% revision cases). 6.7% and 3.3% of patients developed PJK and PJF respectively, with the most common clinical correlate being a minor neurologic deficit such as numbness (37.8%). PJK/PJF and non-PJK/PJF patients had similar post-operative complication profiles. Radiographic parameters varied: the PJK/PJF cohort had greater pre-operative pelvic incidence/pelvic tilt and post-operative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch as well as smaller operative correction of the thoracolumbar Cobb angle. In the literature, prophylactic interventions broadly reduced the incidence of PJK/PJF, with a pooled estimate of 19% compared to 36% in patients who did not receive any additional intervention.
Preservation of posterior anatomical structures likely has a role in reducing the rate of PJK/PJF. Linking radiographic parameters to PJK/PJF while studying techniques that keep posterior structures intact may be steps toward improving ASD correction outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39889963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adult spine deformity ; anatomic preservation ; posterior spinal tension bands ; proximal junctional failure ; proximal junctional kyphosis ; surgical complications</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2025-01, p.123741, Article 123741</ispartof><rights>2025</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2077-0697 ; 0000-0002-3200-4810 ; 0000-0002-7313-8188 ; 0000-0001-9592-8263</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39889963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ruchit V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalif, Joshua I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yearley, Alexander G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalif, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Hasan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Surgical intervention is a cornerstone of adult spinal deformity (ASD) management. However, there remain burdens from complications including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Posterior anatomical preservation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) has emerged as an accessible approach to potentially reduce PJK/PJF risk.
We assembled an institutional cohort of ASD patients evaluated between 2017-2022 who had spinal fusion performed with a modified subperiosteal dissection at and immediately below the UIV. Through a meta-analysis with a random-effects model, we compared our incidence of PJK/PJF against other prophylactic interventions.
Ninety patients were identified, (median age: 64 years, average follow-up: 19 months). A majority had scoliosis and/or spinal stenosis with a median of 8 levels fused (40% revision cases). 6.7% and 3.3% of patients developed PJK and PJF respectively, with the most common clinical correlate being a minor neurologic deficit such as numbness (37.8%). PJK/PJF and non-PJK/PJF patients had similar post-operative complication profiles. Radiographic parameters varied: the PJK/PJF cohort had greater pre-operative pelvic incidence/pelvic tilt and post-operative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch as well as smaller operative correction of the thoracolumbar Cobb angle. In the literature, prophylactic interventions broadly reduced the incidence of PJK/PJF, with a pooled estimate of 19% compared to 36% in patients who did not receive any additional intervention.
Preservation of posterior anatomical structures likely has a role in reducing the rate of PJK/PJF. Linking radiographic parameters to PJK/PJF while studying techniques that keep posterior structures intact may be steps toward improving ASD correction outcomes.</description><subject>adult spine deformity</subject><subject>anatomic preservation</subject><subject>posterior spinal tension bands</subject><subject>proximal junctional failure</subject><subject>proximal junctional kyphosis</subject><subject>surgical complications</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UU1LAzEQDaJYqf0DHmSPXrrmYz8S8FKK1WrFHvQcYnYWs-yXyabaf2-WVoeBecw8hjfzELoiOCaYZLdV_N2CjymmaUwoyxNygi4Iz_mc55k4_ccpnqCZcxUOwUjCc3aOJkxwLkTGLpBcN73SQ9SV0aKolIZ2iF68075WNlq0augao1UdbS04sDs1mK6NQm5t92OaMHjyrR6bAT7v-8_OGReptohWytTewiU6K1XtYHasU_S-un9bPs43rw_r5WIzB4IFCzoBpwXmlJCyzDAVFKtUFDnPc5ymlJEi4zQcUzLNEqE5ZAnjmNGSCwo4wWyKbg57e9t9eXCDbIzTUNeqhc47yUhG05wmNAvU6yPVfzRQyN6GQ-xe_j0lEO4OBAiCdwasdNpAq6EwFvQgi85IguVog6zkaIMcbZAHG9gv0wN4kg</recordid><startdate>20250129</startdate><enddate>20250129</enddate><creator>Patel, Ruchit V.</creator><creator>Chalif, Joshua I.</creator><creator>Yearley, Alexander G.</creator><creator>Jha, Rohan</creator><creator>Chalif, Eric J.</creator><creator>Zaidi, Hasan A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-0697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3200-4810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-8188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-8263</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250129</creationdate><title>Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure</title><author>Patel, Ruchit V. ; Chalif, Joshua I. ; Yearley, Alexander G. ; Jha, Rohan ; Chalif, Eric J. ; Zaidi, Hasan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1093-87e05d08211ff602920a59d7877055231d682875f3c349c8e6438032f892e0403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>adult spine deformity</topic><topic>anatomic preservation</topic><topic>posterior spinal tension bands</topic><topic>proximal junctional failure</topic><topic>proximal junctional kyphosis</topic><topic>surgical complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ruchit V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalif, Joshua I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yearley, Alexander G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalif, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaidi, Hasan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Ruchit V.</au><au>Chalif, Joshua I.</au><au>Yearley, Alexander G.</au><au>Jha, Rohan</au><au>Chalif, Eric J.</au><au>Zaidi, Hasan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2025-01-29</date><risdate>2025</risdate><spage>123741</spage><pages>123741-</pages><artnum>123741</artnum><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Surgical intervention is a cornerstone of adult spinal deformity (ASD) management. However, there remain burdens from complications including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Posterior anatomical preservation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) has emerged as an accessible approach to potentially reduce PJK/PJF risk.
We assembled an institutional cohort of ASD patients evaluated between 2017-2022 who had spinal fusion performed with a modified subperiosteal dissection at and immediately below the UIV. Through a meta-analysis with a random-effects model, we compared our incidence of PJK/PJF against other prophylactic interventions.
Ninety patients were identified, (median age: 64 years, average follow-up: 19 months). A majority had scoliosis and/or spinal stenosis with a median of 8 levels fused (40% revision cases). 6.7% and 3.3% of patients developed PJK and PJF respectively, with the most common clinical correlate being a minor neurologic deficit such as numbness (37.8%). PJK/PJF and non-PJK/PJF patients had similar post-operative complication profiles. Radiographic parameters varied: the PJK/PJF cohort had greater pre-operative pelvic incidence/pelvic tilt and post-operative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch as well as smaller operative correction of the thoracolumbar Cobb angle. In the literature, prophylactic interventions broadly reduced the incidence of PJK/PJF, with a pooled estimate of 19% compared to 36% in patients who did not receive any additional intervention.
Preservation of posterior anatomical structures likely has a role in reducing the rate of PJK/PJF. Linking radiographic parameters to PJK/PJF while studying techniques that keep posterior structures intact may be steps toward improving ASD correction outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39889963</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123741</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-0697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3200-4810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-8188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-8263</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2025-01, p.123741, Article 123741 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3162572426 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | adult spine deformity anatomic preservation posterior spinal tension bands proximal junctional failure proximal junctional kyphosis surgical complications |
title | Impact of Adjacent Muscular Anatomical Preservation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T09%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Adjacent%20Muscular%20Anatomical%20Preservation%20on%20Proximal%20Junctional%20Kyphosis%20and%20Failure&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Patel,%20Ruchit%20V.&rft.date=2025-01-29&rft.spage=123741&rft.pages=123741-&rft.artnum=123741&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3162572426%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3162572426&rft_id=info:pmid/39889963&rft_els_id=S187887502500097X&rfr_iscdi=true |