Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes

The aim of this study was to develop an electrolysis system to produce silver nanoparticles free from toxic gases, as the most common reduction and electrolysis techniques produce nitrogen dioxide (NO ) as a byproduct, which is harmful to human health. The new electrolysis system used two identical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antibiotics (Basel) 2025-01, Vol.14 (1), p.86
Hauptverfasser: Suparno, Suparno, Prasetyowati, Rita, Aziz, Khafidh Nur, Rahma, Anggarwati, Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu, Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani, Grace, Deby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 86
container_title Antibiotics (Basel)
container_volume 14
creator Suparno, Suparno
Prasetyowati, Rita
Aziz, Khafidh Nur
Rahma, Anggarwati
Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu
Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani
Grace, Deby
description The aim of this study was to develop an electrolysis system to produce silver nanoparticles free from toxic gases, as the most common reduction and electrolysis techniques produce nitrogen dioxide (NO ) as a byproduct, which is harmful to human health. The new electrolysis system used two identical silver plate electrodes, replacing silver and carbon rods, and used water as the electrolyte instead of silver nitrate (AgNO ) solution since AgNO is the source of NO . The electrolytic silver nanoparticles (ESNs) produced by the new system were characterized and compared with reductive silver nanoparticles (RSNs). Using UV-Visible spectrophotometry, absorption peaks were found at 425 nm (ESN) and 437 nm (RSN). Using dynamic light scattering, the particle diameters were measured at 40.3 nm and 39.9 nm for ESNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively, and 74.0 nm and 74.6 nm for RSNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively. Antibacterial activity against ( ) was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer method. It was found that the efficacy of ESNs and RSNs was relatively lower than that of 5% chloramphenicol because it was measured in different concentration units (ESNs and RSNs in ppm and chloramphenicol in %). Using the calibration curve, the efficacy of 5% chloramphenicol was comparable to that of 0.005% ESN. It was also found that developed a strong resistance to chloramphenicol and showed no resistance to ESNs. This finding underlines the tremendous potential of ESNs as a future antibiotic raw material.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/antibiotics14010086
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3159799843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_95ec7e985418499a83303c0648fc6e26</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3159194524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4f243b61877c17f6d2b079e1789b3c136b1e43f8abbd9c8e4a6797336d0dd60c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl2LEzEUDaK4S91fIEjAF1-qydxMPp6klK4uLCp-PIdMJlNTpklNMoX-e7Ntd9kV85KQe8659x4OQq8peQ-gyAcTiu98LN5mygglRPJn6LIhQs05yOb5o_cFusp5Q-pRFCSRL9EFKNlKEOQSlcWdkLHFJW9GvBoGb4094GXc7kzyOQYcB7wanS0pjofaD5vQ4--un2zxe4d_-HHvEv5iQqyEWh9dxou18SEX_C3FnY_hvsG0xcYGl1-hF4MZs7s63zP063r1c_l5fvv1081ycTu3AG2Zs6Fh0HEqhbBUDLxvurqTo0KqDiwF3lHHYJCm63plpWOGCyUAeE_6nhMLM3Rz0u2j2ehd8luTDjoar48fMa31eWStWmeFq7YwKplSRgIQsIQzOVjuGl61Pp60dlO3db11oSQzPhF9Wgn-t17HvaZUtEe7Z-jdWSHFP5PLRW99tm4cTXBxyhpoq4RSkkGFvv0HuolTCtWrI4oq1lZrZghOKJtizskND9NQou9Sov-Tksp683iRB859JuAvt6-9Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3159194524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Suparno, Suparno ; Prasetyowati, Rita ; Aziz, Khafidh Nur ; Rahma, Anggarwati ; Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu ; Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani ; Grace, Deby</creator><creatorcontrib>Suparno, Suparno ; Prasetyowati, Rita ; Aziz, Khafidh Nur ; Rahma, Anggarwati ; Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu ; Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani ; Grace, Deby</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to develop an electrolysis system to produce silver nanoparticles free from toxic gases, as the most common reduction and electrolysis techniques produce nitrogen dioxide (NO ) as a byproduct, which is harmful to human health. The new electrolysis system used two identical silver plate electrodes, replacing silver and carbon rods, and used water as the electrolyte instead of silver nitrate (AgNO ) solution since AgNO is the source of NO . The electrolytic silver nanoparticles (ESNs) produced by the new system were characterized and compared with reductive silver nanoparticles (RSNs). Using UV-Visible spectrophotometry, absorption peaks were found at 425 nm (ESN) and 437 nm (RSN). Using dynamic light scattering, the particle diameters were measured at 40.3 nm and 39.9 nm for ESNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively, and 74.0 nm and 74.6 nm for RSNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively. Antibacterial activity against ( ) was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer method. It was found that the efficacy of ESNs and RSNs was relatively lower than that of 5% chloramphenicol because it was measured in different concentration units (ESNs and RSNs in ppm and chloramphenicol in %). Using the calibration curve, the efficacy of 5% chloramphenicol was comparable to that of 0.005% ESN. It was also found that developed a strong resistance to chloramphenicol and showed no resistance to ESNs. This finding underlines the tremendous potential of ESNs as a future antibiotic raw material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-6382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-6382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14010086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39858370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Antibacterial activity ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Bacteria ; bacterial resistance ; Chloramphenicol ; Chloromycetin ; Drug resistance ; Effectiveness ; Electrolysis ; Free radicals ; Gases ; Kirby–Bauer method ; Light scattering ; Nanoparticles ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Photon correlation spectroscopy ; Propionibacterium acnes ; Proteins ; Raw materials ; reduction ; Reduction (electrolytic) ; Silver ; Silver nitrate ; Spectrophotometry ; Spectrum analysis ; toxic free electrolysis</subject><ispartof>Antibiotics (Basel), 2025-01, Vol.14 (1), p.86</ispartof><rights>2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2025 by the authors. 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4f243b61877c17f6d2b079e1789b3c136b1e43f8abbd9c8e4a6797336d0dd60c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1648-026X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759858/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759858/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39858370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suparno, Suparno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasetyowati, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Khafidh Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahma, Anggarwati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Deby</creatorcontrib><title>Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes</title><title>Antibiotics (Basel)</title><addtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to develop an electrolysis system to produce silver nanoparticles free from toxic gases, as the most common reduction and electrolysis techniques produce nitrogen dioxide (NO ) as a byproduct, which is harmful to human health. The new electrolysis system used two identical silver plate electrodes, replacing silver and carbon rods, and used water as the electrolyte instead of silver nitrate (AgNO ) solution since AgNO is the source of NO . The electrolytic silver nanoparticles (ESNs) produced by the new system were characterized and compared with reductive silver nanoparticles (RSNs). Using UV-Visible spectrophotometry, absorption peaks were found at 425 nm (ESN) and 437 nm (RSN). Using dynamic light scattering, the particle diameters were measured at 40.3 nm and 39.9 nm for ESNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively, and 74.0 nm and 74.6 nm for RSNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively. Antibacterial activity against ( ) was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer method. It was found that the efficacy of ESNs and RSNs was relatively lower than that of 5% chloramphenicol because it was measured in different concentration units (ESNs and RSNs in ppm and chloramphenicol in %). Using the calibration curve, the efficacy of 5% chloramphenicol was comparable to that of 0.005% ESN. It was also found that developed a strong resistance to chloramphenicol and showed no resistance to ESNs. This finding underlines the tremendous potential of ESNs as a future antibiotic raw material.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Antibacterial activity</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial resistance</subject><subject>Chloramphenicol</subject><subject>Chloromycetin</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Free radicals</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Kirby–Bauer method</subject><subject>Light scattering</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Photon correlation spectroscopy</subject><subject>Propionibacterium acnes</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>reduction</subject><subject>Reduction (electrolytic)</subject><subject>Silver</subject><subject>Silver nitrate</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>toxic free electrolysis</subject><issn>2079-6382</issn><issn>2079-6382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl2LEzEUDaK4S91fIEjAF1-qydxMPp6klK4uLCp-PIdMJlNTpklNMoX-e7Ntd9kV85KQe8659x4OQq8peQ-gyAcTiu98LN5mygglRPJn6LIhQs05yOb5o_cFusp5Q-pRFCSRL9EFKNlKEOQSlcWdkLHFJW9GvBoGb4094GXc7kzyOQYcB7wanS0pjofaD5vQ4--un2zxe4d_-HHvEv5iQqyEWh9dxou18SEX_C3FnY_hvsG0xcYGl1-hF4MZs7s63zP063r1c_l5fvv1081ycTu3AG2Zs6Fh0HEqhbBUDLxvurqTo0KqDiwF3lHHYJCm63plpWOGCyUAeE_6nhMLM3Rz0u2j2ehd8luTDjoar48fMa31eWStWmeFq7YwKplSRgIQsIQzOVjuGl61Pp60dlO3db11oSQzPhF9Wgn-t17HvaZUtEe7Z-jdWSHFP5PLRW99tm4cTXBxyhpoq4RSkkGFvv0HuolTCtWrI4oq1lZrZghOKJtizskND9NQou9Sov-Tksp683iRB859JuAvt6-9Gw</recordid><startdate>20250114</startdate><enddate>20250114</enddate><creator>Suparno, Suparno</creator><creator>Prasetyowati, Rita</creator><creator>Aziz, Khafidh Nur</creator><creator>Rahma, Anggarwati</creator><creator>Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu</creator><creator>Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani</creator><creator>Grace, Deby</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-026X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250114</creationdate><title>Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes</title><author>Suparno, Suparno ; Prasetyowati, Rita ; Aziz, Khafidh Nur ; Rahma, Anggarwati ; Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu ; Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani ; Grace, Deby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-4f243b61877c17f6d2b079e1789b3c136b1e43f8abbd9c8e4a6797336d0dd60c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Antibacterial activity</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial resistance</topic><topic>Chloramphenicol</topic><topic>Chloromycetin</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Free radicals</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Kirby–Bauer method</topic><topic>Light scattering</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Photon correlation spectroscopy</topic><topic>Propionibacterium acnes</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>reduction</topic><topic>Reduction (electrolytic)</topic><topic>Silver</topic><topic>Silver nitrate</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>toxic free electrolysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suparno, Suparno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasetyowati, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Khafidh Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahma, Anggarwati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, Deby</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suparno, Suparno</au><au>Prasetyowati, Rita</au><au>Aziz, Khafidh Nur</au><au>Rahma, Anggarwati</au><au>Lestari, Eka Sentia Ayu</au><au>Nabiilah, Siti Chaerani</au><au>Grace, Deby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes</atitle><jtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</addtitle><date>2025-01-14</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><pages>86-</pages><issn>2079-6382</issn><eissn>2079-6382</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to develop an electrolysis system to produce silver nanoparticles free from toxic gases, as the most common reduction and electrolysis techniques produce nitrogen dioxide (NO ) as a byproduct, which is harmful to human health. The new electrolysis system used two identical silver plate electrodes, replacing silver and carbon rods, and used water as the electrolyte instead of silver nitrate (AgNO ) solution since AgNO is the source of NO . The electrolytic silver nanoparticles (ESNs) produced by the new system were characterized and compared with reductive silver nanoparticles (RSNs). Using UV-Visible spectrophotometry, absorption peaks were found at 425 nm (ESN) and 437 nm (RSN). Using dynamic light scattering, the particle diameters were measured at 40.3 nm and 39.9 nm for ESNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively, and 74.0 nm and 74.6 nm for RSNs at concentrations of 10 ppm and 30 ppm, respectively. Antibacterial activity against ( ) was assessed using the Kirby-Bauer method. It was found that the efficacy of ESNs and RSNs was relatively lower than that of 5% chloramphenicol because it was measured in different concentration units (ESNs and RSNs in ppm and chloramphenicol in %). Using the calibration curve, the efficacy of 5% chloramphenicol was comparable to that of 0.005% ESN. It was also found that developed a strong resistance to chloramphenicol and showed no resistance to ESNs. This finding underlines the tremendous potential of ESNs as a future antibiotic raw material.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39858370</pmid><doi>10.3390/antibiotics14010086</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-026X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-6382
ispartof Antibiotics (Basel), 2025-01, Vol.14 (1), p.86
issn 2079-6382
2079-6382
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3159799843
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Acids
Antibacterial activity
Antibiotics
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Bacteria
bacterial resistance
Chloramphenicol
Chloromycetin
Drug resistance
Effectiveness
Electrolysis
Free radicals
Gases
Kirby–Bauer method
Light scattering
Nanoparticles
Nitrates
Nitrogen dioxide
Photon correlation spectroscopy
Propionibacterium acnes
Proteins
Raw materials
reduction
Reduction (electrolytic)
Silver
Silver nitrate
Spectrophotometry
Spectrum analysis
toxic free electrolysis
title Antibacterial Efficacy Comparison of Electrolytic and Reductive Silver Nanoparticles Against Propionibacterium acnes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A19%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibacterial%20Efficacy%20Comparison%20of%20Electrolytic%20and%20Reductive%20Silver%20Nanoparticles%20Against%20Propionibacterium%20acnes&rft.jtitle=Antibiotics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Suparno,%20Suparno&rft.date=2025-01-14&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.pages=86-&rft.issn=2079-6382&rft.eissn=2079-6382&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/antibiotics14010086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3159194524%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3159194524&rft_id=info:pmid/39858370&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_95ec7e985418499a83303c0648fc6e26&rfr_iscdi=true