R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study

R21 is a novel malaria vaccine, composed of a fusion protein of the malaria circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen. Following favourable safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of R21 administered with Matrix-M (R21/MM) against clinical malaria...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet. Microbe 2025-01, p.100867, Article 100867
Hauptverfasser: Venkatraman, Navin, Silman, Daniel, Bellamy, Duncan, Stockdale, Lisa, Bowyer, Georgina, Edwards, Nick J, Griffiths, Oliver, Lopez, Fernando Ramos, Powlson, Jonathan, Mair, Catherine, Folegatti, Pedro M, Datoo, Mehreen S, Morter, Richard, Minassian, Angela M, Poulton, Ian, Collins, Katharine A, Brod, Florian, Angell-Manning, Philip, Berrie, Eleanor, Brendish, Nathan, Glenn, Greg, Fries, Louis, Baum, Jake, Blagborough, Andrew M, Roberts, Rachel, Lawrie, Alison M, Angus, Brian, Lewis, David J M, Faust, Saul N, Ewer, Katie J, Hill, Adrian V S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100867
container_title The Lancet. Microbe
container_volume
creator Venkatraman, Navin
Silman, Daniel
Bellamy, Duncan
Stockdale, Lisa
Bowyer, Georgina
Edwards, Nick J
Griffiths, Oliver
Lopez, Fernando Ramos
Powlson, Jonathan
Mair, Catherine
Folegatti, Pedro M
Datoo, Mehreen S
Morter, Richard
Minassian, Angela M
Poulton, Ian
Collins, Katharine A
Brod, Florian
Angell-Manning, Philip
Berrie, Eleanor
Brendish, Nathan
Glenn, Greg
Fries, Louis
Baum, Jake
Blagborough, Andrew M
Roberts, Rachel
Lawrie, Alison M
Angus, Brian
Lewis, David J M
Faust, Saul N
Ewer, Katie J
Hill, Adrian V S
description R21 is a novel malaria vaccine, composed of a fusion protein of the malaria circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen. Following favourable safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of R21 administered with Matrix-M (R21/MM) against clinical malaria in adults from the UK who were malaria naive in a controlled human malaria infection study. In this open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2A controlled human malaria infection study undertaken in Oxford, Southampton, and London, UK, we tested five novel vaccination regimens of R21/MM. A standard three-dose regimen (groups 1 and 6) was compared with a reduced (fractional) third dose (groups 2 and 5) of R21/MM, concomitant administration with viral vectors ChAd63-MVA expressing ME-TRAP (group 3), and a two-dose R21/MM regimen (group 7). Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) was delivered by mosquito bite at Imperial College London, London, UK, 3-4 weeks after final vaccination (or 18 months after final vaccination for group 6) alongside unvaccinated controls (groups 4A and 4B). The primary outcome measures were to assess safety of the vaccines in healthy malaria-naive volunteers and the efficacy (occurrence of blood-stage malaria infection) of the different vaccine regimens compared with non-vaccinated controls after CHMI. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905019). 66 volunteers were enrolled with 59 undergoing subsequent CHMI. All vaccination schedules were well tolerated. The highest level of protection against CHMI was observed in participants receiving the standard three-dose regimen of R21/MM (group 1, nine of 11 volunteers protected) with protection maintained in three of five volunteers re-challenged by CHMI 7·5 months later. Protection against malaria was also seen in group 2, group 3, and group 5 compared with unvaccinated control participants. Total IgG antibody responses to the NANP repeat region of circumsporozoite protein peaked after the third dose of R21/MM in all volunteers and were well maintained to 90 days after challenge. Reducing the third dose did not affect protection or antibody concentrations. Our study shows that R21/MM elicits high-level efficacy against clinical malaria in a controlled human infection model of malaria in adults who are malaria naive. These data supported the evaluation of R21/MM in field efficacy trials in the target population of young children in malaria-endemic areas. EU Horizon 2020, the U
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00083-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3155358058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155358058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1021-2a7e92ac987773cf70530c467d896d161dabc58a8c71f9e45e3ef4ef2a7d143d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUcluFTEQHCEQiUI-AeRjkDB4Gc_CDUVhEYmQgJytfnZP4shjD_ZM4P1N_oJ7vgzPyyJO3SpXVbe7quolZ2854827H6JpGqpE3R6J-jVjrJOUP6n2H-Gn__V71WHOV4UkFBdcqefVnuw7piTj-9Xf74ITF8gZzMn9oWcE7NVyDWFewfOvZAQPyQEN4K6xPC5-JiMGAsGSEAOdEl6Elf477uALtIR3tFa3N1uElN8X5u1NnDBQDxv0b8gEaXbg_ZZsvAsWbYEuISPhVAAxMcwpel9sLpcRwsMCZZ0BzexiIHle7PZF9WwAn_Hwvh5U5x9Pfh5_pqffPn05_nBKDWdidWyxF2D6rm1baYZ2_bapm9Z2fWN5wy1sjOqgMy0feqwVShxqHIrO8lpaeVAd3flOKf5aMM96dNmg9xAwLlnLclCpyjW7QlV3VJNizgkHPSU3QtpqzvQam97FptdMtKj1LjbNi-7V_YhlM6J9VD2EJP8BhKeVBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155358058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Venkatraman, Navin ; Silman, Daniel ; Bellamy, Duncan ; Stockdale, Lisa ; Bowyer, Georgina ; Edwards, Nick J ; Griffiths, Oliver ; Lopez, Fernando Ramos ; Powlson, Jonathan ; Mair, Catherine ; Folegatti, Pedro M ; Datoo, Mehreen S ; Morter, Richard ; Minassian, Angela M ; Poulton, Ian ; Collins, Katharine A ; Brod, Florian ; Angell-Manning, Philip ; Berrie, Eleanor ; Brendish, Nathan ; Glenn, Greg ; Fries, Louis ; Baum, Jake ; Blagborough, Andrew M ; Roberts, Rachel ; Lawrie, Alison M ; Angus, Brian ; Lewis, David J M ; Faust, Saul N ; Ewer, Katie J ; Hill, Adrian V S</creator><creatorcontrib>Venkatraman, Navin ; Silman, Daniel ; Bellamy, Duncan ; Stockdale, Lisa ; Bowyer, Georgina ; Edwards, Nick J ; Griffiths, Oliver ; Lopez, Fernando Ramos ; Powlson, Jonathan ; Mair, Catherine ; Folegatti, Pedro M ; Datoo, Mehreen S ; Morter, Richard ; Minassian, Angela M ; Poulton, Ian ; Collins, Katharine A ; Brod, Florian ; Angell-Manning, Philip ; Berrie, Eleanor ; Brendish, Nathan ; Glenn, Greg ; Fries, Louis ; Baum, Jake ; Blagborough, Andrew M ; Roberts, Rachel ; Lawrie, Alison M ; Angus, Brian ; Lewis, David J M ; Faust, Saul N ; Ewer, Katie J ; Hill, Adrian V S</creatorcontrib><description>R21 is a novel malaria vaccine, composed of a fusion protein of the malaria circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen. Following favourable safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of R21 administered with Matrix-M (R21/MM) against clinical malaria in adults from the UK who were malaria naive in a controlled human malaria infection study. In this open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2A controlled human malaria infection study undertaken in Oxford, Southampton, and London, UK, we tested five novel vaccination regimens of R21/MM. A standard three-dose regimen (groups 1 and 6) was compared with a reduced (fractional) third dose (groups 2 and 5) of R21/MM, concomitant administration with viral vectors ChAd63-MVA expressing ME-TRAP (group 3), and a two-dose R21/MM regimen (group 7). Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) was delivered by mosquito bite at Imperial College London, London, UK, 3-4 weeks after final vaccination (or 18 months after final vaccination for group 6) alongside unvaccinated controls (groups 4A and 4B). The primary outcome measures were to assess safety of the vaccines in healthy malaria-naive volunteers and the efficacy (occurrence of blood-stage malaria infection) of the different vaccine regimens compared with non-vaccinated controls after CHMI. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905019). 66 volunteers were enrolled with 59 undergoing subsequent CHMI. All vaccination schedules were well tolerated. The highest level of protection against CHMI was observed in participants receiving the standard three-dose regimen of R21/MM (group 1, nine of 11 volunteers protected) with protection maintained in three of five volunteers re-challenged by CHMI 7·5 months later. Protection against malaria was also seen in group 2, group 3, and group 5 compared with unvaccinated control participants. Total IgG antibody responses to the NANP repeat region of circumsporozoite protein peaked after the third dose of R21/MM in all volunteers and were well maintained to 90 days after challenge. Reducing the third dose did not affect protection or antibody concentrations. Our study shows that R21/MM elicits high-level efficacy against clinical malaria in a controlled human infection model of malaria in adults who are malaria naive. These data supported the evaluation of R21/MM in field efficacy trials in the target population of young children in malaria-endemic areas. EU Horizon 2020, the UK Medical Research Council, the European Commission, the UK National Institute of Health Research, the Imperial NIHR Clinical Research Facility, the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the Wellcome Trust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-5247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-5247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00083-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39805301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>The Lancet. Microbe, 2025-01, p.100867, Article 100867</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1021-2a7e92ac987773cf70530c467d896d161dabc58a8c71f9e45e3ef4ef2a7d143d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9589-4937 ; 0000-0003-0900-9629 ; 0000-0001-9827-9836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39805301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venkatraman, Navin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowyer, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Nick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Fernando Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powlson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folegatti, Pedro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datoo, Mehreen S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morter, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minassian, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulton, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Katharine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brod, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angell-Manning, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrie, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendish, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fries, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blagborough, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrie, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faust, Saul N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewer, Katie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Adrian V S</creatorcontrib><title>R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study</title><title>The Lancet. Microbe</title><addtitle>Lancet Microbe</addtitle><description>R21 is a novel malaria vaccine, composed of a fusion protein of the malaria circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen. Following favourable safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of R21 administered with Matrix-M (R21/MM) against clinical malaria in adults from the UK who were malaria naive in a controlled human malaria infection study. In this open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2A controlled human malaria infection study undertaken in Oxford, Southampton, and London, UK, we tested five novel vaccination regimens of R21/MM. A standard three-dose regimen (groups 1 and 6) was compared with a reduced (fractional) third dose (groups 2 and 5) of R21/MM, concomitant administration with viral vectors ChAd63-MVA expressing ME-TRAP (group 3), and a two-dose R21/MM regimen (group 7). Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) was delivered by mosquito bite at Imperial College London, London, UK, 3-4 weeks after final vaccination (or 18 months after final vaccination for group 6) alongside unvaccinated controls (groups 4A and 4B). The primary outcome measures were to assess safety of the vaccines in healthy malaria-naive volunteers and the efficacy (occurrence of blood-stage malaria infection) of the different vaccine regimens compared with non-vaccinated controls after CHMI. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905019). 66 volunteers were enrolled with 59 undergoing subsequent CHMI. All vaccination schedules were well tolerated. The highest level of protection against CHMI was observed in participants receiving the standard three-dose regimen of R21/MM (group 1, nine of 11 volunteers protected) with protection maintained in three of five volunteers re-challenged by CHMI 7·5 months later. Protection against malaria was also seen in group 2, group 3, and group 5 compared with unvaccinated control participants. Total IgG antibody responses to the NANP repeat region of circumsporozoite protein peaked after the third dose of R21/MM in all volunteers and were well maintained to 90 days after challenge. Reducing the third dose did not affect protection or antibody concentrations. Our study shows that R21/MM elicits high-level efficacy against clinical malaria in a controlled human infection model of malaria in adults who are malaria naive. These data supported the evaluation of R21/MM in field efficacy trials in the target population of young children in malaria-endemic areas. EU Horizon 2020, the UK Medical Research Council, the European Commission, the UK National Institute of Health Research, the Imperial NIHR Clinical Research Facility, the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the Wellcome Trust.</description><issn>2666-5247</issn><issn>2666-5247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUcluFTEQHCEQiUI-AeRjkDB4Gc_CDUVhEYmQgJytfnZP4shjD_ZM4P1N_oJ7vgzPyyJO3SpXVbe7quolZ2854827H6JpGqpE3R6J-jVjrJOUP6n2H-Gn__V71WHOV4UkFBdcqefVnuw7piTj-9Xf74ITF8gZzMn9oWcE7NVyDWFewfOvZAQPyQEN4K6xPC5-JiMGAsGSEAOdEl6Elf477uALtIR3tFa3N1uElN8X5u1NnDBQDxv0b8gEaXbg_ZZsvAsWbYEuISPhVAAxMcwpel9sLpcRwsMCZZ0BzexiIHle7PZF9WwAn_Hwvh5U5x9Pfh5_pqffPn05_nBKDWdidWyxF2D6rm1baYZ2_bapm9Z2fWN5wy1sjOqgMy0feqwVShxqHIrO8lpaeVAd3flOKf5aMM96dNmg9xAwLlnLclCpyjW7QlV3VJNizgkHPSU3QtpqzvQam97FptdMtKj1LjbNi-7V_YhlM6J9VD2EJP8BhKeVBA</recordid><startdate>20250109</startdate><enddate>20250109</enddate><creator>Venkatraman, Navin</creator><creator>Silman, Daniel</creator><creator>Bellamy, Duncan</creator><creator>Stockdale, Lisa</creator><creator>Bowyer, Georgina</creator><creator>Edwards, Nick J</creator><creator>Griffiths, Oliver</creator><creator>Lopez, Fernando Ramos</creator><creator>Powlson, Jonathan</creator><creator>Mair, Catherine</creator><creator>Folegatti, Pedro M</creator><creator>Datoo, Mehreen S</creator><creator>Morter, Richard</creator><creator>Minassian, Angela M</creator><creator>Poulton, Ian</creator><creator>Collins, Katharine A</creator><creator>Brod, Florian</creator><creator>Angell-Manning, Philip</creator><creator>Berrie, Eleanor</creator><creator>Brendish, Nathan</creator><creator>Glenn, Greg</creator><creator>Fries, Louis</creator><creator>Baum, Jake</creator><creator>Blagborough, Andrew M</creator><creator>Roberts, Rachel</creator><creator>Lawrie, Alison M</creator><creator>Angus, Brian</creator><creator>Lewis, David J M</creator><creator>Faust, Saul N</creator><creator>Ewer, Katie J</creator><creator>Hill, Adrian V S</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-9629</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-9836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250109</creationdate><title>R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study</title><author>Venkatraman, Navin ; Silman, Daniel ; Bellamy, Duncan ; Stockdale, Lisa ; Bowyer, Georgina ; Edwards, Nick J ; Griffiths, Oliver ; Lopez, Fernando Ramos ; Powlson, Jonathan ; Mair, Catherine ; Folegatti, Pedro M ; Datoo, Mehreen S ; Morter, Richard ; Minassian, Angela M ; Poulton, Ian ; Collins, Katharine A ; Brod, Florian ; Angell-Manning, Philip ; Berrie, Eleanor ; Brendish, Nathan ; Glenn, Greg ; Fries, Louis ; Baum, Jake ; Blagborough, Andrew M ; Roberts, Rachel ; Lawrie, Alison M ; Angus, Brian ; Lewis, David J M ; Faust, Saul N ; Ewer, Katie J ; Hill, Adrian V S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1021-2a7e92ac987773cf70530c467d896d161dabc58a8c71f9e45e3ef4ef2a7d143d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venkatraman, Navin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowyer, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Nick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Fernando Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powlson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mair, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folegatti, Pedro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datoo, Mehreen S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morter, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minassian, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulton, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Katharine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brod, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angell-Manning, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrie, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendish, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fries, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blagborough, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrie, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faust, Saul N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewer, Katie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Adrian V S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet. Microbe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venkatraman, Navin</au><au>Silman, Daniel</au><au>Bellamy, Duncan</au><au>Stockdale, Lisa</au><au>Bowyer, Georgina</au><au>Edwards, Nick J</au><au>Griffiths, Oliver</au><au>Lopez, Fernando Ramos</au><au>Powlson, Jonathan</au><au>Mair, Catherine</au><au>Folegatti, Pedro M</au><au>Datoo, Mehreen S</au><au>Morter, Richard</au><au>Minassian, Angela M</au><au>Poulton, Ian</au><au>Collins, Katharine A</au><au>Brod, Florian</au><au>Angell-Manning, Philip</au><au>Berrie, Eleanor</au><au>Brendish, Nathan</au><au>Glenn, Greg</au><au>Fries, Louis</au><au>Baum, Jake</au><au>Blagborough, Andrew M</au><au>Roberts, Rachel</au><au>Lawrie, Alison M</au><au>Angus, Brian</au><au>Lewis, David J M</au><au>Faust, Saul N</au><au>Ewer, Katie J</au><au>Hill, Adrian V S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet. Microbe</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Microbe</addtitle><date>2025-01-09</date><risdate>2025</risdate><spage>100867</spage><pages>100867-</pages><artnum>100867</artnum><issn>2666-5247</issn><eissn>2666-5247</eissn><abstract>R21 is a novel malaria vaccine, composed of a fusion protein of the malaria circumsporozoite protein and hepatitis B surface antigen. Following favourable safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of R21 administered with Matrix-M (R21/MM) against clinical malaria in adults from the UK who were malaria naive in a controlled human malaria infection study. In this open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2A controlled human malaria infection study undertaken in Oxford, Southampton, and London, UK, we tested five novel vaccination regimens of R21/MM. A standard three-dose regimen (groups 1 and 6) was compared with a reduced (fractional) third dose (groups 2 and 5) of R21/MM, concomitant administration with viral vectors ChAd63-MVA expressing ME-TRAP (group 3), and a two-dose R21/MM regimen (group 7). Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) was delivered by mosquito bite at Imperial College London, London, UK, 3-4 weeks after final vaccination (or 18 months after final vaccination for group 6) alongside unvaccinated controls (groups 4A and 4B). The primary outcome measures were to assess safety of the vaccines in healthy malaria-naive volunteers and the efficacy (occurrence of blood-stage malaria infection) of the different vaccine regimens compared with non-vaccinated controls after CHMI. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905019). 66 volunteers were enrolled with 59 undergoing subsequent CHMI. All vaccination schedules were well tolerated. The highest level of protection against CHMI was observed in participants receiving the standard three-dose regimen of R21/MM (group 1, nine of 11 volunteers protected) with protection maintained in three of five volunteers re-challenged by CHMI 7·5 months later. Protection against malaria was also seen in group 2, group 3, and group 5 compared with unvaccinated control participants. Total IgG antibody responses to the NANP repeat region of circumsporozoite protein peaked after the third dose of R21/MM in all volunteers and were well maintained to 90 days after challenge. Reducing the third dose did not affect protection or antibody concentrations. Our study shows that R21/MM elicits high-level efficacy against clinical malaria in a controlled human infection model of malaria in adults who are malaria naive. These data supported the evaluation of R21/MM in field efficacy trials in the target population of young children in malaria-endemic areas. EU Horizon 2020, the UK Medical Research Council, the European Commission, the UK National Institute of Health Research, the Imperial NIHR Clinical Research Facility, the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the Wellcome Trust.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39805301</pmid><doi>10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00083-1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-9629</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-9836</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2666-5247
ispartof The Lancet. Microbe, 2025-01, p.100867, Article 100867
issn 2666-5247
2666-5247
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3155358058
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title R21 in Matrix-M adjuvant in UK malaria-naive adult men and non-pregnant women aged 18-45 years: an open-label, partially blinded, phase 1-2a controlled human malaria infection study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=R21%20in%20Matrix-M%20adjuvant%20in%20UK%20malaria-naive%20adult%20men%20and%20non-pregnant%20women%20aged%2018-45%C2%A0years:%20an%C2%A0open-label,%20partially%20blinded,%20phase%201-2a%20controlled%20human%20malaria%20infection%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet.%20Microbe&rft.au=Venkatraman,%20Navin&rft.date=2025-01-09&rft.spage=100867&rft.pages=100867-&rft.artnum=100867&rft.issn=2666-5247&rft.eissn=2666-5247&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00083-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155358058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155358058&rft_id=info:pmid/39805301&rfr_iscdi=true