Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas
Shelters are microhabitats where animals rest and hide. These microhabitats can be used from short daily periods to long-term estivation or hibernation. Environmental conditions and the phenotypical characteristics of the animal drive habitat selection in relation to shelters. Based on this, climate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoology (Jena) 2022-12, Vol.155, p.126052, Article 126052 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 126052 |
container_title | Zoology (Jena) |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | Forti, Lucas Rodriguez Pontes, Mariana Retuci Augusto-Alves, Guilherme Martins, Allana Hepp, Fábio Szabo, Judit K. |
description | Shelters are microhabitats where animals rest and hide. These microhabitats can be used from short daily periods to long-term estivation or hibernation. Environmental conditions and the phenotypical characteristics of the animal drive habitat selection in relation to shelters. Based on this, climate regions and phylogeny are expected to affect the use of different shelter types. Although shelters are yet to be described for most anuran species, a variety of microhabitats have already been reported as shelter-sites, including dense vegetation, rock crevices, and holes in the ground. In this study, we evaluated photos of frogs for sheltering behaviour from 29 countries in the Americas deposited on the popular citizen-science platform, iNaturalist. We compared the frequency of use of different shelter types identified on the photos among different climate regions and anuran families, also testing possible phylogenetic signals. We identified 11,133 photographs of 378 frog species showing individuals hiding in shelters or in a resting position. We classified observations into 10 shelter types, with live vegetation (24.7 %) being the most commonly recorded natural shelter, followed by hole in the ground (11.4 %) and tree trunk (11.1 %). The use of different shelter types varied between arid and humid climates, and also among different anuran families. We found strong phylogenetic signal for three shelter types (hole in the ground, live vegetation, and water) and the differences in shelter use among taxa suggest a relation with body characteristics. Approximately 47 % of observations of threatened and near threatened species were in hole in the ground, while artificial habitat represented only 3.6 % of the observations in this group. The daily pattern of shelter use corroborated the nocturnal activity of most species. Our findings also expanded the description of shelter sites for 330 species that had no published information on this behaviour. This study contributes to our current knowledge about animal behaviour and highlights the use of citizen science as an effective approach to understand the natural history of amphibians at a large scale.
•Microhabitats where individuals shelter are unknown for most frog species.•Based on citizen science data we identified shelter sites for the first time for 330 species.•Daily use of shelters converges with nocturnal activities for most species.•Threatened species prefer natural over artificial shelters.•Climate and phylog |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.zool.2022.126052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154255016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0944200622000538</els_id><sourcerecordid>3154255016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2ffcc459710f690569694a74a88be62f754e99f90e10443845136ac2653195803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1OGzEUha2KqgTaF-gCeclmUv_PWGKDoC2VkLpp15bjuSaOnHGwHaThLfrGnWSAJau7-c65956D0FdKlpRQ9W2zfE4pLhlhbEmZIpJ9QAvatbxhLSMnaEG0EA0jRJ2is1I2hBBOOf2ETrmikkmtFujfra0WuxQjuAo9Xo3YhRqeYcDFBRhqKLXgDE9gI65rwDlFwMljF8PWVsB26PFuPcb0AMOI03CEfIbHPQxuPJBlDbFCxnXcQcH7Mm_xOT0UbF1OpRw111vIwdnyGX30Nhb48jLP0d8f3__c3DX3v3_-urm-b5zgvDbMe-eE1C0lXmkilVZa2FbYrluBYr6VArT2mgAlQvBOSMqVdUxJTrXsCD9Hl7PvLqfp2FLNNhQHMdoB0r4YTqVgUk5BTyib0eO1GbzZ5en7PBpKzKEKszGHKsyhCjNXMYkuXvz3qy30b5LX7CfgagZg-vIpQDbHxB30IU9lmD6F9_z_A88PmzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3154255016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez ; Pontes, Mariana Retuci ; Augusto-Alves, Guilherme ; Martins, Allana ; Hepp, Fábio ; Szabo, Judit K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez ; Pontes, Mariana Retuci ; Augusto-Alves, Guilherme ; Martins, Allana ; Hepp, Fábio ; Szabo, Judit K.</creatorcontrib><description>Shelters are microhabitats where animals rest and hide. These microhabitats can be used from short daily periods to long-term estivation or hibernation. Environmental conditions and the phenotypical characteristics of the animal drive habitat selection in relation to shelters. Based on this, climate regions and phylogeny are expected to affect the use of different shelter types. Although shelters are yet to be described for most anuran species, a variety of microhabitats have already been reported as shelter-sites, including dense vegetation, rock crevices, and holes in the ground. In this study, we evaluated photos of frogs for sheltering behaviour from 29 countries in the Americas deposited on the popular citizen-science platform, iNaturalist. We compared the frequency of use of different shelter types identified on the photos among different climate regions and anuran families, also testing possible phylogenetic signals. We identified 11,133 photographs of 378 frog species showing individuals hiding in shelters or in a resting position. We classified observations into 10 shelter types, with live vegetation (24.7 %) being the most commonly recorded natural shelter, followed by hole in the ground (11.4 %) and tree trunk (11.1 %). The use of different shelter types varied between arid and humid climates, and also among different anuran families. We found strong phylogenetic signal for three shelter types (hole in the ground, live vegetation, and water) and the differences in shelter use among taxa suggest a relation with body characteristics. Approximately 47 % of observations of threatened and near threatened species were in hole in the ground, while artificial habitat represented only 3.6 % of the observations in this group. The daily pattern of shelter use corroborated the nocturnal activity of most species. Our findings also expanded the description of shelter sites for 330 species that had no published information on this behaviour. This study contributes to our current knowledge about animal behaviour and highlights the use of citizen science as an effective approach to understand the natural history of amphibians at a large scale.
•Microhabitats where individuals shelter are unknown for most frog species.•Based on citizen science data we identified shelter sites for the first time for 330 species.•Daily use of shelters converges with nocturnal activities for most species.•Threatened species prefer natural over artificial shelters.•Climate and phylogeny predict the frequency of shelter use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-2006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2022.126052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36152596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anura ; Anura - genetics ; artificial habitats ; Behavior, Animal ; Biodiversity monitoring ; citizen science ; Climate ; Ecosystem ; estivation ; frogs ; Frogs and toads ; habitat preferences ; hibernation ; natural history ; nocturnal activity ; Phylogeny ; Refuge ; Retreats ; species ; threatened species ; tree trunk ; vegetation ; Volunteer-collected data</subject><ispartof>Zoology (Jena), 2022-12, Vol.155, p.126052, Article 126052</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2ffcc459710f690569694a74a88be62f754e99f90e10443845136ac2653195803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2ffcc459710f690569694a74a88be62f754e99f90e10443845136ac2653195803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200622000538$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Mariana Retuci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto-Alves, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Allana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepp, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Judit K.</creatorcontrib><title>Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas</title><title>Zoology (Jena)</title><addtitle>Zoology (Jena)</addtitle><description>Shelters are microhabitats where animals rest and hide. These microhabitats can be used from short daily periods to long-term estivation or hibernation. Environmental conditions and the phenotypical characteristics of the animal drive habitat selection in relation to shelters. Based on this, climate regions and phylogeny are expected to affect the use of different shelter types. Although shelters are yet to be described for most anuran species, a variety of microhabitats have already been reported as shelter-sites, including dense vegetation, rock crevices, and holes in the ground. In this study, we evaluated photos of frogs for sheltering behaviour from 29 countries in the Americas deposited on the popular citizen-science platform, iNaturalist. We compared the frequency of use of different shelter types identified on the photos among different climate regions and anuran families, also testing possible phylogenetic signals. We identified 11,133 photographs of 378 frog species showing individuals hiding in shelters or in a resting position. We classified observations into 10 shelter types, with live vegetation (24.7 %) being the most commonly recorded natural shelter, followed by hole in the ground (11.4 %) and tree trunk (11.1 %). The use of different shelter types varied between arid and humid climates, and also among different anuran families. We found strong phylogenetic signal for three shelter types (hole in the ground, live vegetation, and water) and the differences in shelter use among taxa suggest a relation with body characteristics. Approximately 47 % of observations of threatened and near threatened species were in hole in the ground, while artificial habitat represented only 3.6 % of the observations in this group. The daily pattern of shelter use corroborated the nocturnal activity of most species. Our findings also expanded the description of shelter sites for 330 species that had no published information on this behaviour. This study contributes to our current knowledge about animal behaviour and highlights the use of citizen science as an effective approach to understand the natural history of amphibians at a large scale.
•Microhabitats where individuals shelter are unknown for most frog species.•Based on citizen science data we identified shelter sites for the first time for 330 species.•Daily use of shelters converges with nocturnal activities for most species.•Threatened species prefer natural over artificial shelters.•Climate and phylogeny predict the frequency of shelter use.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Anura - genetics</subject><subject>artificial habitats</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biodiversity monitoring</subject><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>estivation</subject><subject>frogs</subject><subject>Frogs and toads</subject><subject>habitat preferences</subject><subject>hibernation</subject><subject>natural history</subject><subject>nocturnal activity</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Refuge</subject><subject>Retreats</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>threatened species</subject><subject>tree trunk</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><subject>Volunteer-collected data</subject><issn>0944-2006</issn><issn>1873-2720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1OGzEUha2KqgTaF-gCeclmUv_PWGKDoC2VkLpp15bjuSaOnHGwHaThLfrGnWSAJau7-c65956D0FdKlpRQ9W2zfE4pLhlhbEmZIpJ9QAvatbxhLSMnaEG0EA0jRJ2is1I2hBBOOf2ETrmikkmtFujfra0WuxQjuAo9Xo3YhRqeYcDFBRhqKLXgDE9gI65rwDlFwMljF8PWVsB26PFuPcb0AMOI03CEfIbHPQxuPJBlDbFCxnXcQcH7Mm_xOT0UbF1OpRw111vIwdnyGX30Nhb48jLP0d8f3__c3DX3v3_-urm-b5zgvDbMe-eE1C0lXmkilVZa2FbYrluBYr6VArT2mgAlQvBOSMqVdUxJTrXsCD9Hl7PvLqfp2FLNNhQHMdoB0r4YTqVgUk5BTyib0eO1GbzZ5en7PBpKzKEKszGHKsyhCjNXMYkuXvz3qy30b5LX7CfgagZg-vIpQDbHxB30IU9lmD6F9_z_A88PmzM</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez</creator><creator>Pontes, Mariana Retuci</creator><creator>Augusto-Alves, Guilherme</creator><creator>Martins, Allana</creator><creator>Hepp, Fábio</creator><creator>Szabo, Judit K.</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas</title><author>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez ; Pontes, Mariana Retuci ; Augusto-Alves, Guilherme ; Martins, Allana ; Hepp, Fábio ; Szabo, Judit K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-2ffcc459710f690569694a74a88be62f754e99f90e10443845136ac2653195803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Anura - genetics</topic><topic>artificial habitats</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biodiversity monitoring</topic><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>estivation</topic><topic>frogs</topic><topic>Frogs and toads</topic><topic>habitat preferences</topic><topic>hibernation</topic><topic>natural history</topic><topic>nocturnal activity</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Refuge</topic><topic>Retreats</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>threatened species</topic><topic>tree trunk</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><topic>Volunteer-collected data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontes, Mariana Retuci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto-Alves, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Allana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepp, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Judit K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoology (Jena)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forti, Lucas Rodriguez</au><au>Pontes, Mariana Retuci</au><au>Augusto-Alves, Guilherme</au><au>Martins, Allana</au><au>Hepp, Fábio</au><au>Szabo, Judit K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas</atitle><jtitle>Zoology (Jena)</jtitle><addtitle>Zoology (Jena)</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>155</volume><spage>126052</spage><pages>126052-</pages><artnum>126052</artnum><issn>0944-2006</issn><eissn>1873-2720</eissn><abstract>Shelters are microhabitats where animals rest and hide. These microhabitats can be used from short daily periods to long-term estivation or hibernation. Environmental conditions and the phenotypical characteristics of the animal drive habitat selection in relation to shelters. Based on this, climate regions and phylogeny are expected to affect the use of different shelter types. Although shelters are yet to be described for most anuran species, a variety of microhabitats have already been reported as shelter-sites, including dense vegetation, rock crevices, and holes in the ground. In this study, we evaluated photos of frogs for sheltering behaviour from 29 countries in the Americas deposited on the popular citizen-science platform, iNaturalist. We compared the frequency of use of different shelter types identified on the photos among different climate regions and anuran families, also testing possible phylogenetic signals. We identified 11,133 photographs of 378 frog species showing individuals hiding in shelters or in a resting position. We classified observations into 10 shelter types, with live vegetation (24.7 %) being the most commonly recorded natural shelter, followed by hole in the ground (11.4 %) and tree trunk (11.1 %). The use of different shelter types varied between arid and humid climates, and also among different anuran families. We found strong phylogenetic signal for three shelter types (hole in the ground, live vegetation, and water) and the differences in shelter use among taxa suggest a relation with body characteristics. Approximately 47 % of observations of threatened and near threatened species were in hole in the ground, while artificial habitat represented only 3.6 % of the observations in this group. The daily pattern of shelter use corroborated the nocturnal activity of most species. Our findings also expanded the description of shelter sites for 330 species that had no published information on this behaviour. This study contributes to our current knowledge about animal behaviour and highlights the use of citizen science as an effective approach to understand the natural history of amphibians at a large scale.
•Microhabitats where individuals shelter are unknown for most frog species.•Based on citizen science data we identified shelter sites for the first time for 330 species.•Daily use of shelters converges with nocturnal activities for most species.•Threatened species prefer natural over artificial shelters.•Climate and phylogeny predict the frequency of shelter use.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>36152596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.zool.2022.126052</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-2006 |
ispartof | Zoology (Jena), 2022-12, Vol.155, p.126052, Article 126052 |
issn | 0944-2006 1873-2720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154255016 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Anura Anura - genetics artificial habitats Behavior, Animal Biodiversity monitoring citizen science Climate Ecosystem estivation frogs Frogs and toads habitat preferences hibernation natural history nocturnal activity Phylogeny Refuge Retreats species threatened species tree trunk vegetation Volunteer-collected data |
title | Data collected by citizen scientists reveal the role of climate and phylogeny on the frequency of shelter types used by frogs across the Americas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T21%3A51%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20collected%20by%20citizen%20scientists%20reveal%20the%20role%20of%20climate%20and%20phylogeny%20on%20the%20frequency%20of%20shelter%20types%20used%20by%20frogs%20across%20the%20Americas&rft.jtitle=Zoology%20(Jena)&rft.au=Forti,%20Lucas%20Rodriguez&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=155&rft.spage=126052&rft.pages=126052-&rft.artnum=126052&rft.issn=0944-2006&rft.eissn=1873-2720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.zool.2022.126052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154255016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3154255016&rft_id=info:pmid/36152596&rft_els_id=S0944200622000538&rfr_iscdi=true |