A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning

Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Shu, Sun, Wei, Ren, Miaomiao, Xie, Yutong, Zeng, Decheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65883
container_issue 57
container_start_page 65866
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 31
creator Chen, Shu
Sun, Wei
Ren, Miaomiao
Xie, Yutong
Zeng, Decheng
description Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R avg values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE avg values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154240259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3154240259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlP5DAQhS3EiG34AxyQJS5cwngpx8kRIZaRkLjMnC3HrnQHJQ7YHYn-9zjTzSIOI071VP7q2a5HyAlnF5wx_StxLlVZMAGFVEpUBeyQA15yKDTU9e4nvU8OU3pkTLBa6D2yL-uSgeblAXGXdLluYufpMHrsaTvGrMJq2a9pnMLYtnMLnU2rLixoYxN6OgY6dC9ZpG4RbE-f4ugwpRmwITtZt-wC0h5tDLn5k_xobZ_weFuPyN-b6z9Xd8X9w-3vq8v7wgkGUNTInKhKxh2WXHmofMN1ySUik96BbF3Dat_4tgInq8ZpqatKlha8UBq0k0fkfOOb3_M8YVqZoUsO-94GHKdkJFcggAlVfwOVUkvFVZXRsy_o4zjF_O2ZAqEhL3KmxIZycUwpYmueYjfYuDacmTkts0nL5LTMv7QM5KHTrfXUDOjfR97iyYDcACkfhQXGj7v_Y_sKuuCe6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142744718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><description>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R avg values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE avg values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39604716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; basins ; Decomposition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Forecasting ; Geopotential ; Geopotential height ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Models, Theoretical ; Performance enhancement ; prediction ; Prediction models ; Research Article ; Runoff ; Runoff forecasting ; Sea surface temperature ; Signal processing ; Support vector machines ; surface water temperature ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Movements ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39604716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Miaomiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R avg values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE avg values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geopotential</subject><subject>Geopotential height</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff forecasting</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>surface water temperature</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUlP5DAQhS3EiG34AxyQJS5cwngpx8kRIZaRkLjMnC3HrnQHJQ7YHYn-9zjTzSIOI071VP7q2a5HyAlnF5wx_StxLlVZMAGFVEpUBeyQA15yKDTU9e4nvU8OU3pkTLBa6D2yL-uSgeblAXGXdLluYufpMHrsaTvGrMJq2a9pnMLYtnMLnU2rLixoYxN6OgY6dC9ZpG4RbE-f4ugwpRmwITtZt-wC0h5tDLn5k_xobZ_weFuPyN-b6z9Xd8X9w-3vq8v7wgkGUNTInKhKxh2WXHmofMN1ySUik96BbF3Dat_4tgInq8ZpqatKlha8UBq0k0fkfOOb3_M8YVqZoUsO-94GHKdkJFcggAlVfwOVUkvFVZXRsy_o4zjF_O2ZAqEhL3KmxIZycUwpYmueYjfYuDacmTkts0nL5LTMv7QM5KHTrfXUDOjfR97iyYDcACkfhQXGj7v_Y_sKuuCe6A</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Chen, Shu</creator><creator>Sun, Wei</creator><creator>Ren, Miaomiao</creator><creator>Xie, Yutong</creator><creator>Zeng, Decheng</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><author>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geopotential</topic><topic>Geopotential height</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff forecasting</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>surface water temperature</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Miaomiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Shu</au><au>Sun, Wei</au><au>Ren, Miaomiao</au><au>Xie, Yutong</au><au>Zeng, Decheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>57</issue><spage>65866</spage><epage>65883</epage><pages>65866-65883</pages><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R avg values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE avg values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39604716</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1614-7499
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883
issn 1614-7499
0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154240259
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
basins
Decomposition
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Forecasting
Geopotential
Geopotential height
Learning algorithms
Machine Learning
Models, Theoretical
Performance enhancement
prediction
Prediction models
Research Article
Runoff
Runoff forecasting
Sea surface temperature
Signal processing
Support vector machines
surface water temperature
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Movements
Water Pollution Control
Water resources
title A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20hybrid%20model%20for%20monthly%20runoff%20forecasting%20based%20on%20mixed%20signal%20processing%20and%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Chen,%20Shu&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=57&rft.spage=65866&rft.epage=65883&rft.pages=65866-65883&rft.issn=1614-7499&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154240259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142744718&rft_id=info:pmid/39604716&rfr_iscdi=true