A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning
Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the ru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 57 |
container_start_page | 65866 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Chen, Shu Sun, Wei Ren, Miaomiao Xie, Yutong Zeng, Decheng |
description | Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R
avg
values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE
avg
values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154240259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3154240259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlP5DAQhS3EiG34AxyQJS5cwngpx8kRIZaRkLjMnC3HrnQHJQ7YHYn-9zjTzSIOI071VP7q2a5HyAlnF5wx_StxLlVZMAGFVEpUBeyQA15yKDTU9e4nvU8OU3pkTLBa6D2yL-uSgeblAXGXdLluYufpMHrsaTvGrMJq2a9pnMLYtnMLnU2rLixoYxN6OgY6dC9ZpG4RbE-f4ugwpRmwITtZt-wC0h5tDLn5k_xobZ_weFuPyN-b6z9Xd8X9w-3vq8v7wgkGUNTInKhKxh2WXHmofMN1ySUik96BbF3Dat_4tgInq8ZpqatKlha8UBq0k0fkfOOb3_M8YVqZoUsO-94GHKdkJFcggAlVfwOVUkvFVZXRsy_o4zjF_O2ZAqEhL3KmxIZycUwpYmueYjfYuDacmTkts0nL5LTMv7QM5KHTrfXUDOjfR97iyYDcACkfhQXGj7v_Y_sKuuCe6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142744718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><description>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R
avg
values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE
avg
values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39604716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; basins ; Decomposition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Forecasting ; Geopotential ; Geopotential height ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Models, Theoretical ; Performance enhancement ; prediction ; Prediction models ; Research Article ; Runoff ; Runoff forecasting ; Sea surface temperature ; Signal processing ; Support vector machines ; surface water temperature ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Movements ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39604716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Miaomiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R
avg
values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE
avg
values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geopotential</subject><subject>Geopotential height</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff forecasting</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>surface water temperature</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUlP5DAQhS3EiG34AxyQJS5cwngpx8kRIZaRkLjMnC3HrnQHJQ7YHYn-9zjTzSIOI071VP7q2a5HyAlnF5wx_StxLlVZMAGFVEpUBeyQA15yKDTU9e4nvU8OU3pkTLBa6D2yL-uSgeblAXGXdLluYufpMHrsaTvGrMJq2a9pnMLYtnMLnU2rLixoYxN6OgY6dC9ZpG4RbE-f4ugwpRmwITtZt-wC0h5tDLn5k_xobZ_weFuPyN-b6z9Xd8X9w-3vq8v7wgkGUNTInKhKxh2WXHmofMN1ySUik96BbF3Dat_4tgInq8ZpqatKlha8UBq0k0fkfOOb3_M8YVqZoUsO-94GHKdkJFcggAlVfwOVUkvFVZXRsy_o4zjF_O2ZAqEhL3KmxIZycUwpYmueYjfYuDacmTkts0nL5LTMv7QM5KHTrfXUDOjfR97iyYDcACkfhQXGj7v_Y_sKuuCe6A</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Chen, Shu</creator><creator>Sun, Wei</creator><creator>Ren, Miaomiao</creator><creator>Xie, Yutong</creator><creator>Zeng, Decheng</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</title><author>Chen, Shu ; Sun, Wei ; Ren, Miaomiao ; Xie, Yutong ; Zeng, Decheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-9e0c28601ce615d48db17613ee03dc43fcb09dbdf84c38bc7378836a4d25747c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geopotential</topic><topic>Geopotential height</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff forecasting</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>surface water temperature</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Miaomiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yutong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Decheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Shu</au><au>Sun, Wei</au><au>Ren, Miaomiao</au><au>Xie, Yutong</au><au>Zeng, Decheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>57</issue><spage>65866</spage><epage>65883</epage><pages>65866-65883</pages><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Monthly runoff forecasting plays a critically supportive role in water resources planning and management. Various signal decomposition techniques have been widely applied to enhance the accuracy of monthly runoff forecasting. However, the forecasting of different components, generated through the runoff decomposition, often relies on homogeneous models that utilize identical algorithms or similar structures. The use of a homogeneous model to forecast all components may result in low forecasting accuracy for individual components, which, in turn, impacts the overall forecasting performance negatively. To address this issue, we propose a mixed signal processing model for monthly runoff forecasting, which combines signal processing with heterogeneous machine learning methods that employ different algorithms or structures. Specifically, the SVM and LSTM models are utilized to forecast the original monthly runoff and all components of the monthly runoff decomposed by the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), or each component individually. We compare the forecasting models without signal processing and those with either homogeneous or heterogeneous forecasting models that incorporate signal processing. For validation, the Pingshi Hydrological Station in the Lechangxia Basin was selected as the target station. The results demonstrate that the optimal hybrid model, based on mixed signal processing, exhibits a superior performance when compared with the optimal SVM, LSTM, VMD-SVM, and VMD-LSTM models. Specifically, its validation R
avg
values increased by 3.2%, 3.5%, 0.9%, and 1.2%, respectively, while its validation RMSE
avg
values decreased by 4.7%, 3%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The input variables of the optimal hybrid model primarily include sea surface temperature and geopotential height at 500 hPa, suggesting that these factors have a more impact on the monthly runoff in the Lechangxia Basin. This study underscores the importance of selecting a suitable forecasting model for the different characteristics of components, which aids in improving the overall performance of monthly runoff forecasting with signal processing. Moreover, it highlights that reliance solely on teleconnection factors as input variables may not be sufficient for ensuring the accuracy of monthly runoff prediction models.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39604716</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1156</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1614-7499 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-12, Vol.31 (57), p.65866-65883 |
issn | 1614-7499 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154240259 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution basins Decomposition Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental Monitoring - methods Forecasting Geopotential Geopotential height Learning algorithms Machine Learning Models, Theoretical Performance enhancement prediction Prediction models Research Article Runoff Runoff forecasting Sea surface temperature Signal processing Support vector machines surface water temperature Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Movements Water Pollution Control Water resources |
title | A hybrid model for monthly runoff forecasting based on mixed signal processing and machine learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20hybrid%20model%20for%20monthly%20runoff%20forecasting%20based%20on%20mixed%20signal%20processing%20and%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Chen,%20Shu&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=57&rft.spage=65866&rft.epage=65883&rft.pages=65866-65883&rft.issn=1614-7499&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-024-35528-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154240259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142744718&rft_id=info:pmid/39604716&rfr_iscdi=true |