Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes

Habitat structural complexity is an emergent property of ecosystems that directly shapes their biodiversity, functioning and resilience to disturbance. Yet despite its importance, we continue to lack consensus on how best to define structural complexity, nor do we have a generalised approach to meas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecography (Copenhagen) 2024-11, Vol.2024 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rosen, Alice, Jörg Fischer, Fabian, Coomes, David A., Jackson, Toby D., Asner, Gregory P., Jucker, Tommaso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Ecography (Copenhagen)
container_volume 2024
creator Rosen, Alice
Jörg Fischer, Fabian
Coomes, David A.
Jackson, Toby D.
Asner, Gregory P.
Jucker, Tommaso
description Habitat structural complexity is an emergent property of ecosystems that directly shapes their biodiversity, functioning and resilience to disturbance. Yet despite its importance, we continue to lack consensus on how best to define structural complexity, nor do we have a generalised approach to measure habitat complexity across ecosystems. To bridge this gap, here we adapt a geometric framework developed to quantify the surface complexity of coral reefs and apply it to the canopies of tropical rainforests. Using high‐resolution, repeat‐acquisition airborne laser scanning data collected over 450 km2 of human‐modified tropical landscapes in Borneo, we generated 3D canopy height models of forests at varying stages of recovery from logging. We then tested whether the geometric framework of habitat complexity – which characterises 3D surfaces according to their height range, rugosity and fractal dimension – was able to detect how both human and natural disturbances drive variation in canopy structure through space and time across these landscapes. We found that together, these three metrics of surface complexity captured major differences in canopy 3D structure between highly degraded, selectively logged and old‐growth forests. Moreover, the three metrics were able to track distinct temporal patterns of structural recovery following logging and wind disturbance. However, in the process we also uncovered several important conceptual and methodological limitations with the geometric framework of habitat complexity. We found that fractal dimension was highly sensitive to small variations in data inputs and was ecologically counteractive (e.g. higher fractal dimension in oil palm plantations than old‐growth forests), while rugosity and height range were tightly correlated (r = 0.75) due to their strong dependency on maximum tree height. Our results suggest that forest structural complexity cannot be summarised using these three descriptors alone, as they overlook key features of canopy vertical and horizontal structure that arise from the way trees fill 3D space. Keywords: Forest disturbance, LiDAR, logging, recovery, remote sensing, structural complexity
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecog.07377
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154169846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3124006888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2238-c84dd4c666d4af5671077576462183a0ce2dcb452f55cd0eaea06ab95767087e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJRaElHJO_JURVaUgVWIpc-Q6TuuSxMFOBN14BJ6RJ8GlTAx4ucG_s-_-CF0SmJB4bo126wmITIgjNCIcIAEmxTEaQQ48ESyHU3QWwhaApDmXI9QuvdIvtl3jsLFVH7BtceW8CT0OvR90P3hVY-2arjbvtt_hfuPdsN7g0CltsGpL3NvG7Ns2Q6Par4_PxpW2siZeeNdZHdvryIJWnQnn6KRSdTAXv3WMnu9ny-lDsniaP07vFolO00wmWtKypJpzXlJVMS4ICMEEpzwlMlOgTVrqFWVpxZguwSijgKtVHokAKUw2RteHdzvvXoe4TdHYoE0dJzFuCEVGGCU8l5RHevWHbt3g2zhdVCkF4FLKqG4OSnsXgjdV0XnbKL8rCBT76It99MVP9BGTA36ztdn9I4vZ9GlOMhI_-AZcm4iB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124006888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Rosen, Alice ; Jörg Fischer, Fabian ; Coomes, David A. ; Jackson, Toby D. ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Jucker, Tommaso</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Alice ; Jörg Fischer, Fabian ; Coomes, David A. ; Jackson, Toby D. ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Jucker, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat structural complexity is an emergent property of ecosystems that directly shapes their biodiversity, functioning and resilience to disturbance. Yet despite its importance, we continue to lack consensus on how best to define structural complexity, nor do we have a generalised approach to measure habitat complexity across ecosystems. To bridge this gap, here we adapt a geometric framework developed to quantify the surface complexity of coral reefs and apply it to the canopies of tropical rainforests. Using high‐resolution, repeat‐acquisition airborne laser scanning data collected over 450 km2 of human‐modified tropical landscapes in Borneo, we generated 3D canopy height models of forests at varying stages of recovery from logging. We then tested whether the geometric framework of habitat complexity – which characterises 3D surfaces according to their height range, rugosity and fractal dimension – was able to detect how both human and natural disturbances drive variation in canopy structure through space and time across these landscapes. We found that together, these three metrics of surface complexity captured major differences in canopy 3D structure between highly degraded, selectively logged and old‐growth forests. Moreover, the three metrics were able to track distinct temporal patterns of structural recovery following logging and wind disturbance. However, in the process we also uncovered several important conceptual and methodological limitations with the geometric framework of habitat complexity. We found that fractal dimension was highly sensitive to small variations in data inputs and was ecologically counteractive (e.g. higher fractal dimension in oil palm plantations than old‐growth forests), while rugosity and height range were tightly correlated (r = 0.75) due to their strong dependency on maximum tree height. Our results suggest that forest structural complexity cannot be summarised using these three descriptors alone, as they overlook key features of canopy vertical and horizontal structure that arise from the way trees fill 3D space. Keywords: Forest disturbance, LiDAR, logging, recovery, remote sensing, structural complexity</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0587</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecog.07377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Airborne lasers ; Biodiversity ; Body height ; Borneo ; Canopies ; canopy ; canopy height ; Carbon ; Complexity ; Coral reefs ; corals ; Ecosystems ; Elaeis guineensis ; forest damage ; Forest management ; Forests ; fractal dimensions ; Fractal geometry ; Fractals ; geometry ; Habitats ; Human impact ; humans ; Lidar ; Logging ; Natural disturbance ; Rainforests ; Recovery ; Remote sensing ; space and time ; tree height ; wind</subject><ispartof>Ecography (Copenhagen), 2024-11, Vol.2024 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2238-c84dd4c666d4af5671077576462183a0ce2dcb452f55cd0eaea06ab95767087e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0751-6312</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecog.07377$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecog.07377$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,1414,11549,27911,27912,45561,45562,46039,46463</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jörg Fischer, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomes, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Toby D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asner, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jucker, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes</title><title>Ecography (Copenhagen)</title><description>Habitat structural complexity is an emergent property of ecosystems that directly shapes their biodiversity, functioning and resilience to disturbance. Yet despite its importance, we continue to lack consensus on how best to define structural complexity, nor do we have a generalised approach to measure habitat complexity across ecosystems. To bridge this gap, here we adapt a geometric framework developed to quantify the surface complexity of coral reefs and apply it to the canopies of tropical rainforests. Using high‐resolution, repeat‐acquisition airborne laser scanning data collected over 450 km2 of human‐modified tropical landscapes in Borneo, we generated 3D canopy height models of forests at varying stages of recovery from logging. We then tested whether the geometric framework of habitat complexity – which characterises 3D surfaces according to their height range, rugosity and fractal dimension – was able to detect how both human and natural disturbances drive variation in canopy structure through space and time across these landscapes. We found that together, these three metrics of surface complexity captured major differences in canopy 3D structure between highly degraded, selectively logged and old‐growth forests. Moreover, the three metrics were able to track distinct temporal patterns of structural recovery following logging and wind disturbance. However, in the process we also uncovered several important conceptual and methodological limitations with the geometric framework of habitat complexity. We found that fractal dimension was highly sensitive to small variations in data inputs and was ecologically counteractive (e.g. higher fractal dimension in oil palm plantations than old‐growth forests), while rugosity and height range were tightly correlated (r = 0.75) due to their strong dependency on maximum tree height. Our results suggest that forest structural complexity cannot be summarised using these three descriptors alone, as they overlook key features of canopy vertical and horizontal structure that arise from the way trees fill 3D space. Keywords: Forest disturbance, LiDAR, logging, recovery, remote sensing, structural complexity</description><subject>Airborne lasers</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Body height</subject><subject>Borneo</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>canopy height</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>corals</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Elaeis guineensis</subject><subject>forest damage</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>fractal dimensions</subject><subject>Fractal geometry</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>geometry</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human impact</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Natural disturbance</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>space and time</subject><subject>tree height</subject><subject>wind</subject><issn>0906-7590</issn><issn>1600-0587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJRaElHJO_JURVaUgVWIpc-Q6TuuSxMFOBN14BJ6RJ8GlTAx4ucG_s-_-CF0SmJB4bo126wmITIgjNCIcIAEmxTEaQQ48ESyHU3QWwhaApDmXI9QuvdIvtl3jsLFVH7BtceW8CT0OvR90P3hVY-2arjbvtt_hfuPdsN7g0CltsGpL3NvG7Ns2Q6Par4_PxpW2siZeeNdZHdvryIJWnQnn6KRSdTAXv3WMnu9ny-lDsniaP07vFolO00wmWtKypJpzXlJVMS4ICMEEpzwlMlOgTVrqFWVpxZguwSijgKtVHokAKUw2RteHdzvvXoe4TdHYoE0dJzFuCEVGGCU8l5RHevWHbt3g2zhdVCkF4FLKqG4OSnsXgjdV0XnbKL8rCBT76It99MVP9BGTA36ztdn9I4vZ9GlOMhI_-AZcm4iB</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Rosen, Alice</creator><creator>Jörg Fischer, Fabian</creator><creator>Coomes, David A.</creator><creator>Jackson, Toby D.</creator><creator>Asner, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Jucker, Tommaso</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-6312</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes</title><author>Rosen, Alice ; Jörg Fischer, Fabian ; Coomes, David A. ; Jackson, Toby D. ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Jucker, Tommaso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2238-c84dd4c666d4af5671077576462183a0ce2dcb452f55cd0eaea06ab95767087e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Airborne lasers</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Body height</topic><topic>Borneo</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>canopy height</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>corals</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Elaeis guineensis</topic><topic>forest damage</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>fractal dimensions</topic><topic>Fractal geometry</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>geometry</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human impact</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Natural disturbance</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>space and time</topic><topic>tree height</topic><topic>wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jörg Fischer, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomes, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Toby D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asner, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jucker, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Alice</au><au>Jörg Fischer, Fabian</au><au>Coomes, David A.</au><au>Jackson, Toby D.</au><au>Asner, Gregory P.</au><au>Jucker, Tommaso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes</atitle><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0906-7590</issn><eissn>1600-0587</eissn><abstract>Habitat structural complexity is an emergent property of ecosystems that directly shapes their biodiversity, functioning and resilience to disturbance. Yet despite its importance, we continue to lack consensus on how best to define structural complexity, nor do we have a generalised approach to measure habitat complexity across ecosystems. To bridge this gap, here we adapt a geometric framework developed to quantify the surface complexity of coral reefs and apply it to the canopies of tropical rainforests. Using high‐resolution, repeat‐acquisition airborne laser scanning data collected over 450 km2 of human‐modified tropical landscapes in Borneo, we generated 3D canopy height models of forests at varying stages of recovery from logging. We then tested whether the geometric framework of habitat complexity – which characterises 3D surfaces according to their height range, rugosity and fractal dimension – was able to detect how both human and natural disturbances drive variation in canopy structure through space and time across these landscapes. We found that together, these three metrics of surface complexity captured major differences in canopy 3D structure between highly degraded, selectively logged and old‐growth forests. Moreover, the three metrics were able to track distinct temporal patterns of structural recovery following logging and wind disturbance. However, in the process we also uncovered several important conceptual and methodological limitations with the geometric framework of habitat complexity. We found that fractal dimension was highly sensitive to small variations in data inputs and was ecologically counteractive (e.g. higher fractal dimension in oil palm plantations than old‐growth forests), while rugosity and height range were tightly correlated (r = 0.75) due to their strong dependency on maximum tree height. Our results suggest that forest structural complexity cannot be summarised using these three descriptors alone, as they overlook key features of canopy vertical and horizontal structure that arise from the way trees fill 3D space. Keywords: Forest disturbance, LiDAR, logging, recovery, remote sensing, structural complexity</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecog.07377</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-6312</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-7590
ispartof Ecography (Copenhagen), 2024-11, Vol.2024 (11), p.n/a
issn 0906-7590
1600-0587
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154169846
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Airborne lasers
Biodiversity
Body height
Borneo
Canopies
canopy
canopy height
Carbon
Complexity
Coral reefs
corals
Ecosystems
Elaeis guineensis
forest damage
Forest management
Forests
fractal dimensions
Fractal geometry
Fractals
geometry
Habitats
Human impact
humans
Lidar
Logging
Natural disturbance
Rainforests
Recovery
Remote sensing
space and time
tree height
wind
title Tracking shifts in forest structural complexity through space and time in human‐modified tropical landscapes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A49%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20shifts%20in%20forest%20structural%20complexity%20through%20space%20and%20time%20in%20human%E2%80%90modified%20tropical%20landscapes&rft.jtitle=Ecography%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Rosen,%20Alice&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0906-7590&rft.eissn=1600-0587&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecog.07377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3124006888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124006888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true