Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?

The parr to smolt transition (PST) is a critical life stage for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. Aquaculture commonly uses artificial square wave photoperiod treatments to initiate the PST but faces problems related to poor smolt quality, including elevated mortality after seawater transfe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture 2025-02, Vol.596, p.741699, Article 741699
Hauptverfasser: Montgomery, Daniel W., Negrete, Benjamin, Gam, Le Thi Hong, Izutsu, Ayaka, Culbert, Brett M., Bernier, Nicholas J., Shimizu, Munetaka, Brauner, Colin J., Richards, Jeffrey G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 741699
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 596
creator Montgomery, Daniel W.
Negrete, Benjamin
Gam, Le Thi Hong
Izutsu, Ayaka
Culbert, Brett M.
Bernier, Nicholas J.
Shimizu, Munetaka
Brauner, Colin J.
Richards, Jeffrey G.
description The parr to smolt transition (PST) is a critical life stage for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. Aquaculture commonly uses artificial square wave photoperiod treatments to initiate the PST but faces problems related to poor smolt quality, including elevated mortality after seawater transfer and increased disease prevalence. We investigated whether the use of an additional seasonal cue, temperature, in combination with short daylength photoperiod treatments improved smolt quality. We exposed ∼35 g parr to an experimental treatment involving a 3 × 2 factorial design including ‘winter’ photoperiod treatments of 24L:00D, 12L:12D, and 08L:16D combined with a ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 14 °C or 8 °C. Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D and 08L:16D) led to improved measures of smolt status such as gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, seawater Na+/K+-ATPase isoform expression in the gills, and plasma growth hormone levels when compared to salmon kept in constant light while reduced ‘winter’ temperature (8 °C vs 14 °C) had few impacts on smolt status measures. Despite this, there were no apparent benefits of exposure to short ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) compared to constant light on whole organism osmoregulation (plasma osmolality and ion content, white muscle water content) after seawater transfer. Both short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) and reduced ‘winter’ temperatures (8 °C) decreased growth rates in freshwater compared to salmon kept in constant light and temperature, but only salmon exposed to short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods had enhanced growth in seawater. Our results indicate that the use of a reduced ‘winter’ temperature treatment in combination with short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods does not enhance smolt quality in aquaculture production of Atlantic salmon when compared to the use of short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods alone. This highlights a continued need for research into alternative strategies to improve the robustness of salmon smolts. •A ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 8 °C did not improve smolt quality regardless of ‘winter’ photoperiod treatment•Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods increased gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and the ratio of seawater to freshwater iosoform expression.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiods reduced SGR and FCR in freshwater but improved them during the 1st month after SW transfer.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiod led to elevated ṀO2min and ṀO2max but no overall e
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741699
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154159547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004484862401161X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3154159547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-2508b16ce8fc0cf77a261f42c3d13a320ccee953a5f0438b132dd1bba99fcc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUb2O1DAQTgESxx3vMHQ0u9iOk01o0GnFz0knQQG15YwnF68ce892OG13jwEND3dPglehoKQaafT9zXxV9ZqzLWe8fXvY6vtF4-LyEmkrmJDbneRt3z-rLhiTctPJrn1RvUzpwBhr24ZfVL-_xmAWtP4ONAyUM0VIc3D5Hey1h6fHnw_Wl-XT4y_IkXSeyecEGObB-jPLhQfINB8p6rMtaG8gTSFmMPrkyN_lCY5TyKEgbDAJyE_aI0GeaHWCEtrZfIIwwnV22meLkLSbg39_VT0ftUv06u-8rL5__PBt_3lz--XTzf76doNCdHkjGtYNvEXqRmQ47nZatHyUAmvDa10LhkjUN7VuRibrAq2FMXwYdN-PiJLXl9WbVfcYw_1CKavZJiRX0lBYkqp5I3nTN3JXoP0KxRhSijSqY7SzjifFmTr3oA7qnx7UuQe19lC4-5VL5ZYflqJKaKl8w9hImJUJ9j9U_gBMDaCX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3154159547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Montgomery, Daniel W. ; Negrete, Benjamin ; Gam, Le Thi Hong ; Izutsu, Ayaka ; Culbert, Brett M. ; Bernier, Nicholas J. ; Shimizu, Munetaka ; Brauner, Colin J. ; Richards, Jeffrey G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Daniel W. ; Negrete, Benjamin ; Gam, Le Thi Hong ; Izutsu, Ayaka ; Culbert, Brett M. ; Bernier, Nicholas J. ; Shimizu, Munetaka ; Brauner, Colin J. ; Richards, Jeffrey G.</creatorcontrib><description>The parr to smolt transition (PST) is a critical life stage for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. Aquaculture commonly uses artificial square wave photoperiod treatments to initiate the PST but faces problems related to poor smolt quality, including elevated mortality after seawater transfer and increased disease prevalence. We investigated whether the use of an additional seasonal cue, temperature, in combination with short daylength photoperiod treatments improved smolt quality. We exposed ∼35 g parr to an experimental treatment involving a 3 × 2 factorial design including ‘winter’ photoperiod treatments of 24L:00D, 12L:12D, and 08L:16D combined with a ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 14 °C or 8 °C. Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D and 08L:16D) led to improved measures of smolt status such as gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, seawater Na+/K+-ATPase isoform expression in the gills, and plasma growth hormone levels when compared to salmon kept in constant light while reduced ‘winter’ temperature (8 °C vs 14 °C) had few impacts on smolt status measures. Despite this, there were no apparent benefits of exposure to short ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) compared to constant light on whole organism osmoregulation (plasma osmolality and ion content, white muscle water content) after seawater transfer. Both short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) and reduced ‘winter’ temperatures (8 °C) decreased growth rates in freshwater compared to salmon kept in constant light and temperature, but only salmon exposed to short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods had enhanced growth in seawater. Our results indicate that the use of a reduced ‘winter’ temperature treatment in combination with short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods does not enhance smolt quality in aquaculture production of Atlantic salmon when compared to the use of short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods alone. This highlights a continued need for research into alternative strategies to improve the robustness of salmon smolts. •A ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 8 °C did not improve smolt quality regardless of ‘winter’ photoperiod treatment•Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods increased gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and the ratio of seawater to freshwater iosoform expression.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiods reduced SGR and FCR in freshwater but improved them during the 1st month after SW transfer.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiod led to elevated ṀO2min and ṀO2max but no overall effect on aerobic scope or hypoxia tolerance•Further research is still required to optimize smolt production and improve smolt quality at the time of seawater transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>aquaculture ; disease prevalence ; freshwater ; Growth ; mortality ; muscles ; Na+/K+-ATPase ; osmolality ; osmoregulation ; parr ; photoperiod ; Recirculating aquaculture system ; Salmo salar ; salmon ; seawater ; Seawater transfer ; Smoltification ; smolts ; somatotropin ; temperature ; water content</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2025-02, Vol.596, p.741699, Article 741699</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-2508b16ce8fc0cf77a261f42c3d13a320ccee953a5f0438b132dd1bba99fcc413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741699$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrete, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gam, Le Thi Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izutsu, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbert, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernier, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Munetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brauner, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeffrey G.</creatorcontrib><title>Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>The parr to smolt transition (PST) is a critical life stage for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. Aquaculture commonly uses artificial square wave photoperiod treatments to initiate the PST but faces problems related to poor smolt quality, including elevated mortality after seawater transfer and increased disease prevalence. We investigated whether the use of an additional seasonal cue, temperature, in combination with short daylength photoperiod treatments improved smolt quality. We exposed ∼35 g parr to an experimental treatment involving a 3 × 2 factorial design including ‘winter’ photoperiod treatments of 24L:00D, 12L:12D, and 08L:16D combined with a ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 14 °C or 8 °C. Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D and 08L:16D) led to improved measures of smolt status such as gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, seawater Na+/K+-ATPase isoform expression in the gills, and plasma growth hormone levels when compared to salmon kept in constant light while reduced ‘winter’ temperature (8 °C vs 14 °C) had few impacts on smolt status measures. Despite this, there were no apparent benefits of exposure to short ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) compared to constant light on whole organism osmoregulation (plasma osmolality and ion content, white muscle water content) after seawater transfer. Both short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) and reduced ‘winter’ temperatures (8 °C) decreased growth rates in freshwater compared to salmon kept in constant light and temperature, but only salmon exposed to short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods had enhanced growth in seawater. Our results indicate that the use of a reduced ‘winter’ temperature treatment in combination with short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods does not enhance smolt quality in aquaculture production of Atlantic salmon when compared to the use of short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods alone. This highlights a continued need for research into alternative strategies to improve the robustness of salmon smolts. •A ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 8 °C did not improve smolt quality regardless of ‘winter’ photoperiod treatment•Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods increased gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and the ratio of seawater to freshwater iosoform expression.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiods reduced SGR and FCR in freshwater but improved them during the 1st month after SW transfer.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiod led to elevated ṀO2min and ṀO2max but no overall effect on aerobic scope or hypoxia tolerance•Further research is still required to optimize smolt production and improve smolt quality at the time of seawater transfer.</description><subject>aquaculture</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>Na+/K+-ATPase</subject><subject>osmolality</subject><subject>osmoregulation</subject><subject>parr</subject><subject>photoperiod</subject><subject>Recirculating aquaculture system</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>salmon</subject><subject>seawater</subject><subject>Seawater transfer</subject><subject>Smoltification</subject><subject>smolts</subject><subject>somatotropin</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>water content</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUb2O1DAQTgESxx3vMHQ0u9iOk01o0GnFz0knQQG15YwnF68ce892OG13jwEND3dPglehoKQaafT9zXxV9ZqzLWe8fXvY6vtF4-LyEmkrmJDbneRt3z-rLhiTctPJrn1RvUzpwBhr24ZfVL-_xmAWtP4ONAyUM0VIc3D5Hey1h6fHnw_Wl-XT4y_IkXSeyecEGObB-jPLhQfINB8p6rMtaG8gTSFmMPrkyN_lCY5TyKEgbDAJyE_aI0GeaHWCEtrZfIIwwnV22meLkLSbg39_VT0ftUv06u-8rL5__PBt_3lz--XTzf76doNCdHkjGtYNvEXqRmQ47nZatHyUAmvDa10LhkjUN7VuRibrAq2FMXwYdN-PiJLXl9WbVfcYw_1CKavZJiRX0lBYkqp5I3nTN3JXoP0KxRhSijSqY7SzjifFmTr3oA7qnx7UuQe19lC4-5VL5ZYflqJKaKl8w9hImJUJ9j9U_gBMDaCX</recordid><startdate>20250215</startdate><enddate>20250215</enddate><creator>Montgomery, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Negrete, Benjamin</creator><creator>Gam, Le Thi Hong</creator><creator>Izutsu, Ayaka</creator><creator>Culbert, Brett M.</creator><creator>Bernier, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Shimizu, Munetaka</creator><creator>Brauner, Colin J.</creator><creator>Richards, Jeffrey G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250215</creationdate><title>Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?</title><author>Montgomery, Daniel W. ; Negrete, Benjamin ; Gam, Le Thi Hong ; Izutsu, Ayaka ; Culbert, Brett M. ; Bernier, Nicholas J. ; Shimizu, Munetaka ; Brauner, Colin J. ; Richards, Jeffrey G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-2508b16ce8fc0cf77a261f42c3d13a320ccee953a5f0438b132dd1bba99fcc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>aquaculture</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>Na+/K+-ATPase</topic><topic>osmolality</topic><topic>osmoregulation</topic><topic>parr</topic><topic>photoperiod</topic><topic>Recirculating aquaculture system</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>salmon</topic><topic>seawater</topic><topic>Seawater transfer</topic><topic>Smoltification</topic><topic>smolts</topic><topic>somatotropin</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrete, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gam, Le Thi Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izutsu, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbert, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernier, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Munetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brauner, Colin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jeffrey G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montgomery, Daniel W.</au><au>Negrete, Benjamin</au><au>Gam, Le Thi Hong</au><au>Izutsu, Ayaka</au><au>Culbert, Brett M.</au><au>Bernier, Nicholas J.</au><au>Shimizu, Munetaka</au><au>Brauner, Colin J.</au><au>Richards, Jeffrey G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2025-02-15</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>596</volume><spage>741699</spage><pages>741699-</pages><artnum>741699</artnum><issn>0044-8486</issn><abstract>The parr to smolt transition (PST) is a critical life stage for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture. Aquaculture commonly uses artificial square wave photoperiod treatments to initiate the PST but faces problems related to poor smolt quality, including elevated mortality after seawater transfer and increased disease prevalence. We investigated whether the use of an additional seasonal cue, temperature, in combination with short daylength photoperiod treatments improved smolt quality. We exposed ∼35 g parr to an experimental treatment involving a 3 × 2 factorial design including ‘winter’ photoperiod treatments of 24L:00D, 12L:12D, and 08L:16D combined with a ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 14 °C or 8 °C. Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D and 08L:16D) led to improved measures of smolt status such as gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, seawater Na+/K+-ATPase isoform expression in the gills, and plasma growth hormone levels when compared to salmon kept in constant light while reduced ‘winter’ temperature (8 °C vs 14 °C) had few impacts on smolt status measures. Despite this, there were no apparent benefits of exposure to short ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) compared to constant light on whole organism osmoregulation (plasma osmolality and ion content, white muscle water content) after seawater transfer. Both short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods (12L:12D or 08L:16D) and reduced ‘winter’ temperatures (8 °C) decreased growth rates in freshwater compared to salmon kept in constant light and temperature, but only salmon exposed to short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods had enhanced growth in seawater. Our results indicate that the use of a reduced ‘winter’ temperature treatment in combination with short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods does not enhance smolt quality in aquaculture production of Atlantic salmon when compared to the use of short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods alone. This highlights a continued need for research into alternative strategies to improve the robustness of salmon smolts. •A ‘winter’ temperature treatment of 8 °C did not improve smolt quality regardless of ‘winter’ photoperiod treatment•Short daylength ‘winter’ photoperiods increased gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and the ratio of seawater to freshwater iosoform expression.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiods reduced SGR and FCR in freshwater but improved them during the 1st month after SW transfer.•Short ‘winter’ photoperiod led to elevated ṀO2min and ṀO2max but no overall effect on aerobic scope or hypoxia tolerance•Further research is still required to optimize smolt production and improve smolt quality at the time of seawater transfer.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741699</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-8486
ispartof Aquaculture, 2025-02, Vol.596, p.741699, Article 741699
issn 0044-8486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3154159547
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects aquaculture
disease prevalence
freshwater
Growth
mortality
muscles
Na+/K+-ATPase
osmolality
osmoregulation
parr
photoperiod
Recirculating aquaculture system
Salmo salar
salmon
seawater
Seawater transfer
Smoltification
smolts
somatotropin
temperature
water content
title Producing a better smolt: Can ‘winter’ treatments combining low temperature and short daylength photoperiods enhance the smolt quality of Atlantic salmon?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Producing%20a%20better%20smolt:%20Can%20%E2%80%98winter%E2%80%99%20treatments%20combining%20low%20temperature%20and%20short%20daylength%20photoperiods%20enhance%20the%20smolt%20quality%20of%20Atlantic%20salmon?&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Montgomery,%20Daniel%20W.&rft.date=2025-02-15&rft.volume=596&rft.spage=741699&rft.pages=741699-&rft.artnum=741699&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154159547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3154159547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004484862401161X&rfr_iscdi=true