Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance
The agronomical interest of hybrid wheat has long been a matter of debate. Compared to maize where hybrids have been successfully grown for decades, the mixed results obtained in wheat have been attributed at least partially to the lack of heterotic groups. The wheat genome is known to be strongly p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional & integrative genomics 2025-12, Vol.25 (1), p.10, Article 10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Functional & integrative genomics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Gimenez, Kevin Blanc, Pierre Argillier, Odile Kitt, Jonathan Pierre, Jean-Baptiste Le Gouis, Jacques Paux, Etienne |
description | The agronomical interest of hybrid wheat has long been a matter of debate. Compared to maize where hybrids have been successfully grown for decades, the mixed results obtained in wheat have been attributed at least partially to the lack of heterotic groups. The wheat genome is known to be strongly partitioned and characterized by numerous presence/absence variations and alien introgressions which have not been thoroughly considered in hybrid breeding. The objective was to investigate the relationships between hybrid performance and genomic diversity. For this, we characterized a set of 124 hybrids as well as their 19 female and 16 male parents. Phenotyping for yield and yield components was conducted during two years in three locations. Parental lines were genotyped using a 410 K SNP array as well as through sequence capture of roughly 200,000 loci. This led to the identification of 180 structural variations including presence-absence variations and alien introgressions. Twenty-six of them were associated to hybrid performance through either additivity or dominance effects. While no correlation was observed at the whole genome level, the genetic distance for 25 genomic regions resulting from the structural and functional partitioning of the chromosomes shown positive or negative correlation with agronomic traits including yield. Large introgressions, like the
Aegilops ventricosa
2NS-2AS translocation, can correspond to entire chromosomal regions, such as the R1 region, with an impact on yield. Our results suggest hybrid breeding should consider both structural variations and chromosome partitioning rather than maximizing whole-genome genetic distance, and according to genomic regions to combine homozygosity and heterozygosity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153917520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153917520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b712ab20eb1cf7e884752ec9df42ca4590e67fc9158344d5eda91aef06d583c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AQ8S8OKlmq9umqMsfiwseFHQU0jT6VrZJjVpdf33Zt1VwYOnGSbPvBMehI4pOaeEyItICRUsI0xkhOaUZcstNKKCF5lUotj-6fnjHtqP8YUQkhPFd9EeV7JQjIsRepq2nbE99jWOfRhsPwSzwG8mNKZvvIvYuArPwfkWcGdC36ymjZtj73AZwFT4_RlMj58_ytBUuINQ-9AaZ-EQ7dRmEeFoUw_Qw_XV_eQ2m93dTCeXs8yyfNxnpaTMlIxASW0toSiEzBlYVdWCWSNyRWAsa6toXnAhqhwqo6iBmoyrNLGMH6CzdW4X_OsAsddtEy0sFsaBH6LmNOeKplCS0NM_6Isfgku_-6K45JyIRLE1ZYOPMUCtu9C0JnxoSvRKvF6L10m8_hKvl2npZBM9lC1UPyvfphPA10BMT24O4ff2P7GfF-aPbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153373304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Gimenez, Kevin ; Blanc, Pierre ; Argillier, Odile ; Kitt, Jonathan ; Pierre, Jean-Baptiste ; Le Gouis, Jacques ; Paux, Etienne</creator><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Kevin ; Blanc, Pierre ; Argillier, Odile ; Kitt, Jonathan ; Pierre, Jean-Baptiste ; Le Gouis, Jacques ; Paux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><description>The agronomical interest of hybrid wheat has long been a matter of debate. Compared to maize where hybrids have been successfully grown for decades, the mixed results obtained in wheat have been attributed at least partially to the lack of heterotic groups. The wheat genome is known to be strongly partitioned and characterized by numerous presence/absence variations and alien introgressions which have not been thoroughly considered in hybrid breeding. The objective was to investigate the relationships between hybrid performance and genomic diversity. For this, we characterized a set of 124 hybrids as well as their 19 female and 16 male parents. Phenotyping for yield and yield components was conducted during two years in three locations. Parental lines were genotyped using a 410 K SNP array as well as through sequence capture of roughly 200,000 loci. This led to the identification of 180 structural variations including presence-absence variations and alien introgressions. Twenty-six of them were associated to hybrid performance through either additivity or dominance effects. While no correlation was observed at the whole genome level, the genetic distance for 25 genomic regions resulting from the structural and functional partitioning of the chromosomes shown positive or negative correlation with agronomic traits including yield. Large introgressions, like the
Aegilops ventricosa
2NS-2AS translocation, can correspond to entire chromosomal regions, such as the R1 region, with an impact on yield. Our results suggest hybrid breeding should consider both structural variations and chromosome partitioning rather than maximizing whole-genome genetic distance, and according to genomic regions to combine homozygosity and heterozygosity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-793X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1438-7948</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-7948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39789234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Biochemistry ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bread ; Cell Biology ; Chromosomes ; Chromosomes, Plant - genetics ; Genetic distance ; Genetic diversity ; Genome, Plant ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genotype & phenotype ; Heterozygosity ; Hybridization, Genetic ; Hybrids ; Life Sciences ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Nucleotide sequence ; Phenotype ; Phenotyping ; Plant Breeding ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Single-nucleotide polymorphism ; Structure-function relationships ; Triticum - genetics ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Functional & integrative genomics, 2025-12, Vol.25 (1), p.10, Article 10</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b712ab20eb1cf7e884752ec9df42ca4590e67fc9158344d5eda91aef06d583c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9980-3070 ; 0000-0002-3817-4538 ; 0000-0002-3094-7129 ; 0000-0001-5726-4902</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39789234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argillier, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitt, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Gouis, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance</title><title>Functional & integrative genomics</title><addtitle>Funct Integr Genomics</addtitle><addtitle>Funct Integr Genomics</addtitle><description>The agronomical interest of hybrid wheat has long been a matter of debate. Compared to maize where hybrids have been successfully grown for decades, the mixed results obtained in wheat have been attributed at least partially to the lack of heterotic groups. The wheat genome is known to be strongly partitioned and characterized by numerous presence/absence variations and alien introgressions which have not been thoroughly considered in hybrid breeding. The objective was to investigate the relationships between hybrid performance and genomic diversity. For this, we characterized a set of 124 hybrids as well as their 19 female and 16 male parents. Phenotyping for yield and yield components was conducted during two years in three locations. Parental lines were genotyped using a 410 K SNP array as well as through sequence capture of roughly 200,000 loci. This led to the identification of 180 structural variations including presence-absence variations and alien introgressions. Twenty-six of them were associated to hybrid performance through either additivity or dominance effects. While no correlation was observed at the whole genome level, the genetic distance for 25 genomic regions resulting from the structural and functional partitioning of the chromosomes shown positive or negative correlation with agronomic traits including yield. Large introgressions, like the
Aegilops ventricosa
2NS-2AS translocation, can correspond to entire chromosomal regions, such as the R1 region, with an impact on yield. Our results suggest hybrid breeding should consider both structural variations and chromosome partitioning rather than maximizing whole-genome genetic distance, and according to genomic regions to combine homozygosity and heterozygosity.</description><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bread</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic distance</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genome, Plant</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Heterozygosity</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Plant Breeding</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</subject><subject>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Triticum - genetics</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1438-793X</issn><issn>1438-7948</issn><issn>1438-7948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AQ8S8OKlmq9umqMsfiwseFHQU0jT6VrZJjVpdf33Zt1VwYOnGSbPvBMehI4pOaeEyItICRUsI0xkhOaUZcstNKKCF5lUotj-6fnjHtqP8YUQkhPFd9EeV7JQjIsRepq2nbE99jWOfRhsPwSzwG8mNKZvvIvYuArPwfkWcGdC36ymjZtj73AZwFT4_RlMj58_ytBUuINQ-9AaZ-EQ7dRmEeFoUw_Qw_XV_eQ2m93dTCeXs8yyfNxnpaTMlIxASW0toSiEzBlYVdWCWSNyRWAsa6toXnAhqhwqo6iBmoyrNLGMH6CzdW4X_OsAsddtEy0sFsaBH6LmNOeKplCS0NM_6Isfgku_-6K45JyIRLE1ZYOPMUCtu9C0JnxoSvRKvF6L10m8_hKvl2npZBM9lC1UPyvfphPA10BMT24O4ff2P7GfF-aPbA</recordid><startdate>20251201</startdate><enddate>20251201</enddate><creator>Gimenez, Kevin</creator><creator>Blanc, Pierre</creator><creator>Argillier, Odile</creator><creator>Kitt, Jonathan</creator><creator>Pierre, Jean-Baptiste</creator><creator>Le Gouis, Jacques</creator><creator>Paux, Etienne</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-4538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-7129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-4902</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20251201</creationdate><title>Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance</title><author>Gimenez, Kevin ; Blanc, Pierre ; Argillier, Odile ; Kitt, Jonathan ; Pierre, Jean-Baptiste ; Le Gouis, Jacques ; Paux, Etienne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b712ab20eb1cf7e884752ec9df42ca4590e67fc9158344d5eda91aef06d583c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bread</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic distance</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genome, Plant</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Heterozygosity</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Plant Breeding</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</topic><topic>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Triticum - genetics</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argillier, Odile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitt, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Gouis, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Functional & integrative genomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gimenez, Kevin</au><au>Blanc, Pierre</au><au>Argillier, Odile</au><au>Kitt, Jonathan</au><au>Pierre, Jean-Baptiste</au><au>Le Gouis, Jacques</au><au>Paux, Etienne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance</atitle><jtitle>Functional & integrative genomics</jtitle><stitle>Funct Integr Genomics</stitle><addtitle>Funct Integr Genomics</addtitle><date>2025-12-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><pages>10-</pages><artnum>10</artnum><issn>1438-793X</issn><issn>1438-7948</issn><eissn>1438-7948</eissn><abstract>The agronomical interest of hybrid wheat has long been a matter of debate. Compared to maize where hybrids have been successfully grown for decades, the mixed results obtained in wheat have been attributed at least partially to the lack of heterotic groups. The wheat genome is known to be strongly partitioned and characterized by numerous presence/absence variations and alien introgressions which have not been thoroughly considered in hybrid breeding. The objective was to investigate the relationships between hybrid performance and genomic diversity. For this, we characterized a set of 124 hybrids as well as their 19 female and 16 male parents. Phenotyping for yield and yield components was conducted during two years in three locations. Parental lines were genotyped using a 410 K SNP array as well as through sequence capture of roughly 200,000 loci. This led to the identification of 180 structural variations including presence-absence variations and alien introgressions. Twenty-six of them were associated to hybrid performance through either additivity or dominance effects. While no correlation was observed at the whole genome level, the genetic distance for 25 genomic regions resulting from the structural and functional partitioning of the chromosomes shown positive or negative correlation with agronomic traits including yield. Large introgressions, like the
Aegilops ventricosa
2NS-2AS translocation, can correspond to entire chromosomal regions, such as the R1 region, with an impact on yield. Our results suggest hybrid breeding should consider both structural variations and chromosome partitioning rather than maximizing whole-genome genetic distance, and according to genomic regions to combine homozygosity and heterozygosity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39789234</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-4538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-7129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-4902</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-793X |
ispartof | Functional & integrative genomics, 2025-12, Vol.25 (1), p.10, Article 10 |
issn | 1438-793X 1438-7948 1438-7948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153917520 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal Genetics and Genomics Biochemistry Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Bread Cell Biology Chromosomes Chromosomes, Plant - genetics Genetic distance Genetic diversity Genome, Plant Genomes Genomics Genotype & phenotype Heterozygosity Hybridization, Genetic Hybrids Life Sciences Microbial Genetics and Genomics Nucleotide sequence Phenotype Phenotyping Plant Breeding Plant Genetics and Genomics Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Single-nucleotide polymorphism Structure-function relationships Triticum - genetics Wheat |
title | Impact of structural variations and genome partitioning on bread wheat hybrid performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T12%3A57%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20structural%20variations%20and%20genome%20partitioning%20on%20bread%20wheat%20hybrid%20performance&rft.jtitle=Functional%20&%20integrative%20genomics&rft.au=Gimenez,%20Kevin&rft.date=2025-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.pages=10-&rft.artnum=10&rft.issn=1438-793X&rft.eissn=1438-7948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10142-024-01512-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153917520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153373304&rft_id=info:pmid/39789234&rfr_iscdi=true |