Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine

Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-12, Vol.13 (24), p.7722
Hauptverfasser: Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O, Lafage, Renaud, Tretiakov, Peter, Smith, Justin S, Line, Breton G, Diebo, Bassel G, Daniels, Alan H, Gum, Jeffrey L, Protopsaltis, Themistocles S, Hamilton, David Kojo, Buell, Thomas, Soroceanu, Alex, Scheer, Justin, Eastlack, Robert K, Mullin, Jeffrey P, Mundis, Gregory, Hosogane, Naobumi, Yagi, Mitsuru, Anand, Neel, Okonkwo, David O, Wang, Michael Y, Klineberg, Eric O, Kebaish, Khaled M, Lewis, Stephen, Hostin, Richard, Gupta, Munish Chandra, Lenke, Lawrence G, Kim, Han Jo, Ames, Christopher P, Shaffrey, Christopher I, Bess, Shay, Schwab, Frank J, Lafage, Virginie, Burton, Douglas, Passias, Peter G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 7722
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O
Lafage, Renaud
Tretiakov, Peter
Smith, Justin S
Line, Breton G
Diebo, Bassel G
Daniels, Alan H
Gum, Jeffrey L
Protopsaltis, Themistocles S
Hamilton, David Kojo
Buell, Thomas
Soroceanu, Alex
Scheer, Justin
Eastlack, Robert K
Mullin, Jeffrey P
Mundis, Gregory
Hosogane, Naobumi
Yagi, Mitsuru
Anand, Neel
Okonkwo, David O
Wang, Michael Y
Klineberg, Eric O
Kebaish, Khaled M
Lewis, Stephen
Hostin, Richard
Gupta, Munish Chandra
Lenke, Lawrence G
Kim, Han Jo
Ames, Christopher P
Shaffrey, Christopher I
Bess, Shay
Schwab, Frank J
Lafage, Virginie
Burton, Douglas
Passias, Peter G
description Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Adult spine deformity patients ≥ 18 yrs with preoperative and 5-year (5Y) data fused to the sacrum/pelvis were included. The rates of PJK, PJK revision, and radiographic PJF were compared between patients with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (UT; T1-T7) and lower thoracic spine (LT; T8-L1). Mean differences were assessed via analyses of covariance, factoring in any differences between cohorts at baseline and any use of PJF prophylaxis. Backstep logistic regressions assessed predictors of achieving Smith et al.'s Best Clinical Outcomes (BCOs) and complications, controlling for similar covariates. A total of 232 ASD patients were included (64.2 ± 10.2 years, 78% female); 36.3% were UT and 63.7% were LT. Postoperatively, the rates of PJK for UT were lower than LT at 1Y (34.6 vs. 50.4%, = 0.024), 2Y (29.5 vs. 49.6% ( = 0.003), and 5Y (48.7 vs. 62.8%, = 0.048), with comparable rates of PJF. In total, 4.0% of UT patients underwent subsequent reoperation, compared to 13.0% of LT patients ( = 0.025). A total of 6.0% of patients had recurrent PJK, and 3.9% had recurrent PJF (both > 0.05). After reoperation, UT patients reported higher rates of improvement in the minimum clinically important difference for ODI by 2Y ( = 0.007) and last follow-up ( < 0.001). While adjusted regression revealed that, for UT patients, the minimization of construct extension was predictive of achieving BCOs by last follow-up (model < 0.001), no such relationship was identified in LT patients. Patients initially fused to the lower thoracic spine demonstrate an increased incidence of PJK and lower rates of disability improvement, but are at a lessened risk of neurologic complications if reoperation is required.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13247722
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153869110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821837929</galeid><sourcerecordid>A821837929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-35fc746df4b842b87e0c371ab4a98eef7102e6cff40edef6aa01a7421ec36def3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1PHCEUhklTU4161XtD0psmZhWG2YG53Kyutd1Ek2pvJyxzcNkww5SP2vlB_s-yaq1tChfA4TkH3pMXofeUnDBWk9ON6igrSs6L4g3aKwjnE8IEe_tqv4sOQ9iQPIQoC8rfoV1W80pU5XQPPcxdN0gvo_kBeNZLOwYTsNP4KkXlOgjY9HjWJhvx18Hke3wG2vnOxBFf5yzoY8D3Jq7xtXc_TZeBz6lX0bgt-2Uc1u6xoMcLaWzygC97E420dsSLFKDF0eHbYQCPv4EPKeClu8-Hm7XzUhn1-CocoB0tbYDD53Uf3S7Ob-afJsuri8v5bDlRjNRxwqZa8bJqdbnKSleCA1GMU7kqZS0ANKekgEppXRJoQVdSEip57gkoVuUA20cfn-oO3n1PEGLTmaDAWtmDS6FhdMpEVVNKMvrhH3Tjks-it1RZ5-YKLv5Qd9JCY3rtYpa1LdrMREEF43VRZ-rkP1SeLXRGuR60yfG_Eo6fEpR3IXjQzeBz7_3YUNJsfdG88kWmj56_mlYdtC_sbxewXxhGtJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149645878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O ; Lafage, Renaud ; Tretiakov, Peter ; Smith, Justin S ; Line, Breton G ; Diebo, Bassel G ; Daniels, Alan H ; Gum, Jeffrey L ; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S ; Hamilton, David Kojo ; Buell, Thomas ; Soroceanu, Alex ; Scheer, Justin ; Eastlack, Robert K ; Mullin, Jeffrey P ; Mundis, Gregory ; Hosogane, Naobumi ; Yagi, Mitsuru ; Anand, Neel ; Okonkwo, David O ; Wang, Michael Y ; Klineberg, Eric O ; Kebaish, Khaled M ; Lewis, Stephen ; Hostin, Richard ; Gupta, Munish Chandra ; Lenke, Lawrence G ; Kim, Han Jo ; Ames, Christopher P ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Bess, Shay ; Schwab, Frank J ; Lafage, Virginie ; Burton, Douglas ; Passias, Peter G</creator><creatorcontrib>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O ; Lafage, Renaud ; Tretiakov, Peter ; Smith, Justin S ; Line, Breton G ; Diebo, Bassel G ; Daniels, Alan H ; Gum, Jeffrey L ; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S ; Hamilton, David Kojo ; Buell, Thomas ; Soroceanu, Alex ; Scheer, Justin ; Eastlack, Robert K ; Mullin, Jeffrey P ; Mundis, Gregory ; Hosogane, Naobumi ; Yagi, Mitsuru ; Anand, Neel ; Okonkwo, David O ; Wang, Michael Y ; Klineberg, Eric O ; Kebaish, Khaled M ; Lewis, Stephen ; Hostin, Richard ; Gupta, Munish Chandra ; Lenke, Lawrence G ; Kim, Han Jo ; Ames, Christopher P ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Bess, Shay ; Schwab, Frank J ; Lafage, Virginie ; Burton, Douglas ; Passias, Peter G ; International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Adult spine deformity patients ≥ 18 yrs with preoperative and 5-year (5Y) data fused to the sacrum/pelvis were included. The rates of PJK, PJK revision, and radiographic PJF were compared between patients with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (UT; T1-T7) and lower thoracic spine (LT; T8-L1). Mean differences were assessed via analyses of covariance, factoring in any differences between cohorts at baseline and any use of PJF prophylaxis. Backstep logistic regressions assessed predictors of achieving Smith et al.'s Best Clinical Outcomes (BCOs) and complications, controlling for similar covariates. A total of 232 ASD patients were included (64.2 ± 10.2 years, 78% female); 36.3% were UT and 63.7% were LT. Postoperatively, the rates of PJK for UT were lower than LT at 1Y (34.6 vs. 50.4%, = 0.024), 2Y (29.5 vs. 49.6% ( = 0.003), and 5Y (48.7 vs. 62.8%, = 0.048), with comparable rates of PJF. In total, 4.0% of UT patients underwent subsequent reoperation, compared to 13.0% of LT patients ( = 0.025). A total of 6.0% of patients had recurrent PJK, and 3.9% had recurrent PJF (both &gt; 0.05). After reoperation, UT patients reported higher rates of improvement in the minimum clinically important difference for ODI by 2Y ( = 0.007) and last follow-up ( &lt; 0.001). While adjusted regression revealed that, for UT patients, the minimization of construct extension was predictive of achieving BCOs by last follow-up (model &lt; 0.001), no such relationship was identified in LT patients. Patients initially fused to the lower thoracic spine demonstrate an increased incidence of PJK and lower rates of disability improvement, but are at a lessened risk of neurologic complications if reoperation is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39768645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Classification ; Clinical outcomes ; Comorbidity ; Comparative analysis ; Complications ; Data collection ; Disease prevention ; Frailty ; Patients ; Review boards ; Scoliosis ; Spine ; Surgery ; Treatment outcome ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-12, Vol.13 (24), p.7722</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-35fc746df4b842b87e0c371ab4a98eef7102e6cff40edef6aa01a7421ec36def3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4820-1835 ; 0000-0003-0395-1066 ; 0000-0001-9597-4139 ; 0000-0002-9697-8999 ; 0000-0002-7488-3227 ; 0000-0002-0119-7111 ; 0000-0002-1479-4070 ; 0000-0002-2070-4043 ; 0000-0002-0580-5129 ; 0000-0003-0471-9437 ; 0000-0002-2324-3780 ; 0000-0002-4711-4377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39768645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafage, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tretiakov, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Line, Breton G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diebo, Bassel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Alan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gum, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protopsaltis, Themistocles S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, David Kojo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buell, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroceanu, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastlack, Robert K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundis, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosogane, Naobumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Neel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okonkwo, David O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klineberg, Eric O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebaish, Khaled M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Munish Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenke, Lawrence G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bess, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafage, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passias, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Adult spine deformity patients ≥ 18 yrs with preoperative and 5-year (5Y) data fused to the sacrum/pelvis were included. The rates of PJK, PJK revision, and radiographic PJF were compared between patients with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (UT; T1-T7) and lower thoracic spine (LT; T8-L1). Mean differences were assessed via analyses of covariance, factoring in any differences between cohorts at baseline and any use of PJF prophylaxis. Backstep logistic regressions assessed predictors of achieving Smith et al.'s Best Clinical Outcomes (BCOs) and complications, controlling for similar covariates. A total of 232 ASD patients were included (64.2 ± 10.2 years, 78% female); 36.3% were UT and 63.7% were LT. Postoperatively, the rates of PJK for UT were lower than LT at 1Y (34.6 vs. 50.4%, = 0.024), 2Y (29.5 vs. 49.6% ( = 0.003), and 5Y (48.7 vs. 62.8%, = 0.048), with comparable rates of PJF. In total, 4.0% of UT patients underwent subsequent reoperation, compared to 13.0% of LT patients ( = 0.025). A total of 6.0% of patients had recurrent PJK, and 3.9% had recurrent PJF (both &gt; 0.05). After reoperation, UT patients reported higher rates of improvement in the minimum clinically important difference for ODI by 2Y ( = 0.007) and last follow-up ( &lt; 0.001). While adjusted regression revealed that, for UT patients, the minimization of construct extension was predictive of achieving BCOs by last follow-up (model &lt; 0.001), no such relationship was identified in LT patients. Patients initially fused to the lower thoracic spine demonstrate an increased incidence of PJK and lower rates of disability improvement, but are at a lessened risk of neurologic complications if reoperation is required.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment outcome</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1PHCEUhklTU4161XtD0psmZhWG2YG53Kyutd1Ek2pvJyxzcNkww5SP2vlB_s-yaq1tChfA4TkH3pMXofeUnDBWk9ON6igrSs6L4g3aKwjnE8IEe_tqv4sOQ9iQPIQoC8rfoV1W80pU5XQPPcxdN0gvo_kBeNZLOwYTsNP4KkXlOgjY9HjWJhvx18Hke3wG2vnOxBFf5yzoY8D3Jq7xtXc_TZeBz6lX0bgt-2Uc1u6xoMcLaWzygC97E420dsSLFKDF0eHbYQCPv4EPKeClu8-Hm7XzUhn1-CocoB0tbYDD53Uf3S7Ob-afJsuri8v5bDlRjNRxwqZa8bJqdbnKSleCA1GMU7kqZS0ANKekgEppXRJoQVdSEip57gkoVuUA20cfn-oO3n1PEGLTmaDAWtmDS6FhdMpEVVNKMvrhH3Tjks-it1RZ5-YKLv5Qd9JCY3rtYpa1LdrMREEF43VRZ-rkP1SeLXRGuR60yfG_Eo6fEpR3IXjQzeBz7_3YUNJsfdG88kWmj56_mlYdtC_sbxewXxhGtJ0</recordid><startdate>20241218</startdate><enddate>20241218</enddate><creator>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O</creator><creator>Lafage, Renaud</creator><creator>Tretiakov, Peter</creator><creator>Smith, Justin S</creator><creator>Line, Breton G</creator><creator>Diebo, Bassel G</creator><creator>Daniels, Alan H</creator><creator>Gum, Jeffrey L</creator><creator>Protopsaltis, Themistocles S</creator><creator>Hamilton, David Kojo</creator><creator>Buell, Thomas</creator><creator>Soroceanu, Alex</creator><creator>Scheer, Justin</creator><creator>Eastlack, Robert K</creator><creator>Mullin, Jeffrey P</creator><creator>Mundis, Gregory</creator><creator>Hosogane, Naobumi</creator><creator>Yagi, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Anand, Neel</creator><creator>Okonkwo, David O</creator><creator>Wang, Michael Y</creator><creator>Klineberg, Eric O</creator><creator>Kebaish, Khaled M</creator><creator>Lewis, Stephen</creator><creator>Hostin, Richard</creator><creator>Gupta, Munish Chandra</creator><creator>Lenke, Lawrence G</creator><creator>Kim, Han Jo</creator><creator>Ames, Christopher P</creator><creator>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creator><creator>Bess, Shay</creator><creator>Schwab, Frank J</creator><creator>Lafage, Virginie</creator><creator>Burton, Douglas</creator><creator>Passias, Peter G</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-1835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0395-1066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-4139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-8999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-3227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-7111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-4070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-4043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-5129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-9437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-4377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241218</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine</title><author>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O ; Lafage, Renaud ; Tretiakov, Peter ; Smith, Justin S ; Line, Breton G ; Diebo, Bassel G ; Daniels, Alan H ; Gum, Jeffrey L ; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S ; Hamilton, David Kojo ; Buell, Thomas ; Soroceanu, Alex ; Scheer, Justin ; Eastlack, Robert K ; Mullin, Jeffrey P ; Mundis, Gregory ; Hosogane, Naobumi ; Yagi, Mitsuru ; Anand, Neel ; Okonkwo, David O ; Wang, Michael Y ; Klineberg, Eric O ; Kebaish, Khaled M ; Lewis, Stephen ; Hostin, Richard ; Gupta, Munish Chandra ; Lenke, Lawrence G ; Kim, Han Jo ; Ames, Christopher P ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Bess, Shay ; Schwab, Frank J ; Lafage, Virginie ; Burton, Douglas ; Passias, Peter G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-35fc746df4b842b87e0c371ab4a98eef7102e6cff40edef6aa01a7421ec36def3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment outcome</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafage, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tretiakov, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Line, Breton G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diebo, Bassel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Alan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gum, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protopsaltis, Themistocles S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, David Kojo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buell, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroceanu, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastlack, Robert K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundis, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosogane, Naobumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Neel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okonkwo, David O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klineberg, Eric O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebaish, Khaled M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Munish Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenke, Lawrence G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bess, Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafage, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passias, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O</au><au>Lafage, Renaud</au><au>Tretiakov, Peter</au><au>Smith, Justin S</au><au>Line, Breton G</au><au>Diebo, Bassel G</au><au>Daniels, Alan H</au><au>Gum, Jeffrey L</au><au>Protopsaltis, Themistocles S</au><au>Hamilton, David Kojo</au><au>Buell, Thomas</au><au>Soroceanu, Alex</au><au>Scheer, Justin</au><au>Eastlack, Robert K</au><au>Mullin, Jeffrey P</au><au>Mundis, Gregory</au><au>Hosogane, Naobumi</au><au>Yagi, Mitsuru</au><au>Anand, Neel</au><au>Okonkwo, David O</au><au>Wang, Michael Y</au><au>Klineberg, Eric O</au><au>Kebaish, Khaled M</au><au>Lewis, Stephen</au><au>Hostin, Richard</au><au>Gupta, Munish Chandra</au><au>Lenke, Lawrence G</au><au>Kim, Han Jo</au><au>Ames, Christopher P</au><au>Shaffrey, Christopher I</au><au>Bess, Shay</au><au>Schwab, Frank J</au><au>Lafage, Virginie</au><au>Burton, Douglas</au><au>Passias, Peter G</au><aucorp>International Spine Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-12-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>7722</spage><pages>7722-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or failure (PJF) may demonstrate disparate outcomes and recovery when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Few studies have distinguished the reoperation and recovery abilities of patients with PJK or PJF when fused to the upper (UT) versus lower (LT) thoracic spine. Adult spine deformity patients ≥ 18 yrs with preoperative and 5-year (5Y) data fused to the sacrum/pelvis were included. The rates of PJK, PJK revision, and radiographic PJF were compared between patients with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (UT; T1-T7) and lower thoracic spine (LT; T8-L1). Mean differences were assessed via analyses of covariance, factoring in any differences between cohorts at baseline and any use of PJF prophylaxis. Backstep logistic regressions assessed predictors of achieving Smith et al.'s Best Clinical Outcomes (BCOs) and complications, controlling for similar covariates. A total of 232 ASD patients were included (64.2 ± 10.2 years, 78% female); 36.3% were UT and 63.7% were LT. Postoperatively, the rates of PJK for UT were lower than LT at 1Y (34.6 vs. 50.4%, = 0.024), 2Y (29.5 vs. 49.6% ( = 0.003), and 5Y (48.7 vs. 62.8%, = 0.048), with comparable rates of PJF. In total, 4.0% of UT patients underwent subsequent reoperation, compared to 13.0% of LT patients ( = 0.025). A total of 6.0% of patients had recurrent PJK, and 3.9% had recurrent PJF (both &gt; 0.05). After reoperation, UT patients reported higher rates of improvement in the minimum clinically important difference for ODI by 2Y ( = 0.007) and last follow-up ( &lt; 0.001). While adjusted regression revealed that, for UT patients, the minimization of construct extension was predictive of achieving BCOs by last follow-up (model &lt; 0.001), no such relationship was identified in LT patients. Patients initially fused to the lower thoracic spine demonstrate an increased incidence of PJK and lower rates of disability improvement, but are at a lessened risk of neurologic complications if reoperation is required.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39768645</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13247722</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-1835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0395-1066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-4139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-8999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-3227</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-7111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-4070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-4043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-5129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-9437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-4377</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-12, Vol.13 (24), p.7722
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153869110
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Abnormalities
Classification
Clinical outcomes
Comorbidity
Comparative analysis
Complications
Data collection
Disease prevention
Frailty
Patients
Review boards
Scoliosis
Spine
Surgery
Treatment outcome
Vertebrae
title Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure Initially Fused to Upper Versus Lower Thoracic Spine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A41%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Outcomes%20in%20Adult%20Spinal%20Deformity%20Patients%20with%20Proximal%20Junctional%20Kyphosis%20or%20Failure%20Initially%20Fused%20to%20Upper%20Versus%20Lower%20Thoracic%20Spine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Onafowokan,%20Oluwatobi%20O&rft.aucorp=International%20Spine%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2024-12-18&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=7722&rft.pages=7722-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13247722&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA821837929%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149645878&rft_id=info:pmid/39768645&rft_galeid=A821837929&rfr_iscdi=true