Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns

Context Evaluating connectivity and identifying corridors for protection is a central challenge in applied ecology and conservation. Rigorous validation and comparison of how approaches perform in capturing biological processes is needed to guide research and conservation action. Objectives We aim t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape ecology 2023-12, Vol.38 (12), p.3205-3219
Hauptverfasser: Finerty, Genevieve E., Cushman, Samuel A., Bauer, Dominik T., Elliot, Nicolas B., Kesch, M. Kristina, Macdonald, David W., Loveridge, Andrew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3219
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3205
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 38
creator Finerty, Genevieve E.
Cushman, Samuel A.
Bauer, Dominik T.
Elliot, Nicolas B.
Kesch, M. Kristina
Macdonald, David W.
Loveridge, Andrew J.
description Context Evaluating connectivity and identifying corridors for protection is a central challenge in applied ecology and conservation. Rigorous validation and comparison of how approaches perform in capturing biological processes is needed to guide research and conservation action. Objectives We aim to compare the ability of connectivity surfaces optimised using home range and dispersal data to accurately capture lion movement during dispersal, using cost-distance and circuit theory approaches. Methods We delineate periods of dispersal in African lions (Panthera leo) to obtain movement trajectories of dispersing individuals across the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area, southern Africa. We use these trajectories to assess comparative measures of connectivity values at dispersal points across surfaces and the ability of models to discriminate between observed and randomised paths. Results Encouragingly, results show that on average, all connectivity approaches and resistance surfaces used perform well in predicting movements of an independent set of dispersing lions. Cost-distance approaches were generally more sensitive to resistance input than circuit theory, but differences in performance measures between resistance inputs were small across both approaches. Conclusions Findings suggest that home range data can be used to generate resistance surfaces for connectivity maps in this system, with independent dispersal data providing a promising approach to thresholding what is considered as “connected” when delineating corridors. Most dispersers traversed through landscapes that had minimal human settlement and are likely highly connected by dispersal. Research into limiting factors and dispersal abilities will be critical to understanding how populations will respond to increasing habitat fragmentation and human expansion.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153858980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153858980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2495225b9fd0fa2969dd3b67a372982f1482a272a3e44acbe8b4d8cc166e1c963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL16qk6RtGm_L4hcseNGrIU3TNUub1KRd2P31Zq0gePA0MPO8L8OD0CWGGwzAbgMGXkIKhKaAWUnS_RGa4ZyRlLMCH6MZcIJTwhk9RWchbACAUoAZer_fynaUg7HrRDlrtRrM1gy7pHO1bkPSOH_YB-23EXL2LjE2mPXHEE_edcmi8UZJm7TxltQm9NoH2Sa9HAbtbThHJ41sg774mXP09nD_unxKVy-Pz8vFKlWUF0NKMp4Tkle8qaGRhBe8rmlVMEkZ4SVpcFYSSRiRVGeZVJUuq6wulcJFobHiBZ2j66m39-5z1GEQnQlKt6202o1BUJzTMi-jo4he_UE3bvQ2ficIBwY4y4BFikyU8i4ErxvRe9NJvxMYxEG5mJSLqFx8Kxf7GKJTKETYrrX_rf4n9QURSoWv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2907014407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Finerty, Genevieve E. ; Cushman, Samuel A. ; Bauer, Dominik T. ; Elliot, Nicolas B. ; Kesch, M. Kristina ; Macdonald, David W. ; Loveridge, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Finerty, Genevieve E. ; Cushman, Samuel A. ; Bauer, Dominik T. ; Elliot, Nicolas B. ; Kesch, M. Kristina ; Macdonald, David W. ; Loveridge, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>Context Evaluating connectivity and identifying corridors for protection is a central challenge in applied ecology and conservation. Rigorous validation and comparison of how approaches perform in capturing biological processes is needed to guide research and conservation action. Objectives We aim to compare the ability of connectivity surfaces optimised using home range and dispersal data to accurately capture lion movement during dispersal, using cost-distance and circuit theory approaches. Methods We delineate periods of dispersal in African lions (Panthera leo) to obtain movement trajectories of dispersing individuals across the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area, southern Africa. We use these trajectories to assess comparative measures of connectivity values at dispersal points across surfaces and the ability of models to discriminate between observed and randomised paths. Results Encouragingly, results show that on average, all connectivity approaches and resistance surfaces used perform well in predicting movements of an independent set of dispersing lions. Cost-distance approaches were generally more sensitive to resistance input than circuit theory, but differences in performance measures between resistance inputs were small across both approaches. Conclusions Findings suggest that home range data can be used to generate resistance surfaces for connectivity maps in this system, with independent dispersal data providing a promising approach to thresholding what is considered as “connected” when delineating corridors. Most dispersers traversed through landscapes that had minimal human settlement and are likely highly connected by dispersal. Research into limiting factors and dispersal abilities will be critical to understanding how populations will respond to increasing habitat fragmentation and human expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>applied ecology ; Biological activity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Circuits ; Connectivity ; Conservation ; Conservation areas ; Corridors ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Habitat fragmentation ; Home range ; Human settlements ; humans ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Panthera leo ; Performance prediction ; Research Article ; Southern Africa ; Sustainable Development ; Trajectory analysis ; Trajectory measurement</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2023-12, Vol.38 (12), p.3205-3219</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2495225b9fd0fa2969dd3b67a372982f1482a272a3e44acbe8b4d8cc166e1c963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2495225b9fd0fa2969dd3b67a372982f1482a272a3e44acbe8b4d8cc166e1c963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5266-5109</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finerty, Genevieve E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Dominik T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, Nicolas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesch, M. Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context Evaluating connectivity and identifying corridors for protection is a central challenge in applied ecology and conservation. Rigorous validation and comparison of how approaches perform in capturing biological processes is needed to guide research and conservation action. Objectives We aim to compare the ability of connectivity surfaces optimised using home range and dispersal data to accurately capture lion movement during dispersal, using cost-distance and circuit theory approaches. Methods We delineate periods of dispersal in African lions (Panthera leo) to obtain movement trajectories of dispersing individuals across the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area, southern Africa. We use these trajectories to assess comparative measures of connectivity values at dispersal points across surfaces and the ability of models to discriminate between observed and randomised paths. Results Encouragingly, results show that on average, all connectivity approaches and resistance surfaces used perform well in predicting movements of an independent set of dispersing lions. Cost-distance approaches were generally more sensitive to resistance input than circuit theory, but differences in performance measures between resistance inputs were small across both approaches. Conclusions Findings suggest that home range data can be used to generate resistance surfaces for connectivity maps in this system, with independent dispersal data providing a promising approach to thresholding what is considered as “connected” when delineating corridors. Most dispersers traversed through landscapes that had minimal human settlement and are likely highly connected by dispersal. Research into limiting factors and dispersal abilities will be critical to understanding how populations will respond to increasing habitat fragmentation and human expansion.</description><subject>applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Panthera leo</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Southern Africa</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><subject>Trajectory measurement</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL16qk6RtGm_L4hcseNGrIU3TNUub1KRd2P31Zq0gePA0MPO8L8OD0CWGGwzAbgMGXkIKhKaAWUnS_RGa4ZyRlLMCH6MZcIJTwhk9RWchbACAUoAZer_fynaUg7HrRDlrtRrM1gy7pHO1bkPSOH_YB-23EXL2LjE2mPXHEE_edcmi8UZJm7TxltQm9NoH2Sa9HAbtbThHJ41sg774mXP09nD_unxKVy-Pz8vFKlWUF0NKMp4Tkle8qaGRhBe8rmlVMEkZ4SVpcFYSSRiRVGeZVJUuq6wulcJFobHiBZ2j66m39-5z1GEQnQlKt6202o1BUJzTMi-jo4he_UE3bvQ2ficIBwY4y4BFikyU8i4ErxvRe9NJvxMYxEG5mJSLqFx8Kxf7GKJTKETYrrX_rf4n9QURSoWv</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Finerty, Genevieve E.</creator><creator>Cushman, Samuel A.</creator><creator>Bauer, Dominik T.</creator><creator>Elliot, Nicolas B.</creator><creator>Kesch, M. Kristina</creator><creator>Macdonald, David W.</creator><creator>Loveridge, Andrew J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-5109</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns</title><author>Finerty, Genevieve E. ; Cushman, Samuel A. ; Bauer, Dominik T. ; Elliot, Nicolas B. ; Kesch, M. Kristina ; Macdonald, David W. ; Loveridge, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2495225b9fd0fa2969dd3b67a372982f1482a272a3e44acbe8b4d8cc166e1c963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Panthera leo</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Southern Africa</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><topic>Trajectory measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finerty, Genevieve E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Dominik T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliot, Nicolas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesch, M. Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finerty, Genevieve E.</au><au>Cushman, Samuel A.</au><au>Bauer, Dominik T.</au><au>Elliot, Nicolas B.</au><au>Kesch, M. Kristina</au><au>Macdonald, David W.</au><au>Loveridge, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3205</spage><epage>3219</epage><pages>3205-3219</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context Evaluating connectivity and identifying corridors for protection is a central challenge in applied ecology and conservation. Rigorous validation and comparison of how approaches perform in capturing biological processes is needed to guide research and conservation action. Objectives We aim to compare the ability of connectivity surfaces optimised using home range and dispersal data to accurately capture lion movement during dispersal, using cost-distance and circuit theory approaches. Methods We delineate periods of dispersal in African lions (Panthera leo) to obtain movement trajectories of dispersing individuals across the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area, southern Africa. We use these trajectories to assess comparative measures of connectivity values at dispersal points across surfaces and the ability of models to discriminate between observed and randomised paths. Results Encouragingly, results show that on average, all connectivity approaches and resistance surfaces used perform well in predicting movements of an independent set of dispersing lions. Cost-distance approaches were generally more sensitive to resistance input than circuit theory, but differences in performance measures between resistance inputs were small across both approaches. Conclusions Findings suggest that home range data can be used to generate resistance surfaces for connectivity maps in this system, with independent dispersal data providing a promising approach to thresholding what is considered as “connected” when delineating corridors. Most dispersers traversed through landscapes that had minimal human settlement and are likely highly connected by dispersal. Research into limiting factors and dispersal abilities will be critical to understanding how populations will respond to increasing habitat fragmentation and human expansion.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-5109</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2973
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2023-12, Vol.38 (12), p.3205-3219
issn 0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153858980
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects applied ecology
Biological activity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Circuits
Connectivity
Conservation
Conservation areas
Corridors
Dispersal
Dispersion
Ecology
Environmental Management
Habitat fragmentation
Home range
Human settlements
humans
Landscape Ecology
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Life Sciences
Nature Conservation
Panthera leo
Performance prediction
Research Article
Southern Africa
Sustainable Development
Trajectory analysis
Trajectory measurement
title Evaluating connectivity models for conservation: insights from African lion dispersal patterns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A17%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20connectivity%20models%20for%20conservation:%20insights%20from%20African%20lion%20dispersal%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Finerty,%20Genevieve%20E.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3205&rft.epage=3219&rft.pages=3205-3219&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-023-01782-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153858980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2907014407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true