Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway

Good process hygiene in broiler slaughter is paramount to achieve safe products with long shelf-lives. Here we investigated changes in bacterial load and diversity on chicken carcasses at selected stages on slaughtering lines in two abattoirs in Norway. Carcasses included in the study, came from flo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food control 2023-04, Vol.146, p.109526, Article 109526
Hauptverfasser: Hauge, Sigrun J., Johannessen, Gro S., Haverkamp, Thomas H.A., Bjørkøy, Solfrid, Llarena, Ann Katrin, Spilsberg, Bjørn, Leithaug, Magnus, Økland, Marianne, Holthe, Janne, Røtterud, Ole-Johan, Alvseike, Ole, Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109526
container_title Food control
container_volume 146
creator Hauge, Sigrun J.
Johannessen, Gro S.
Haverkamp, Thomas H.A.
Bjørkøy, Solfrid
Llarena, Ann Katrin
Spilsberg, Bjørn
Leithaug, Magnus
Økland, Marianne
Holthe, Janne
Røtterud, Ole-Johan
Alvseike, Ole
Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise
description Good process hygiene in broiler slaughter is paramount to achieve safe products with long shelf-lives. Here we investigated changes in bacterial load and diversity on chicken carcasses at selected stages on slaughtering lines in two abattoirs in Norway. Carcasses included in the study, came from flocks that had been classified as either positive or negative for Campylobacter. In total, 120 neck-skins were collected at four sampling points: before scalding, after plucking, after evisceration, and after chilling. The bacterial load was analyzed at each sampling point using quantitative and qualitative cultivation while the bacterial composition was determined using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial loads on carcasses decreased along the slaughter line by 2.1, 1.1, 1.1, and 1.0 log cfu per g for Total Plate Counts (TPC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter, respectively. The largest reduction was observed after washing and chilling. For TPC, a large reduction was also observed after scalding and plucking. Scalding water samples had low amounts of E. coli and were negative for Campylobacter. Only a weak statistical association was found between indicator counts and Campylobacter. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing results showed a more diverse bacterial community at the start of the slaughter line, dominated by Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Streptococcus, which altered to a less-diverse community, dominated by Asinibacterium spp., Afipia spp., Pseudomonas, Polaromonas, and Psychrobacter after chilling. Both abattoirs were assessed as low risk by a new categorization method. This study contributes to identify factors that increases and decreases levels of Campylobacter and other bacteria during slaughter and should enable the implementation of control measures and thus improve meat safety. •Bacterial communities were identified along the slaughter lines.•Bacterial loads on broiler carcasses decreased by 1–2 log/g along slaughter lines.•Air-chilling without use of water reduced Campylobacter.•Scalding reduced total plate count by > 1 log/g.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109526
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153831545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956713522007198</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153831545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-159d59b219ea29d964c28fa4c29e24df43f905bcdc2ef06eaf87b08116e0929a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QbJ005pkHp3sLMUXFN3oOmSSmzYlk9RkxjL_3pTq2s25l8O5B-6H0C0lc0pofb-bmxC0Cr6fM8JYNnnF6jM0oc2imC0o4-dokr0670V1ia5S2hFCF4SSCdouU4KUOvA9Dgbvw-D6OOJ9DCrbeDtuLHjA0mvcStVDtNJhPXrZWZWwdMFvcH8IuI3BOog4OTlstjmHnfWQsPX4LcSDHK_RhZEuwc3vnKLPp8eP1cts_f78ulquZ6ooq35GK64r3jLKQTKueV0q1hiZlQMrtSkLw0nVKq0YGFKDNM2iJQ2lNRDOuCym6O7Um1_4GiD1orNJgXPSQxiSKGhVNFnKKkfrU1TFkFIEI_bRdjKOghJxRCt24g-tOKIVJ7T58OF0CPmRbwtRJJUxKdA2guqFDva_ih96m4fz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153831545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hauge, Sigrun J. ; Johannessen, Gro S. ; Haverkamp, Thomas H.A. ; Bjørkøy, Solfrid ; Llarena, Ann Katrin ; Spilsberg, Bjørn ; Leithaug, Magnus ; Økland, Marianne ; Holthe, Janne ; Røtterud, Ole-Johan ; Alvseike, Ole ; Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Sigrun J. ; Johannessen, Gro S. ; Haverkamp, Thomas H.A. ; Bjørkøy, Solfrid ; Llarena, Ann Katrin ; Spilsberg, Bjørn ; Leithaug, Magnus ; Økland, Marianne ; Holthe, Janne ; Røtterud, Ole-Johan ; Alvseike, Ole ; Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</creatorcontrib><description>Good process hygiene in broiler slaughter is paramount to achieve safe products with long shelf-lives. Here we investigated changes in bacterial load and diversity on chicken carcasses at selected stages on slaughtering lines in two abattoirs in Norway. Carcasses included in the study, came from flocks that had been classified as either positive or negative for Campylobacter. In total, 120 neck-skins were collected at four sampling points: before scalding, after plucking, after evisceration, and after chilling. The bacterial load was analyzed at each sampling point using quantitative and qualitative cultivation while the bacterial composition was determined using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial loads on carcasses decreased along the slaughter line by 2.1, 1.1, 1.1, and 1.0 log cfu per g for Total Plate Counts (TPC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter, respectively. The largest reduction was observed after washing and chilling. For TPC, a large reduction was also observed after scalding and plucking. Scalding water samples had low amounts of E. coli and were negative for Campylobacter. Only a weak statistical association was found between indicator counts and Campylobacter. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing results showed a more diverse bacterial community at the start of the slaughter line, dominated by Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Streptococcus, which altered to a less-diverse community, dominated by Asinibacterium spp., Afipia spp., Pseudomonas, Polaromonas, and Psychrobacter after chilling. Both abattoirs were assessed as low risk by a new categorization method. This study contributes to identify factors that increases and decreases levels of Campylobacter and other bacteria during slaughter and should enable the implementation of control measures and thus improve meat safety. •Bacterial communities were identified along the slaughter lines.•Bacterial loads on broiler carcasses decreased by 1–2 log/g along slaughter lines.•Air-chilling without use of water reduced Campylobacter.•Scalding reduced total plate count by &gt; 1 log/g.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>16S sequencing ; Afipia ; bacterial communities ; Bio-mapping ; Broiler ; Campylobacter ; chickens ; Escherichia coli ; evisceration ; food safety ; genes ; hygiene ; meat ; Metagenomics ; microbial load ; Norway ; Polaromonas ; Poultry ; Pseudomonas ; Psychrobacter ; risk ; Risk-categorization ; Staphylococcus ; Streptococcus</subject><ispartof>Food control, 2023-04, Vol.146, p.109526, Article 109526</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-159d59b219ea29d964c28fa4c29e24df43f905bcdc2ef06eaf87b08116e0929a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-159d59b219ea29d964c28fa4c29e24df43f905bcdc2ef06eaf87b08116e0929a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4504-9548 ; 0000-0001-7884-8317 ; 0000-0002-0271-0677 ; 0000-0001-8579-4089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713522007198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Sigrun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Gro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haverkamp, Thomas H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjørkøy, Solfrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llarena, Ann Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilsberg, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leithaug, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Økland, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holthe, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Røtterud, Ole-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvseike, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway</title><title>Food control</title><description>Good process hygiene in broiler slaughter is paramount to achieve safe products with long shelf-lives. Here we investigated changes in bacterial load and diversity on chicken carcasses at selected stages on slaughtering lines in two abattoirs in Norway. Carcasses included in the study, came from flocks that had been classified as either positive or negative for Campylobacter. In total, 120 neck-skins were collected at four sampling points: before scalding, after plucking, after evisceration, and after chilling. The bacterial load was analyzed at each sampling point using quantitative and qualitative cultivation while the bacterial composition was determined using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial loads on carcasses decreased along the slaughter line by 2.1, 1.1, 1.1, and 1.0 log cfu per g for Total Plate Counts (TPC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter, respectively. The largest reduction was observed after washing and chilling. For TPC, a large reduction was also observed after scalding and plucking. Scalding water samples had low amounts of E. coli and were negative for Campylobacter. Only a weak statistical association was found between indicator counts and Campylobacter. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing results showed a more diverse bacterial community at the start of the slaughter line, dominated by Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Streptococcus, which altered to a less-diverse community, dominated by Asinibacterium spp., Afipia spp., Pseudomonas, Polaromonas, and Psychrobacter after chilling. Both abattoirs were assessed as low risk by a new categorization method. This study contributes to identify factors that increases and decreases levels of Campylobacter and other bacteria during slaughter and should enable the implementation of control measures and thus improve meat safety. •Bacterial communities were identified along the slaughter lines.•Bacterial loads on broiler carcasses decreased by 1–2 log/g along slaughter lines.•Air-chilling without use of water reduced Campylobacter.•Scalding reduced total plate count by &gt; 1 log/g.</description><subject>16S sequencing</subject><subject>Afipia</subject><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>Bio-mapping</subject><subject>Broiler</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>chickens</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>evisceration</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>hygiene</subject><subject>meat</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>microbial load</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Polaromonas</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Psychrobacter</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk-categorization</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><issn>0956-7135</issn><issn>1873-7129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QbJ005pkHp3sLMUXFN3oOmSSmzYlk9RkxjL_3pTq2s25l8O5B-6H0C0lc0pofb-bmxC0Cr6fM8JYNnnF6jM0oc2imC0o4-dokr0670V1ia5S2hFCF4SSCdouU4KUOvA9Dgbvw-D6OOJ9DCrbeDtuLHjA0mvcStVDtNJhPXrZWZWwdMFvcH8IuI3BOog4OTlstjmHnfWQsPX4LcSDHK_RhZEuwc3vnKLPp8eP1cts_f78ulquZ6ooq35GK64r3jLKQTKueV0q1hiZlQMrtSkLw0nVKq0YGFKDNM2iJQ2lNRDOuCym6O7Um1_4GiD1orNJgXPSQxiSKGhVNFnKKkfrU1TFkFIEI_bRdjKOghJxRCt24g-tOKIVJ7T58OF0CPmRbwtRJJUxKdA2guqFDva_ih96m4fz</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Hauge, Sigrun J.</creator><creator>Johannessen, Gro S.</creator><creator>Haverkamp, Thomas H.A.</creator><creator>Bjørkøy, Solfrid</creator><creator>Llarena, Ann Katrin</creator><creator>Spilsberg, Bjørn</creator><creator>Leithaug, Magnus</creator><creator>Økland, Marianne</creator><creator>Holthe, Janne</creator><creator>Røtterud, Ole-Johan</creator><creator>Alvseike, Ole</creator><creator>Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-9548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-8317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-4089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway</title><author>Hauge, Sigrun J. ; Johannessen, Gro S. ; Haverkamp, Thomas H.A. ; Bjørkøy, Solfrid ; Llarena, Ann Katrin ; Spilsberg, Bjørn ; Leithaug, Magnus ; Økland, Marianne ; Holthe, Janne ; Røtterud, Ole-Johan ; Alvseike, Ole ; Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-159d59b219ea29d964c28fa4c29e24df43f905bcdc2ef06eaf87b08116e0929a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>16S sequencing</topic><topic>Afipia</topic><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>Bio-mapping</topic><topic>Broiler</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>chickens</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>evisceration</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>hygiene</topic><topic>meat</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>microbial load</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Polaromonas</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Psychrobacter</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk-categorization</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Sigrun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Gro S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haverkamp, Thomas H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjørkøy, Solfrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llarena, Ann Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilsberg, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leithaug, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Økland, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holthe, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Røtterud, Ole-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvseike, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauge, Sigrun J.</au><au>Johannessen, Gro S.</au><au>Haverkamp, Thomas H.A.</au><au>Bjørkøy, Solfrid</au><au>Llarena, Ann Katrin</au><au>Spilsberg, Bjørn</au><au>Leithaug, Magnus</au><au>Økland, Marianne</au><au>Holthe, Janne</au><au>Røtterud, Ole-Johan</au><au>Alvseike, Ole</au><au>Nagel-Alne, Gunvor Elise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway</atitle><jtitle>Food control</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>109526</spage><pages>109526-</pages><artnum>109526</artnum><issn>0956-7135</issn><eissn>1873-7129</eissn><abstract>Good process hygiene in broiler slaughter is paramount to achieve safe products with long shelf-lives. Here we investigated changes in bacterial load and diversity on chicken carcasses at selected stages on slaughtering lines in two abattoirs in Norway. Carcasses included in the study, came from flocks that had been classified as either positive or negative for Campylobacter. In total, 120 neck-skins were collected at four sampling points: before scalding, after plucking, after evisceration, and after chilling. The bacterial load was analyzed at each sampling point using quantitative and qualitative cultivation while the bacterial composition was determined using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial loads on carcasses decreased along the slaughter line by 2.1, 1.1, 1.1, and 1.0 log cfu per g for Total Plate Counts (TPC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter, respectively. The largest reduction was observed after washing and chilling. For TPC, a large reduction was also observed after scalding and plucking. Scalding water samples had low amounts of E. coli and were negative for Campylobacter. Only a weak statistical association was found between indicator counts and Campylobacter. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing results showed a more diverse bacterial community at the start of the slaughter line, dominated by Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Streptococcus, which altered to a less-diverse community, dominated by Asinibacterium spp., Afipia spp., Pseudomonas, Polaromonas, and Psychrobacter after chilling. Both abattoirs were assessed as low risk by a new categorization method. This study contributes to identify factors that increases and decreases levels of Campylobacter and other bacteria during slaughter and should enable the implementation of control measures and thus improve meat safety. •Bacterial communities were identified along the slaughter lines.•Bacterial loads on broiler carcasses decreased by 1–2 log/g along slaughter lines.•Air-chilling without use of water reduced Campylobacter.•Scalding reduced total plate count by &gt; 1 log/g.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109526</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-9548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-8317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-0677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-4089</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7135
ispartof Food control, 2023-04, Vol.146, p.109526, Article 109526
issn 0956-7135
1873-7129
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153831545
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 16S sequencing
Afipia
bacterial communities
Bio-mapping
Broiler
Campylobacter
chickens
Escherichia coli
evisceration
food safety
genes
hygiene
meat
Metagenomics
microbial load
Norway
Polaromonas
Poultry
Pseudomonas
Psychrobacter
risk
Risk-categorization
Staphylococcus
Streptococcus
title Assessment of poultry process hygiene and bacterial dynamics along two broiler slaughter lines in Norway
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A52%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20poultry%20process%20hygiene%20and%20bacterial%20dynamics%20along%20two%20broiler%20slaughter%20lines%20in%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Food%20control&rft.au=Hauge,%20Sigrun%20J.&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=109526&rft.pages=109526-&rft.artnum=109526&rft.issn=0956-7135&rft.eissn=1873-7129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153831545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153831545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0956713522007198&rfr_iscdi=true