What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal

Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs hereafter) have become a significant global challenge for biodiversity conservation and management. Understanding factors that drive collisions is crucial for devising management policies and plans. Field surveys were conducted in 2019 to collect data on the physica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for nature conservation 2024-09, Vol.81, p.126678, Article 126678
Hauptverfasser: Bhandari, Kritana, Upadhaya, Suraj, Yadav, Nabin Kumar, Poudel, Prawesh, Heyojoo, Binod Prasad, Timilsina, Yajna Prasad, Koirala, Pramila
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 126678
container_title Journal for nature conservation
container_volume 81
creator Bhandari, Kritana
Upadhaya, Suraj
Yadav, Nabin Kumar
Poudel, Prawesh
Heyojoo, Binod Prasad
Timilsina, Yajna Prasad
Koirala, Pramila
description Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs hereafter) have become a significant global challenge for biodiversity conservation and management. Understanding factors that drive collisions is crucial for devising management policies and plans. Field surveys were conducted in 2019 to collect data on the physical and ecological features of the study area in each 875 m segment, and species death records were collected from government agencies between 2015 and 2019. This study identified the most important factors that influence WVCs, and we predicted the WVC hotspot along the East-West highway of Banke and Bardia National Parks in western Nepal using the kernel density estimation function in Arc GIS 10.5. We performed Binomial regression analysis to identify the most important factors associated with WVCs. Results showed that geographic factors such as topography, presence of retaining walls, canals/drainage, land use or land cover, forest land, agricultural land, grassland, and barren land have negative influence on WVCs, whereas speed breaker and aspect exhibit a positive influence. We found that WVCs are more likely to occur near forest land than agricultural land, grasslands, and barren land. We also found that the presence of the retaining wall, cannel/drainage, and speed breakers increased the likelihood of WVCs events. Mammals like spotted deer, Axis axis (27 %) and wild boars, Sus scrofa (21 %) are the most frequently affected species in wildlife-vehicle collisions. Due to the unavailability of data from the park office, this study does not include species like insects, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and small mammals. Animal-friendly infrastructures like wildlife crossings (overpass/underpass), canopy bridges, conservation signage and reflectors near the hotspot can reduce WVCs. In addition, alternative roads outside the park area can be constructed to divert vehicle movement and reduce collisions in the national park area.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153828307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1617138124001274</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153828307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-10f397ffa0c66dcc17c64e2743278b297807be42b3d34b6d58bb92098713d6b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhTOARCn8ADaPLCl-pLYjBlRVvKQKFlAHBsuxb4gjNy522qr_nlRhZjrL-a7u-bLshuAZwYTftbO2MzOKaTEjlHMhz7IJ4UTkhElykV2m1GJMCSnKSfa1bnSPam36EBOy0e0BHZy33tWQ76FxxgMywXuXXOgSCh1q3Hdz0Mf0gBbI6AQo9Tt7RHUMG7SG1EPs0Btstb_KzmvtE1z_5TT7fHr8WL7kq_fn1-VilRsqaZ8TXLNS1LXGhnNrDBGGF0BFwaiQFS2FxKKCglbMsqLidi6rqqS4lIIwyyvJptnteHcbw89u-EBtXDLgve4g7JJiZM4klQyLoUrGqokhpQi12ka30fGoCFYneapVgzx1kqdGeQNzPzIwbNg7iCoZB50B6yKYXtng_qF_AVVEeUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153828307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bhandari, Kritana ; Upadhaya, Suraj ; Yadav, Nabin Kumar ; Poudel, Prawesh ; Heyojoo, Binod Prasad ; Timilsina, Yajna Prasad ; Koirala, Pramila</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Kritana ; Upadhaya, Suraj ; Yadav, Nabin Kumar ; Poudel, Prawesh ; Heyojoo, Binod Prasad ; Timilsina, Yajna Prasad ; Koirala, Pramila</creatorcontrib><description>Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs hereafter) have become a significant global challenge for biodiversity conservation and management. Understanding factors that drive collisions is crucial for devising management policies and plans. Field surveys were conducted in 2019 to collect data on the physical and ecological features of the study area in each 875 m segment, and species death records were collected from government agencies between 2015 and 2019. This study identified the most important factors that influence WVCs, and we predicted the WVC hotspot along the East-West highway of Banke and Bardia National Parks in western Nepal using the kernel density estimation function in Arc GIS 10.5. We performed Binomial regression analysis to identify the most important factors associated with WVCs. Results showed that geographic factors such as topography, presence of retaining walls, canals/drainage, land use or land cover, forest land, agricultural land, grassland, and barren land have negative influence on WVCs, whereas speed breaker and aspect exhibit a positive influence. We found that WVCs are more likely to occur near forest land than agricultural land, grasslands, and barren land. We also found that the presence of the retaining wall, cannel/drainage, and speed breakers increased the likelihood of WVCs events. Mammals like spotted deer, Axis axis (27 %) and wild boars, Sus scrofa (21 %) are the most frequently affected species in wildlife-vehicle collisions. Due to the unavailability of data from the park office, this study does not include species like insects, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and small mammals. Animal-friendly infrastructures like wildlife crossings (overpass/underpass), canopy bridges, conservation signage and reflectors near the hotspot can reduce WVCs. In addition, alternative roads outside the park area can be constructed to divert vehicle movement and reduce collisions in the national park area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-1381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; Animal-friendly infrastructure ; Axis axis ; Biodiversity conservation ; canopy ; case studies ; death ; deer ; drainage ; forest land ; grasslands ; land cover ; land use ; Land use land cover ; national parks ; Nepal ; regression analysis ; species ; Sus scrofa ; topography ; wildlife ; Wildlife crossing ; Wildlife-vehicle collision</subject><ispartof>Journal for nature conservation, 2024-09, Vol.81, p.126678, Article 126678</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-10f397ffa0c66dcc17c64e2743278b297807be42b3d34b6d58bb92098713d6b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Kritana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhaya, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Nabin Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poudel, Prawesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyojoo, Binod Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Yajna Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koirala, Pramila</creatorcontrib><title>What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal</title><title>Journal for nature conservation</title><description>Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs hereafter) have become a significant global challenge for biodiversity conservation and management. Understanding factors that drive collisions is crucial for devising management policies and plans. Field surveys were conducted in 2019 to collect data on the physical and ecological features of the study area in each 875 m segment, and species death records were collected from government agencies between 2015 and 2019. This study identified the most important factors that influence WVCs, and we predicted the WVC hotspot along the East-West highway of Banke and Bardia National Parks in western Nepal using the kernel density estimation function in Arc GIS 10.5. We performed Binomial regression analysis to identify the most important factors associated with WVCs. Results showed that geographic factors such as topography, presence of retaining walls, canals/drainage, land use or land cover, forest land, agricultural land, grassland, and barren land have negative influence on WVCs, whereas speed breaker and aspect exhibit a positive influence. We found that WVCs are more likely to occur near forest land than agricultural land, grasslands, and barren land. We also found that the presence of the retaining wall, cannel/drainage, and speed breakers increased the likelihood of WVCs events. Mammals like spotted deer, Axis axis (27 %) and wild boars, Sus scrofa (21 %) are the most frequently affected species in wildlife-vehicle collisions. Due to the unavailability of data from the park office, this study does not include species like insects, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and small mammals. Animal-friendly infrastructures like wildlife crossings (overpass/underpass), canopy bridges, conservation signage and reflectors near the hotspot can reduce WVCs. In addition, alternative roads outside the park area can be constructed to divert vehicle movement and reduce collisions in the national park area.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal-friendly infrastructure</subject><subject>Axis axis</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>death</subject><subject>deer</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>forest land</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>land cover</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Land use land cover</subject><subject>national parks</subject><subject>Nepal</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife crossing</subject><subject>Wildlife-vehicle collision</subject><issn>1617-1381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhTOARCn8ADaPLCl-pLYjBlRVvKQKFlAHBsuxb4gjNy522qr_nlRhZjrL-a7u-bLshuAZwYTftbO2MzOKaTEjlHMhz7IJ4UTkhElykV2m1GJMCSnKSfa1bnSPam36EBOy0e0BHZy33tWQ76FxxgMywXuXXOgSCh1q3Hdz0Mf0gBbI6AQo9Tt7RHUMG7SG1EPs0Btstb_KzmvtE1z_5TT7fHr8WL7kq_fn1-VilRsqaZ8TXLNS1LXGhnNrDBGGF0BFwaiQFS2FxKKCglbMsqLidi6rqqS4lIIwyyvJptnteHcbw89u-EBtXDLgve4g7JJiZM4klQyLoUrGqokhpQi12ka30fGoCFYneapVgzx1kqdGeQNzPzIwbNg7iCoZB50B6yKYXtng_qF_AVVEeUI</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Bhandari, Kritana</creator><creator>Upadhaya, Suraj</creator><creator>Yadav, Nabin Kumar</creator><creator>Poudel, Prawesh</creator><creator>Heyojoo, Binod Prasad</creator><creator>Timilsina, Yajna Prasad</creator><creator>Koirala, Pramila</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal</title><author>Bhandari, Kritana ; Upadhaya, Suraj ; Yadav, Nabin Kumar ; Poudel, Prawesh ; Heyojoo, Binod Prasad ; Timilsina, Yajna Prasad ; Koirala, Pramila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-10f397ffa0c66dcc17c64e2743278b297807be42b3d34b6d58bb92098713d6b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal-friendly infrastructure</topic><topic>Axis axis</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>death</topic><topic>deer</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>forest land</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>land cover</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Land use land cover</topic><topic>national parks</topic><topic>Nepal</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife crossing</topic><topic>Wildlife-vehicle collision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Kritana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhaya, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Nabin Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poudel, Prawesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyojoo, Binod Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Yajna Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koirala, Pramila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhandari, Kritana</au><au>Upadhaya, Suraj</au><au>Yadav, Nabin Kumar</au><au>Poudel, Prawesh</au><au>Heyojoo, Binod Prasad</au><au>Timilsina, Yajna Prasad</au><au>Koirala, Pramila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal</atitle><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>126678</spage><pages>126678-</pages><artnum>126678</artnum><issn>1617-1381</issn><abstract>Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs hereafter) have become a significant global challenge for biodiversity conservation and management. Understanding factors that drive collisions is crucial for devising management policies and plans. Field surveys were conducted in 2019 to collect data on the physical and ecological features of the study area in each 875 m segment, and species death records were collected from government agencies between 2015 and 2019. This study identified the most important factors that influence WVCs, and we predicted the WVC hotspot along the East-West highway of Banke and Bardia National Parks in western Nepal using the kernel density estimation function in Arc GIS 10.5. We performed Binomial regression analysis to identify the most important factors associated with WVCs. Results showed that geographic factors such as topography, presence of retaining walls, canals/drainage, land use or land cover, forest land, agricultural land, grassland, and barren land have negative influence on WVCs, whereas speed breaker and aspect exhibit a positive influence. We found that WVCs are more likely to occur near forest land than agricultural land, grasslands, and barren land. We also found that the presence of the retaining wall, cannel/drainage, and speed breakers increased the likelihood of WVCs events. Mammals like spotted deer, Axis axis (27 %) and wild boars, Sus scrofa (21 %) are the most frequently affected species in wildlife-vehicle collisions. Due to the unavailability of data from the park office, this study does not include species like insects, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and small mammals. Animal-friendly infrastructures like wildlife crossings (overpass/underpass), canopy bridges, conservation signage and reflectors near the hotspot can reduce WVCs. In addition, alternative roads outside the park area can be constructed to divert vehicle movement and reduce collisions in the national park area.</abstract><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126678</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-1381
ispartof Journal for nature conservation, 2024-09, Vol.81, p.126678, Article 126678
issn 1617-1381
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153828307
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural land
Animal-friendly infrastructure
Axis axis
Biodiversity conservation
canopy
case studies
death
deer
drainage
forest land
grasslands
land cover
land use
Land use land cover
national parks
Nepal
regression analysis
species
Sus scrofa
topography
wildlife
Wildlife crossing
Wildlife-vehicle collision
title What factors drive wildlife-vehicle collisions on highways? A case study from Western Nepal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A43%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20factors%20drive%20wildlife-vehicle%20collisions%20on%20highways?%20A%20case%20study%20from%20Western%20Nepal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20nature%20conservation&rft.au=Bhandari,%20Kritana&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=126678&rft.pages=126678-&rft.artnum=126678&rft.issn=1617-1381&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153828307%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153828307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1617138124001274&rfr_iscdi=true