Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade

Illegal collecting of wild Venus flytraps (Dionaea muscipula) for the horticultural trade represents a persistent threat to populations of the species across their endemic range in the coastal plain of North and South Carolina (United States). Although wild collecting of Venus flytraps is not a nove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2024-10, Vol.38 (5), p.e14320-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Margulies, Jared D., Trost, Benjamin, Hamon, Laura, Kerr, Natalie Z., Kunz, Michael, Randall, John L., Shew, Roger D., Shew, Dale M., Starke, Lesley, Suiter, Dale, West, Zachary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e14320
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 38
creator Margulies, Jared D.
Trost, Benjamin
Hamon, Laura
Kerr, Natalie Z.
Kunz, Michael
Randall, John L.
Shew, Roger D.
Shew, Dale M.
Starke, Lesley
Suiter, Dale
West, Zachary
description Illegal collecting of wild Venus flytraps (Dionaea muscipula) for the horticultural trade represents a persistent threat to populations of the species across their endemic range in the coastal plain of North and South Carolina (United States). Although wild collecting of Venus flytraps is not a novel threat, there has been very little research on the impacts of collecting on the species’ conservation to date or why an illegal trade persists alongside a legal one. We drew on qualitative expert stakeholder elicitation to contextualize the threat of illegal collecting to the long‐term conservation of Venus flytraps in relation to other anthropogenic threats. Expert elicitation included botanical and conservation researchers, cognizant state and federal agency staff, land managers, and conservation nonprofit actors. The workshop included mapping of supply chain structures and prioritization of social and environmental harms. Expert consensus determined illegal collecting is an ongoing problem for Venus flytrap conservation, but habitat destruction, degradation, and fire suppression are the most significant threats to flytrap conservation. Supply chain analysis showed that observable social and environmental harms of the trade are focused at the supply stage and that less is known about transit and demand stages. Key research gaps identified include a lack of understanding of plant laundering practices relevant to a range of desirable plant taxa; the role of commercial nurseries in illicit horticultural supply chains; motivations for engaging in Venus flytrap collecting; and the persistent demand for illegally harvested plants when cultivated, legally obtainable plants are readily available. Our findings and methodology are relevant to a range of ornamental plants affected by illegal trade for which robust social data on illegal collecting drivers are lacking. Evaluación experta del impacto de la colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas y las prioridades de investigación sobre el mercado ilegal Resumen La colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas (Dionaea muscipula) silvestres para el mercado de horticultura representa una amenaza constante para las poblaciones de la especie a lo largo de su distribución endémica en la planicie costera de Carolina del Norte y del Sur, Estados Unidos. Aunque esta colecta no es una amenaza novedosa, a la fecha se ha investigado muy poco sobre su impacto en la conservación de la especie o por qué el mercado ilegal persiste a la par del leg
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.14320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153788993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3102045724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-de3cd892d7c123b2741af1ad15a91420f68fd651cece15349e1b92a921821fcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctO3DAUBmCrKioD7aYPUFnqBiEFfGyH2Mt2xE1CYgPdRh7nmBolcWonovP2eMgMCxYIb2xZn35ffkK-AzuBPE5tWPkTkIKzT2QBJRcFVEJ_JgumlCqU0nyfHKT0yBjTJcgvZF9oLlUl1YL05_8HjCM1KWFKHfYjDY76tsUH01Ib8sKOvn-gvhuMHRMNPf2D_ZSoa9djNEOipm_oEH2IfvSY90OkEROaaP9u9C4r4wa_kj1n2oTftvMhub84v1teFTe3l9fLXzeFFVCyokFhm3zvprLAxYpXEowD00BpNEjO3JlyzVkJFi1CKaRGWGluNAfFwVknDsnRnDvE8G_CNNadTxbb1vQYplTnU0SVf0aLD1DGWSWrUmb68w19DFPs80NmJcuKb9TxrGwMKUV0df6dzsR1DazeFFZvCqtfCsv4xzZyWnXYvNJdQxnADJ58i-t3ourl7e_rOfQZtNGggA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102045724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Margulies, Jared D. ; Trost, Benjamin ; Hamon, Laura ; Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Kunz, Michael ; Randall, John L. ; Shew, Roger D. ; Shew, Dale M. ; Starke, Lesley ; Suiter, Dale ; West, Zachary</creator><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Jared D. ; Trost, Benjamin ; Hamon, Laura ; Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Kunz, Michael ; Randall, John L. ; Shew, Roger D. ; Shew, Dale M. ; Starke, Lesley ; Suiter, Dale ; West, Zachary</creatorcontrib><description>Illegal collecting of wild Venus flytraps (Dionaea muscipula) for the horticultural trade represents a persistent threat to populations of the species across their endemic range in the coastal plain of North and South Carolina (United States). Although wild collecting of Venus flytraps is not a novel threat, there has been very little research on the impacts of collecting on the species’ conservation to date or why an illegal trade persists alongside a legal one. We drew on qualitative expert stakeholder elicitation to contextualize the threat of illegal collecting to the long‐term conservation of Venus flytraps in relation to other anthropogenic threats. Expert elicitation included botanical and conservation researchers, cognizant state and federal agency staff, land managers, and conservation nonprofit actors. The workshop included mapping of supply chain structures and prioritization of social and environmental harms. Expert consensus determined illegal collecting is an ongoing problem for Venus flytrap conservation, but habitat destruction, degradation, and fire suppression are the most significant threats to flytrap conservation. Supply chain analysis showed that observable social and environmental harms of the trade are focused at the supply stage and that less is known about transit and demand stages. Key research gaps identified include a lack of understanding of plant laundering practices relevant to a range of desirable plant taxa; the role of commercial nurseries in illicit horticultural supply chains; motivations for engaging in Venus flytrap collecting; and the persistent demand for illegally harvested plants when cultivated, legally obtainable plants are readily available. Our findings and methodology are relevant to a range of ornamental plants affected by illegal trade for which robust social data on illegal collecting drivers are lacking. Evaluación experta del impacto de la colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas y las prioridades de investigación sobre el mercado ilegal Resumen La colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas (Dionaea muscipula) silvestres para el mercado de horticultura representa una amenaza constante para las poblaciones de la especie a lo largo de su distribución endémica en la planicie costera de Carolina del Norte y del Sur, Estados Unidos. Aunque esta colecta no es una amenaza novedosa, a la fecha se ha investigado muy poco sobre su impacto en la conservación de la especie o por qué el mercado ilegal persiste a la par del legal. Partimos del conocimiento cualitativo de los actores expertos para contextualizar la amenaza de la colecta ilegal para la conservación a largo plazo de la venus atrapamoscas en relación con otras amenazas antropogénicas. Este conocimiento involucró a investigadores de la conservación y la botánica, personal consciente de agencias federales y estatales y actores de la conservación sin fines de lucro. El taller incluyó el mapeo de las estructuras de las cadenas de suministro y la priorización de los daños sociales y ambientales. El consenso de los expertos determinó que la colecta ilegal es un problema continuo para la conservación de la venus atrapamoscas, pero la destrucción y degradación del hábitat, así como la contención de incendios son las amenazas más significativas. El análisis de las cadenas de suministro mostró que los daños ambientales y sociales observables en el mercado se enfocan en la fase de suministro y que se sabe poco sobre las fases de tránsito y demanda. Los vacíos de investigación más importantes incluyen la falta de entendimiento de las prácticas de lavado de plantas relevantes para un rango de taxones deseables de plantas; el papel de los viveros comerciales en las cadenas de suministro de la horticultura ilícita; los motivos para participar en la colecta de venus atrapamoscas; y la demanda continua de plantas cosechadas ilegalmente cuando ya hay disponibilidad de plantas cultivadas que se obtienen legalmente. Nuestros descubrimientos y metodología son relevantes para una gama de plantas ornamentales afectadas por el mercado ilegal para las cuales hay carencia de datos sociales sólidos sobre los factores de colecta ilegal. 【摘要】 为园艺贸易而盗采野生捕蝇草 (Dionaea muscipula) 对该物种在美国南北卡罗来纳州沿海平原特有分布区的种群构成了持续威胁。尽管对捕蝇草的野采并非新出现的威胁, 但迄今为止, 有关采摘对该物种保护的影响以及非法贸易与合法贸易同时存在的原因仍研究甚少。本研究利用定性的利益相关专家启发法, 讨论了盗采对捕蝇草长期保护的威胁以及其他人为威胁的影响。参与的专家包括植物学家和保护研究者、知情的州及联邦机构工作人员, 以及非营利保护组织的实践者。研讨会包括绘制供应链结构图以及对社会与环境危害进行优先排序。专家们一致认为, 盗采是捕蝇草保护工作一直面临的问题, 但栖息地破坏、退化和火灾控制才是捕蝇草保护工作面临的最大威胁。供应链分析表明, 观察到的捕蝇草贸易的社会与环境危害主要集中在供应阶段, 而对过境和需求阶段的了解较少。我们发现的主要研究空白包括:尚不了解与大量满足需求的植物类群相关的植物“洗白”行为、商业苗圃在非法园艺供应链中的作用、参与捕蝇草采摘行为的动机, 以及当可以轻易获得合法种植的植物时, 对盗采植物的持续需求。我们的研究结果和方法还适用于一系列受非法贸易影响, 但缺乏可靠的盗采驱动因素社会数据的观赏植物。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39248748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Carnivorous plants ; ceguera vegetal ; Coastal plains ; colecta ilegal de plantas ; Commerce ; conocimiento de expertos ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Cost analysis ; Demand analysis ; Dionaea ; Dionaea muscipula ; Droseraceae - physiology ; Ecosystem ; Endemic species ; Environmental degradation ; expert elicitation ; expert opinion ; fire suppression ; habitat destruction ; Habitat loss ; Horticulture ; Human influences ; illegal wildlife trade ; Land conservation ; Land management ; mercado ilegal de flora ; Ornamental plants ; plant blindness ; plant poaching ; plantas carnívoras ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; prioritization ; South Carolina ; species ; stakeholders ; supply chain ; Supply chains ; Threat evaluation ; trade ; Wildlife conservation ; wildlife management ; 专家启发法 ; 多肉植物 ; 植物盗采 ; 植物盲 ; 非法野生动植物贸易</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2024-10, Vol.38 (5), p.e14320-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for .</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-de3cd892d7c123b2741af1ad15a91420f68fd651cece15349e1b92a921821fcf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2029-4424 ; 0009-0006-6332-7010 ; 0000-0003-0004-2780 ; 0000-0003-4227-2031 ; 0000-0002-7494-7227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcobi.14320$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcobi.14320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39248748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Jared D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trost, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamon, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shew, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shew, Dale M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starke, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suiter, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Zachary</creatorcontrib><title>Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Illegal collecting of wild Venus flytraps (Dionaea muscipula) for the horticultural trade represents a persistent threat to populations of the species across their endemic range in the coastal plain of North and South Carolina (United States). Although wild collecting of Venus flytraps is not a novel threat, there has been very little research on the impacts of collecting on the species’ conservation to date or why an illegal trade persists alongside a legal one. We drew on qualitative expert stakeholder elicitation to contextualize the threat of illegal collecting to the long‐term conservation of Venus flytraps in relation to other anthropogenic threats. Expert elicitation included botanical and conservation researchers, cognizant state and federal agency staff, land managers, and conservation nonprofit actors. The workshop included mapping of supply chain structures and prioritization of social and environmental harms. Expert consensus determined illegal collecting is an ongoing problem for Venus flytrap conservation, but habitat destruction, degradation, and fire suppression are the most significant threats to flytrap conservation. Supply chain analysis showed that observable social and environmental harms of the trade are focused at the supply stage and that less is known about transit and demand stages. Key research gaps identified include a lack of understanding of plant laundering practices relevant to a range of desirable plant taxa; the role of commercial nurseries in illicit horticultural supply chains; motivations for engaging in Venus flytrap collecting; and the persistent demand for illegally harvested plants when cultivated, legally obtainable plants are readily available. Our findings and methodology are relevant to a range of ornamental plants affected by illegal trade for which robust social data on illegal collecting drivers are lacking. Evaluación experta del impacto de la colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas y las prioridades de investigación sobre el mercado ilegal Resumen La colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas (Dionaea muscipula) silvestres para el mercado de horticultura representa una amenaza constante para las poblaciones de la especie a lo largo de su distribución endémica en la planicie costera de Carolina del Norte y del Sur, Estados Unidos. Aunque esta colecta no es una amenaza novedosa, a la fecha se ha investigado muy poco sobre su impacto en la conservación de la especie o por qué el mercado ilegal persiste a la par del legal. Partimos del conocimiento cualitativo de los actores expertos para contextualizar la amenaza de la colecta ilegal para la conservación a largo plazo de la venus atrapamoscas en relación con otras amenazas antropogénicas. Este conocimiento involucró a investigadores de la conservación y la botánica, personal consciente de agencias federales y estatales y actores de la conservación sin fines de lucro. El taller incluyó el mapeo de las estructuras de las cadenas de suministro y la priorización de los daños sociales y ambientales. El consenso de los expertos determinó que la colecta ilegal es un problema continuo para la conservación de la venus atrapamoscas, pero la destrucción y degradación del hábitat, así como la contención de incendios son las amenazas más significativas. El análisis de las cadenas de suministro mostró que los daños ambientales y sociales observables en el mercado se enfocan en la fase de suministro y que se sabe poco sobre las fases de tránsito y demanda. Los vacíos de investigación más importantes incluyen la falta de entendimiento de las prácticas de lavado de plantas relevantes para un rango de taxones deseables de plantas; el papel de los viveros comerciales en las cadenas de suministro de la horticultura ilícita; los motivos para participar en la colecta de venus atrapamoscas; y la demanda continua de plantas cosechadas ilegalmente cuando ya hay disponibilidad de plantas cultivadas que se obtienen legalmente. Nuestros descubrimientos y metodología son relevantes para una gama de plantas ornamentales afectadas por el mercado ilegal para las cuales hay carencia de datos sociales sólidos sobre los factores de colecta ilegal. 【摘要】 为园艺贸易而盗采野生捕蝇草 (Dionaea muscipula) 对该物种在美国南北卡罗来纳州沿海平原特有分布区的种群构成了持续威胁。尽管对捕蝇草的野采并非新出现的威胁, 但迄今为止, 有关采摘对该物种保护的影响以及非法贸易与合法贸易同时存在的原因仍研究甚少。本研究利用定性的利益相关专家启发法, 讨论了盗采对捕蝇草长期保护的威胁以及其他人为威胁的影响。参与的专家包括植物学家和保护研究者、知情的州及联邦机构工作人员, 以及非营利保护组织的实践者。研讨会包括绘制供应链结构图以及对社会与环境危害进行优先排序。专家们一致认为, 盗采是捕蝇草保护工作一直面临的问题, 但栖息地破坏、退化和火灾控制才是捕蝇草保护工作面临的最大威胁。供应链分析表明, 观察到的捕蝇草贸易的社会与环境危害主要集中在供应阶段, 而对过境和需求阶段的了解较少。我们发现的主要研究空白包括:尚不了解与大量满足需求的植物类群相关的植物“洗白”行为、商业苗圃在非法园艺供应链中的作用、参与捕蝇草采摘行为的动机, 以及当可以轻易获得合法种植的植物时, 对盗采植物的持续需求。我们的研究结果和方法还适用于一系列受非法贸易影响, 但缺乏可靠的盗采驱动因素社会数据的观赏植物。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Carnivorous plants</subject><subject>ceguera vegetal</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>colecta ilegal de plantas</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>conocimiento de expertos</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Demand analysis</subject><subject>Dionaea</subject><subject>Dionaea muscipula</subject><subject>Droseraceae - physiology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>expert elicitation</subject><subject>expert opinion</subject><subject>fire suppression</subject><subject>habitat destruction</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>illegal wildlife trade</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>mercado ilegal de flora</subject><subject>Ornamental plants</subject><subject>plant blindness</subject><subject>plant poaching</subject><subject>plantas carnívoras</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>prioritization</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>supply chain</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>专家启发法</subject><subject>多肉植物</subject><subject>植物盗采</subject><subject>植物盲</subject><subject>非法野生动植物贸易</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctO3DAUBmCrKioD7aYPUFnqBiEFfGyH2Mt2xE1CYgPdRh7nmBolcWonovP2eMgMCxYIb2xZn35ffkK-AzuBPE5tWPkTkIKzT2QBJRcFVEJ_JgumlCqU0nyfHKT0yBjTJcgvZF9oLlUl1YL05_8HjCM1KWFKHfYjDY76tsUH01Ib8sKOvn-gvhuMHRMNPf2D_ZSoa9djNEOipm_oEH2IfvSY90OkEROaaP9u9C4r4wa_kj1n2oTftvMhub84v1teFTe3l9fLXzeFFVCyokFhm3zvprLAxYpXEowD00BpNEjO3JlyzVkJFi1CKaRGWGluNAfFwVknDsnRnDvE8G_CNNadTxbb1vQYplTnU0SVf0aLD1DGWSWrUmb68w19DFPs80NmJcuKb9TxrGwMKUV0df6dzsR1DazeFFZvCqtfCsv4xzZyWnXYvNJdQxnADJ58i-t3ourl7e_rOfQZtNGggA</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Margulies, Jared D.</creator><creator>Trost, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hamon, Laura</creator><creator>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creator><creator>Kunz, Michael</creator><creator>Randall, John L.</creator><creator>Shew, Roger D.</creator><creator>Shew, Dale M.</creator><creator>Starke, Lesley</creator><creator>Suiter, Dale</creator><creator>West, Zachary</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-4424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6332-7010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0004-2780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-2031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-7227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade</title><author>Margulies, Jared D. ; Trost, Benjamin ; Hamon, Laura ; Kerr, Natalie Z. ; Kunz, Michael ; Randall, John L. ; Shew, Roger D. ; Shew, Dale M. ; Starke, Lesley ; Suiter, Dale ; West, Zachary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-de3cd892d7c123b2741af1ad15a91420f68fd651cece15349e1b92a921821fcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Carnivorous plants</topic><topic>ceguera vegetal</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>colecta ilegal de plantas</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>conocimiento de expertos</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Demand analysis</topic><topic>Dionaea</topic><topic>Dionaea muscipula</topic><topic>Droseraceae - physiology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>expert elicitation</topic><topic>expert opinion</topic><topic>fire suppression</topic><topic>habitat destruction</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>illegal wildlife trade</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>mercado ilegal de flora</topic><topic>Ornamental plants</topic><topic>plant blindness</topic><topic>plant poaching</topic><topic>plantas carnívoras</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>prioritization</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>supply chain</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>专家启发法</topic><topic>多肉植物</topic><topic>植物盗采</topic><topic>植物盲</topic><topic>非法野生动植物贸易</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Jared D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trost, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamon, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Natalie Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shew, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shew, Dale M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starke, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suiter, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Zachary</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margulies, Jared D.</au><au>Trost, Benjamin</au><au>Hamon, Laura</au><au>Kerr, Natalie Z.</au><au>Kunz, Michael</au><au>Randall, John L.</au><au>Shew, Roger D.</au><au>Shew, Dale M.</au><au>Starke, Lesley</au><au>Suiter, Dale</au><au>West, Zachary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e14320</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14320-n/a</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Illegal collecting of wild Venus flytraps (Dionaea muscipula) for the horticultural trade represents a persistent threat to populations of the species across their endemic range in the coastal plain of North and South Carolina (United States). Although wild collecting of Venus flytraps is not a novel threat, there has been very little research on the impacts of collecting on the species’ conservation to date or why an illegal trade persists alongside a legal one. We drew on qualitative expert stakeholder elicitation to contextualize the threat of illegal collecting to the long‐term conservation of Venus flytraps in relation to other anthropogenic threats. Expert elicitation included botanical and conservation researchers, cognizant state and federal agency staff, land managers, and conservation nonprofit actors. The workshop included mapping of supply chain structures and prioritization of social and environmental harms. Expert consensus determined illegal collecting is an ongoing problem for Venus flytrap conservation, but habitat destruction, degradation, and fire suppression are the most significant threats to flytrap conservation. Supply chain analysis showed that observable social and environmental harms of the trade are focused at the supply stage and that less is known about transit and demand stages. Key research gaps identified include a lack of understanding of plant laundering practices relevant to a range of desirable plant taxa; the role of commercial nurseries in illicit horticultural supply chains; motivations for engaging in Venus flytrap collecting; and the persistent demand for illegally harvested plants when cultivated, legally obtainable plants are readily available. Our findings and methodology are relevant to a range of ornamental plants affected by illegal trade for which robust social data on illegal collecting drivers are lacking. Evaluación experta del impacto de la colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas y las prioridades de investigación sobre el mercado ilegal Resumen La colecta ilegal de venus atrapamoscas (Dionaea muscipula) silvestres para el mercado de horticultura representa una amenaza constante para las poblaciones de la especie a lo largo de su distribución endémica en la planicie costera de Carolina del Norte y del Sur, Estados Unidos. Aunque esta colecta no es una amenaza novedosa, a la fecha se ha investigado muy poco sobre su impacto en la conservación de la especie o por qué el mercado ilegal persiste a la par del legal. Partimos del conocimiento cualitativo de los actores expertos para contextualizar la amenaza de la colecta ilegal para la conservación a largo plazo de la venus atrapamoscas en relación con otras amenazas antropogénicas. Este conocimiento involucró a investigadores de la conservación y la botánica, personal consciente de agencias federales y estatales y actores de la conservación sin fines de lucro. El taller incluyó el mapeo de las estructuras de las cadenas de suministro y la priorización de los daños sociales y ambientales. El consenso de los expertos determinó que la colecta ilegal es un problema continuo para la conservación de la venus atrapamoscas, pero la destrucción y degradación del hábitat, así como la contención de incendios son las amenazas más significativas. El análisis de las cadenas de suministro mostró que los daños ambientales y sociales observables en el mercado se enfocan en la fase de suministro y que se sabe poco sobre las fases de tránsito y demanda. Los vacíos de investigación más importantes incluyen la falta de entendimiento de las prácticas de lavado de plantas relevantes para un rango de taxones deseables de plantas; el papel de los viveros comerciales en las cadenas de suministro de la horticultura ilícita; los motivos para participar en la colecta de venus atrapamoscas; y la demanda continua de plantas cosechadas ilegalmente cuando ya hay disponibilidad de plantas cultivadas que se obtienen legalmente. Nuestros descubrimientos y metodología son relevantes para una gama de plantas ornamentales afectadas por el mercado ilegal para las cuales hay carencia de datos sociales sólidos sobre los factores de colecta ilegal. 【摘要】 为园艺贸易而盗采野生捕蝇草 (Dionaea muscipula) 对该物种在美国南北卡罗来纳州沿海平原特有分布区的种群构成了持续威胁。尽管对捕蝇草的野采并非新出现的威胁, 但迄今为止, 有关采摘对该物种保护的影响以及非法贸易与合法贸易同时存在的原因仍研究甚少。本研究利用定性的利益相关专家启发法, 讨论了盗采对捕蝇草长期保护的威胁以及其他人为威胁的影响。参与的专家包括植物学家和保护研究者、知情的州及联邦机构工作人员, 以及非营利保护组织的实践者。研讨会包括绘制供应链结构图以及对社会与环境危害进行优先排序。专家们一致认为, 盗采是捕蝇草保护工作一直面临的问题, 但栖息地破坏、退化和火灾控制才是捕蝇草保护工作面临的最大威胁。供应链分析表明, 观察到的捕蝇草贸易的社会与环境危害主要集中在供应阶段, 而对过境和需求阶段的了解较少。我们发现的主要研究空白包括:尚不了解与大量满足需求的植物类群相关的植物“洗白”行为、商业苗圃在非法园艺供应链中的作用、参与捕蝇草采摘行为的动机, 以及当可以轻易获得合法种植的植物时, 对盗采植物的持续需求。我们的研究结果和方法还适用于一系列受非法贸易影响, 但缺乏可靠的盗采驱动因素社会数据的观赏植物。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>39248748</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.14320</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-4424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6332-7010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0004-2780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-2031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-7227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2024-10, Vol.38 (5), p.e14320-n/a
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153788993
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library
subjects Anthropogenic factors
Carnivorous plants
ceguera vegetal
Coastal plains
colecta ilegal de plantas
Commerce
conocimiento de expertos
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Cost analysis
Demand analysis
Dionaea
Dionaea muscipula
Droseraceae - physiology
Ecosystem
Endemic species
Environmental degradation
expert elicitation
expert opinion
fire suppression
habitat destruction
Habitat loss
Horticulture
Human influences
illegal wildlife trade
Land conservation
Land management
mercado ilegal de flora
Ornamental plants
plant blindness
plant poaching
plantas carnívoras
Plants
Plants (botany)
prioritization
South Carolina
species
stakeholders
supply chain
Supply chains
Threat evaluation
trade
Wildlife conservation
wildlife management
专家启发法
多肉植物
植物盗采
植物盲
非法野生动植物贸易
title Expert assessment of illegal collecting impacts on Venus flytraps and priorities for research on illegal trade
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A14%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20assessment%20of%20illegal%20collecting%20impacts%20on%20Venus%20flytraps%20and%20priorities%20for%20research%20on%20illegal%20trade&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Margulies,%20Jared%20D.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e14320&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14320-n/a&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.14320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102045724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102045724&rft_id=info:pmid/39248748&rfr_iscdi=true