A Comprehensive Study of Factors Affecting the Prediction of the pKa Shift of Asp26 in Thioredoxin Protein

The stable protonation state of ionizable amino acids in a protein can be predicted by computing the pKa shift of that residue within the protein environment. Thermodynamic Integration (TI) is an ideal molecular dynamics-based approach for predicting the pKa shift of ionizable protein residues. Here...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2024-08, Vol.128 (30), p.7304-7312
Hauptverfasser: Verma, Shivani, Nair, Nisanth N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The stable protonation state of ionizable amino acids in a protein can be predicted by computing the pKa shift of that residue within the protein environment. Thermodynamic Integration (TI) is an ideal molecular dynamics-based approach for predicting the pKa shift of ionizable protein residues. Here, we probe TI-based simulation protocols for their ability to accurately predict the pKa shift of Asp26 in thioredoxin. While implicit solvent models can predict the pKa shift accurately, explicit solvent models result in substantial errors. To understand the underlying reason for this surprising discrepancy, we investigate the role of various factors such as solvent models, conformational sampling, background charges, and polarization.The stable protonation state of ionizable amino acids in a protein can be predicted by computing the pKa shift of that residue within the protein environment. Thermodynamic Integration (TI) is an ideal molecular dynamics-based approach for predicting the pKa shift of ionizable protein residues. Here, we probe TI-based simulation protocols for their ability to accurately predict the pKa shift of Asp26 in thioredoxin. While implicit solvent models can predict the pKa shift accurately, explicit solvent models result in substantial errors. To understand the underlying reason for this surprising discrepancy, we investigate the role of various factors such as solvent models, conformational sampling, background charges, and polarization.
ISSN:1520-5207
1520-5207
DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c01516