Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead

Interior dust lead loadings on floors and windowsills are reliable predictors of a child’s blood lead level and an important predictor in “clearance testing” of residences. The portable X-ray fluorescence device is an alternate technique that can provide fast, accurate, and precise results regarding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran) 2022-11, Vol.19 (11), p.10625-10636
Hauptverfasser: Obeng, A. B., Del Rio, M., Costa, C., Chavarria, C., Rodriguez, C., Galkaduwa, M. B., Wekumbura, C., Gamage, K., Hettiarachchi, G. M., Hargrove, W., Sobin, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10636
container_issue 11
container_start_page 10625
container_title International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)
container_volume 19
creator Obeng, A. B.
Del Rio, M.
Costa, C.
Chavarria, C.
Rodriguez, C.
Galkaduwa, M. B.
Wekumbura, C.
Gamage, K.
Hettiarachchi, G. M.
Hargrove, W.
Sobin, C.
description Interior dust lead loadings on floors and windowsills are reliable predictors of a child’s blood lead level and an important predictor in “clearance testing” of residences. The portable X-ray fluorescence device is an alternate technique that can provide fast, accurate, and precise results regarding the presence of dust lead hazards in residences. In this paper, we tested the comparability of the portable X-ray fluorescence device against Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, using the newer lead hazard standards for dust wipe samples. Dust wipe samples ( n  = 109) collected from floors and interior windowsills of 13 homes were tested by means of a portable X-ray fluorescence device and subsequently analyzed for lead using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Considering Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry as the “gold standard,” the portable X-ray fluorescence device produced an average false negative rate of 27.3% at the new dust lead hazard standards of 10 μg/ft 2 for floors, and 100 μg/ft 2 for windowsills. There were no false positive results from the portable X-ray fluorescence device at the new dust lead hazard standards. A Bland Altman analysis showed that 96.3% of the data points were within the lower and upper acceptable limits of agreement. The results of the study suggested that the portable X-ray fluorescence device has a good agreement with the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry method at lower lead concentrations and is appropriate for measuring lead concentrations in field dust wipe samples from homes where lead concentrations are in a lower range.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153727264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153727264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-844512761cdcb2df8d57e25055ace0b1d17a7f8f5483e8ca734fe11adb4c9fb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5g8sgT8jN0RVbykSiyA2CzHvq5SuUmwE1D49QTSmenc4TtHVx9Cl5RcU0LUTaZclawgjBaE65Uu9BFaUMVlwUpOjg83FYqdorOcd4SIUgi6QObNxtrX_YjbgC3u2tTbKgJ-L5IdcYhDmyA7aBxgD5_1FKFN2DY2jt91s8WhhuixH3KPv-oOcLb7LkL-oyJYf45Ogo0ZLg65RK_3dy_rx2Lz_PC0vt0Ujpe6L7QQkjJVUuddxXzQXipgkkhpHZCKeqqsCjpIoTloZxUXASi1vhJuFSrGl-hq3u1S-zFA7s2-nv6O0TbQDtlwKrliipViQtmMutTmnCCYLtV7m0ZDifm1aWabZrJp_mwaPZX4XMoT3GwhmV07pElD_q_1A8X6eOs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153727264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Obeng, A. B. ; Del Rio, M. ; Costa, C. ; Chavarria, C. ; Rodriguez, C. ; Galkaduwa, M. B. ; Wekumbura, C. ; Gamage, K. ; Hettiarachchi, G. M. ; Hargrove, W. ; Sobin, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Obeng, A. B. ; Del Rio, M. ; Costa, C. ; Chavarria, C. ; Rodriguez, C. ; Galkaduwa, M. B. ; Wekumbura, C. ; Gamage, K. ; Hettiarachchi, G. M. ; Hargrove, W. ; Sobin, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Interior dust lead loadings on floors and windowsills are reliable predictors of a child’s blood lead level and an important predictor in “clearance testing” of residences. The portable X-ray fluorescence device is an alternate technique that can provide fast, accurate, and precise results regarding the presence of dust lead hazards in residences. In this paper, we tested the comparability of the portable X-ray fluorescence device against Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, using the newer lead hazard standards for dust wipe samples. Dust wipe samples ( n  = 109) collected from floors and interior windowsills of 13 homes were tested by means of a portable X-ray fluorescence device and subsequently analyzed for lead using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Considering Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry as the “gold standard,” the portable X-ray fluorescence device produced an average false negative rate of 27.3% at the new dust lead hazard standards of 10 μg/ft 2 for floors, and 100 μg/ft 2 for windowsills. There were no false positive results from the portable X-ray fluorescence device at the new dust lead hazard standards. A Bland Altman analysis showed that 96.3% of the data points were within the lower and upper acceptable limits of agreement. The results of the study suggested that the portable X-ray fluorescence device has a good agreement with the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry method at lower lead concentrations and is appropriate for measuring lead concentrations in field dust wipe samples from homes where lead concentrations are in a lower range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; atomic absorption spectrometry ; blood ; children ; dust ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; fluorescence ; lead ; Original Paper ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; X-radiation</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2022-11, Vol.19 (11), p.10625-10636</ispartof><rights>Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-844512761cdcb2df8d57e25055ace0b1d17a7f8f5483e8ca734fe11adb4c9fb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-844512761cdcb2df8d57e25055ace0b1d17a7f8f5483e8ca734fe11adb4c9fb23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6133-271X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obeng, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rio, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavarria, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galkaduwa, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wekumbura, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamage, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hettiarachchi, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobin, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead</title><title>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</title><addtitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Interior dust lead loadings on floors and windowsills are reliable predictors of a child’s blood lead level and an important predictor in “clearance testing” of residences. The portable X-ray fluorescence device is an alternate technique that can provide fast, accurate, and precise results regarding the presence of dust lead hazards in residences. In this paper, we tested the comparability of the portable X-ray fluorescence device against Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, using the newer lead hazard standards for dust wipe samples. Dust wipe samples ( n  = 109) collected from floors and interior windowsills of 13 homes were tested by means of a portable X-ray fluorescence device and subsequently analyzed for lead using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Considering Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry as the “gold standard,” the portable X-ray fluorescence device produced an average false negative rate of 27.3% at the new dust lead hazard standards of 10 μg/ft 2 for floors, and 100 μg/ft 2 for windowsills. There were no false positive results from the portable X-ray fluorescence device at the new dust lead hazard standards. A Bland Altman analysis showed that 96.3% of the data points were within the lower and upper acceptable limits of agreement. The results of the study suggested that the portable X-ray fluorescence device has a good agreement with the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry method at lower lead concentrations and is appropriate for measuring lead concentrations in field dust wipe samples from homes where lead concentrations are in a lower range.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>atomic absorption spectrometry</subject><subject>blood</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>dust</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>fluorescence</subject><subject>lead</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>X-radiation</subject><issn>1735-1472</issn><issn>1735-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwB5g8sgT8jN0RVbykSiyA2CzHvq5SuUmwE1D49QTSmenc4TtHVx9Cl5RcU0LUTaZclawgjBaE65Uu9BFaUMVlwUpOjg83FYqdorOcd4SIUgi6QObNxtrX_YjbgC3u2tTbKgJ-L5IdcYhDmyA7aBxgD5_1FKFN2DY2jt91s8WhhuixH3KPv-oOcLb7LkL-oyJYf45Ogo0ZLg65RK_3dy_rx2Lz_PC0vt0Ujpe6L7QQkjJVUuddxXzQXipgkkhpHZCKeqqsCjpIoTloZxUXASi1vhJuFSrGl-hq3u1S-zFA7s2-nv6O0TbQDtlwKrliipViQtmMutTmnCCYLtV7m0ZDifm1aWabZrJp_mwaPZX4XMoT3GwhmV07pElD_q_1A8X6eOs</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Obeng, A. B.</creator><creator>Del Rio, M.</creator><creator>Costa, C.</creator><creator>Chavarria, C.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, C.</creator><creator>Galkaduwa, M. B.</creator><creator>Wekumbura, C.</creator><creator>Gamage, K.</creator><creator>Hettiarachchi, G. M.</creator><creator>Hargrove, W.</creator><creator>Sobin, C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-271X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead</title><author>Obeng, A. B. ; Del Rio, M. ; Costa, C. ; Chavarria, C. ; Rodriguez, C. ; Galkaduwa, M. B. ; Wekumbura, C. ; Gamage, K. ; Hettiarachchi, G. M. ; Hargrove, W. ; Sobin, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-844512761cdcb2df8d57e25055ace0b1d17a7f8f5483e8ca734fe11adb4c9fb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>atomic absorption spectrometry</topic><topic>blood</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>dust</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>fluorescence</topic><topic>lead</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>X-radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obeng, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rio, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavarria, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galkaduwa, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wekumbura, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamage, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hettiarachchi, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobin, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obeng, A. B.</au><au>Del Rio, M.</au><au>Costa, C.</au><au>Chavarria, C.</au><au>Rodriguez, C.</au><au>Galkaduwa, M. B.</au><au>Wekumbura, C.</au><au>Gamage, K.</au><au>Hettiarachchi, G. M.</au><au>Hargrove, W.</au><au>Sobin, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran)</jtitle><stitle>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>10625</spage><epage>10636</epage><pages>10625-10636</pages><issn>1735-1472</issn><eissn>1735-2630</eissn><abstract>Interior dust lead loadings on floors and windowsills are reliable predictors of a child’s blood lead level and an important predictor in “clearance testing” of residences. The portable X-ray fluorescence device is an alternate technique that can provide fast, accurate, and precise results regarding the presence of dust lead hazards in residences. In this paper, we tested the comparability of the portable X-ray fluorescence device against Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, using the newer lead hazard standards for dust wipe samples. Dust wipe samples ( n  = 109) collected from floors and interior windowsills of 13 homes were tested by means of a portable X-ray fluorescence device and subsequently analyzed for lead using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Considering Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry as the “gold standard,” the portable X-ray fluorescence device produced an average false negative rate of 27.3% at the new dust lead hazard standards of 10 μg/ft 2 for floors, and 100 μg/ft 2 for windowsills. There were no false positive results from the portable X-ray fluorescence device at the new dust lead hazard standards. A Bland Altman analysis showed that 96.3% of the data points were within the lower and upper acceptable limits of agreement. The results of the study suggested that the portable X-ray fluorescence device has a good agreement with the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry method at lower lead concentrations and is appropriate for measuring lead concentrations in field dust wipe samples from homes where lead concentrations are in a lower range.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-271X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-1472
ispartof International journal of environmental science and technology (Tehran), 2022-11, Vol.19 (11), p.10625-10636
issn 1735-1472
1735-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153727264
source Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquatic Pollution
atomic absorption spectrometry
blood
children
dust
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Science and Engineering
fluorescence
lead
Original Paper
Soil Science & Conservation
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
X-radiation
title Validity of a portable X-ray fluorescence device for analyzing field dust wipe samples for lead
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20a%20portable%20X-ray%20fluorescence%20device%20for%20analyzing%20field%20dust%20wipe%20samples%20for%20lead&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20science%20and%20technology%20(Tehran)&rft.au=Obeng,%20A.%20B.&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=10625&rft.epage=10636&rft.pages=10625-10636&rft.issn=1735-1472&rft.eissn=1735-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13762-021-03898-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153727264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153727264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true