Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts
Attracting pollinators to achieve successful reproduction is a key challenge for wild plants that may be disturbed by complex multispecies interactions in nature. Pairwise plant–pollinator interactions have traditionally been studied for decades, while ignoring other ecological players may obscure a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecology 2024-08, Vol.112 (8), p.1719-1730 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1730 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1719 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Deng, Guo‐Cui Dai, Can Song, Qing‐Qing Zhang, You‐Xuan Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao Wang, Xiao‐Fan Gong, Yan‐Bing |
description | Attracting pollinators to achieve successful reproduction is a key challenge for wild plants that may be disturbed by complex multispecies interactions in nature. Pairwise plant–pollinator interactions have traditionally been studied for decades, while ignoring other ecological players may obscure a comprehensive understanding on how plants recruit partners or combat enemies in the pollination process. Hence, integrated studies considering the inherent complexity of ecological interactions are needed, which may open up new perspectives for deciphering intricate systems and predicting ecological consequences.
We examined the presence of nectar yeasts using a combination of high‐throughput sequencing, cultivation and microscopy and quantified floral herbivory by evaluating the incidence of flowers with visible holes in 13 natural populations of Iris bulleyana in the Hengduan Mountains of southwest China during 2017–2022. We combined yeast inoculation and herbivore manipulation treatments to illustrate the isolated and combined impacts of two contrasting nectarivorous organisms, the ascomycetous yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii and adult sawflies, on pollinator visitation and plant reproductive success in two populations. In the lab, we first employed gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to profile the volatile metabolites of yeast‐inoculated nectar relative to control, followed by a behavioural bioassay to test the preference of honeybees for these microbial volatiles.
Yeasts commonly inhabited floral nectar and insect herbivores frequently bit holes in the perianth tube to consume nectar and nectaries. Nectar yeasts indirectly facilitated plant reproduction through increased pollinator visits, probably because of microbial metabolism as honeybees preferred nectar volatiles produced by yeasts in behavioural bioassays. Insect herbivores increased total floral visits but reduced legitimate visits by inducing legitimate‐to‐robbing behavioural changes of honeybees, thus leading to lower seed production. The detrimental effect of herbivory was mitigated by the presence of yeasts, which diminished the relative proportion of robbing visits and thereby ‘rescued’ flowers from reproductive failure.
Synthesis: Overall, we found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. Our findings suggest that both microbial |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2745.14358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153726079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089699929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3028-2ec28ad66720f6b761e18f388f3d54cdb43f707ed08c2f87bc19f607e3c3a773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evRa8eOluPtokPUrd9YMFL3sPaZpglm5Tk1bpvzfdigcvDgzDzDzvMLwA3CK4QjHWiNA8xSzLVygjOT8Di9_JOVhAiHEKM8YuwVUIBwghZTlcgPLRBj90vXVt4kzSuaaxrTy11Zi8a1_ZT-d1SGxIYlGDrqdFq1UvfTJqGfpwDS6MbIK--alLsN9u9uVzunt7eikfdqkiEPMUa4W5rCllGBpaMYo04obwmHWeqbrKiGGQ6RpyhQ1nlUKFoXFAFJGMkSW4n8923n0MOvTiaIPSTSNb7YYgCMoJw1FQRPTuD3pwg2_jc4JAXtCiKPBErWdKeReC10Z03h6lHwWCYvJUTA6KyUFx8jQq8lnxZRs9_oeL1005674BN193pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089699929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Deng, Guo‐Cui ; Dai, Can ; Song, Qing‐Qing ; Zhang, You‐Xuan ; Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao ; Wang, Xiao‐Fan ; Gong, Yan‐Bing</creator><creatorcontrib>Deng, Guo‐Cui ; Dai, Can ; Song, Qing‐Qing ; Zhang, You‐Xuan ; Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao ; Wang, Xiao‐Fan ; Gong, Yan‐Bing</creatorcontrib><description>Attracting pollinators to achieve successful reproduction is a key challenge for wild plants that may be disturbed by complex multispecies interactions in nature. Pairwise plant–pollinator interactions have traditionally been studied for decades, while ignoring other ecological players may obscure a comprehensive understanding on how plants recruit partners or combat enemies in the pollination process. Hence, integrated studies considering the inherent complexity of ecological interactions are needed, which may open up new perspectives for deciphering intricate systems and predicting ecological consequences.
We examined the presence of nectar yeasts using a combination of high‐throughput sequencing, cultivation and microscopy and quantified floral herbivory by evaluating the incidence of flowers with visible holes in 13 natural populations of Iris bulleyana in the Hengduan Mountains of southwest China during 2017–2022. We combined yeast inoculation and herbivore manipulation treatments to illustrate the isolated and combined impacts of two contrasting nectarivorous organisms, the ascomycetous yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii and adult sawflies, on pollinator visitation and plant reproductive success in two populations. In the lab, we first employed gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to profile the volatile metabolites of yeast‐inoculated nectar relative to control, followed by a behavioural bioassay to test the preference of honeybees for these microbial volatiles.
Yeasts commonly inhabited floral nectar and insect herbivores frequently bit holes in the perianth tube to consume nectar and nectaries. Nectar yeasts indirectly facilitated plant reproduction through increased pollinator visits, probably because of microbial metabolism as honeybees preferred nectar volatiles produced by yeasts in behavioural bioassays. Insect herbivores increased total floral visits but reduced legitimate visits by inducing legitimate‐to‐robbing behavioural changes of honeybees, thus leading to lower seed production. The detrimental effect of herbivory was mitigated by the presence of yeasts, which diminished the relative proportion of robbing visits and thereby ‘rescued’ flowers from reproductive failure.
Synthesis: Overall, we found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. Our findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.
The authors found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. These findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.14358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>adults ; Allelochemicals ; alpine flowers ; Animal reproduction ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Bio-assays ; Bioassays ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity hot spots ; biodiversity hotspot ; Biological effects ; Breeding success ; China ; Complexity ; Ecological effects ; Flowers ; Gas chromatography ; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Inoculation ; Insects ; Iris ; Iris bulleyana ; legitimate pollinators ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Metabolism ; Metabolites ; Metschnikowia ; Microorganisms ; Microscopy ; Mountains ; Natural populations ; Nectar ; nectar feeding ; nectar microbes ; nectar robbing ; perianth ; Plant nectar ; Plant reproduction ; Plant reproductive structures ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; plant‐insect interactions ; Pollen ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Populations ; Reproduction ; Reproductive failure ; reproductive success ; Robbing behavior ; Seed production ; species ; Volatiles ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2024-08, Vol.112 (8), p.1719-1730</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Ecology © 2024 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2024 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3028-2ec28ad66720f6b761e18f388f3d54cdb43f707ed08c2f87bc19f607e3c3a773</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1860-9781 ; 0000-0002-9450-6162</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2745.14358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2745.14358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deng, Guo‐Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Qing‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, You‐Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao‐Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yan‐Bing</creatorcontrib><title>Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>Attracting pollinators to achieve successful reproduction is a key challenge for wild plants that may be disturbed by complex multispecies interactions in nature. Pairwise plant–pollinator interactions have traditionally been studied for decades, while ignoring other ecological players may obscure a comprehensive understanding on how plants recruit partners or combat enemies in the pollination process. Hence, integrated studies considering the inherent complexity of ecological interactions are needed, which may open up new perspectives for deciphering intricate systems and predicting ecological consequences.
We examined the presence of nectar yeasts using a combination of high‐throughput sequencing, cultivation and microscopy and quantified floral herbivory by evaluating the incidence of flowers with visible holes in 13 natural populations of Iris bulleyana in the Hengduan Mountains of southwest China during 2017–2022. We combined yeast inoculation and herbivore manipulation treatments to illustrate the isolated and combined impacts of two contrasting nectarivorous organisms, the ascomycetous yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii and adult sawflies, on pollinator visitation and plant reproductive success in two populations. In the lab, we first employed gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to profile the volatile metabolites of yeast‐inoculated nectar relative to control, followed by a behavioural bioassay to test the preference of honeybees for these microbial volatiles.
Yeasts commonly inhabited floral nectar and insect herbivores frequently bit holes in the perianth tube to consume nectar and nectaries. Nectar yeasts indirectly facilitated plant reproduction through increased pollinator visits, probably because of microbial metabolism as honeybees preferred nectar volatiles produced by yeasts in behavioural bioassays. Insect herbivores increased total floral visits but reduced legitimate visits by inducing legitimate‐to‐robbing behavioural changes of honeybees, thus leading to lower seed production. The detrimental effect of herbivory was mitigated by the presence of yeasts, which diminished the relative proportion of robbing visits and thereby ‘rescued’ flowers from reproductive failure.
Synthesis: Overall, we found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. Our findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.
The authors found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. These findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>Allelochemicals</subject><subject>alpine flowers</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bio-assays</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity hot spots</subject><subject>biodiversity hotspot</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>gas chromatography-mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Iris</subject><subject>Iris bulleyana</subject><subject>legitimate pollinators</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Metschnikowia</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Natural populations</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>nectar feeding</subject><subject>nectar microbes</subject><subject>nectar robbing</subject><subject>perianth</subject><subject>Plant nectar</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant reproductive structures</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>plant‐insect interactions</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive failure</subject><subject>reproductive success</subject><subject>Robbing behavior</subject><subject>Seed production</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evRa8eOluPtokPUrd9YMFL3sPaZpglm5Tk1bpvzfdigcvDgzDzDzvMLwA3CK4QjHWiNA8xSzLVygjOT8Di9_JOVhAiHEKM8YuwVUIBwghZTlcgPLRBj90vXVt4kzSuaaxrTy11Zi8a1_ZT-d1SGxIYlGDrqdFq1UvfTJqGfpwDS6MbIK--alLsN9u9uVzunt7eikfdqkiEPMUa4W5rCllGBpaMYo04obwmHWeqbrKiGGQ6RpyhQ1nlUKFoXFAFJGMkSW4n8923n0MOvTiaIPSTSNb7YYgCMoJw1FQRPTuD3pwg2_jc4JAXtCiKPBErWdKeReC10Z03h6lHwWCYvJUTA6KyUFx8jQq8lnxZRs9_oeL1005674BN193pg</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Deng, Guo‐Cui</creator><creator>Dai, Can</creator><creator>Song, Qing‐Qing</creator><creator>Zhang, You‐Xuan</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao</creator><creator>Wang, Xiao‐Fan</creator><creator>Gong, Yan‐Bing</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-9781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-6162</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts</title><author>Deng, Guo‐Cui ; Dai, Can ; Song, Qing‐Qing ; Zhang, You‐Xuan ; Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao ; Wang, Xiao‐Fan ; Gong, Yan‐Bing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3028-2ec28ad66720f6b761e18f388f3d54cdb43f707ed08c2f87bc19f607e3c3a773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>Allelochemicals</topic><topic>alpine flowers</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bio-assays</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity hot spots</topic><topic>biodiversity hotspot</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>gas chromatography-mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Iris</topic><topic>Iris bulleyana</topic><topic>legitimate pollinators</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Metschnikowia</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Natural populations</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>nectar feeding</topic><topic>nectar microbes</topic><topic>nectar robbing</topic><topic>perianth</topic><topic>Plant nectar</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant reproductive structures</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>plant‐insect interactions</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive failure</topic><topic>reproductive success</topic><topic>Robbing behavior</topic><topic>Seed production</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deng, Guo‐Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Qing‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, You‐Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao‐Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yan‐Bing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deng, Guo‐Cui</au><au>Dai, Can</au><au>Song, Qing‐Qing</au><au>Zhang, You‐Xuan</au><au>Zhang, Xiao‐Xiao</au><au>Wang, Xiao‐Fan</au><au>Gong, Yan‐Bing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1719</spage><epage>1730</epage><pages>1719-1730</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>Attracting pollinators to achieve successful reproduction is a key challenge for wild plants that may be disturbed by complex multispecies interactions in nature. Pairwise plant–pollinator interactions have traditionally been studied for decades, while ignoring other ecological players may obscure a comprehensive understanding on how plants recruit partners or combat enemies in the pollination process. Hence, integrated studies considering the inherent complexity of ecological interactions are needed, which may open up new perspectives for deciphering intricate systems and predicting ecological consequences.
We examined the presence of nectar yeasts using a combination of high‐throughput sequencing, cultivation and microscopy and quantified floral herbivory by evaluating the incidence of flowers with visible holes in 13 natural populations of Iris bulleyana in the Hengduan Mountains of southwest China during 2017–2022. We combined yeast inoculation and herbivore manipulation treatments to illustrate the isolated and combined impacts of two contrasting nectarivorous organisms, the ascomycetous yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii and adult sawflies, on pollinator visitation and plant reproductive success in two populations. In the lab, we first employed gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to profile the volatile metabolites of yeast‐inoculated nectar relative to control, followed by a behavioural bioassay to test the preference of honeybees for these microbial volatiles.
Yeasts commonly inhabited floral nectar and insect herbivores frequently bit holes in the perianth tube to consume nectar and nectaries. Nectar yeasts indirectly facilitated plant reproduction through increased pollinator visits, probably because of microbial metabolism as honeybees preferred nectar volatiles produced by yeasts in behavioural bioassays. Insect herbivores increased total floral visits but reduced legitimate visits by inducing legitimate‐to‐robbing behavioural changes of honeybees, thus leading to lower seed production. The detrimental effect of herbivory was mitigated by the presence of yeasts, which diminished the relative proportion of robbing visits and thereby ‘rescued’ flowers from reproductive failure.
Synthesis: Overall, we found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. Our findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.
The authors found contrasting effects of non‐pollinator species, including both micro‐ and macro‐organisms, on plant–pollinator interactions in a biodiversity hotspot, where pollination deficit may be a ubiquitous phenomenon. These findings suggest that both microbial and herbivory effects are likely to be important in explaining the exact causes of pollen limitation in species‐rich areas, highlighting the biological context dependence of species interactions in natural ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.14358</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-9781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-6162</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2024-08, Vol.112 (8), p.1719-1730 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153726079 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | adults Allelochemicals alpine flowers Animal reproduction Apis mellifera Bees Bio-assays Bioassays Biodiversity Biodiversity hot spots biodiversity hotspot Biological effects Breeding success China Complexity Ecological effects Flowers Gas chromatography gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Herbivores Herbivory Inoculation Insects Iris Iris bulleyana legitimate pollinators Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy Metabolism Metabolites Metschnikowia Microorganisms Microscopy Mountains Natural populations Nectar nectar feeding nectar microbes nectar robbing perianth Plant nectar Plant reproduction Plant reproductive structures Plants Plants (botany) plant‐insect interactions Pollen Pollination Pollinators Populations Reproduction Reproductive failure reproductive success Robbing behavior Seed production species Volatiles Yeast Yeasts |
title | Disruption of pollination by herbivores is rescued by nectar yeasts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disruption%20of%20pollination%20by%20herbivores%20is%20rescued%20by%20nectar%20yeasts&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Deng,%20Guo%E2%80%90Cui&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1719&rft.epage=1730&rft.pages=1719-1730&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.14358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3089699929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089699929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |