The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry
Context Quantum computing is an exciting area, which has grown at an astonishing rate in the last decade. It is especially promising for the computational and theoretical chemistry area. One algorithm has received a lot of attention lately, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). It is used to so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular modeling 2024-08, Vol.30 (8), p.275-275, Article 275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | Journal of molecular modeling |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Porto, Caio M. Nome, Rene Alfonso Morgon, Nelson H. |
description | Context
Quantum computing is an exciting area, which has grown at an astonishing rate in the last decade. It is especially promising for the computational and theoretical chemistry area. One algorithm has received a lot of attention lately, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). It is used to solve electronic structure problems and it is suitable to the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. VQE calculations require ansatze and one of the most known is the unitary coupled cluster (UCC). It uses the chosen basis set to generate a quantum computing circuit which will be iteratively minimized. The present work investigates the circuit depth and the number of gates as a function of basis sets and molecular size. It has been shown that for the current quantum devices, only the smallest molecules and basis sets are tractable. The H
2
molecule with the cc-pVTZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets have circuit depths in the order of 10
6
to 10
7
gates and the C
2
H
6
molecule with 3–21G basis set has a circuit depth of
2.2
×
10
8
gates. At the same time the analysis demonstrates that the H
2
molecule with STO-3G basis set, requires at least 500 shots to reduce the error and that, although error mitigation schemes can diminish the error, they were not able to completely negate it.
Methods
The quantum computing and electronic structure calculations were performed using the Qiskit package from IBM and the PySCF package, respectively. The ansatze were generated using the UCCSD method as implemented in Qiskit, using the basis sets STO-3G, 3–21G, 6–311G(d,p), def2-TZVP, cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ. The operators and the Hamiltonian were mapped using the Jordan-Wigner scheme. The classical optimizer chosen was the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA). The quantum computers used were the Nairobi and Osaka, with 7 and 127 qubits respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153724851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3082628582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6e8cb1c2007405b0c726c774e405f78801e2f671bc6e38e71f2dc1c66507ec0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7qL-AQ8S8OKlOpm2SXqUxS9YEETPoc1OtdKmu01z0F9vdtcP8KCHIWTy5B2Gh7FjAecCQF14AF1kCWAsCQoT3GFTKDKd5IDpLpsKKSDBIoMJO_L-FQAE5jJH3GeTtADUqcQpe3h8Id64ug3kLPG-5lXpG889jZ6XbhHLl-M78So07aJxz3zs-SqUbgwdt323DOO62ThuX6hr_Di8HbK9umw9HX2eB-zp-upxdpvM72_uZpfzxKIuxkSStpWwGJfJIK_AKpRWqYzirVZagyCspRKVlZRqUqLGhRVWyhwUWajTA3a2zV0O_SqQH02cb6ltS0d98CYVeaow07n4HwWNEnWuMaKnv9DXPgwuLrKhNCpQKlK4pezQez9QbZZD05XDmxFg1n7M1o-JfszGj1lHn3xGh6qjxfeXLxsRSLeAj0_umYaf2X_EfgBjuZkC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082827077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Porto, Caio M. ; Nome, Rene Alfonso ; Morgon, Nelson H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porto, Caio M. ; Nome, Rene Alfonso ; Morgon, Nelson H.</creatorcontrib><description>Context
Quantum computing is an exciting area, which has grown at an astonishing rate in the last decade. It is especially promising for the computational and theoretical chemistry area. One algorithm has received a lot of attention lately, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). It is used to solve electronic structure problems and it is suitable to the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. VQE calculations require ansatze and one of the most known is the unitary coupled cluster (UCC). It uses the chosen basis set to generate a quantum computing circuit which will be iteratively minimized. The present work investigates the circuit depth and the number of gates as a function of basis sets and molecular size. It has been shown that for the current quantum devices, only the smallest molecules and basis sets are tractable. The H
2
molecule with the cc-pVTZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets have circuit depths in the order of 10
6
to 10
7
gates and the C
2
H
6
molecule with 3–21G basis set has a circuit depth of
2.2
×
10
8
gates. At the same time the analysis demonstrates that the H
2
molecule with STO-3G basis set, requires at least 500 shots to reduce the error and that, although error mitigation schemes can diminish the error, they were not able to completely negate it.
Methods
The quantum computing and electronic structure calculations were performed using the Qiskit package from IBM and the PySCF package, respectively. The ansatze were generated using the UCCSD method as implemented in Qiskit, using the basis sets STO-3G, 3–21G, 6–311G(d,p), def2-TZVP, cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ. The operators and the Hamiltonian were mapped using the Jordan-Wigner scheme. The classical optimizer chosen was the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA). The quantum computers used were the Nairobi and Osaka, with 7 and 127 qubits respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-2940</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0948-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0948-5023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39028362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Computer Applications in Chemistry ; Electronic structure ; Electrons ; Error analysis ; Gates (circuits) ; Hamiltonian functions ; Molecular Medicine ; molecular weight ; Quantum computers ; Quantum computing ; Qubits (quantum computing) ; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular modeling, 2024-08, Vol.30 (8), p.275-275, Article 275</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6e8cb1c2007405b0c726c774e405f78801e2f671bc6e38e71f2dc1c66507ec0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39028362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porto, Caio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nome, Rene Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgon, Nelson H.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry</title><title>Journal of molecular modeling</title><addtitle>J Mol Model</addtitle><addtitle>J Mol Model</addtitle><description>Context
Quantum computing is an exciting area, which has grown at an astonishing rate in the last decade. It is especially promising for the computational and theoretical chemistry area. One algorithm has received a lot of attention lately, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). It is used to solve electronic structure problems and it is suitable to the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. VQE calculations require ansatze and one of the most known is the unitary coupled cluster (UCC). It uses the chosen basis set to generate a quantum computing circuit which will be iteratively minimized. The present work investigates the circuit depth and the number of gates as a function of basis sets and molecular size. It has been shown that for the current quantum devices, only the smallest molecules and basis sets are tractable. The H
2
molecule with the cc-pVTZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets have circuit depths in the order of 10
6
to 10
7
gates and the C
2
H
6
molecule with 3–21G basis set has a circuit depth of
2.2
×
10
8
gates. At the same time the analysis demonstrates that the H
2
molecule with STO-3G basis set, requires at least 500 shots to reduce the error and that, although error mitigation schemes can diminish the error, they were not able to completely negate it.
Methods
The quantum computing and electronic structure calculations were performed using the Qiskit package from IBM and the PySCF package, respectively. The ansatze were generated using the UCCSD method as implemented in Qiskit, using the basis sets STO-3G, 3–21G, 6–311G(d,p), def2-TZVP, cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ. The operators and the Hamiltonian were mapped using the Jordan-Wigner scheme. The classical optimizer chosen was the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA). The quantum computers used were the Nairobi and Osaka, with 7 and 127 qubits respectively.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Applications in Chemistry</subject><subject>Electronic structure</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Gates (circuits)</subject><subject>Hamiltonian functions</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>molecular weight</subject><subject>Quantum computers</subject><subject>Quantum computing</subject><subject>Qubits (quantum computing)</subject><subject>Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</subject><issn>1610-2940</issn><issn>0948-5023</issn><issn>0948-5023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7qL-AQ8S8OKlOpm2SXqUxS9YEETPoc1OtdKmu01z0F9vdtcP8KCHIWTy5B2Gh7FjAecCQF14AF1kCWAsCQoT3GFTKDKd5IDpLpsKKSDBIoMJO_L-FQAE5jJH3GeTtADUqcQpe3h8Id64ug3kLPG-5lXpG889jZ6XbhHLl-M78So07aJxz3zs-SqUbgwdt323DOO62ThuX6hr_Di8HbK9umw9HX2eB-zp-upxdpvM72_uZpfzxKIuxkSStpWwGJfJIK_AKpRWqYzirVZagyCspRKVlZRqUqLGhRVWyhwUWajTA3a2zV0O_SqQH02cb6ltS0d98CYVeaow07n4HwWNEnWuMaKnv9DXPgwuLrKhNCpQKlK4pezQez9QbZZD05XDmxFg1n7M1o-JfszGj1lHn3xGh6qjxfeXLxsRSLeAj0_umYaf2X_EfgBjuZkC</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Porto, Caio M.</creator><creator>Nome, Rene Alfonso</creator><creator>Morgon, Nelson H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry</title><author>Porto, Caio M. ; Nome, Rene Alfonso ; Morgon, Nelson H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6e8cb1c2007405b0c726c774e405f78801e2f671bc6e38e71f2dc1c66507ec0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Applications in Chemistry</topic><topic>Electronic structure</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Gates (circuits)</topic><topic>Hamiltonian functions</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>molecular weight</topic><topic>Quantum computers</topic><topic>Quantum computing</topic><topic>Qubits (quantum computing)</topic><topic>Theoretical and Computational Chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porto, Caio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nome, Rene Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgon, Nelson H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porto, Caio M.</au><au>Nome, Rene Alfonso</au><au>Morgon, Nelson H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular modeling</jtitle><stitle>J Mol Model</stitle><addtitle>J Mol Model</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>275-275</pages><artnum>275</artnum><issn>1610-2940</issn><issn>0948-5023</issn><eissn>0948-5023</eissn><abstract>Context
Quantum computing is an exciting area, which has grown at an astonishing rate in the last decade. It is especially promising for the computational and theoretical chemistry area. One algorithm has received a lot of attention lately, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). It is used to solve electronic structure problems and it is suitable to the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. VQE calculations require ansatze and one of the most known is the unitary coupled cluster (UCC). It uses the chosen basis set to generate a quantum computing circuit which will be iteratively minimized. The present work investigates the circuit depth and the number of gates as a function of basis sets and molecular size. It has been shown that for the current quantum devices, only the smallest molecules and basis sets are tractable. The H
2
molecule with the cc-pVTZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets have circuit depths in the order of 10
6
to 10
7
gates and the C
2
H
6
molecule with 3–21G basis set has a circuit depth of
2.2
×
10
8
gates. At the same time the analysis demonstrates that the H
2
molecule with STO-3G basis set, requires at least 500 shots to reduce the error and that, although error mitigation schemes can diminish the error, they were not able to completely negate it.
Methods
The quantum computing and electronic structure calculations were performed using the Qiskit package from IBM and the PySCF package, respectively. The ansatze were generated using the UCCSD method as implemented in Qiskit, using the basis sets STO-3G, 3–21G, 6–311G(d,p), def2-TZVP, cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ. The operators and the Hamiltonian were mapped using the Jordan-Wigner scheme. The classical optimizer chosen was the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA). The quantum computers used were the Nairobi and Osaka, with 7 and 127 qubits respectively.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39028362</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1610-2940 |
ispartof | Journal of molecular modeling, 2024-08, Vol.30 (8), p.275-275, Article 275 |
issn | 1610-2940 0948-5023 0948-5023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153724851 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Computer Applications in Chemistry Electronic structure Electrons Error analysis Gates (circuits) Hamiltonian functions Molecular Medicine molecular weight Quantum computers Quantum computing Qubits (quantum computing) Theoretical and Computational Chemistry |
title | The influence of basis sets and ansatze building to quantum computing in chemistry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20basis%20sets%20and%20ansatze%20building%20to%20quantum%20computing%20in%20chemistry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20modeling&rft.au=Porto,%20Caio%20M.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=275-275&rft.artnum=275&rft.issn=1610-2940&rft.eissn=0948-5023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00894-024-06072-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082628582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082827077&rft_id=info:pmid/39028362&rfr_iscdi=true |