Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproduction in domestic animals 2024-08, Vol.59 (8), p.e14701-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gómez‐López, David L., Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A., Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar, Schneider, Augusto, Rocha, Juan F., Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page e14701
container_title Reproduction in domestic animals
container_volume 59
creator Gómez‐López, David L.
Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A.
Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar
Schneider, Augusto
Rocha, Juan F.
Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.
description This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM‐HEPES (HEPES‐G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP‐15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES‐G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES‐G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP‐15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rda.14701
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153710521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089881914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2761-34f067580df273d1e9934989a6f09128397ba411317adb79649b1f54dd0dd4d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9KxDAQxoMouq4efAEJeNFDNdOkTeJtWf-CIIiCt5I2qUbaZk3alX0bn8UnM7rqQRCcy8zAbz4-5kNoB8ghxDryWh0C4wRW0AgYlQnJKKyiEZE0T3Keiw20GcITIZAJztfRBpVAJGN8hO6nj6a1lWrwgwq2jlNvXXeMJx1WTW98F_e5wWo2805Vj7h32HZvr3Pbe4db1Q_-8wC7GpdubjuDnasWvQlbaK1WTTDbX32M7s5Ob6cXydX1-eV0cpVUKc8hoawmOc8E0XXKqQYjJWVSSJXXREIqqOSlYgAUuNIllzmTJdQZ05pozTTQMdpf6kaDz4MJfdHaUJmmUZ1xQygoZJQDydJ_oERIIUDGF47R3i_0yQ3xGc0HJQWhabQWqYMlVXkXgjd1MfO2VX5RACk-kiliMsVnMpHd_VIcytboH_I7iggcLYEX25jF30rFzclkKfkOvo-WYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098032283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gómez‐López, David L. ; Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A. ; Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar ; Schneider, Augusto ; Rocha, Juan F. ; Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐López, David L. ; Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A. ; Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar ; Schneider, Augusto ; Rocha, Juan F. ; Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM‐HEPES (HEPES‐G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP‐15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES‐G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES‐G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP‐15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rda.14701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39109447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; BAX gene ; blastocyst ; Blastocyst - drug effects ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - pharmacology ; Cattle ; Cell culture ; chemical reaction ; Chemical reactions ; Citric acid ; Citric Acid - pharmacology ; Culture Media ; culture medium ; Cumulus Cells - drug effects ; Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary ; embryos ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary ; Gametocytes ; Gasification ; Gene expression ; genes ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary ; Maturation ; Metaphase ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - drug effects ; pH control ; reproduction ; Sodium bicarbonate ; Sodium Bicarbonate - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2024-08, Vol.59 (8), p.e14701-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2761-34f067580df273d1e9934989a6f09128397ba411317adb79649b1f54dd0dd4d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2078-5656</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frda.14701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frda.14701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39109447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐López, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Juan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM‐HEPES (HEPES‐G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP‐15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES‐G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES‐G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP‐15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BAX gene</subject><subject>blastocyst</subject><subject>Blastocyst - drug effects</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>chemical reaction</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Citric Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>culture medium</subject><subject>Cumulus Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary</subject><subject>Gametocytes</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>Metaphase</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>pH control</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>Sodium bicarbonate</subject><subject>Sodium Bicarbonate - pharmacology</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9KxDAQxoMouq4efAEJeNFDNdOkTeJtWf-CIIiCt5I2qUbaZk3alX0bn8UnM7rqQRCcy8zAbz4-5kNoB8ghxDryWh0C4wRW0AgYlQnJKKyiEZE0T3Keiw20GcITIZAJztfRBpVAJGN8hO6nj6a1lWrwgwq2jlNvXXeMJx1WTW98F_e5wWo2805Vj7h32HZvr3Pbe4db1Q_-8wC7GpdubjuDnasWvQlbaK1WTTDbX32M7s5Ob6cXydX1-eV0cpVUKc8hoawmOc8E0XXKqQYjJWVSSJXXREIqqOSlYgAUuNIllzmTJdQZ05pozTTQMdpf6kaDz4MJfdHaUJmmUZ1xQygoZJQDydJ_oERIIUDGF47R3i_0yQ3xGc0HJQWhabQWqYMlVXkXgjd1MfO2VX5RACk-kiliMsVnMpHd_VIcytboH_I7iggcLYEX25jF30rFzclkKfkOvo-WYA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Gómez‐López, David L.</creator><creator>Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A.</creator><creator>Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar</creator><creator>Schneider, Augusto</creator><creator>Rocha, Juan F.</creator><creator>Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-5656</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes</title><author>Gómez‐López, David L. ; Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A. ; Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar ; Schneider, Augusto ; Rocha, Juan F. ; Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2761-34f067580df273d1e9934989a6f09128397ba411317adb79649b1f54dd0dd4d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BAX gene</topic><topic>blastocyst</topic><topic>Blastocyst - drug effects</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>chemical reaction</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Citric Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>culture medium</topic><topic>Cumulus Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary</topic><topic>Gametocytes</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>Metaphase</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>pH control</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>Sodium bicarbonate</topic><topic>Sodium Bicarbonate - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐López, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Juan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez‐López, David L.</au><au>Velasco‐Acosta, Diego A.</au><au>Chávez‐Rodríguez, Aldemar</au><au>Schneider, Augusto</au><au>Rocha, Juan F.</au><au>Dubeibe‐Marín, Diego F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e14701</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14701-n/a</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM‐HEPES (HEPES‐G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP‐15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES‐G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES‐G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP‐15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES‐G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>39109447</pmid><doi>10.1111/rda.14701</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-5656</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6768
ispartof Reproduction in domestic animals, 2024-08, Vol.59 (8), p.e14701-n/a
issn 0936-6768
1439-0531
1439-0531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153710521
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
BAX gene
blastocyst
Blastocyst - drug effects
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - pharmacology
Cattle
Cell culture
chemical reaction
Chemical reactions
Citric acid
Citric Acid - pharmacology
Culture Media
culture medium
Cumulus Cells - drug effects
Embryo Culture Techniques - veterinary
embryos
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary
Gametocytes
Gasification
Gene expression
genes
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - methods
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques - veterinary
Maturation
Metaphase
Oocytes
Oocytes - drug effects
pH control
reproduction
Sodium bicarbonate
Sodium Bicarbonate - pharmacology
title Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemical%20gasification:%20An%20alternative%20approach%20to%20in%C2%A0vitro%20maturation%20of%20bovine%20oocytes&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez%E2%80%90L%C3%B3pez,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e14701&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14701-n/a&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rda.14701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3089881914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098032283&rft_id=info:pmid/39109447&rfr_iscdi=true