Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol

•Different modes of residue return lead to the same enrichment of RDC in plough layer.•Tillage had no effects on RDC distribution in labile and recalcitrant fractions.•No-tillage provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregate.•RDC could reach 10–20 cm in no-tillage through le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catena (Giessen) 2024-09, Vol.244, p.108254, Article 108254
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yan, Liang, Aizhen, Huang, Dandan, Zhang, Shaoqing, Zhang, Yang, Gao, Yan, Guo, Yafei, Gregorich, Edward G., McLaughlin, Neil B., Chen, Xuewen, Zhang, Shixiu, Wang, Yongjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108254
container_title Catena (Giessen)
container_volume 244
creator Zhang, Yan
Liang, Aizhen
Huang, Dandan
Zhang, Shaoqing
Zhang, Yang
Gao, Yan
Guo, Yafei
Gregorich, Edward G.
McLaughlin, Neil B.
Chen, Xuewen
Zhang, Shixiu
Wang, Yongjun
description •Different modes of residue return lead to the same enrichment of RDC in plough layer.•Tillage had no effects on RDC distribution in labile and recalcitrant fractions.•No-tillage provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregate.•RDC could reach 10–20 cm in no-tillage through leaching and stored in MAOC. The soil organic carbon (SOC) cycle is dynamic and exhibits both addition of new carbon and consumption of existing SOC; carbon inventory in the soil is the net result of these two opposing processes. Quantifying the residue-derived carbon (RDC) under different tillage systems via 13C tracing technique provides an objective appraisal of the contribution of returned residue to soil carbon sequestration in bulk soil and different fractions. We used 13C-labelled maize residue to monitor the fate of RDC stock (RDCstock) in different soil fractions under no-tillage (NT) and mouldboard ploughing (MP). Accumulation of RDC increased in the surface layer under NT while it decreased in all layers under MP over time. After two years, both NT and MP stored an equivalent amount of RDCstock with a RDCconversion rate of 16.8–17.0 %. Tillage had no effect on the RDC concentration (RDCcon) in microaggregate (Mic), silt–clay (Si-Cl), labile organic carbon (LP-C) and recalcitrant carbon (RP-C), but affected the RDCcon in macroaggregate (Mac) and particulate organic carbon (POC). NT generated more RDCstock in Mac than MP, which was induced by the higher RDCstock in coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and occluded silt–clay (O-Si-Cl). The percentage of RDCstock in mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contributed more to total RDCstock than POC in both NT and MP, but RDCstock in POC was higher in NT (47 %) than MP (18 %). Most (70 %-75 %) of RDCstock existed as LP-C in both tillage practices. Our results showed that although the total RDCstock reached the same status in both NT and MP, the distribution in soil fractions varied, especially in physical fractions. RDC reached 10–20 cm in NT through leaching and was stored in MAOC, and NT provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregates. It also inferred that tillage practices strongly affected the way that newly derived carbon was stored.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.catena.2024.108254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153704955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S034181622400451X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153704955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-f5107fac8d3c21f69e955db9a9ebf7b9045cdd4149bb48288bf74b1f96ac51be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85eumatEmbXgRZ_IIVL-vBU8jHZMnSbdakXfDfm1LPnoZ5eOeFeRC6pWRFCa3v9yujBujVqiQly0iUnJ2hBRVNWdRCNOdoQSpGC0Hr8hJdpbQnhLCG0wX62vquUzvA4ByYIeHQ4wjJ2xEKC9GfwGKjos7Y-jREr8fB50UdQr_DKfgOu6jMxBL2meP30HU-he4aXTjVJbj5m0v0-fy0Xb8Wm4-Xt_XjpjAlFUPhOCWNU0bYKgNXt9BybnWrWtCu0S1h3FjLKGu1ZqIUIlOmqWtrZTjVUC3R3dx7jOF7hDTIg08G8lc9hDHJivKqISy35iiboyaGlCI4eYz-oOKPpEROJuVeziblZFLOJvPZw3wG-Y2ThyiT8dAbsD5mZ9IG_3_BL7Dff6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153704955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Yan ; Liang, Aizhen ; Huang, Dandan ; Zhang, Shaoqing ; Zhang, Yang ; Gao, Yan ; Guo, Yafei ; Gregorich, Edward G. ; McLaughlin, Neil B. ; Chen, Xuewen ; Zhang, Shixiu ; Wang, Yongjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan ; Liang, Aizhen ; Huang, Dandan ; Zhang, Shaoqing ; Zhang, Yang ; Gao, Yan ; Guo, Yafei ; Gregorich, Edward G. ; McLaughlin, Neil B. ; Chen, Xuewen ; Zhang, Shixiu ; Wang, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><description>•Different modes of residue return lead to the same enrichment of RDC in plough layer.•Tillage had no effects on RDC distribution in labile and recalcitrant fractions.•No-tillage provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregate.•RDC could reach 10–20 cm in no-tillage through leaching and stored in MAOC. The soil organic carbon (SOC) cycle is dynamic and exhibits both addition of new carbon and consumption of existing SOC; carbon inventory in the soil is the net result of these two opposing processes. Quantifying the residue-derived carbon (RDC) under different tillage systems via 13C tracing technique provides an objective appraisal of the contribution of returned residue to soil carbon sequestration in bulk soil and different fractions. We used 13C-labelled maize residue to monitor the fate of RDC stock (RDCstock) in different soil fractions under no-tillage (NT) and mouldboard ploughing (MP). Accumulation of RDC increased in the surface layer under NT while it decreased in all layers under MP over time. After two years, both NT and MP stored an equivalent amount of RDCstock with a RDCconversion rate of 16.8–17.0 %. Tillage had no effect on the RDC concentration (RDCcon) in microaggregate (Mic), silt–clay (Si-Cl), labile organic carbon (LP-C) and recalcitrant carbon (RP-C), but affected the RDCcon in macroaggregate (Mac) and particulate organic carbon (POC). NT generated more RDCstock in Mac than MP, which was induced by the higher RDCstock in coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and occluded silt–clay (O-Si-Cl). The percentage of RDCstock in mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contributed more to total RDCstock than POC in both NT and MP, but RDCstock in POC was higher in NT (47 %) than MP (18 %). Most (70 %-75 %) of RDCstock existed as LP-C in both tillage practices. Our results showed that although the total RDCstock reached the same status in both NT and MP, the distribution in soil fractions varied, especially in physical fractions. RDC reached 10–20 cm in NT through leaching and was stored in MAOC, and NT provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregates. It also inferred that tillage practices strongly affected the way that newly derived carbon was stored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2024.108254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>carbon footprint ; carbon sequestration ; catenas ; corn ; labile carbon ; Mollisols ; no-tillage ; particulate organic carbon ; Physical and chemical fractions ; Residue-derived carbon ; Tillage practices</subject><ispartof>Catena (Giessen), 2024-09, Vol.244, p.108254, Article 108254</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-f5107fac8d3c21f69e955db9a9ebf7b9045cdd4149bb48288bf74b1f96ac51be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0780-184X ; 0000-0002-6023-9895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622400451X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Aizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorich, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuewen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shixiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol</title><title>Catena (Giessen)</title><description>•Different modes of residue return lead to the same enrichment of RDC in plough layer.•Tillage had no effects on RDC distribution in labile and recalcitrant fractions.•No-tillage provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregate.•RDC could reach 10–20 cm in no-tillage through leaching and stored in MAOC. The soil organic carbon (SOC) cycle is dynamic and exhibits both addition of new carbon and consumption of existing SOC; carbon inventory in the soil is the net result of these two opposing processes. Quantifying the residue-derived carbon (RDC) under different tillage systems via 13C tracing technique provides an objective appraisal of the contribution of returned residue to soil carbon sequestration in bulk soil and different fractions. We used 13C-labelled maize residue to monitor the fate of RDC stock (RDCstock) in different soil fractions under no-tillage (NT) and mouldboard ploughing (MP). Accumulation of RDC increased in the surface layer under NT while it decreased in all layers under MP over time. After two years, both NT and MP stored an equivalent amount of RDCstock with a RDCconversion rate of 16.8–17.0 %. Tillage had no effect on the RDC concentration (RDCcon) in microaggregate (Mic), silt–clay (Si-Cl), labile organic carbon (LP-C) and recalcitrant carbon (RP-C), but affected the RDCcon in macroaggregate (Mac) and particulate organic carbon (POC). NT generated more RDCstock in Mac than MP, which was induced by the higher RDCstock in coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and occluded silt–clay (O-Si-Cl). The percentage of RDCstock in mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contributed more to total RDCstock than POC in both NT and MP, but RDCstock in POC was higher in NT (47 %) than MP (18 %). Most (70 %-75 %) of RDCstock existed as LP-C in both tillage practices. Our results showed that although the total RDCstock reached the same status in both NT and MP, the distribution in soil fractions varied, especially in physical fractions. RDC reached 10–20 cm in NT through leaching and was stored in MAOC, and NT provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregates. It also inferred that tillage practices strongly affected the way that newly derived carbon was stored.</description><subject>carbon footprint</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>catenas</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>labile carbon</subject><subject>Mollisols</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>particulate organic carbon</subject><subject>Physical and chemical fractions</subject><subject>Residue-derived carbon</subject><subject>Tillage practices</subject><issn>0341-8162</issn><issn>1872-6887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw85eumatEmbXgRZ_IIVL-vBU8jHZMnSbdakXfDfm1LPnoZ5eOeFeRC6pWRFCa3v9yujBujVqiQly0iUnJ2hBRVNWdRCNOdoQSpGC0Hr8hJdpbQnhLCG0wX62vquUzvA4ByYIeHQ4wjJ2xEKC9GfwGKjos7Y-jREr8fB50UdQr_DKfgOu6jMxBL2meP30HU-he4aXTjVJbj5m0v0-fy0Xb8Wm4-Xt_XjpjAlFUPhOCWNU0bYKgNXt9BybnWrWtCu0S1h3FjLKGu1ZqIUIlOmqWtrZTjVUC3R3dx7jOF7hDTIg08G8lc9hDHJivKqISy35iiboyaGlCI4eYz-oOKPpEROJuVeziblZFLOJvPZw3wG-Y2ThyiT8dAbsD5mZ9IG_3_BL7Dff6c</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yan</creator><creator>Liang, Aizhen</creator><creator>Huang, Dandan</creator><creator>Zhang, Shaoqing</creator><creator>Zhang, Yang</creator><creator>Gao, Yan</creator><creator>Guo, Yafei</creator><creator>Gregorich, Edward G.</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Neil B.</creator><creator>Chen, Xuewen</creator><creator>Zhang, Shixiu</creator><creator>Wang, Yongjun</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-184X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-9895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol</title><author>Zhang, Yan ; Liang, Aizhen ; Huang, Dandan ; Zhang, Shaoqing ; Zhang, Yang ; Gao, Yan ; Guo, Yafei ; Gregorich, Edward G. ; McLaughlin, Neil B. ; Chen, Xuewen ; Zhang, Shixiu ; Wang, Yongjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-f5107fac8d3c21f69e955db9a9ebf7b9045cdd4149bb48288bf74b1f96ac51be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>carbon footprint</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>catenas</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>labile carbon</topic><topic>Mollisols</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>particulate organic carbon</topic><topic>Physical and chemical fractions</topic><topic>Residue-derived carbon</topic><topic>Tillage practices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Aizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorich, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuewen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shixiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yongjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yan</au><au>Liang, Aizhen</au><au>Huang, Dandan</au><au>Zhang, Shaoqing</au><au>Zhang, Yang</au><au>Gao, Yan</au><au>Guo, Yafei</au><au>Gregorich, Edward G.</au><au>McLaughlin, Neil B.</au><au>Chen, Xuewen</au><au>Zhang, Shixiu</au><au>Wang, Yongjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol</atitle><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>244</volume><spage>108254</spage><pages>108254-</pages><artnum>108254</artnum><issn>0341-8162</issn><eissn>1872-6887</eissn><abstract>•Different modes of residue return lead to the same enrichment of RDC in plough layer.•Tillage had no effects on RDC distribution in labile and recalcitrant fractions.•No-tillage provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregate.•RDC could reach 10–20 cm in no-tillage through leaching and stored in MAOC. The soil organic carbon (SOC) cycle is dynamic and exhibits both addition of new carbon and consumption of existing SOC; carbon inventory in the soil is the net result of these two opposing processes. Quantifying the residue-derived carbon (RDC) under different tillage systems via 13C tracing technique provides an objective appraisal of the contribution of returned residue to soil carbon sequestration in bulk soil and different fractions. We used 13C-labelled maize residue to monitor the fate of RDC stock (RDCstock) in different soil fractions under no-tillage (NT) and mouldboard ploughing (MP). Accumulation of RDC increased in the surface layer under NT while it decreased in all layers under MP over time. After two years, both NT and MP stored an equivalent amount of RDCstock with a RDCconversion rate of 16.8–17.0 %. Tillage had no effect on the RDC concentration (RDCcon) in microaggregate (Mic), silt–clay (Si-Cl), labile organic carbon (LP-C) and recalcitrant carbon (RP-C), but affected the RDCcon in macroaggregate (Mac) and particulate organic carbon (POC). NT generated more RDCstock in Mac than MP, which was induced by the higher RDCstock in coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and occluded silt–clay (O-Si-Cl). The percentage of RDCstock in mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) contributed more to total RDCstock than POC in both NT and MP, but RDCstock in POC was higher in NT (47 %) than MP (18 %). Most (70 %-75 %) of RDCstock existed as LP-C in both tillage practices. Our results showed that although the total RDCstock reached the same status in both NT and MP, the distribution in soil fractions varied, especially in physical fractions. RDC reached 10–20 cm in NT through leaching and was stored in MAOC, and NT provided strong protection for newly derived carbon via macroaggregates. It also inferred that tillage practices strongly affected the way that newly derived carbon was stored.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.catena.2024.108254</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-184X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-9895</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0341-8162
ispartof Catena (Giessen), 2024-09, Vol.244, p.108254, Article 108254
issn 0341-8162
1872-6887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153704955
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects carbon footprint
carbon sequestration
catenas
corn
labile carbon
Mollisols
no-tillage
particulate organic carbon
Physical and chemical fractions
Residue-derived carbon
Tillage practices
title Tillage effects on residue-derived carbon distribution among soil fractions in a Mollisol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage%20effects%20on%20residue-derived%20carbon%20distribution%20among%20soil%20fractions%20in%20a%20Mollisol&rft.jtitle=Catena%20(Giessen)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yan&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=244&rft.spage=108254&rft.pages=108254-&rft.artnum=108254&rft.issn=0341-8162&rft.eissn=1872-6887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153704955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153704955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S034181622400451X&rfr_iscdi=true