Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives

Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2024-08, Vol.88 (6), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Fisk, Jonathan James, Leong, Kirsten Mya, Berl, Richard E. W., Long, Jonathan W., Landon, Adam C., Adams, Melinda M., Hankins, Don L., Williams, Christopher K., Lake, Frank K., Salerno, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 88
creator Fisk, Jonathan James
Leong, Kirsten Mya
Berl, Richard E. W.
Long, Jonathan W.
Landon, Adam C.
Adams, Melinda M.
Hankins, Don L.
Williams, Christopher K.
Lake, Frank K.
Salerno, Jonathan
description Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all. Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building recipr
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.22584
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153674710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153674710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-8021a71f06e87c6b4ebcf827b9cc573a26e7f1916c8b1c4c3bcb7a51e505226b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90D1PwzAQBmALgUQpLPwCSywIKcXnfDgdUVVK-RALCLbIcS9pKscOdtKq_56UMDEw3XDPne5eQi6BTYAxfrvZ1eWE8ziNjsgIpqEIeArimIz6Jg_iCD5PyZn3G8ZCgDQZkXy-tXpbmZLuKr3SVYG0lkaWWKNpqep02zn01Ba0tFt0RhqFtF0725VrujSrqkRjO0-fjN1pXJW9lWZFG3S-QdVWW_Tn5KSQ2uPFbx2T9_v52-wheH5dLGd3z4EKBYuClHGQAgqWYCpUkkeYqyLlIp8qFYtQ8gRFAVNIVJqDilSYq1zIGDBmMedJHo7J9bC3cfarQ99mdeUVai0N9idmIcRhIiIBrKdXf-jGdv1zuldMiDjhKT-om0EpZ713WGSNq2rp9hmw7BB3dog7-4m7xzDgPkfc_yOzx4-XxTDzDbcHhAE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3077562820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fisk, Jonathan James ; Leong, Kirsten Mya ; Berl, Richard E. W. ; Long, Jonathan W. ; Landon, Adam C. ; Adams, Melinda M. ; Hankins, Don L. ; Williams, Christopher K. ; Lake, Frank K. ; Salerno, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Jonathan James ; Leong, Kirsten Mya ; Berl, Richard E. W. ; Long, Jonathan W. ; Landon, Adam C. ; Adams, Melinda M. ; Hankins, Don L. ; Williams, Christopher K. ; Lake, Frank K. ; Salerno, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all. Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building reciprocal, accountable relations with Indigenous Peoples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; citizen participation ; Community participation ; Culture ; culture change ; Ecosystem management ; Ethics ; Evolution ; fish ; governance ; Indigenous Knowledges ; Indigenous peoples ; Information management ; Information processing ; issues and policy ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; paradigm shift ; Public participation ; Resource management ; Social-ecological systems ; stewardship ; transformative change ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-08, Vol.88 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-8021a71f06e87c6b4ebcf827b9cc573a26e7f1916c8b1c4c3bcb7a51e505226b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-8021a71f06e87c6b4ebcf827b9cc573a26e7f1916c8b1c4c3bcb7a51e505226b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3563-7779 ; 0000-0001-9210-3127</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22584$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22584$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Jonathan James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Kirsten Mya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berl, Richard E. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landon, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hankins, Don L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Christopher K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, Frank K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salerno, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all. Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building reciprocal, accountable relations with Indigenous Peoples.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>citizen participation</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>culture change</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Indigenous Knowledges</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>paradigm shift</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>stewardship</subject><subject>transformative change</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp90D1PwzAQBmALgUQpLPwCSywIKcXnfDgdUVVK-RALCLbIcS9pKscOdtKq_56UMDEw3XDPne5eQi6BTYAxfrvZ1eWE8ziNjsgIpqEIeArimIz6Jg_iCD5PyZn3G8ZCgDQZkXy-tXpbmZLuKr3SVYG0lkaWWKNpqep02zn01Ba0tFt0RhqFtF0725VrujSrqkRjO0-fjN1pXJW9lWZFG3S-QdVWW_Tn5KSQ2uPFbx2T9_v52-wheH5dLGd3z4EKBYuClHGQAgqWYCpUkkeYqyLlIp8qFYtQ8gRFAVNIVJqDilSYq1zIGDBmMedJHo7J9bC3cfarQ99mdeUVai0N9idmIcRhIiIBrKdXf-jGdv1zuldMiDjhKT-om0EpZ713WGSNq2rp9hmw7BB3dog7-4m7xzDgPkfc_yOzx4-XxTDzDbcHhAE</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Fisk, Jonathan James</creator><creator>Leong, Kirsten Mya</creator><creator>Berl, Richard E. W.</creator><creator>Long, Jonathan W.</creator><creator>Landon, Adam C.</creator><creator>Adams, Melinda M.</creator><creator>Hankins, Don L.</creator><creator>Williams, Christopher K.</creator><creator>Lake, Frank K.</creator><creator>Salerno, Jonathan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-7779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-3127</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives</title><author>Fisk, Jonathan James ; Leong, Kirsten Mya ; Berl, Richard E. W. ; Long, Jonathan W. ; Landon, Adam C. ; Adams, Melinda M. ; Hankins, Don L. ; Williams, Christopher K. ; Lake, Frank K. ; Salerno, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-8021a71f06e87c6b4ebcf827b9cc573a26e7f1916c8b1c4c3bcb7a51e505226b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>citizen participation</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>culture change</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Indigenous Knowledges</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>paradigm shift</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>stewardship</topic><topic>transformative change</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Jonathan James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Kirsten Mya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berl, Richard E. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landon, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hankins, Don L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Christopher K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, Frank K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salerno, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisk, Jonathan James</au><au>Leong, Kirsten Mya</au><au>Berl, Richard E. W.</au><au>Long, Jonathan W.</au><au>Landon, Adam C.</au><au>Adams, Melinda M.</au><au>Hankins, Don L.</au><au>Williams, Christopher K.</au><au>Lake, Frank K.</au><au>Salerno, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all. Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building reciprocal, accountable relations with Indigenous Peoples.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22584</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-7779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-3127</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-08, Vol.88 (6), p.n/a
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153674710
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Case studies
citizen participation
Community participation
Culture
culture change
Ecosystem management
Ethics
Evolution
fish
governance
Indigenous Knowledges
Indigenous peoples
Information management
Information processing
issues and policy
Natural resource management
Natural resources
paradigm shift
Public participation
Resource management
Social-ecological systems
stewardship
transformative change
Wildlife management
title Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A34%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolving%20wildlife%20management%20cultures%20of%20governance%20through%20Indigenous%20Knowledges%20and%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Fisk,%20Jonathan%20James&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153674710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3077562820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true