Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management

•20–29% lower soil moisture and 60–88% lower solar radiation occurred under panels.•There is increased soil moisture and incidence of saturation at the dripline.•Differences in ET and soil moisture within the solar farm vary by season.•The interspace zone facilitates infiltration, leading to reduced...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2024-07, Vol.638, p.131474, Article 131474
Hauptverfasser: Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz, Cibin, Raj, Duncan, Jonathan M., McPhillips, Lauren E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 131474
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 638
creator Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz
Cibin, Raj
Duncan, Jonathan M.
McPhillips, Lauren E.
description •20–29% lower soil moisture and 60–88% lower solar radiation occurred under panels.•There is increased soil moisture and incidence of saturation at the dripline.•Differences in ET and soil moisture within the solar farm vary by season.•The interspace zone facilitates infiltration, leading to reduced incidence of saturation.•Stormwater management strategies can manage changes in runoff from solar farms. As solar energy becomes a cheap source of renewable energy, the number of major utility-scale ground solar panel installations, often called ‘solar farms,’ are growing. With these solar farms often covering hundreds of acres, there is potential for impacts on natural hydrologic processes, including runoff generation and erosion. There is still limited research in this area, and best management practices to address these impacts are variable and not well understood. To fill this gap, we conducted a field investigation of soil moisture patterns, solar radiation, and vegetation at two solar farms in central Pennsylvania, USA that are representative of the complex terrain in the region (e.g., high or variable slopes). Both solar farms also included engineered infiltration basins or trenches that were investigated. Analysis of soil moisture patterns reveals redistribution of water relative to panels, with dripline soil moisture 19 % higher than the reference, and underpanel moisture 25 % lower than the reference, on average at both solar farms over a year. There are also the greatest periods of saturation and runoff generation at the panel driplines. However, an open interspace between panel rows and existing infiltration basins and trenches are playing a critical role in managing runoff. Micrometeorological monitoring indicates reduced evapotranspiration (ET) under panels, with potential underpanel ET 37–67 % lower in summer, and minimal difference in winter. However, a survey of vegetation revealed almost complete ground coverage under panels, which is critical for supporting infiltration and reducing erosion. As solar farms expand to meet important renewable energy goals, it is essential that care be taken to design the landscape to minimize runoff generation and erosion. This work demonstrates that healthy vegetation and well-draining soils can help manage runoff on solar farms; where necessary on more challenging landscapes, engineered stormwater controls can manage any unmitigated runoff.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153657722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169424008709</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153657722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8a9ea5f282db9b681e5c6098f89eefb62050ceefb4d4385411d84a9469f5ca9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRbMAifL4BCQv2bTYjpPGbBCqeFSqhJBgbU2dcesqsYPttgpfT0q7ZzYzi3uuNCfLbhmdMMrK-81ks-7r4JsJp1xMWM7EVJxlI0o5H7NSiovsMsYNHSbPxSj7-diCS9b01q1I9LYhrbcxbQMScDXBHXQ-BXCxswGS9Y6sMWHwK3RoU0_2Nq2tIzCwDQRiILQPZN52jdV_8UiMDyQmH9o9DCBpwcEKW3TpOjs30ES8Oe2r7Ovl-XP2Nl68v85nT4ux5pKmcQUSoTC84vVSLsuKYaFLKitTSUSzLDktqD5cohZ5VQjG6kqAFKU0hQZp8qvs7tjbBf-9xZhUa6PGpgGHfhtVzoq8LKZTzodocYzq4GMMaFQXbAuhV4yqg1-1USe_6uBXHf0O3OORw-GPncWgorboNNY2oE6q9vafhl8BaY0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153657722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz ; Cibin, Raj ; Duncan, Jonathan M. ; McPhillips, Lauren E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz ; Cibin, Raj ; Duncan, Jonathan M. ; McPhillips, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><description>•20–29% lower soil moisture and 60–88% lower solar radiation occurred under panels.•There is increased soil moisture and incidence of saturation at the dripline.•Differences in ET and soil moisture within the solar farm vary by season.•The interspace zone facilitates infiltration, leading to reduced incidence of saturation.•Stormwater management strategies can manage changes in runoff from solar farms. As solar energy becomes a cheap source of renewable energy, the number of major utility-scale ground solar panel installations, often called ‘solar farms,’ are growing. With these solar farms often covering hundreds of acres, there is potential for impacts on natural hydrologic processes, including runoff generation and erosion. There is still limited research in this area, and best management practices to address these impacts are variable and not well understood. To fill this gap, we conducted a field investigation of soil moisture patterns, solar radiation, and vegetation at two solar farms in central Pennsylvania, USA that are representative of the complex terrain in the region (e.g., high or variable slopes). Both solar farms also included engineered infiltration basins or trenches that were investigated. Analysis of soil moisture patterns reveals redistribution of water relative to panels, with dripline soil moisture 19 % higher than the reference, and underpanel moisture 25 % lower than the reference, on average at both solar farms over a year. There are also the greatest periods of saturation and runoff generation at the panel driplines. However, an open interspace between panel rows and existing infiltration basins and trenches are playing a critical role in managing runoff. Micrometeorological monitoring indicates reduced evapotranspiration (ET) under panels, with potential underpanel ET 37–67 % lower in summer, and minimal difference in winter. However, a survey of vegetation revealed almost complete ground coverage under panels, which is critical for supporting infiltration and reducing erosion. As solar farms expand to meet important renewable energy goals, it is essential that care be taken to design the landscape to minimize runoff generation and erosion. This work demonstrates that healthy vegetation and well-draining soils can help manage runoff on solar farms; where necessary on more challenging landscapes, engineered stormwater controls can manage any unmitigated runoff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>evapotranspiration ; landscapes ; Pennsylvania ; soil water ; solar collectors ; solar energy ; solar farms ; solar radiation ; stormwater ; stormwater management ; summer ; surveys ; vegetation cover ; winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2024-07, Vol.638, p.131474, Article 131474</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8a9ea5f282db9b681e5c6098f89eefb62050ceefb4d4385411d84a9469f5ca9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4990-7979 ; 0000-0001-5374-8504</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424008709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cibin, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhillips, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•20–29% lower soil moisture and 60–88% lower solar radiation occurred under panels.•There is increased soil moisture and incidence of saturation at the dripline.•Differences in ET and soil moisture within the solar farm vary by season.•The interspace zone facilitates infiltration, leading to reduced incidence of saturation.•Stormwater management strategies can manage changes in runoff from solar farms. As solar energy becomes a cheap source of renewable energy, the number of major utility-scale ground solar panel installations, often called ‘solar farms,’ are growing. With these solar farms often covering hundreds of acres, there is potential for impacts on natural hydrologic processes, including runoff generation and erosion. There is still limited research in this area, and best management practices to address these impacts are variable and not well understood. To fill this gap, we conducted a field investigation of soil moisture patterns, solar radiation, and vegetation at two solar farms in central Pennsylvania, USA that are representative of the complex terrain in the region (e.g., high or variable slopes). Both solar farms also included engineered infiltration basins or trenches that were investigated. Analysis of soil moisture patterns reveals redistribution of water relative to panels, with dripline soil moisture 19 % higher than the reference, and underpanel moisture 25 % lower than the reference, on average at both solar farms over a year. There are also the greatest periods of saturation and runoff generation at the panel driplines. However, an open interspace between panel rows and existing infiltration basins and trenches are playing a critical role in managing runoff. Micrometeorological monitoring indicates reduced evapotranspiration (ET) under panels, with potential underpanel ET 37–67 % lower in summer, and minimal difference in winter. However, a survey of vegetation revealed almost complete ground coverage under panels, which is critical for supporting infiltration and reducing erosion. As solar farms expand to meet important renewable energy goals, it is essential that care be taken to design the landscape to minimize runoff generation and erosion. This work demonstrates that healthy vegetation and well-draining soils can help manage runoff on solar farms; where necessary on more challenging landscapes, engineered stormwater controls can manage any unmitigated runoff.</description><subject>evapotranspiration</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>solar collectors</subject><subject>solar energy</subject><subject>solar farms</subject><subject>solar radiation</subject><subject>stormwater</subject><subject>stormwater management</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRbMAifL4BCQv2bTYjpPGbBCqeFSqhJBgbU2dcesqsYPttgpfT0q7ZzYzi3uuNCfLbhmdMMrK-81ks-7r4JsJp1xMWM7EVJxlI0o5H7NSiovsMsYNHSbPxSj7-diCS9b01q1I9LYhrbcxbQMScDXBHXQ-BXCxswGS9Y6sMWHwK3RoU0_2Nq2tIzCwDQRiILQPZN52jdV_8UiMDyQmH9o9DCBpwcEKW3TpOjs30ES8Oe2r7Ovl-XP2Nl68v85nT4ux5pKmcQUSoTC84vVSLsuKYaFLKitTSUSzLDktqD5cohZ5VQjG6kqAFKU0hQZp8qvs7tjbBf-9xZhUa6PGpgGHfhtVzoq8LKZTzodocYzq4GMMaFQXbAuhV4yqg1-1USe_6uBXHf0O3OORw-GPncWgorboNNY2oE6q9vafhl8BaY0E</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz</creator><creator>Cibin, Raj</creator><creator>Duncan, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>McPhillips, Lauren E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-7979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5374-8504</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management</title><author>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz ; Cibin, Raj ; Duncan, Jonathan M. ; McPhillips, Lauren E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8a9ea5f282db9b681e5c6098f89eefb62050ceefb4d4385411d84a9469f5ca9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>evapotranspiration</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>solar collectors</topic><topic>solar energy</topic><topic>solar farms</topic><topic>solar radiation</topic><topic>stormwater</topic><topic>stormwater management</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cibin, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhillips, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yavari Bajehbaj, Rouhangiz</au><au>Cibin, Raj</au><au>Duncan, Jonathan M.</au><au>McPhillips, Lauren E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>638</volume><spage>131474</spage><pages>131474-</pages><artnum>131474</artnum><issn>0022-1694</issn><abstract>•20–29% lower soil moisture and 60–88% lower solar radiation occurred under panels.•There is increased soil moisture and incidence of saturation at the dripline.•Differences in ET and soil moisture within the solar farm vary by season.•The interspace zone facilitates infiltration, leading to reduced incidence of saturation.•Stormwater management strategies can manage changes in runoff from solar farms. As solar energy becomes a cheap source of renewable energy, the number of major utility-scale ground solar panel installations, often called ‘solar farms,’ are growing. With these solar farms often covering hundreds of acres, there is potential for impacts on natural hydrologic processes, including runoff generation and erosion. There is still limited research in this area, and best management practices to address these impacts are variable and not well understood. To fill this gap, we conducted a field investigation of soil moisture patterns, solar radiation, and vegetation at two solar farms in central Pennsylvania, USA that are representative of the complex terrain in the region (e.g., high or variable slopes). Both solar farms also included engineered infiltration basins or trenches that were investigated. Analysis of soil moisture patterns reveals redistribution of water relative to panels, with dripline soil moisture 19 % higher than the reference, and underpanel moisture 25 % lower than the reference, on average at both solar farms over a year. There are also the greatest periods of saturation and runoff generation at the panel driplines. However, an open interspace between panel rows and existing infiltration basins and trenches are playing a critical role in managing runoff. Micrometeorological monitoring indicates reduced evapotranspiration (ET) under panels, with potential underpanel ET 37–67 % lower in summer, and minimal difference in winter. However, a survey of vegetation revealed almost complete ground coverage under panels, which is critical for supporting infiltration and reducing erosion. As solar farms expand to meet important renewable energy goals, it is essential that care be taken to design the landscape to minimize runoff generation and erosion. This work demonstrates that healthy vegetation and well-draining soils can help manage runoff on solar farms; where necessary on more challenging landscapes, engineered stormwater controls can manage any unmitigated runoff.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131474</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-7979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5374-8504</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2024-07, Vol.638, p.131474, Article 131474
issn 0022-1694
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153657722
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects evapotranspiration
landscapes
Pennsylvania
soil water
solar collectors
solar energy
solar farms
solar radiation
stormwater
stormwater management
summer
surveys
vegetation cover
winter
title Quantifying soil moisture and evapotranspiration heterogeneity within a solar farm: Implications for stormwater management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20soil%20moisture%20and%20evapotranspiration%20heterogeneity%20within%20a%20solar%20farm:%20Implications%20for%20stormwater%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Yavari%20Bajehbaj,%20Rouhangiz&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=638&rft.spage=131474&rft.pages=131474-&rft.artnum=131474&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153657722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153657722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169424008709&rfr_iscdi=true