How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis
The relationship between tax policy and environment is a hot topic of widespread concern. Clarifying the mechanism between them is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of economy and environment. This study constructs a theoretical framework based on the multi-sector model of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.18535-18557 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 18557 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 18535 |
| container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Li, Kunming Wen, Jianhua Jiang, Tingjun Fan, Xiamin Huang, Linxing |
| description | The relationship between tax policy and environment is a hot topic of widespread concern. Clarifying the mechanism between them is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of economy and environment. This study constructs a theoretical framework based on the multi-sector model of general equilibrium theory to investigate the effect of tax competition on environmental pollution. It is theoretically supported that such an effect exists and is affected by environmental protection investment (EI), that is, there is a threshold effect derived from EI. The theoretical finding is confirmed by an empirical study employing the spatial panel threshold model and using China’s provincial panel data from 2007 to 2019. The empirical result shows that the threshold effect of EI is significant since that lower tax competition (i.e., higher tax collection and management efficiency) tends to reduce environmental pollution when EI is below the threshold value and vice versa. In addition, we find that the effect of tax competition is regionally heterogeneous. Finally, several policy recommendations are proposed based on the theoretical and empirical results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153654462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153654462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d44f4db88eb535c9f34a5015918550ee74857bf45895284e716b1ed40e7d20133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtKBDEQhhtRUEcv4Crgxk1r5dUPNyKDLxDc6NaQ6anWSHfSJhmd2XkNr-dJzDiC4sJVFcX3VxVflu1ROKQA5VGgUBRVDoznwAWwfL6WbVFZ8pzVpVz_1W9m2yE8ATCoWbGV3V-6VxL1nDSuHzCaaJwlum2xiYGMH43VH2_vgaB9Md7ZHm3UHRlc182W5MkxOSVh0NGkKTbOuh6jNw3RVneLYMJOttHqLuDudx1ld-dnt-PL_Prm4mp8ep03HHjMp0K0YjqpKpxILpu65UJLoLKmlZSAWIpKlpNWyKqWrBJY0mJCcSoAyykDyvkoO1jtHbx7nmGIqjehwa7TFt0sKE4lL6QQBUvo_h_0yc18-jdRkA4VvKohUWxFNd6F4LFVgze99gtFQS2Vq5VylZSrL-VqnkJ8FQoJtg_of1b_k_oE_SSFQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074863890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Li, Kunming ; Wen, Jianhua ; Jiang, Tingjun ; Fan, Xiamin ; Huang, Linxing</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Kunming ; Wen, Jianhua ; Jiang, Tingjun ; Fan, Xiamin ; Huang, Linxing</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between tax policy and environment is a hot topic of widespread concern. Clarifying the mechanism between them is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of economy and environment. This study constructs a theoretical framework based on the multi-sector model of general equilibrium theory to investigate the effect of tax competition on environmental pollution. It is theoretically supported that such an effect exists and is affected by environmental protection investment (EI), that is, there is a threshold effect derived from EI. The theoretical finding is confirmed by an empirical study employing the spatial panel threshold model and using China’s provincial panel data from 2007 to 2019. The empirical result shows that the threshold effect of EI is significant since that lower tax competition (i.e., higher tax collection and management efficiency) tends to reduce environmental pollution when EI is below the threshold value and vice versa. In addition, we find that the effect of tax competition is regionally heterogeneous. Finally, several policy recommendations are proposed based on the theoretical and empirical results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>China ; Competition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Econometrics ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Emotional intelligence ; Empirical analysis ; empirical research ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; equilibrium theory ; issues and policy ; Panel data ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Spatial analysis ; Sustainable Development ; Tax collections ; Taxation ; threshold models</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.18535-18557</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d44f4db88eb535c9f34a5015918550ee74857bf45895284e716b1ed40e7d20133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1291-4999</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Kunming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Linxing</creatorcontrib><title>How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>The relationship between tax policy and environment is a hot topic of widespread concern. Clarifying the mechanism between them is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of economy and environment. This study constructs a theoretical framework based on the multi-sector model of general equilibrium theory to investigate the effect of tax competition on environmental pollution. It is theoretically supported that such an effect exists and is affected by environmental protection investment (EI), that is, there is a threshold effect derived from EI. The theoretical finding is confirmed by an empirical study employing the spatial panel threshold model and using China’s provincial panel data from 2007 to 2019. The empirical result shows that the threshold effect of EI is significant since that lower tax competition (i.e., higher tax collection and management efficiency) tends to reduce environmental pollution when EI is below the threshold value and vice versa. In addition, we find that the effect of tax competition is regionally heterogeneous. Finally, several policy recommendations are proposed based on the theoretical and empirical results.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Emotional intelligence</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>empirical research</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>equilibrium theory</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Tax collections</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>threshold models</subject><issn>1573-2975</issn><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtKBDEQhhtRUEcv4Crgxk1r5dUPNyKDLxDc6NaQ6anWSHfSJhmd2XkNr-dJzDiC4sJVFcX3VxVflu1ROKQA5VGgUBRVDoznwAWwfL6WbVFZ8pzVpVz_1W9m2yE8ATCoWbGV3V-6VxL1nDSuHzCaaJwlum2xiYGMH43VH2_vgaB9Md7ZHm3UHRlc182W5MkxOSVh0NGkKTbOuh6jNw3RVneLYMJOttHqLuDudx1ld-dnt-PL_Prm4mp8ep03HHjMp0K0YjqpKpxILpu65UJLoLKmlZSAWIpKlpNWyKqWrBJY0mJCcSoAyykDyvkoO1jtHbx7nmGIqjehwa7TFt0sKE4lL6QQBUvo_h_0yc18-jdRkA4VvKohUWxFNd6F4LFVgze99gtFQS2Vq5VylZSrL-VqnkJ8FQoJtg_of1b_k_oE_SSFQA</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Li, Kunming</creator><creator>Wen, Jianhua</creator><creator>Jiang, Tingjun</creator><creator>Fan, Xiamin</creator><creator>Huang, Linxing</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-4999</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis</title><author>Li, Kunming ; Wen, Jianhua ; Jiang, Tingjun ; Fan, Xiamin ; Huang, Linxing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d44f4db88eb535c9f34a5015918550ee74857bf45895284e716b1ed40e7d20133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Emotional intelligence</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>empirical research</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>equilibrium theory</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Tax collections</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>threshold models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Kunming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Linxing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Kunming</au><au>Wen, Jianhua</au><au>Jiang, Tingjun</au><au>Fan, Xiamin</au><au>Huang, Linxing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>18535</spage><epage>18557</epage><pages>18535-18557</pages><issn>1573-2975</issn><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>The relationship between tax policy and environment is a hot topic of widespread concern. Clarifying the mechanism between them is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of economy and environment. This study constructs a theoretical framework based on the multi-sector model of general equilibrium theory to investigate the effect of tax competition on environmental pollution. It is theoretically supported that such an effect exists and is affected by environmental protection investment (EI), that is, there is a threshold effect derived from EI. The theoretical finding is confirmed by an empirical study employing the spatial panel threshold model and using China’s provincial panel data from 2007 to 2019. The empirical result shows that the threshold effect of EI is significant since that lower tax competition (i.e., higher tax collection and management efficiency) tends to reduce environmental pollution when EI is below the threshold value and vice versa. In addition, we find that the effect of tax competition is regionally heterogeneous. Finally, several policy recommendations are proposed based on the theoretical and empirical results.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-4999</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1573-2975 |
| ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.18535-18557 |
| issn | 1573-2975 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153654462 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | China Competition Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Econometrics Economic Geology Economic Growth Emotional intelligence Empirical analysis empirical research Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Management Environmental protection equilibrium theory issues and policy Panel data Pollution Pollution control Spatial analysis Sustainable Development Tax collections Taxation threshold models |
| title | How tax competition affects China’s environmental pollution?: A spatial econometric analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A18%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20tax%20competition%20affects%20China%E2%80%99s%20environmental%20pollution?:%20A%20spatial%20econometric%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Li,%20Kunming&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=18535&rft.epage=18557&rft.pages=18535-18557&rft.issn=1573-2975&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-023-03402-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153654462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074863890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |