Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Machine learning may be a tool with the potential for obesity prediction. This study aims to review the literature on the performance of machine learning models in predicting obesity and to quantify the pooled results through a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases, 2024-09, Vol.34 (9), p.2034-2045
Hauptverfasser: Delpino, Felipe Mendes, Costa, Ândria Krolow, César do Nascimento, Murilo, Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio, Geremias dos Santos, Hellen, Wichmann, Roberta Moreira, Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias, Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre, Nunes, Bruno Pereira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2045
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2034
container_title Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases
container_volume 34
creator Delpino, Felipe Mendes
Costa, Ândria Krolow
César do Nascimento, Murilo
Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio
Geremias dos Santos, Hellen
Wichmann, Roberta Moreira
Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias
Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre
Nunes, Bruno Pereira
description Machine learning may be a tool with the potential for obesity prediction. This study aims to review the literature on the performance of machine learning models in predicting obesity and to quantify the pooled results through a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that used machine learning to predict obesity. Searches were conducted in October 2023 across databases including LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL. We included studies that utilized classification models and reported results in the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022306940), without imposing restrictions on the year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD). Meta-analysis was conducted using MedCalc software. A total of 14 studies were included, with the majority demonstrating satisfactory performance for obesity prediction, with AUCs exceeding 0.70. The random forest algorithm emerged as the top performer in obesity prediction, achieving an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76–0.96; I2: 99.8%), closely followed by logistic regression with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.95; I2: 99.6%). The least effective model was gradient boosting, with an AUC of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.82; I2: 98.1%). Machine learning models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance for obesity. However, future research should utilize more comparable data, larger databases, and a broader range of machine learning models. •Machine Learning proved capable of predicting overweight and obesity with good predictive capacity.•Random Forest was the model with the best ability to predict obesity in our meta-analysis.•Obesity prediction was worse when the Gradient Boosting model was used.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153632361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0939475324002047</els_id><sourcerecordid>3080633717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-364bb23fcf7b425bad39f2e5c5c7835b18ece36a7a8f5f439e23a6e716b128623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy4JtieOkwuoKl-VKnGBszVxJl2vknixnVb7A_jfTdmFIz2NNHreeaV5GHsjRSmFrN_vynmZyPWlEqoqhS6FEs_YRupWFGBU-5xtRAttURkN5-xlSjshwAioXrBzaIWodKs27PenQIlP6LZ-Jj4SxtnPt3yLd8SRb_3tlu8pDiFOODviOfB9pN67zENHyecDxymsAeyXMSeOc8_D2FM8LT7yS54OKdOE2Tse6c7T_R9qoowFzjgekk-v2NmAY6LXp3nBfn75_OPqW3Hz_ev11eVN4ZSpcgF11XUKBjeYrlK6wx7aQZF22pkGdCcbcgQ1GmwGPVTQkgKsyci6k6qpFVywd8e7-xh-LZSynXxyNI44U1iSBamhBgW1fBoVjagBjDQrWh1RF0NKkQa7j37CeLBS2EdXdmePruyjKyu0XV2tsbenhqWbqP8X-itnBT4cAVpfsj4u2uQ8rRp6H8ll2wf__4YHEUqokQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080633717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Delpino, Felipe Mendes ; Costa, Ândria Krolow ; César do Nascimento, Murilo ; Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio ; Geremias dos Santos, Hellen ; Wichmann, Roberta Moreira ; Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias ; Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre ; Nunes, Bruno Pereira</creator><creatorcontrib>Delpino, Felipe Mendes ; Costa, Ândria Krolow ; César do Nascimento, Murilo ; Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio ; Geremias dos Santos, Hellen ; Wichmann, Roberta Moreira ; Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias ; Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre ; Nunes, Bruno Pereira</creatorcontrib><description>Machine learning may be a tool with the potential for obesity prediction. This study aims to review the literature on the performance of machine learning models in predicting obesity and to quantify the pooled results through a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that used machine learning to predict obesity. Searches were conducted in October 2023 across databases including LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL. We included studies that utilized classification models and reported results in the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022306940), without imposing restrictions on the year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD). Meta-analysis was conducted using MedCalc software. A total of 14 studies were included, with the majority demonstrating satisfactory performance for obesity prediction, with AUCs exceeding 0.70. The random forest algorithm emerged as the top performer in obesity prediction, achieving an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76–0.96; I2: 99.8%), closely followed by logistic regression with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.95; I2: 99.6%). The least effective model was gradient boosting, with an AUC of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.82; I2: 98.1%). Machine learning models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance for obesity. However, future research should utilize more comparable data, larger databases, and a broader range of machine learning models. •Machine Learning proved capable of predicting overweight and obesity with good predictive capacity.•Random Forest was the model with the best ability to predict obesity in our meta-analysis.•Obesity prediction was worse when the Gradient Boosting model was used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0939-4753</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1590-3729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1590-3729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39004592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; algorithms ; computer software ; Decision Support Techniques ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted ; Female ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; metabolism ; Middle Aged ; nutrition ; Obesity ; Obesity - diagnosis ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Prediction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; risk ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; systematic review ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases, 2024-09, Vol.34 (9), p.2034-2045</ispartof><rights>2024 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-364bb23fcf7b425bad39f2e5c5c7835b18ece36a7a8f5f439e23a6e716b128623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3562-3246 ; 0000-0002-4951-9327 ; 0000-0003-3052-2742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39004592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delpino, Felipe Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Ândria Krolow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>César do Nascimento, Murilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geremias dos Santos, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Roberta Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Bruno Pereira</creatorcontrib><title>Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases</title><addtitle>Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis</addtitle><description>Machine learning may be a tool with the potential for obesity prediction. This study aims to review the literature on the performance of machine learning models in predicting obesity and to quantify the pooled results through a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that used machine learning to predict obesity. Searches were conducted in October 2023 across databases including LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL. We included studies that utilized classification models and reported results in the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022306940), without imposing restrictions on the year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD). Meta-analysis was conducted using MedCalc software. A total of 14 studies were included, with the majority demonstrating satisfactory performance for obesity prediction, with AUCs exceeding 0.70. The random forest algorithm emerged as the top performer in obesity prediction, achieving an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76–0.96; I2: 99.8%), closely followed by logistic regression with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.95; I2: 99.6%). The least effective model was gradient boosting, with an AUC of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.82; I2: 98.1%). Machine learning models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance for obesity. However, future research should utilize more comparable data, larger databases, and a broader range of machine learning models. •Machine Learning proved capable of predicting overweight and obesity with good predictive capacity.•Random Forest was the model with the best ability to predict obesity in our meta-analysis.•Obesity prediction was worse when the Gradient Boosting model was used.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0939-4753</issn><issn>1590-3729</issn><issn>1590-3729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy4JtieOkwuoKl-VKnGBszVxJl2vknixnVb7A_jfTdmFIz2NNHreeaV5GHsjRSmFrN_vynmZyPWlEqoqhS6FEs_YRupWFGBU-5xtRAttURkN5-xlSjshwAioXrBzaIWodKs27PenQIlP6LZ-Jj4SxtnPt3yLd8SRb_3tlu8pDiFOODviOfB9pN67zENHyecDxymsAeyXMSeOc8_D2FM8LT7yS54OKdOE2Tse6c7T_R9qoowFzjgekk-v2NmAY6LXp3nBfn75_OPqW3Hz_ev11eVN4ZSpcgF11XUKBjeYrlK6wx7aQZF22pkGdCcbcgQ1GmwGPVTQkgKsyci6k6qpFVywd8e7-xh-LZSynXxyNI44U1iSBamhBgW1fBoVjagBjDQrWh1RF0NKkQa7j37CeLBS2EdXdmePruyjKyu0XV2tsbenhqWbqP8X-itnBT4cAVpfsj4u2uQ8rRp6H8ll2wf__4YHEUqokQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Delpino, Felipe Mendes</creator><creator>Costa, Ândria Krolow</creator><creator>César do Nascimento, Murilo</creator><creator>Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio</creator><creator>Geremias dos Santos, Hellen</creator><creator>Wichmann, Roberta Moreira</creator><creator>Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias</creator><creator>Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre</creator><creator>Nunes, Bruno Pereira</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-3246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-9327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-2742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Delpino, Felipe Mendes ; Costa, Ândria Krolow ; César do Nascimento, Murilo ; Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio ; Geremias dos Santos, Hellen ; Wichmann, Roberta Moreira ; Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias ; Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre ; Nunes, Bruno Pereira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-364bb23fcf7b425bad39f2e5c5c7835b18ece36a7a8f5f439e23a6e716b128623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delpino, Felipe Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Ândria Krolow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>César do Nascimento, Murilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geremias dos Santos, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichmann, Roberta Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Bruno Pereira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delpino, Felipe Mendes</au><au>Costa, Ândria Krolow</au><au>César do Nascimento, Murilo</au><au>Dias Moura, Heriederson Sávio</au><au>Geremias dos Santos, Hellen</au><au>Wichmann, Roberta Moreira</au><au>Porto Chiavegatto Filho, Alexandre Dias</au><au>Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre</au><au>Nunes, Bruno Pereira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2034</spage><epage>2045</epage><pages>2034-2045</pages><issn>0939-4753</issn><issn>1590-3729</issn><eissn>1590-3729</eissn><abstract>Machine learning may be a tool with the potential for obesity prediction. This study aims to review the literature on the performance of machine learning models in predicting obesity and to quantify the pooled results through a meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that used machine learning to predict obesity. Searches were conducted in October 2023 across databases including LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL. We included studies that utilized classification models and reported results in the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022306940), without imposing restrictions on the year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD). Meta-analysis was conducted using MedCalc software. A total of 14 studies were included, with the majority demonstrating satisfactory performance for obesity prediction, with AUCs exceeding 0.70. The random forest algorithm emerged as the top performer in obesity prediction, achieving an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76–0.96; I2: 99.8%), closely followed by logistic regression with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.95; I2: 99.6%). The least effective model was gradient boosting, with an AUC of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.82; I2: 98.1%). Machine learning models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance for obesity. However, future research should utilize more comparable data, larger databases, and a broader range of machine learning models. •Machine Learning proved capable of predicting overweight and obesity with good predictive capacity.•Random Forest was the model with the best ability to predict obesity in our meta-analysis.•Obesity prediction was worse when the Gradient Boosting model was used.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39004592</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-3246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-9327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-2742</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0939-4753
ispartof Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases, 2024-09, Vol.34 (9), p.2034-2045
issn 0939-4753
1590-3729
1590-3729
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153632361
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
algorithms
computer software
Decision Support Techniques
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Female
Humans
Machine Learning
Male
Meta-analysis
metabolism
Middle Aged
nutrition
Obesity
Obesity - diagnosis
Obesity - epidemiology
Prediction
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
risk
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
systematic review
Young Adult
title Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A02%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20machine%20learning%20have%20a%20high%20performance%20to%20predict%20obesity%20among%20adults%20and%20older%20adults?%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Nutrition,%20metabolism,%20and%20cardiovascular%20diseases&rft.au=Delpino,%20Felipe%20Mendes&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2034&rft.epage=2045&rft.pages=2034-2045&rft.issn=0939-4753&rft.eissn=1590-3729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3080633717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080633717&rft_id=info:pmid/39004592&rft_els_id=S0939475324002047&rfr_iscdi=true