Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale
Context Wild bees are important pollinators for wild and cultivated plants. Besides other causes, their decline has been linked to land-use change such as urbanisation. In contrast, urban habitats are discussed as potential wild bee refuges. Objectives To expand our understanding of cities as wild b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape ecology 2023-11, Vol.38 (11), p.2981-2999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2999 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2981 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Weber, Monika Diekötter, Tim Dietzsch, Anke C. Erler, Silvio Greil, Henri Jütte, Tobias Krahner, André Pistorius, Jens |
description | Context
Wild bees are important pollinators for wild and cultivated plants. Besides other causes, their decline has been linked to land-use change such as urbanisation. In contrast, urban habitats are discussed as potential wild bee refuges.
Objectives
To expand our understanding of cities as wild bee habitats, bee responses to urban land-use types with varying foraging and nesting resources were analysed.
Methods
Wild bees were sampled with pan traps at 49 study sites in a Central European city. Effects of land-use types on wild bees were examined at 12 scales ranging from 50 to 1500 m from sampling points. For analyses, bees were grouped according to their traits (e.g., size, nesting and pollen-collecting behaviour) to account for species-specific requirements.
Results
Land-use types significantly affected wild bees covering all investigated scales. Anthropogenically managed flower-rich habitats, i.e., long-term allotments and cemeteries, were beneficial for most wild bee groups within varying scales between 200 and 600 m. Impervious surface affected only some of the investigated wild bee groups, mostly in a unimodal manner within a 100 m scale.
Conclusions
This study shows that it is recommended for future investigations to take different scales and different bee traits into account when assessing urban habitat quality for bees. In particular, the non-linear response to impervious surface indicates positive edge effects between urban core and rural areas. Conservation measures and implementation management to support wild bees in urban areas should consider the results on scale and land use to meet species-specific demands effectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153626754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153626754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4080e40c991e5b843e07d07b4695e65fed2c5f6b49700100aa060d3c8c836f193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFrGzEQhUVJoU7aP9CToJde1IyklbQ6FpOkBUMv9VnVamftNWvJkdaY_PvIcSDQQy4zh_ne480j5CuHHxzA3BYOtgUGQjLgRikmPpAFV0YwazS_IguwgjNhjfxErkvZAYCUAAvyb507H-lpnHraIZY6Ig7jTIec9nSY0gkzy2PYUh_nbU6HtME4Bjr52NNjQdrjAWM_xg1N8exA5-yr_HwuwU_4mXwc_FTwy-u-Iev7u7_LX2z15-H38ueKBWn1zBpoARsI1nJUXdtIBNOD6RptFWo1YC-CGnTXWANQX_YeNPQytKGVeuBW3pDvF99DTo9HLLPbjyXgVINiOhYnuZJaaKOain77D92lY441nROt0cY0jW0rJS5UyKmUjIM75HHv85Pj4M6lu0vprpbuXkp3oorkRVQqHDeY36zfUT0DLmWDcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876774498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Weber, Monika ; Diekötter, Tim ; Dietzsch, Anke C. ; Erler, Silvio ; Greil, Henri ; Jütte, Tobias ; Krahner, André ; Pistorius, Jens</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Monika ; Diekötter, Tim ; Dietzsch, Anke C. ; Erler, Silvio ; Greil, Henri ; Jütte, Tobias ; Krahner, André ; Pistorius, Jens</creatorcontrib><description>Context
Wild bees are important pollinators for wild and cultivated plants. Besides other causes, their decline has been linked to land-use change such as urbanisation. In contrast, urban habitats are discussed as potential wild bee refuges.
Objectives
To expand our understanding of cities as wild bee habitats, bee responses to urban land-use types with varying foraging and nesting resources were analysed.
Methods
Wild bees were sampled with pan traps at 49 study sites in a Central European city. Effects of land-use types on wild bees were examined at 12 scales ranging from 50 to 1500 m from sampling points. For analyses, bees were grouped according to their traits (e.g., size, nesting and pollen-collecting behaviour) to account for species-specific requirements.
Results
Land-use types significantly affected wild bees covering all investigated scales. Anthropogenically managed flower-rich habitats, i.e., long-term allotments and cemeteries, were beneficial for most wild bee groups within varying scales between 200 and 600 m. Impervious surface affected only some of the investigated wild bee groups, mostly in a unimodal manner within a 100 m scale.
Conclusions
This study shows that it is recommended for future investigations to take different scales and different bee traits into account when assessing urban habitat quality for bees. In particular, the non-linear response to impervious surface indicates positive edge effects between urban core and rural areas. Conservation measures and implementation management to support wild bees in urban areas should consider the results on scale and land use to meet species-specific demands effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Allotments ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bees ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cemeteries ; Cities ; Cultivated plants ; Ecology ; Edge effect ; Environmental Management ; Environmental quality ; Flowers ; Habitats ; Investigations ; Land use ; land use change ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Nesting ; Nesting behavior ; Nonlinear response ; Pollen ; Pollinators ; Quality assessment ; Research Article ; Rural areas ; Sustainable Development ; Urban areas ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2023-11, Vol.38 (11), p.2981-2999</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4080e40c991e5b843e07d07b4695e65fed2c5f6b49700100aa060d3c8c836f193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4080e40c991e5b843e07d07b4695e65fed2c5f6b49700100aa060d3c8c836f193</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4838-793X ; 0000-0002-7707-1216 ; 0000-0003-2075-7951 ; 0000-0002-9425-8103 ; 0000-0001-6890-5699 ; 0000-0002-7420-8950 ; 0000-0002-9517-9562 ; 0000-0003-4501-1689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekötter, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Anke C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erler, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greil, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jütte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krahner, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, Jens</creatorcontrib><title>Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
Wild bees are important pollinators for wild and cultivated plants. Besides other causes, their decline has been linked to land-use change such as urbanisation. In contrast, urban habitats are discussed as potential wild bee refuges.
Objectives
To expand our understanding of cities as wild bee habitats, bee responses to urban land-use types with varying foraging and nesting resources were analysed.
Methods
Wild bees were sampled with pan traps at 49 study sites in a Central European city. Effects of land-use types on wild bees were examined at 12 scales ranging from 50 to 1500 m from sampling points. For analyses, bees were grouped according to their traits (e.g., size, nesting and pollen-collecting behaviour) to account for species-specific requirements.
Results
Land-use types significantly affected wild bees covering all investigated scales. Anthropogenically managed flower-rich habitats, i.e., long-term allotments and cemeteries, were beneficial for most wild bee groups within varying scales between 200 and 600 m. Impervious surface affected only some of the investigated wild bee groups, mostly in a unimodal manner within a 100 m scale.
Conclusions
This study shows that it is recommended for future investigations to take different scales and different bee traits into account when assessing urban habitat quality for bees. In particular, the non-linear response to impervious surface indicates positive edge effects between urban core and rural areas. Conservation measures and implementation management to support wild bees in urban areas should consider the results on scale and land use to meet species-specific demands effectively.</description><subject>Allotments</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cemeteries</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Cultivated plants</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting behavior</subject><subject>Nonlinear response</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFrGzEQhUVJoU7aP9CToJde1IyklbQ6FpOkBUMv9VnVamftNWvJkdaY_PvIcSDQQy4zh_ne480j5CuHHxzA3BYOtgUGQjLgRikmPpAFV0YwazS_IguwgjNhjfxErkvZAYCUAAvyb507H-lpnHraIZY6Ig7jTIec9nSY0gkzy2PYUh_nbU6HtME4Bjr52NNjQdrjAWM_xg1N8exA5-yr_HwuwU_4mXwc_FTwy-u-Iev7u7_LX2z15-H38ueKBWn1zBpoARsI1nJUXdtIBNOD6RptFWo1YC-CGnTXWANQX_YeNPQytKGVeuBW3pDvF99DTo9HLLPbjyXgVINiOhYnuZJaaKOain77D92lY441nROt0cY0jW0rJS5UyKmUjIM75HHv85Pj4M6lu0vprpbuXkp3oorkRVQqHDeY36zfUT0DLmWDcg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Weber, Monika</creator><creator>Diekötter, Tim</creator><creator>Dietzsch, Anke C.</creator><creator>Erler, Silvio</creator><creator>Greil, Henri</creator><creator>Jütte, Tobias</creator><creator>Krahner, André</creator><creator>Pistorius, Jens</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-793X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-1216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-8103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7420-8950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-9562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-1689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale</title><author>Weber, Monika ; Diekötter, Tim ; Dietzsch, Anke C. ; Erler, Silvio ; Greil, Henri ; Jütte, Tobias ; Krahner, André ; Pistorius, Jens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4080e40c991e5b843e07d07b4695e65fed2c5f6b49700100aa060d3c8c836f193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Allotments</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cemeteries</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Cultivated plants</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting behavior</topic><topic>Nonlinear response</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekötter, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Anke C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erler, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greil, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jütte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krahner, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, Jens</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Monika</au><au>Diekötter, Tim</au><au>Dietzsch, Anke C.</au><au>Erler, Silvio</au><au>Greil, Henri</au><au>Jütte, Tobias</au><au>Krahner, André</au><au>Pistorius, Jens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2981</spage><epage>2999</epage><pages>2981-2999</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
Wild bees are important pollinators for wild and cultivated plants. Besides other causes, their decline has been linked to land-use change such as urbanisation. In contrast, urban habitats are discussed as potential wild bee refuges.
Objectives
To expand our understanding of cities as wild bee habitats, bee responses to urban land-use types with varying foraging and nesting resources were analysed.
Methods
Wild bees were sampled with pan traps at 49 study sites in a Central European city. Effects of land-use types on wild bees were examined at 12 scales ranging from 50 to 1500 m from sampling points. For analyses, bees were grouped according to their traits (e.g., size, nesting and pollen-collecting behaviour) to account for species-specific requirements.
Results
Land-use types significantly affected wild bees covering all investigated scales. Anthropogenically managed flower-rich habitats, i.e., long-term allotments and cemeteries, were beneficial for most wild bee groups within varying scales between 200 and 600 m. Impervious surface affected only some of the investigated wild bee groups, mostly in a unimodal manner within a 100 m scale.
Conclusions
This study shows that it is recommended for future investigations to take different scales and different bee traits into account when assessing urban habitat quality for bees. In particular, the non-linear response to impervious surface indicates positive edge effects between urban core and rural areas. Conservation measures and implementation management to support wild bees in urban areas should consider the results on scale and land use to meet species-specific demands effectively.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-793X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-1216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-8103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7420-8950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-9562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-1689</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2023-11, Vol.38 (11), p.2981-2999 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153626754 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Allotments Anthropogenic factors Bees Biomedical and Life Sciences Cemeteries Cities Cultivated plants Ecology Edge effect Environmental Management Environmental quality Flowers Habitats Investigations Land use land use change Landscape Ecology Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life Sciences Nature Conservation Nesting Nesting behavior Nonlinear response Pollen Pollinators Quality assessment Research Article Rural areas Sustainable Development Urban areas Urbanization |
title | Urban wild bees benefit from flower-rich anthropogenic land use depending on bee trait and scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A08%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20wild%20bees%20benefit%20from%20flower-rich%20anthropogenic%20land%20use%20depending%20on%20bee%20trait%20and%20scale&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Weber,%20Monika&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2981&rft.epage=2999&rft.pages=2981-2999&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-023-01755-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153626754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876774498&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |