Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries

We quantify the projected impacts of alternative levels of global warming upon the climatically determined geographic ranges of plants and vertebrates in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India), accounting for uncertainties in regional climate projection. We quantify in a spa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climatic change 2024-03, Vol.177 (3), p.47-47, Article 47
Hauptverfasser: Price, J., Warren, R., Forstenhäusler, N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 3
container_start_page 47
container_title Climatic change
container_volume 177
creator Price, J.
Warren, R.
Forstenhäusler, N.
description We quantify the projected impacts of alternative levels of global warming upon the climatically determined geographic ranges of plants and vertebrates in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India), accounting for uncertainties in regional climate projection. We quantify in a spatially explicit fashion the species richness remaining or lost, allowing the identification of climate refugia which we define as areas where > 75% of the species currently present remain in a world with a particular level of global warming above pre-industrial levels. In all countries and in both taxa, species richness declines with warming, as does the proportion of each country remaining a climate refugium for plants or vertebrates. In percentage terms, refugia loss relative to a 1961–1990 baseline period is greatest in India and Brazil, and least in Ghana and Ethiopia for the same level of warming, and is greater for plants than for vertebrates. Taking account of present land uses (i.e. area still considered natural), and using species richness of plants as a proxy to indicate biodiversity more generally, the proportion of land acting as climate refugia for biodiversity in five of the countries variously declines from 32–75% of a country in the 1961–1990 baseline period to 20–64% for 1.5 °C global warming, 11–53% for 2 °C, 3–33% for 3 °C and 2–24% for 4 °C warming. In Ethiopia, India, Brazil and China, climate refugia decline rapidly with warming while in Ghana and China some refugia persist even with 3–4 °C of warming. Only small percentages of Brazil, India and China are both climate refugia and lie within protected areas; hence, an expansion of the protected area networks in these countries would be required to deliver climate resilient biodiversity conservation. These percentages are larger in Ethiopia and Ghana and, in some areas of Ghana, the only remaining refugia are in protected areas, the remaining landscape converted to other uses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153614243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153614243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5c56e98ba2bc389b02dd5738081b2099d9ecb061cc28bac0a25529b4926b34863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OHDEQhS2USEwIF2BlKZtsDOXfaS-TUQJISGzI2rLdnolRT3vi6h7CrThDThbDRELKglWVSt97qqpHyBmHcw6wvEAOulMMhGQgjTFMHJEF10vJuOrgHVkAN5oBgD0mHxDvn7ulMAtSvubS532qmKdHOhTEhNQjlpj9lHr6kKefdDOU4Af64Os2jxta1pSfazoVquifpxX1oewT3dXE8tjPONXc4CHt04A0jxTzbxrLPLZ5wo_k_doPmE7_1RPy4_u3u9UVu7m9vF59uWFRWjMxHbVJtgtehCg7G0D0fbumg44HAdb2NsUAhscoGhTBC62FDcoKE6TqjDwhnw--u1p-zQknt80Y0zD4MZUZneRaGq6Ekg399B96X-Y6tu2csFKYpeJGNUocqFjbk2pau13NW18fHQf3nIE7ZOBaBu4lAyeaSB5E2OBxk-qr9Ruqv3QOib8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932674164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Price, J. ; Warren, R. ; Forstenhäusler, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Price, J. ; Warren, R. ; Forstenhäusler, N.</creatorcontrib><description>We quantify the projected impacts of alternative levels of global warming upon the climatically determined geographic ranges of plants and vertebrates in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India), accounting for uncertainties in regional climate projection. We quantify in a spatially explicit fashion the species richness remaining or lost, allowing the identification of climate refugia which we define as areas where &gt; 75% of the species currently present remain in a world with a particular level of global warming above pre-industrial levels. In all countries and in both taxa, species richness declines with warming, as does the proportion of each country remaining a climate refugium for plants or vertebrates. In percentage terms, refugia loss relative to a 1961–1990 baseline period is greatest in India and Brazil, and least in Ghana and Ethiopia for the same level of warming, and is greater for plants than for vertebrates. Taking account of present land uses (i.e. area still considered natural), and using species richness of plants as a proxy to indicate biodiversity more generally, the proportion of land acting as climate refugia for biodiversity in five of the countries variously declines from 32–75% of a country in the 1961–1990 baseline period to 20–64% for 1.5 °C global warming, 11–53% for 2 °C, 3–33% for 3 °C and 2–24% for 4 °C warming. In Ethiopia, India, Brazil and China, climate refugia decline rapidly with warming while in Ghana and China some refugia persist even with 3–4 °C of warming. Only small percentages of Brazil, India and China are both climate refugia and lie within protected areas; hence, an expansion of the protected area networks in these countries would be required to deliver climate resilient biodiversity conservation. These percentages are larger in Ethiopia and Ghana and, in some areas of Ghana, the only remaining refugia are in protected areas, the remaining landscape converted to other uses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity conservation ; Biodiversity loss ; Brazil ; China ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; conservation areas ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Egypt ; Ethiopia ; Ghana ; Global warming ; India ; Land use ; landscapes ; Plants ; Population decline ; Protected areas ; refuge habitats ; Refuges ; Refugia ; Regional climates ; species ; Species richness ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2024-03, Vol.177 (3), p.47-47, Article 47</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5c56e98ba2bc389b02dd5738081b2099d9ecb061cc28bac0a25529b4926b34863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5c56e98ba2bc389b02dd5738081b2099d9ecb061cc28bac0a25529b4926b34863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0122-1599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Price, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstenhäusler, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>We quantify the projected impacts of alternative levels of global warming upon the climatically determined geographic ranges of plants and vertebrates in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India), accounting for uncertainties in regional climate projection. We quantify in a spatially explicit fashion the species richness remaining or lost, allowing the identification of climate refugia which we define as areas where &gt; 75% of the species currently present remain in a world with a particular level of global warming above pre-industrial levels. In all countries and in both taxa, species richness declines with warming, as does the proportion of each country remaining a climate refugium for plants or vertebrates. In percentage terms, refugia loss relative to a 1961–1990 baseline period is greatest in India and Brazil, and least in Ghana and Ethiopia for the same level of warming, and is greater for plants than for vertebrates. Taking account of present land uses (i.e. area still considered natural), and using species richness of plants as a proxy to indicate biodiversity more generally, the proportion of land acting as climate refugia for biodiversity in five of the countries variously declines from 32–75% of a country in the 1961–1990 baseline period to 20–64% for 1.5 °C global warming, 11–53% for 2 °C, 3–33% for 3 °C and 2–24% for 4 °C warming. In Ethiopia, India, Brazil and China, climate refugia decline rapidly with warming while in Ghana and China some refugia persist even with 3–4 °C of warming. Only small percentages of Brazil, India and China are both climate refugia and lie within protected areas; hence, an expansion of the protected area networks in these countries would be required to deliver climate resilient biodiversity conservation. These percentages are larger in Ethiopia and Ghana and, in some areas of Ghana, the only remaining refugia are in protected areas, the remaining landscape converted to other uses.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>Ghana</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>refuge habitats</subject><subject>Refuges</subject><subject>Refugia</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1OHDEQhS2USEwIF2BlKZtsDOXfaS-TUQJISGzI2rLdnolRT3vi6h7CrThDThbDRELKglWVSt97qqpHyBmHcw6wvEAOulMMhGQgjTFMHJEF10vJuOrgHVkAN5oBgD0mHxDvn7ulMAtSvubS532qmKdHOhTEhNQjlpj9lHr6kKefdDOU4Af64Os2jxta1pSfazoVquifpxX1oewT3dXE8tjPONXc4CHt04A0jxTzbxrLPLZ5wo_k_doPmE7_1RPy4_u3u9UVu7m9vF59uWFRWjMxHbVJtgtehCg7G0D0fbumg44HAdb2NsUAhscoGhTBC62FDcoKE6TqjDwhnw--u1p-zQknt80Y0zD4MZUZneRaGq6Ekg399B96X-Y6tu2csFKYpeJGNUocqFjbk2pau13NW18fHQf3nIE7ZOBaBu4lAyeaSB5E2OBxk-qr9Ruqv3QOib8</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Price, J.</creator><creator>Warren, R.</creator><creator>Forstenhäusler, N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-1599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries</title><author>Price, J. ; Warren, R. ; Forstenhäusler, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5c56e98ba2bc389b02dd5738081b2099d9ecb061cc28bac0a25529b4926b34863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>Ghana</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>refuge habitats</topic><topic>Refuges</topic><topic>Refugia</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Price, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstenhäusler, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Price, J.</au><au>Warren, R.</au><au>Forstenhäusler, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>47-47</pages><artnum>47</artnum><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><abstract>We quantify the projected impacts of alternative levels of global warming upon the climatically determined geographic ranges of plants and vertebrates in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India), accounting for uncertainties in regional climate projection. We quantify in a spatially explicit fashion the species richness remaining or lost, allowing the identification of climate refugia which we define as areas where &gt; 75% of the species currently present remain in a world with a particular level of global warming above pre-industrial levels. In all countries and in both taxa, species richness declines with warming, as does the proportion of each country remaining a climate refugium for plants or vertebrates. In percentage terms, refugia loss relative to a 1961–1990 baseline period is greatest in India and Brazil, and least in Ghana and Ethiopia for the same level of warming, and is greater for plants than for vertebrates. Taking account of present land uses (i.e. area still considered natural), and using species richness of plants as a proxy to indicate biodiversity more generally, the proportion of land acting as climate refugia for biodiversity in five of the countries variously declines from 32–75% of a country in the 1961–1990 baseline period to 20–64% for 1.5 °C global warming, 11–53% for 2 °C, 3–33% for 3 °C and 2–24% for 4 °C warming. In Ethiopia, India, Brazil and China, climate refugia decline rapidly with warming while in Ghana and China some refugia persist even with 3–4 °C of warming. Only small percentages of Brazil, India and China are both climate refugia and lie within protected areas; hence, an expansion of the protected area networks in these countries would be required to deliver climate resilient biodiversity conservation. These percentages are larger in Ethiopia and Ghana and, in some areas of Ghana, the only remaining refugia are in protected areas, the remaining landscape converted to other uses.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-1599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0009
ispartof Climatic change, 2024-03, Vol.177 (3), p.47-47, Article 47
issn 0165-0009
1573-1480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153614243
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Biodiversity
biodiversity conservation
Biodiversity loss
Brazil
China
Climate
Climate change
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Conservation
conservation areas
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Egypt
Ethiopia
Ghana
Global warming
India
Land use
landscapes
Plants
Population decline
Protected areas
refuge habitats
Refuges
Refugia
Regional climates
species
Species richness
Vertebrates
Wildlife conservation
title Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels in six countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodiversity%20losses%20associated%20with%20global%20warming%20of%201.5%20to%204%20%C2%B0C%20above%20pre-industrial%20levels%20in%20six%20countries&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Price,%20J.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=47-47&rft.artnum=47&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-023-03666-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153614243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932674164&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true