Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer

Context Identifying how animals select habitat while navigating landscapes is important for understanding behavioral ecology and guiding management and conservation decisions. However, habitat selection may be spatially and temporally plastic, making it challenging to quantify how species use resour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape ecology 2024-04, Vol.39 (4), p.84-84, Article 84
Hauptverfasser: Stephens, Ryan B., Millspaugh, Joshua J., McRoberts, Jon T., Heit, David R., Wiskirchen, Kevyn H., Sumners, Jason A., Isabelle, Jason L., Moll, Remington J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 4
container_start_page 84
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 39
creator Stephens, Ryan B.
Millspaugh, Joshua J.
McRoberts, Jon T.
Heit, David R.
Wiskirchen, Kevyn H.
Sumners, Jason A.
Isabelle, Jason L.
Moll, Remington J.
description Context Identifying how animals select habitat while navigating landscapes is important for understanding behavioral ecology and guiding management and conservation decisions. However, habitat selection may be spatially and temporally plastic, making it challenging to quantify how species use resources across space and time. Objectives We investigated how landscape context and dispersal shape habitat selection at multiple spatial scales in white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Methods Using step-selection functions, we quantified habitat selection of landcover and topographic covariates at three spatial scales for juvenile males during three movement periods (before, during, after dispersal) in two regions of Missouri, USA—a fragmented, low forest cover region with rolling hills, and a forested, topographically variable region. Results Although selection for forest cover increased after dispersal in both regions, deer selected forest cover at smaller spatial scales in the fragmented, low forest cover region. This result indicates scale of selection was dependent on forest availability and configuration with deer likely perceiving landscapes differently across their distribution. Functional responses to topography differed in magnitude and direction between regions with deer avoiding roads and selecting valleys in the rolling hills region (especially during dispersal) while showing no response to roads and selecting for ridgelines (during dispersal) in the topographically variable region. This result suggests movement behavior is strongly dependent on topography. Conclusions Although deer may select similar habitats among regions, landscape context and movement period shape the scale, strength, and direction of selection. This result has important implications for how animals use landscapes across different regional contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153613693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3020234833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fce7b0464296bc1cd8db2222a9063bddb4dbaca3243b92e6bd94b6366bff1c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DngJevEQrSZueHEXcQPCgnmOWaifSptskg8uvNzqC4sG6VBV87_F4TbPL4IABdIeZgZoBBd5SYLNO0feVZoMddZyqTrLVX_d6s5nzIwAIAbDR3N84MyD1OGH0GAuZGxuKKSTjgK6EMZKQSZ6bCT2xb2Qw0WdXP-LGWPC1kBCJD3nClEN8IC_zUJAWE4bKe8S03az1Zsi48723mruz09uTC3p1fX55cnxFnWi7QlXvsLPQypYraR1zfuYtr2MUSGG9t623xhnBW2EVR2m9aq0UUtq-Zw7EVrO_9J3S-LzAXPRTyA6HGhjHRdaCHQnJhFSiont_0MdxkWJNpwVw4KKdiU-KLymXxpwT9npK4cmkN81Af5aul6XrWrr-Kl2_V5FYinKF4wOmH-t_VB8ALoaM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3020234833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stephens, Ryan B. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J. ; McRoberts, Jon T. ; Heit, David R. ; Wiskirchen, Kevyn H. ; Sumners, Jason A. ; Isabelle, Jason L. ; Moll, Remington J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Ryan B. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J. ; McRoberts, Jon T. ; Heit, David R. ; Wiskirchen, Kevyn H. ; Sumners, Jason A. ; Isabelle, Jason L. ; Moll, Remington J.</creatorcontrib><description>Context Identifying how animals select habitat while navigating landscapes is important for understanding behavioral ecology and guiding management and conservation decisions. However, habitat selection may be spatially and temporally plastic, making it challenging to quantify how species use resources across space and time. Objectives We investigated how landscape context and dispersal shape habitat selection at multiple spatial scales in white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Methods Using step-selection functions, we quantified habitat selection of landcover and topographic covariates at three spatial scales for juvenile males during three movement periods (before, during, after dispersal) in two regions of Missouri, USA—a fragmented, low forest cover region with rolling hills, and a forested, topographically variable region. Results Although selection for forest cover increased after dispersal in both regions, deer selected forest cover at smaller spatial scales in the fragmented, low forest cover region. This result indicates scale of selection was dependent on forest availability and configuration with deer likely perceiving landscapes differently across their distribution. Functional responses to topography differed in magnitude and direction between regions with deer avoiding roads and selecting valleys in the rolling hills region (especially during dispersal) while showing no response to roads and selecting for ridgelines (during dispersal) in the topographically variable region. This result suggests movement behavior is strongly dependent on topography. Conclusions Although deer may select similar habitats among regions, landscape context and movement period shape the scale, strength, and direction of selection. This result has important implications for how animals use landscapes across different regional contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Context ; Deer ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Forests ; Habitat fragmentation ; habitat preferences ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Hills ; juveniles ; land cover ; Landscape ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; landscapes ; Life Sciences ; Missouri ; Nature Conservation ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Research Article ; Roads ; space and time ; species ; Sustainable Development ; Topography ; Variable region</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2024-04, Vol.39 (4), p.84-84, Article 84</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fce7b0464296bc1cd8db2222a9063bddb4dbaca3243b92e6bd94b6366bff1c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8524-9873 ; 0009-0002-8250-6226 ; 0000-0001-6179-5159 ; 0000-0002-2759-2590 ; 0000-0002-0681-2646 ; 0000-0002-9473-9011 ; 0000-0003-2216-3583</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41096,41464,42165,42533,51294,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRoberts, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heit, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiskirchen, Kevyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumners, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isabelle, Jason L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Remington J.</creatorcontrib><title>Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context Identifying how animals select habitat while navigating landscapes is important for understanding behavioral ecology and guiding management and conservation decisions. However, habitat selection may be spatially and temporally plastic, making it challenging to quantify how species use resources across space and time. Objectives We investigated how landscape context and dispersal shape habitat selection at multiple spatial scales in white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Methods Using step-selection functions, we quantified habitat selection of landcover and topographic covariates at three spatial scales for juvenile males during three movement periods (before, during, after dispersal) in two regions of Missouri, USA—a fragmented, low forest cover region with rolling hills, and a forested, topographically variable region. Results Although selection for forest cover increased after dispersal in both regions, deer selected forest cover at smaller spatial scales in the fragmented, low forest cover region. This result indicates scale of selection was dependent on forest availability and configuration with deer likely perceiving landscapes differently across their distribution. Functional responses to topography differed in magnitude and direction between regions with deer avoiding roads and selecting valleys in the rolling hills region (especially during dispersal) while showing no response to roads and selecting for ridgelines (during dispersal) in the topographically variable region. This result suggests movement behavior is strongly dependent on topography. Conclusions Although deer may select similar habitats among regions, landscape context and movement period shape the scale, strength, and direction of selection. This result has important implications for how animals use landscapes across different regional contexts.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hills</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>land cover</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>space and time</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Variable region</subject><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DngJevEQrSZueHEXcQPCgnmOWaifSptskg8uvNzqC4sG6VBV87_F4TbPL4IABdIeZgZoBBd5SYLNO0feVZoMddZyqTrLVX_d6s5nzIwAIAbDR3N84MyD1OGH0GAuZGxuKKSTjgK6EMZKQSZ6bCT2xb2Qw0WdXP-LGWPC1kBCJD3nClEN8IC_zUJAWE4bKe8S03az1Zsi48723mruz09uTC3p1fX55cnxFnWi7QlXvsLPQypYraR1zfuYtr2MUSGG9t623xhnBW2EVR2m9aq0UUtq-Zw7EVrO_9J3S-LzAXPRTyA6HGhjHRdaCHQnJhFSiont_0MdxkWJNpwVw4KKdiU-KLymXxpwT9npK4cmkN81Af5aul6XrWrr-Kl2_V5FYinKF4wOmH-t_VB8ALoaM</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Stephens, Ryan B.</creator><creator>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creator><creator>McRoberts, Jon T.</creator><creator>Heit, David R.</creator><creator>Wiskirchen, Kevyn H.</creator><creator>Sumners, Jason A.</creator><creator>Isabelle, Jason L.</creator><creator>Moll, Remington J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-9873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8250-6226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-5159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-2646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-9011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-3583</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer</title><author>Stephens, Ryan B. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J. ; McRoberts, Jon T. ; Heit, David R. ; Wiskirchen, Kevyn H. ; Sumners, Jason A. ; Isabelle, Jason L. ; Moll, Remington J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fce7b0464296bc1cd8db2222a9063bddb4dbaca3243b92e6bd94b6366bff1c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hills</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>land cover</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>space and time</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Variable region</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRoberts, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heit, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiskirchen, Kevyn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumners, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isabelle, Jason L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Remington J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephens, Ryan B.</au><au>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</au><au>McRoberts, Jon T.</au><au>Heit, David R.</au><au>Wiskirchen, Kevyn H.</au><au>Sumners, Jason A.</au><au>Isabelle, Jason L.</au><au>Moll, Remington J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>84-84</pages><artnum>84</artnum><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context Identifying how animals select habitat while navigating landscapes is important for understanding behavioral ecology and guiding management and conservation decisions. However, habitat selection may be spatially and temporally plastic, making it challenging to quantify how species use resources across space and time. Objectives We investigated how landscape context and dispersal shape habitat selection at multiple spatial scales in white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Methods Using step-selection functions, we quantified habitat selection of landcover and topographic covariates at three spatial scales for juvenile males during three movement periods (before, during, after dispersal) in two regions of Missouri, USA—a fragmented, low forest cover region with rolling hills, and a forested, topographically variable region. Results Although selection for forest cover increased after dispersal in both regions, deer selected forest cover at smaller spatial scales in the fragmented, low forest cover region. This result indicates scale of selection was dependent on forest availability and configuration with deer likely perceiving landscapes differently across their distribution. Functional responses to topography differed in magnitude and direction between regions with deer avoiding roads and selecting valleys in the rolling hills region (especially during dispersal) while showing no response to roads and selecting for ridgelines (during dispersal) in the topographically variable region. This result suggests movement behavior is strongly dependent on topography. Conclusions Although deer may select similar habitats among regions, landscape context and movement period shape the scale, strength, and direction of selection. This result has important implications for how animals use landscapes across different regional contexts.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-9873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8250-6226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-5159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-2646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-9011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-3583</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-9761
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2024-04, Vol.39 (4), p.84-84, Article 84
issn 1572-9761
0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153613693
source SpringerOpen; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Context
Deer
Dispersal
Dispersion
Ecology
Environmental Management
Forests
Habitat fragmentation
habitat preferences
Habitat selection
Habitats
Hills
juveniles
land cover
Landscape
Landscape Ecology
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
landscapes
Life Sciences
Missouri
Nature Conservation
Odocoileus virginianus
Research Article
Roads
space and time
species
Sustainable Development
Topography
Variable region
title Scale-dependent habitat selection is shaped by landscape context in dispersing white-tailed deer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T17%3A45%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale-dependent%20habitat%20selection%20is%20shaped%20by%20landscape%20context%20in%20dispersing%20white-tailed%20deer&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Stephens,%20Ryan%20B.&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=84-84&rft.artnum=84&rft.issn=1572-9761&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-024-01879-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3020234833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3020234833&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true